I'll help. Weekly World News. National Enquirer.

the indigo, only french media are not biased right?

12clicks
Dont worry about ControlThy, he is just cheese eating stupid french fuck

White girls have tighter pussy. It's co-evolution. ;-)

lol..funniest thing I have heard all morning. Thanks Colin!:thumbsup

I am not poking fun at you at all.
You are doing it all yourself and alot of people are enjoying it intensely.

Do I really have to explain this to you??

After a story is reported, a lot of things happen. Other news agencies interview witnesses and bystanders, people talk, things come to light, and the truth eventually surfaces. If that truth is widely different from what the original *reporter* or *newssource* told the world, then shit hits the fan pretty quick, and they take a shitstorm of flack and criticism. They lose credibility, something that no news agency wants. So they do their best to report things as they happened, or as they are happening. Period.


If you have a problem with this, then it's your problem.

your family is looking over your shoulder?
don't let them convince you you're witty. real life would be a real letdown for ya. :winkwink:

Okay, since you are retarded, I'll explain it to you. :Graucho

French media has more chance to be biased on french events than a US or african media.

US media has more chance to be biased on US events than a french or african media.

It's called third party objectivity.

No lets get stoned.

:smokin

Bonjour Drew,

There is the use of vulgarity once again, not that I expected anything different from you.
Is that the last resort of a weak mind, a mind that has no power and knowledge left to defend itself?

Au revoir,

John

Keywords here -- "other news agencies"...... as in, you think CNN is the only news agency in the US?? There are tons of different networks, newspapers, radio ect, all competing to get the scoop on everyone else. That very competition seems to keep things fairly honest, at least among the serious news media. I mean, if network A reports a story in a completely innacurate and biased way, and network B later reports the "real truth" showing Network A's innacuracies, that would make Network A look stupid, correct?



Yeah, National Enquirer is taken seriously by millions, or so I hear. Millions of foriegners that is. ha ha, they think that's what all N. Americans read and believe.

And as soon as you come up with a news camera that isn't operated by a human being, I'll concede the point.

Which planet you live on? :winkwink: Here on earth, Ann Coulters hysterical tirade against everyone to the left of Pat Buchanan, despite the fact it contains a bunch of slanderous half-truths itself, sat atop of the NY Times bestseller list for a few weeks.

More exhibits:

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com

http://www.worldnetdaily.com

http://www.cwfa.org

Now, you might regard every one of those "news" organizations as big jokes, and you might not take them seriously, but believe me, there are more people than you want to think about who form their entire worldviews based upon that sort of "reporting."

This opinion is growing fast.

You believe that truth will show up on CNN?

"Sorry people, we lied to you"

Surf the net, listen to world news and you might get something different. But if only watch CNN and local papers, like most americans, you're biased. Come on, did you travel in your life? Go buy some newspapers around the world and read the headlines & editorials.

For an individual who represents the company and employer he works for like you do, it is rather entertaining that I get a lecture about wit and reality from you.

And yes, my family is sitting right beside me.
Posting on GFY is a family event and they all want to say "HI" to you.

:GFYBand

ControlThy
What vulgarity? It's quite obvious
you are stupid french gallery maker. The bottom feeder. Go back and worry about your gallery at Hun. One day you might afford your dream car
Mecedes A class. LOL

About the only post in this thread that makes sense :thumbsup

Plenty. You've never seen footage from a surveilance cam? They're all over the place, what planet are <i>YOU</i> living on?? If you'd read my posts instead of compiling nonsense, you'd understand that I specifically said that all reporting is open to being bias in some way. Not all reporting IS bias, but for example, a lot of newspaper columns are, because they are rife with the personal opinions of the writer. Anyone who perceives the word according to Rush Limbaugh as gospel is an idiot anyway. I never said all news agencies were jokes. What I DID say is that <i>IF</i> a news agency is found to have reported something inaccurately they would lose a lot of credibilyt, something which is of course the lifeblood of the serious news sources.

I'm on Earth, what planet are you on?

Not bad for 3 months work. :thumbsup

Only a fucking idiot would say this, especially to me. You have no clue about what news sources I tune in to. You have no clue what newpapers I might read articles from. You have NO CLUE what radio newscasts I listen to daily.

In short, you have no clue.

Well if you had a clue, we would not argue on this. :winkwink:

Right back at you.

Hey Drew,

Hmm, I see that you have not been paying attention.
If you would like to start with the usual immature posts about who's bank account is bigger, go ahead - but you will be alone.

I have nothing to proof to you.

Greetings,

John

ControlFreak
Is this you and one of your European friends? LOL
Nothing beats European fashion.
<img src="http://www.kweer.net/basketfolder/speedo/basketbch1.jpg">

It seems like half the time, someone from EU, or immigrant, or French-Canadian, ridicules N. Americans for watching CNN, saying snidely that it is US-based so it must be biased, and adding that EU news is more worthy, believable and accurate. MY point is that this is retarded. Period. All news sources are prone to bias, innacuracies, mistakes, and propoganda at times. At times, not always.


I've tried to make my points clear and concise, yet as always, some people seem to skip over or miss altogether some vital snippets of my posts. Are these people dumb or simply quick to argue about anything? I honestly don't know.

