CCbill vs NATS on rebills

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • crockett
    in a van by the river
    • May 2003
    • 76818

    #1

    CCbill vs NATS on rebills

    Just a general question, I'm interested in other's experiences. If you promote programs that use nats via revshare.. how are your rebills?
    In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
  • uno
    RIP Dodger. BEST.CAT.EVER
    • Dec 2002
    • 18450

    #2
    Rebills seem on par for me.
    -uno
    icq: 111-914
    CrazyBabe.com - porn art
    MojoHost - For all your hosting needs, present and future. Tell them I sent ya!

    Comment

    • JMM
      Confirmed User
      • Apr 2001
      • 1755

      #3
      You are trying to compare Apples to Oranges.

      CCbill is a third party credit card processor.

      NATS is a piece of software.

      The answer would depend on which processor the program using NATS is using to process transactions.

      So really, it doesn't have anything to do with NATS.

      Comment

      • bDok
        Confirmed User
        • Feb 2005
        • 1917

        #4
        that and you can have multiple processors... which is one of the reason to go with something like nats... so you can set a bunch of processors back and if it rejects from one it tries another processor... so your signups a lot of times are better than if it was just ccbill.

        this is true for mpa3, partner soft, etc. etc.
        =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
        Warriors come out to plaAAaayyy!
        =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

        Comment

        • crockett
          in a van by the river
          • May 2003
          • 76818

          #5
          Originally posted by bDok
          that and you can have multiple processors... which is one of the reason to go with something like nats... so you can set a bunch of processors back and if it rejects from one it tries another processor... so your signups a lot of times are better than if it was just ccbill.

          this is true for mpa3, partner soft, etc. etc.
          Well I know the beneficial reasons to use a software like Nats.. The problem comes in when programs use other billing companies as their primary biller. Other than say CCBill whom I trust.

          I think that's where the issue is coming in. With ccbill I always had great rebill ratios, but I'm guessing the program I'm having trouble with is likely using a different processor.

          I posted NATs in the topic, because that for the most part the only 3rd party billing software I'll promote sites under, other than ccbill. So MPA3 or whom ever is a non issue to me, because I generally don't promote sites using them.

          This isn't meant to be a bash Nats thread, as I realize it's not their fault whom each program uses as their billers. I am just curious on general tends vs just normal ccbill vs using a 3rd party like Nats.
          In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

          Comment

          • RawAlex
            So Fucking Banned
            • Oct 2003
            • 9465

            #6
            My take is this: The theory of NATS isn't just "stats" but rather to make the process of cascading billing not only possible but easy. If a program can get processing with 3 or 4 different processors and processing types, then they have more chance of selling memberships. If you are running CCBill direct, then you are totally at the mercy of their scrub alone.

            That being said, I wouldn't be shocked if some people suggested that someone might think that NATS sites don't convert as well. I wouldn't venture an opinion on this, but I would be shocked if others expressed that opinion.

            Comment

            • V_RocKs
              Damn Right I Kiss Ass!
              • Nov 2003
              • 32449

              #7
              My meatcash and braincash rebills pay for my house payment.

              Comment

              Working...