Megarotic.com celebrating / joysharing / make $100K - Page 4 - GoFuckYourself.com

JD · 08-31-2007, 12:01 AM

150 bastards

polish_aristocrat · 08-31-2007, 12:02 AM

I seriously can't believe that no one here emailed the guy just to verify if he's real and then posted here that he received a reply or that he didn't, or the e-mail bounced or whatever.

I would have done it but I thought there would be already 10 people who did it asap when the guy asked for it.

and now , 15 hours later, people are still debating if this guy is real or not

ProjectNaked · 08-31-2007, 12:07 AM

ilbb · 08-31-2007, 01:11 AM

fake nick?

Paul Markham · 08-31-2007, 04:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gotys

to Paul Markham:

I totally agree with you here... there is one thing that don't make any sense to me though... Why do these people worry about content costs at all? I know that a tube site costs around $7000/month in bandwith for only 100,000 daily users. So if Megarotic has 1 million users/daily, then their bandwith costs are $70,000 / month.

Now my question is, if someone's costs are $70,000 / month, why not add another $7,000 / month and purchase 70 licenced DVDs ? That would only raise the total costs by 10%, but would keep megarotic and other tube sites legal? 70 clicenced DVDs would give them PLENTY of LEGAL content for each month.

So you see Paul, you keep talking about how "content costs too much money"...you are right, it costs money, but in comparison to their bandwith costs, it's a drop in the ocean...so my answer to all that is - it's not about the content costs - it's about the variety of content. Purchased DVD content is just DVD content and never has the quality of let's say Brazers' videos.

Those are my thoughts..i may be wrong though

Of course stealing it the easier option, but not if we hound them and shut down processing and go after their advertisers. Don't fool yourself the surfers on their sites are looking for anything specific. That's not the surfer they have. Nor the surfer we are signing up most of the time, otherwise retention would be better.

I agree that letting members upload it, or saying members are uploading it when in truth they are uploading it themselves, gives them a better selection and probably quality of video.

I wonder if he will answer my posts.

Megarotic · 08-31-2007, 04:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

Of course stealing it the easier option, but not if we hound them and shut down processing and go after their advertisers. Don't fool yourself the surfers on their sites are looking for anything specific. That's not the surfer they have. Nor the surfer we are signing up most of the time, otherwise retention would be better.

I agree that letting members upload it, or saying members are uploading it when in truth they are uploading it themselves, gives them a better selection and probably quality of video.

I wonder if he will answer my posts.

From: "Paul Markham" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Your thread on GFY
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 06:34:33 +0200

Was it serious?

I have lots of videos we can give you.

testpie · 08-31-2007, 05:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Megarotic

Get a video camera, a bunch of hot girls and a hotel room and you are in business :-)

Assumably you kids don't give two shits about 2257 docs then?

fris · 08-31-2007, 05:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Megarotic

From: "Paul Markham" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Your thread on GFY
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 06:34:33 +0200

Was it serious?

I have lots of videos we can give you.

surfers are uploading the videos either from rapidshare or other hosts, and they or you dont have the rights to the videos.

so basically you keep them on, until the content owner complains?

basially all your videos are exclusive content you dont even have sponsor links too.

as i said in my earlier post, these companies spend 100's of thousand dollars shooting this content, and you are giving it away for free, without sending the sponsors any traffic.

I could see if you had some sort of links/banners on each video, but you dont.

And the traffic program, basically people embed videos and make money off stolen/ripped content?

Thats stupid too.

You should be like xxxjay and his tube site, only program owners can send content that way its their with the permission of the owners, not some random person that downloaded 90 min videos from a free host

I would like to see a response on this, really curious.

FRAUD · 08-31-2007, 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fris

surfers are uploading the videos either from rapidshare or other hosts, and they or you dont have the rights to the videos.

so basically you keep them on, until the content owner complains?

basially all your videos are exclusive content you dont even have sponsor links too.

as i said in my earlier post, these companies spend 100's of thousand dollars shooting this content, and you are giving it away for free, without sending the sponsors any traffic.

I could see if you had some sort of links/banners on each video, but you dont.

And the traffic program, basically people embed videos and make money off stolen/ripped content?

Thats stupid too.

You should be like xxxjay and his tube site, only program owners can send content that way its their with the permission of the owners, not some random person that downloaded 90 min videos from a free host

I would like to see a response on this, really curious.

