Quote:
Originally Posted by bDok
that and you can have multiple processors... which is one of the reason to go with something like nats... so you can set a bunch of processors back and if it rejects from one it tries another processor... so your signups a lot of times are better than if it was just ccbill. 
this is true for mpa3, partner soft, etc. etc. |
Well I know the beneficial reasons to use a software like Nats.. The problem comes in when programs use other billing companies as their primary biller. Other than say CCBill whom I trust.
I think that's where the issue is coming in. With ccbill I always had great rebill ratios, but I'm guessing the program I'm having trouble with is likely using a different processor.
I posted NATs in the topic, because that for the most part the only 3rd party billing software I'll promote sites under, other than ccbill. So MPA3 or whom ever is a non issue to me, because I generally don't promote sites using them.
This isn't meant to be a bash Nats thread, as I realize it's not their fault whom each program uses as their billers. I am just curious on general tends vs just normal ccbill vs using a 3rd party like Nats.