Which sponsors are really "clean"? - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

Rankings · 03-18-2007, 03:28 PM

50 Clean Sponsors.. SEE SIG!

_Rush_ · 03-18-2007, 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XPays

That's a kickass ad.

Miguel · 03-18-2007, 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex

Incorrect - click there members links and then click cancel. The affiliate code is lost.

Click the webmasters link, affiliate code is lost. I didn't even look hard to find these two popular leaks.

Use NATS and affliate code will not be lost after that.

Serious Cash is clear and running NATS!

count of monte cristo · 03-18-2007, 04:24 PM

would you consider a sponsor who has an ATM-style descriptor and charges in $40.00 increments for their price points shady?

hypothetically speaking, of course

count of monte cristo · 03-18-2007, 04:31 PM

nm

123456

VIPimp · 03-18-2007, 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Miguel

Use NATS and affliate code will not be lost after that.

I just saw many nats programs where the wm link was not carrying the code. And have plenty of other leaks, doesnt make a difference what software the site is running.

RogerV · 03-18-2007, 05:25 PM

no leaks here..

NTSS · 03-18-2007, 05:30 PM

Interesting thread. Were's the rest of the sponsors? This seems like a very small percentage. Maybe after a couple days we will hear from more or maybe they havent responded already because they aren't "clean" and just don't give a fuck.

CDSmith · 03-18-2007, 05:34 PM

Nice to see PussyCash already mentioned a few times.

Even their models are clean, like Ivory soap girls.

jayeff · 03-18-2007, 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by THEMASKEDRIDER

people that do shady shit make more money

In reality that is rarely true. The cliché derives from the very narrow perspective that if a given transaction would legitimately earn - say - $30 and via a "trick" of some kind, that can be turned into $50, that equates to "more money".

And of course, on that single transaction it does and all those extra $20 dollars mount up to reinforce the illusion. But now compare the number of scams big enough for people to remember, against the number of regular businesses making profits year in and year out.

A few scammers think on a large scale (and are smart enough to pull something off and get away with it), but the majority are small-time, unambitious and short-sighted. How can they be anything else, when by their nature, most scams are ways to cut a bigger slice of the existing cake. Scammers rarely try to bake a bigger cake and even fail to notice when their activities make the cake smaller.

Right now quite a lot of the people center-stage in this industry use dubious methods of one kind or another. But that is less an endorsement of their tactics than because this industry is in its infancy. Check back in 5 years or so and see how many are still around...

RawAlex · 03-18-2007, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jayeff

It seems kinda silly for those who have almost everything locked down, not to go the last yard. But compared to rest of the crap out there, I feel for the guys who are 99.9% clean, yet getting kicked in this thread for that 0.1%

It isn't a question of kicking anyone for the last 0.1% - it is a question of if a program says "we are clean" there shouldn't be anything that even resembles a leak. Plus I found those things right on page one, I didn't even check cookies or verify affiliate codes through all the pages.

I applaud them for going to almost the end... They can do the last little bit and be totally clear. Then they could crow about it, and it honestly would be a great selling point.

CDSmith · 03-18-2007, 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jayeff

In reality that is rarely true. The cliché derives from the very narrow perspective that if a given transaction would legitimately earn - say - $30 and via a "trick" of some kind, that can be turned into $50, that equates to "more money".

And of course, on that single transaction it does and all those extra $20 dollars mount up to reinforce the illusion. But now compare the number of scams big enough for people to remember, against the number of regular businesses making profits year in and year out.

A few scammers think on a large scale (and are smart enough to pull something off and get away with it), but the majority are small-time, unambitious and short-sighted. How can they be anything else, when by their nature, most scams are ways to cut a bigger slice of the existing cake. Scammers rarely try to bake a bigger cake and even fail to notice when their activities make the cake smaller.

Right now quite a lot of the people center-stage in this industry use dubious methods of one kind or another. But that is less an endorsement of their tactics than because this industry is in its infancy. Check back in 5 years or so and see how many are still around...

I have neither seen nor heard this said any better that that.

You nailed every point dead nuts on.

As usual.

thehand · 03-18-2007, 06:47 PM

At Video Secrets, we take pride in running a "clean" program:-)

RawAlex · 03-18-2007, 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith

I have neither seen nor heard this said any better that that.

You nailed every point dead nuts on.

As usual.

Sadly, 5 years from now the scammers will have made their millions and moved on, and the rest of us will still be slugging it out in the trenches.

p1mpdogg · 03-18-2007, 09:56 PM

EpicCash is very clean and will count every hit for hit. feel free to audit our stats.

Brooke Anderson · 03-18-2007, 10:19 PM

I'm clean, as are all the girls at 4 Real Cash

RawAlex · 03-18-2007, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by p1mpdogg

EpicCash is very clean and will count every hit for hit. feel free to audit our stats.

