|
My take is this: The theory of NATS isn't just "stats" but rather to make the process of cascading billing not only possible but easy. If a program can get processing with 3 or 4 different processors and processing types, then they have more chance of selling memberships. If you are running CCBill direct, then you are totally at the mercy of their scrub alone.
That being said, I wouldn't be shocked if some people suggested that someone might think that NATS sites don't convert as well. I wouldn't venture an opinion on this, but I would be shocked if others expressed that opinion.
|