Dear Drew,

Yes that is me and my boyfriend.
We have been together for 10 years, aren't you happy for us?

Kisses,

John "Big" gaymustioanos

Fair enough, but I think you'll agree that the vast majority of news footage isn't shot by surveilance camera.

I understand. I was only taking issue with your statement that once a news source is exposed as biased people disregard it as nonsense. The opposite is true in many cases.

Agreed, but unfortunately we live in a world with lots of idiots. One of the biggest mistakes made by liberals and centrists is to dismiss right wingers as kooks. Kooks they might be, but there are alot of them, they are well organized, and they have a great deal of control over the political party currently occupying the executive branch.

And I responded by listing a some news organizations that are so biased its almost hilarious to read them. Or at least it would be hilarious, were it not for the fact that milions of people give them a great deal of credibility.

Toobiveek, a small planet orbiting a star in the outer spiral of M51.

CD Smith,

I agree with you.

I was in Nice, France a few years ago and didn't notice anything particularly different about the reporting of events *shrug*.

Indigo, have a website in particular that you could show us this big difference in reporting? Maybe a news clip? Hpw about an example? Anything?

Yes you are fucking idiot. Why should I care about
your bank acc.? LOL What is in there, your worthless Euro dollars? What the fuck I'd do with them? Wipe my ass?

Ahh. Must have one of those new faster than light internet connections I've been hearing so much about.

I have nothing against gays. :)

What about European gays? ;-)

ControlThy, as long as you stay on your side of the ocean I dont give a fuck.

it's about time i saw some good political incorrectness

:-)

any hardline right wing religion (including christians) will always produce self reitious idiots that feel god has given them the right to end other peoples lives

yes - there are a lot of peaceful muslims
but there is nothing wrong with stereotyping anyone because people usually do what you would expect them to do

whew,,,,just measured! that was close:winkwink:


:rasta

partly yes, but I read so many reviews and feed by many expert people. Not any part writes go and kill others than muslims. This is crazy, actually it writes go and show your piece, friendship, good personality, etc... and invite them to muslim religion. Actually I don't understand this, all main religions pray to same god. They only have differences operating this. Everybody can choose whatever he/she like.

Agreed. Fact is, my dad worked on a CBC camera crew for many years, he can spot a dipshit cameraman at work or shoddy reporting instantly, and I know of no greater news-hound than he is. He reads the paper cover-to-cover every morning, watches 3 or 4 different newscasts, and listens to newsradio constantly. I'm not sure what drives him to soaking up so much news, but he is a good source of conversation at times because of it.Well, I was referring to people that are sentient enough to know when a news source has become a joke in the industry. One of my older brothers is/was such a person... one of the Limbaugh lubbers, and believe me he has lost much credibility with the rest of the family because of it. (thus supporting my previous point) Are there any nice girls there? I'm rather looking to get off this sphere lately.

for some reason I knew it was a guy named mohammad

go figure

:1orglaugh

Mohammed was a warrior. What kind of example did he set in his lifetime that people might follow? Here are some sample from the Koran.

The Immunity. 5. "Kill those who join other gods with God wherever you may find them."

The Cattle. 76. "Those who believe fight in the cause of God."

The Women. 74. "Let those who fight in the cause of God who barter the life of this world for that which is to come; for whoever fights on God's path, whether he is killed or triumphs, We will give him a handsome reward."

The Accessions. 39. "Say to the Infidels: if they desist from their unbelief, what is now past shall be forgiven; but if they return to it, they have already before them the doom of the ancients! Fight then against them till strife be at an end, and the religion be all of it God's."

for an individual who thinks I have an employer, its entertaining to watch you expose how much you REALLY know. :1orglaugh

:1orglaugh

of course.

On those years there were wars and they were killing the ones that choose muslims. So that they defend and fight. Normally a muslim does not take a plane and dive to a tower. This is not muslim, this is terrorism and they think this is a mission from god. I'm not saying all the muslims are perfect, of course there are bad seeds in every religion. You can't blame this to all muslims. Most of muslims are living in piece.

no, most muslims *say* they live in peace:1orglaugh

most muslims should be in pieces.

You are exactly right.

<img src=http://home.earthlink.net/~mcmillanj/miscnavy/powmia.GIF border="1">

I'm sure you are familiar also with the Hadith. How about the part where Mohammed slays Jews at Banu Quraiza simply for not supporting Mohammed.

Muhammad headed an army of three thousand infantry men and thirty horsemen of Ansar and Muhajireen. The Banu Quraiza was attacked for not supporting Muhammad when the Quraish attacked Medina. Ali sworn that he would never stop until he either storms their garrisons or be killed. This siege lasted 25 days. Finally the Banu Qurayza surrendered unconditionally. Muhammad ordered that the men be handcuffed, while the women and children were isolated in confinement. Thereupon Al-Aws tribe interceded begging the Prophet to be lenient towards them. Muhammad suggested that Sa'd bin Mu'adh, a former ally, be deputed to give verdict about them, and they agreed. Sa'd's verdict who had received as a serious wound in the previous Battle of the Confederates was "that all the able-bodied male persons belonging to the tribe should be killed, women and children taken prisoners and their wealth divided among the Muslim fighters.

:ak47:

:thumbsup