Yo, my MaiN man frIs, its me your homeboy MEGarotic on my boys computer.

Here is me reply. You sees if I's was to stop nicking peoples content and MAke a real site of iT then it wOuldn't be the biggest site in aDuLT then now wood IT? Then it wuld be like all the REst with that crPPy old used up shit content thats on every sITe that licenseS contents. EveRy body knoW that the pEOPle wiff the dopess cOntent doN'T license dat shit to nobodyS.

OF course I knoWs that we is RippinS you guys off, WHatS, do I looK like a duMMy? YOUS can't touch me. I is over here in URope and stuFFs. YOUS better watch IT oR I is gonna start POsting me pics of aLL de MercedeS and me in soMe cool SunglasseS and shit.

PeaCe Outs

FRAUD · 08-31-2007, 01:16 PM

WhEre is mY maiN man Fris?

btw, this is not megarotic. NiCk is FakE

nophest · 08-31-2007, 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FRAUD

WhEre is mY maiN man Fris?

btw, this is not megarotic. NiCk is FakE

90% sure it's not a fake nick.

RawAlex · 08-31-2007, 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nophest

90% sure it's not a fake nick.

100% fake nick. The Megatoric people have been VERY, VERY disrete at the shows, and they aren't the type to suddenly show up on the board and give the fuck you attitude.

That is Lars job.

Don't bother anymore, fake nick horseshit thread.

fris · 08-31-2007, 08:27 PM

they have shown up at the shows

steved · 08-31-2007, 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Casa Nova

Paul Markham · 08-31-2007, 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Megarotic

From: "Paul Markham" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Your thread on GFY
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 06:34:33 +0200

Was it serious?

I have lots of videos we can give you.

Yes we have lots of videos. Depends on the deal we agree to. But as you don't reply I assume you don't want to know. So much for your approach about looking for genuine content producers.

It's cheaper and easier to steal them.

This is proof that this guy has ZERO intentions of getting legit content on his site. We own the license to hundreds of videos, videos he can either license or do a deal on "views" did he reply? NO? IMO because he has no intention of going legit, it's just a screen so he appears to care.

Never thought he was legit and just wanted to prove it.

Brujah · 09-01-2007, 12:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

Yes we have lots of videos. Depends on the deal we agree to. But as you don't reply I assume you don't want to know. So much for your approach about looking for genuine content producers.

It's cheaper and easier to steal them.

This is proof that this guy has ZERO intentions of getting legit content on his site. We own the license to hundreds of videos, videos he can either license or do a deal on "views" did he reply? NO? IMO because he has no intention of going legit, it's just a screen so he appears to care.

Never thought he was legit and just wanted to prove it.

But Paul, this is the #1 Adult site on the internet. Adapt to the new ways, or move aside. Right?

polish_aristocrat · 09-01-2007, 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

Yes we have lots of videos. Depends on the deal we agree to. But as you don't reply I assume you don't want to know. So much for your approach about looking for genuine content producers.

It's cheaper and easier to steal them.

This is proof that this guy has ZERO intentions of getting legit content on his site. We own the license to hundreds of videos, videos he can either license or do a deal on "views" did he reply? NO? IMO because he has no intention of going legit, it's just a screen so he appears to care.

Never thought he was legit and just wanted to prove it.

Ok, finally after two days, it's been proven that this is not a fake nick.....

Paul Markham · 09-01-2007, 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah

But Paul, this is the #1 Adult site on the internet. Adapt to the new ways, or move aside. Right?

We as an industry have to adapt and sites like these prove one thing. They appeal to the surfer more than we do with our present model. Well more than the $30 for 30 days model.

Truth = Very very few porn consumers want more than 30 minutes entertainment and very few want it very often. Otherwise there would be no threads or posts about a gallery giving away 20 hardcore pics or too much hardcore video as satisfying the the surfer enough to turn him off buying a membership.

Plus the BW bill of sites like Megarotic would go through the roof and sponsors BW bills would be to large to support the model we have today.

We sell a product based on our needs, not the consumers. This leaves us open to attack from people who meet the consumers needs better than we do.

Sites like AFF have zero scruples. They will pay money to sites like Megarotic knowing full well that they are thieves and breaking laws. They like Megarotic have no ethics or scruples. Sending them traffic opens you to the same charge. I wonder if they apply the same scruple to their affiliates stealing/cheating them? What would be there stand on anyone downloading all their content for a site?

