CCbill vs NATS on rebills - GoFuckYourself.com

crockett · 07-13-2007, 01:35 PM

Just a general question, I'm interested in other's experiences. If you promote programs that use nats via revshare.. how are your rebills?

uno · 07-13-2007, 01:44 PM

Rebills seem on par for me.

JMM · 07-13-2007, 02:02 PM

You are trying to compare Apples to Oranges.

CCbill is a third party credit card processor.

NATS is a piece of software.

The answer would depend on which processor the program using NATS is using to process transactions.

So really, it doesn't have anything to do with NATS.

bDok · 07-13-2007, 02:36 PM

that and you can have multiple processors... which is one of the reason to go with something like nats... so you can set a bunch of processors back and if it rejects from one it tries another processor... so your signups a lot of times are better than if it was just ccbill.

this is true for mpa3, partner soft, etc. etc.

crockett · 07-13-2007, 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bDok

that and you can have multiple processors... which is one of the reason to go with something like nats... so you can set a bunch of processors back and if it rejects from one it tries another processor... so your signups a lot of times are better than if it was just ccbill.

this is true for mpa3, partner soft, etc. etc.

Well I know the beneficial reasons to use a software like Nats.. The problem comes in when programs use other billing companies as their primary biller. Other than say CCBill whom I trust.

I think that's where the issue is coming in. With ccbill I always had great rebill ratios, but I'm guessing the program I'm having trouble with is likely using a different processor.

I posted NATs in the topic, because that for the most part the only 3rd party billing software I'll promote sites under, other than ccbill. So MPA3 or whom ever is a non issue to me, because I generally don't promote sites using them.

This isn't meant to be a bash Nats thread, as I realize it's not their fault whom each program uses as their billers. I am just curious on general tends vs just normal ccbill vs using a 3rd party like Nats.

RawAlex · 07-13-2007, 03:22 PM

My take is this: The theory of NATS isn't just "stats" but rather to make the process of cascading billing not only possible but easy. If a program can get processing with 3 or 4 different processors and processing types, then they have more chance of selling memberships. If you are running CCBill direct, then you are totally at the mercy of their scrub alone.

That being said, I wouldn't be shocked if some people suggested that someone might think that NATS sites don't convert as well. I wouldn't venture an opinion on this, but I would be shocked if others expressed that opinion.

V_RocKs · 07-13-2007, 03:52 PM

My meatcash and braincash rebills pay for my house payment.

07-13-2007, 01:35 PM	#1
crockett in a van by the river Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 76,806	CCbill vs NATS on rebills Just a general question, I'm interested in other's experiences. If you promote programs that use nats via revshare.. how are your rebills? __________________ In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

07-13-2007, 01:44 PM	#2
uno RIP Dodger. BEST.CAT.EVER Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: NYC Area Posts: 18,450	Rebills seem on par for me. __________________ -uno icq: 111-914 CrazyBabe.com - porn art MojoHost - For all your hosting needs, present and future. Tell them I sent ya!

07-13-2007, 02:36 PM	#4
bDok Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: SD/OC/LA Posts: 1,917	that and you can have multiple processors... which is one of the reason to go with something like nats... so you can set a bunch of processors back and if it rejects from one it tries another processor... so your signups a lot of times are better than if it was just ccbill. this is true for mpa3, partner soft, etc. etc. __________________ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Warriors come out to plaAAaayyy! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

07-13-2007, 02:02 PM	#3
JMM Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2001 Posts: 1,755	You are trying to compare Apples to Oranges. CCbill is a third party credit card processor. NATS is a piece of software. The answer would depend on which processor the program using NATS is using to process transactions. So really, it doesn't have anything to do with NATS.

07-13-2007, 03:22 PM	#6
RawAlex So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: In a house. Posts: 9,465	My take is this: The theory of NATS isn't just "stats" but rather to make the process of cascading billing not only possible but easy. If a program can get processing with 3 or 4 different processors and processing types, then they have more chance of selling memberships. If you are running CCBill direct, then you are totally at the mercy of their scrub alone. That being said, I wouldn't be shocked if some people suggested that someone might think that NATS sites don't convert as well. I wouldn't venture an opinion on this, but I would be shocked if others expressed that opinion.

07-13-2007, 03:52 PM	#7
V_RocKs Damn Right I Kiss Ass! Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Cowtown, USA Posts: 32,413	My meatcash and braincash rebills pay for my house payment.