Yet people will denounce sites that steal and at the same time send traffic to sites supporting thieves. This is nothing new and reminds me of the same situation with Acacia. People denouncing Acacia while sending traffic to sites who licensed with them.

Many PPV and VOD sites are knocking on my door for a "deal" on my videos. I don't do these deals but it proves they want them. Megarotic did not even bother to reply. They have no intentions of licensing. They can disprove this by showing us a few licensor's. Can they afford it or are they just to immoral to pay?

But this is the real problem. If we continue to go down the road of 30 day memberships at $30 we will lose more and more business. Sorry if your business relies on that model. But times change and if you scream about staying loyal to the old ways think about all the non exclusive content providers who closed when affiliates stopped buying content. If it was alright to move on then it's alright to move on now.

Paul Markham · 09-01-2007, 01:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat

Ok, finally after two days, it's been proven that this is not a fake nick.....

Assuming they don't forward it straight to Lars.

I'm wearing my tin foil hat.

To carry on.

Slowing down Torrent sites and sites like Megarotic is easier than you think. All it takes is a collective will from the rest of the industry. First is billing. As a content provider I know only one billing processor takes stealing content seriously. Verotel are the ONLY processor to contact me and ask if XYZ owns the license on content. Even after being shown the licenses they will come to us and ask if they are genuine.

Verotel

Never been asked by anyone else. Megarotic are or were processing via CommerceGate. If they did not know the content was stolen and they were processing for thieves what are they doing in business? Are you processing via CommerceGate and if so would you pull the processing of any processor who does process payments for a site like Megarotic or a Torrent site?

All these sites cost money to run. These bills are met often by advertisers. would you pull the links of an advertiser? It really is that simple, if the advertiser lost 50% of his traffic by advertising there would be no way he would go that route. You have to take the short term loss if you want to ensure your long term future.

Would any major TGP site ban galleries for anyone sending traffic to AFF?

The problem is this industry future planning is usually no more than a few months and no one will do much to stop the growth of sites stealing content. I applaud and support those who are doing something, but I fear the most people will do is post on GFY and other boards. Yet still do business with people who do business with thieves.

xmas13 · 09-01-2007, 04:30 AM

My list of most hated adult companies:

- Megarotic, now nr1

- Epassporte, formerly n1

- AFF

TTiger · 09-01-2007, 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex

100% fake nick. The Megatoric people have been VERY, VERY disrete at the shows, and they aren't the type to suddenly show up on the board and give the fuck you attitude.

That is Lars job.

Don't bother anymore, fake nick horseshit thread.

which show? did you ever meet them?

polish_aristocrat · 09-02-2007, 12:44 AM

How come this thread died so fast?

Blazed · 09-02-2007, 04:32 AM

They don't STEAL shit, surfers STEAL and upload it to their website, they ask you whiney content producers to go on their website, search your shit and send in a report and get it removed. They are completely legal by doing so, just like the millions of other entertainment websites, adult or mainstream.
Why are you all so mad? Because one of your videos gets more views on megarotic than your whole collection combined?

doorman · 09-04-2007, 09:40 AM

Its one thing to go and steal someones content. or to host it under the guise and protection of the dmca for hosting companies. But if this thread is any indication, they are in violation since they admit knowledge to the content they host and dont deal with it as the dmca states.

Free hosts have been riding that shit since sites like geocities and porncity first poped up and steve easton has been chasing all those ghosts for years. I wonder if steve is chasing this asian dragon...

and blazed your right, the "users" do it. Just like the users uploaded all their videos for this guys megavideo site... techcrunch.com/2007/08/07/megavideo-youtube-killer/

I suppose your one of those guys who "finds" the best content then makes galleries and send surfers to what ever site is paying the best that week.

The door is open.

Vick! · 09-04-2007, 11:12 AM

is it a fine place to put sig?

st0ned · 09-04-2007, 11:21 AM

Crazy shit!

splooge · 09-05-2007, 12:47 PM

guys porn on the internet is changing and everyone needs to roll with it or get off the money train

you could say that all the tube sites are stealing content, rightfully so, because they are

but the real problem was youtube.com and it's ingenious website model

youtube started a whole trend that has worked its way into all aspects of the internet

a real businessperson in this industry who is an affiliate program owner would recognize the change and capitalize on it, similar to a daytrader who watches trends and buys or sells accordingly to make the most money

i would have expected the big guys (nastydollars, bangbros, trafficcashgold) to already have come out with their own tube sites with *gasp* full videos of their own content but with the same 10 view per day limit that megarotic has, and perhaps only 5-10 minutes of content until someone buys a membership (like megarotic has, a surfer membership to view all the content without 10 per day limit. you could even just let them view 1/4th the content from each nastydollars paysite, then upsell another membership if they have a particular site they like). This would definately create huge competition for megarotic and basically provide the exact same service megarotic gives to its surfers. One site already using a derivative of this method is xvideos . com.

The surfers want their porn and lots of it all for free... so give it to them. But some of them also want more and will pay for it like they do at megarotic.. so give THAT to them too. You cant honestly tell me with a straight face that the top affiliate programs do NOT have the cash or servers to pull that off? It would be perhaps 1 year only for any one of the top 3 to create a megarotic clone that would grow to the same size.

The only problem i can foresee is how to compensate webmasters with that business model.. but why would bangbros care? They are making more money in a market they werent making money in before.

RawAlex · 09-05-2007, 01:30 PM

splooge, bangbros is the type of company that should care the most, because the more their content is out there for free in larger and longer pieces, the less value that content has.

Imagine: You pay $2000 to shoot an exclusive scene for your paysite, put it on your site, and tomorrow some user has turned that into a "user generated content" submission to the tubes and torrent sites, and millions of freeloaders are enjoying it for nothing, and enjoying part of it long enough to get off without issue.

splooge, I at least like that you are looking for a business solution. But Megarotic is charging for memberships just to pay for additional bandwidth. Their business model encourages mass consumption, to a point where even at the current reduced costs of bandwidth, it is still expensive to feed the masses. It is the reason most programs that have trailers on their tours limit it to a few trailers total, to avoid the free loaders.

In the end, Youtube's business model was "let's see if we can find enough money to stay in business long enough for someone big to come along and buy us out". Now Google's version is "let's see if we can make enough money back on this to justify the legal costs, because bandwidth isn't an issue for us". The business model is entirely based on aggregative eyeballs to sell to others, with little or no actual content costs. But if the affiliate porn site model has been destroyed on the way, porn tube sites could find themselves with way to many "already got off" eyeballs and few porn buyers.

It is an interesting question, one that will likely come clearer into focus as programs decide how they want to approach their future.

splooge · 09-05-2007, 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex

.

Imagine: You pay $2000 to shoot an exclusive scene for your paysite, put it on your site, and tomorrow some user has turned that into a "user generated content" submission to the tubes and torrent sites, and millions of freeloaders are enjoying it for nothing, and enjoying part of it long enough to get off without issue.

In the end, Youtube's business model was "let's see if we can find enough money to stay in business long enough for someone big to come along and buy us out". Now Google's version is "let's see if we can make enough money back on this to justify the legal costs, because bandwidth isn't an issue for us". The business model is entirely based on aggregative eyeballs to sell to others, with little or no actual content costs. But if the affiliate porn site model has been destroyed on the way, porn tube sites could find themselves with way to many "already got off" eyeballs and few porn buyers.

It is an interesting question, one that will likely come clearer into focus as programs decide how they want to approach their future.

very insightful and full of good info, thanks for that. I didnt really think of youtube in that way before. I agree It definately will be interesting to see how things develop in the future and i guess my plan doesnt make that much sense for bangbros.

polish_aristocrat · 09-11-2007, 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daruma

10 pages if there are responses by Megarotic..
3 pages if none..

well, only 4 pages in the end....

Angie77 · 09-11-2007, 11:11 AM

sig spot!

Dirty D · 09-11-2007, 11:16 AM

Someone please point out the Megarotic people to me at the next show...

Carry on.

klinton · 09-11-2007, 11:38 AM

very interesting

polish_aristocrat · 11-14-2007, 05:54 AM

ridikuloz · 11-14-2007, 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat

cheers!!!!

will76 · 11-14-2007, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

We as an industry have to adapt and sites like these prove one thing. They appeal to the surfer more than we do with our present model. Well more than the $30 for 30 days model.

Truth = Very very few porn consumers want more than 30 minutes entertainment and very few want it very often. Otherwise there would be no threads or posts about a gallery giving away 20 hardcore pics or too much hardcore video as satisfying the the surfer enough to turn him off buying a membership.

Plus the BW bill of sites like Megarotic would go through the roof and sponsors BW bills would be to large to support the model we have today.

We sell a product based on our needs, not the consumers. This leaves us open to attack from people who meet the consumers needs better than we do.

Sites like AFF have zero scruples. They will pay money to sites like Megarotic knowing full well that they are thieves and breaking laws. They like Megarotic have no ethics or scruples. Sending them traffic opens you to the same charge. I wonder if they apply the same scruple to their affiliates stealing/cheating them? What would be there stand on anyone downloading all their content for a site?

Yet people will denounce sites that steal and at the same time send traffic to sites supporting thieves. This is nothing new and reminds me of the same situation with Acacia. People denouncing Acacia while sending traffic to sites who licensed with them.

Many PPV and VOD sites are knocking on my door for a "deal" on my videos. I don't do these deals but it proves they want them. Megarotic did not even bother to reply. They have no intentions of licensing. They can disprove this by showing us a few licensor's. Can they afford it or are they just to immoral to pay?

But this is the real problem. If we continue to go down the road of 30 day memberships at $30 we will lose more and more business. Sorry if your business relies on that model. But times change and if you scream about staying loyal to the old ways think about all the non exclusive content providers who closed when affiliates stopped buying content. If it was alright to move on then it's alright to move on now.

Paul you go on and on about how we don't meet the customers needs, that the customer found a better model, we need to adapt, blah blah blah.

So how do you plan on competiting with FREE again?

munki · 11-14-2007, 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jace

uuuuuuuuuuuuummmmmmmmmmmmmm

HEY YOU FUCKIN FUCK, WHY DON'T YOU FUCK THE FUCKING HELL OFF. TAKE THAT SHIT ELSEWHERE YOU THIEVING BITCH!

HEY YOU FUCKIN FUCK, WHY DON'T YOU FUCK THE FUCKING HELL OFF. TAKE THAT SHIT ELSEWHERE YOU THIEVING BITCH!

HEY YOU FUCKIN FUCK, WHY DON'T YOU FUCK THE FUCKING HELL OFF. TAKE THAT SHIT ELSEWHERE YOU THIEVING BITCH!

HEY YOU FUCKIN FUCK, WHY DON'T YOU FUCK THE FUCKING HELL OFF. TAKE THAT SHIT ELSEWHERE YOU THIEVING BITCH!

HEY YOU FUCKIN FUCK, WHY DON'T YOU FUCK THE FUCKING HELL OFF. TAKE THAT SHIT ELSEWHERE YOU THIEVING BITCH!

HEY YOU FUCKIN FUCK, WHY DON'T YOU FUCK THE FUCKING HELL OFF. TAKE THAT SHIT ELSEWHERE YOU THIEVING BITCH!

Too late to second this motion again?

buzzy · 11-14-2007, 11:21 AM

The hypocrisy in this thread amazes me, don't get me wrong stealing isn't right but 99% of people on this forum download music and apps illegally.

xxxjay · 11-21-2007, 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Megarotic

Hello Friends,

Thanks to hundreds of adult content producers who have joined our rewards program and uploaded thousands of videos to our site.

That's bull shit...name one producer. You ain't no www.snizzshare.com

L-Pink · 11-21-2007, 08:46 PM

I uploaded a video of a dog fucking a snake but it was for their personal use only.

Garywell · 11-30-2007, 10:30 AM

Hi!
I'm realvideocash.com co-owner. megarotic.com sells stolen content.

If search xttp://www.megarotic.com/video/?c=search&s=russian first video is stolen from amateurmoviesclub.com - Tipsy Russian Students Dirty Dancing

xttp://www.megarotic.com/video/?c=search&s=russian&p=4 - 2 Russian Girls one white guy - stolen from rawporntryouts.com

xttp://www.megarotic.com/video/?c=search&s=russian&p=6 - all Complete Russian orgy videos are from amateurmoviesclub.com

xttp://www.megarotic.com/video/?c=search&s=russian&p=7 - more russian orgy is ours too ans etc.

Xttp://www.megarotic.com/video/?c=search&s=russian&p=9 - 70% of content is ours.

And much more from russian partner programs content.

to megarotic: You guy think that we are not able to get you from Russia?

tranza · 11-30-2007, 10:36 AM

Is this for real??

Randyyy · 12-11-2007, 09:04 AM

let's see what happens when we have TWO megarotic threads on the main page LOL

Nicky · 12-11-2007, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tranza

Is this for real??

Seems the guy is for real atleast

08-31-2007, 12:02 AM	#152
polish_aristocrat Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 40,377	I seriously can't believe that no one here emailed the guy just to verify if he's real and then posted here that he received a reply or that he didn't, or the e-mail bounced or whatever. I would have done it but I thought there would be already 10 people who did it asap when the guy asked for it. and now , 15 hours later, people are still debating if this guy is real or not __________________ I don't use ICQ anymore.

08-31-2007, 08:27 PM	#163
fris Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 55,372	they have shown up at the shows __________________ Since 1999: 69 Adult Industry awards for Best Hosting Company and professional excellence. WP Stuff

09-02-2007, 12:44 AM	#172
polish_aristocrat Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 40,377	How come this thread died so fast? __________________ I don't use ICQ anymore.

09-04-2007, 11:12 AM	#175
Vick! Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: 20 00'24.00" N, 75 09'00.00 W Posts: 6,882	is it a fine place to put sig? __________________ Affordable Quality Web Hosting

09-04-2007, 11:21 AM	#176
st0ned Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Arizona Posts: 8,437	Crazy shit! __________________ Conversion Sharks - 1,000+ adult dating offers, traffic management, and consistently high payouts. We will guarantee and beat your current EPC to win your dating traffic! Skype: ConversionSharks \|\| Email: info /@/ conversionsharks.com

08-31-2007, 12:01 AM	#151
JD Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 22,651	150 bastards

08-31-2007, 12:07 AM	#153
ProjectNaked Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Detroit Areola Posts: 4,309

08-31-2007, 01:11 AM	#154
ilbb Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2005 Location: EU - Czech republic Posts: 3,025	fake nick?

08-31-2007, 01:16 PM	#160
FRAUD Registered User Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 34	WhEre is mY maiN man Fris? btw, this is not megarotic. NiCk is FakE

09-01-2007, 04:30 AM	#170
xmas13 Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: GFY Posts: 5,176	My list of most hated adult companies: - Megarotic, now nr1 - Epassporte, formerly n1 - AFF

09-02-2007, 04:32 AM	#173
Blazed Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: London Posts: 1,701	They don't STEAL shit, surfers STEAL and upload it to their website, they ask you whiney content producers to go on their website, search your shit and send in a report and get it removed. They are completely legal by doing so, just like the millions of other entertainment websites, adult or mainstream. Why are you all so mad? Because one of your videos gets more views on megarotic than your whole collection combined?

09-04-2007, 09:40 AM	#174
doorman Registered User Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 2	Its one thing to go and steal someones content. or to host it under the guise and protection of the dmca for hosting companies. But if this thread is any indication, they are in violation since they admit knowledge to the content they host and dont deal with it as the dmca states. Free hosts have been riding that shit since sites like geocities and porncity first poped up and steve easton has been chasing all those ghosts for years. I wonder if steve is chasing this asian dragon... and blazed your right, the "users" do it. Just like the users uploaded all their videos for this guys megavideo site... techcrunch.com/2007/08/07/megavideo-youtube-killer/ I suppose your one of those guys who "finds" the best content then makes galleries and send surfers to what ever site is paying the best that week. The door is open.

09-05-2007, 12:47 PM	#177
splooge Registered User Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 43	guys porn on the internet is changing and everyone needs to roll with it or get off the money train you could say that all the tube sites are stealing content, rightfully so, because they are but the real problem was youtube.com and it's ingenious website model youtube started a whole trend that has worked its way into all aspects of the internet a real businessperson in this industry who is an affiliate program owner would recognize the change and capitalize on it, similar to a daytrader who watches trends and buys or sells accordingly to make the most money i would have expected the big guys (nastydollars, bangbros, trafficcashgold) to already have come out with their own tube sites with gasp full videos of their own content but with the same 10 view per day limit that megarotic has, and perhaps only 5-10 minutes of content until someone buys a membership (like megarotic has, a surfer membership to view all the content without 10 per day limit. you could even just let them view 1/4th the content from each nastydollars paysite, then upsell another membership if they have a particular site they like). This would definately create huge competition for megarotic and basically provide the exact same service megarotic gives to its surfers. One site already using a derivative of this method is xvideos . com. The surfers want their porn and lots of it all for free... so give it to them. But some of them also want more and will pay for it like they do at megarotic.. so give THAT to them too. You cant honestly tell me with a straight face that the top affiliate programs do NOT have the cash or servers to pull that off? It would be perhaps 1 year only for any one of the top 3 to create a megarotic clone that would grow to the same size. The only problem i can foresee is how to compensate webmasters with that business model.. but why would bangbros care? They are making more money in a market they werent making money in before. Last edited by splooge; 09-05-2007 at 12:48 PM..

09-05-2007, 01:30 PM	#178
RawAlex So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: In a house. Posts: 9,465	splooge, bangbros is the type of company that should care the most, because the more their content is out there for free in larger and longer pieces, the less value that content has. Imagine: You pay $2000 to shoot an exclusive scene for your paysite, put it on your site, and tomorrow some user has turned that into a "user generated content" submission to the tubes and torrent sites, and millions of freeloaders are enjoying it for nothing, and enjoying part of it long enough to get off without issue. splooge, I at least like that you are looking for a business solution. But Megarotic is charging for memberships just to pay for additional bandwidth. Their business model encourages mass consumption, to a point where even at the current reduced costs of bandwidth, it is still expensive to feed the masses. It is the reason most programs that have trailers on their tours limit it to a few trailers total, to avoid the free loaders. In the end, Youtube's business model was "let's see if we can find enough money to stay in business long enough for someone big to come along and buy us out". Now Google's version is "let's see if we can make enough money back on this to justify the legal costs, because bandwidth isn't an issue for us". The business model is entirely based on aggregative eyeballs to sell to others, with little or no actual content costs. But if the affiliate porn site model has been destroyed on the way, porn tube sites could find themselves with way to many "already got off" eyeballs and few porn buyers. It is an interesting question, one that will likely come clearer into focus as programs decide how they want to approach their future.

09-11-2007, 11:11 AM	#181
Angie77 Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Netherlands Posts: 1,356	sig spot! __________________ Best Conversions, Highest Payouts in the industry, Dedicated affiliate support: What more could you ask for? Sign up Today!

09-11-2007, 11:16 AM	#182
Dirty D Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Location: Paying Webmasters Millions Since 1999 Posts: 4,044	Someone please point out the Megarotic people to me at the next show... Carry on. __________________ Dirty D - ICQ #1326843 - $1 Million Dollars of Bonus Money - 8,000+ FHG! Glory Hole Girlz - Crack Whore Confessions - Tampa Bukkake - Slut Wife Training - Fuck a Fan Electricity Play - Porn Video Drive - Theater Sluts - Skunk Riley - Ukraine Amateurs - Strapon Sessions

09-11-2007, 11:38 AM	#183
klinton So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: online Posts: 8,766	very interesting

11-14-2007, 05:54 AM	#184
polish_aristocrat Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 40,377	__________________ I don't use ICQ anymore.

11-14-2007, 11:21 AM	#188
buzzy Confirmed User Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 2,606	The hypocrisy in this thread amazes me, don't get me wrong stealing isn't right but 99% of people on this forum download music and apps illegally.

11-21-2007, 08:46 PM	#190
L-Pink working on my tan Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Florida/Kentucky Posts: 39,151	I uploaded a video of a dog fucking a snake but it was for their personal use only.

11-30-2007, 10:30 AM	#191
Garywell Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Czech Posts: 240	Hi! I'm realvideocash.com co-owner. megarotic.com sells stolen content. If search xttp://www.megarotic.com/video/?c=search&s=russian first video is stolen from amateurmoviesclub.com - Tipsy Russian Students Dirty Dancing xttp://www.megarotic.com/video/?c=search&s=russian&p=4 - 2 Russian Girls one white guy - stolen from rawporntryouts.com xttp://www.megarotic.com/video/?c=search&s=russian&p=6 - all Complete Russian orgy videos are from amateurmoviesclub.com xttp://www.megarotic.com/video/?c=search&s=russian&p=7 - more russian orgy is ours too ans etc. Xttp://www.megarotic.com/video/?c=search&s=russian&p=9 - 70% of content is ours. And much more from russian partner programs content. to megarotic: You guy think that we are not able to get you from Russia?

11-30-2007, 10:36 AM	#192
tranza ICQ: 197-556-237 Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: BRASIL !!! Posts: 57,559	Is this for real?? __________________ I'm just a newbie.

12-11-2007, 09:04 AM	#193
Randyyy Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 2,240	let's see what happens when we have TWO megarotic threads on the main page LOL __________________ need video editing done? hit me up! ICQ: 10347906