P1mpdog, it isn't about counting "click for click". That isn't the concept here.

I checked your tour for http://www.epiccash.com/track/track....E&SID=41&PID=S

(randomly selected from google).

Your webmaster link isn't coded (although it opens in a new window, which is nice)

Your members link, if you cancel, goes to a 401 page for camspot.

Your links to surfpartol and others open in the same window.

The camspot console you blur behind your tour doesn't credit to the webmaster.

So, no clean isn't exactly the correct words here.

will76 · 03-18-2007, 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XPays

yes- patent-pending .

Your attorney most have had a special, buy one patent, get 20 free.

Care to share your list of patent pending stuff. If you don't I wonder if that would be held against you in the case of a lawsuit.

From the sounds of it we are all infringing on your patents, so if you wont share them with us than how will i know what I am doing is violating your patent. I personally think it is only a matter of time before you flip the switch on your patents. Why else would you patent so many things if you didn't want to be like acacia and try to scare money out of people, bully them because they can't afford a lawyer. We have already seen you in action with bullying some who owned sexpays.com because you threatened to sue them because you said the name infrindged on xpays.com which is absurd.

So will you disclouse your patents and if you don;t do you think that weakens your claim we are infringing when you pull the trigger ?

will76 · 03-18-2007, 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex

P1mpdog, it isn't about counting "click for click". That isn't the concept here.

I checked your tour for http://www.epiccash.com/track/track....E&SID=41&PID=S

(randomly selected from google).

Your webmaster link isn't coded (although it opens in a new window, which is nice)

Your members link, if you cancel, goes to a 401 page for camspot.

Your links to surfpartol and others open in the same window.

The camspot console you blur behind your tour doesn't credit to the webmaster.

So, no clean isn't exactly the correct words here.

i thought camspot had nothing to do with epiccash ?

RawAlex · 03-18-2007, 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76

i thought camspot had nothing to do with epiccash ?

I have no idea, I just call them as I see them.

http://1-dream.com/exit_pages/blur.html

that is the blur on that tour page I posted above.

p1mpdogg · 03-19-2007, 02:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex

P1mpdog, it isn't about counting "click for click". That isn't the concept here.

I checked your tour for http://www.epiccash.com/track/track....E&SID=41&PID=S

(randomly selected from google).

Your webmaster link isn't coded (although it opens in a new window, which is nice)

Your members link, if you cancel, goes to a 401 page for camspot.

Your links to surfpartol and others open in the same window.

The camspot console you blur behind your tour doesn't credit to the webmaster.

So, no clean isn't exactly the correct words here.

we have no console tours also. thats why you get paid more on console tours.

sorry for the surfpatrol and kiddie porn links being traffic leaks. i will make sure to take those down

p1mpdogg · 03-19-2007, 02:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76

i thought camspot had nothing to do with epiccash ?

if i put cams.com there, what does that tell you?

idiot.

will76 · 03-19-2007, 02:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by p1mpdogg

we have no console tours also. thats why you get paid more on console tours.

sorry for the surfpatrol and kiddie porn links being traffic leaks. i will make sure to take those down

hurry house nigga, get that fixed pronto

Shoehorn! · 03-19-2007, 02:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jayeff

Recently we have had threads about tours with (deliberate) traffic leaks and of course Zango. There isn't much sense cutting off traffic to AFF, SexSearch and the rest, but still sending to sponsors who pop any of the offenders in their consoles. So predictably that was the topic of at least one more thread. Then we have the content thieves and the sponsors who have no problem with that type of site...

Maybe it would be easier to list the sponsors who - as far as we know - aren't involved in anything questionable. Nominations?

You won't find sites like that advertised anywhere on BaileysRoom.com, HaydenHeart.com or any other Axis-Adult.com site.

Danny B · 03-19-2007, 02:30 AM

We behave too. See my sig for a clean and honest sponsor!

JamesK2 · 03-19-2007, 02:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex

Same answer... perhaps have your member's link open in a new window (members shouldn't be coming through an affiliate link, now should they) and if you don't pay for WM referals, then why have a leak like that on every tour page?

99% of the paysites links to its affiliate program. It's a standard. You are going way to far, go out and find real leaks like a join page link with no code on it, a refresh or simple affiliate id removal from the url would make the affiliate lose its credit

The Ghost · 03-19-2007, 03:10 AM

Island Dollars <-- Zero traffic leaks

Affiliate tours
Joon Mali
Asha Kumara
Lily Koh

There isn't one single traffic leak on our tours. Feel free to check

gtp · 03-19-2007, 05:40 AM

Two gay gay sponsors are clean for sure:

Intensecash
Blueloot

o0o_Lizard_o0o · 03-19-2007, 05:48 AM

clean and convert like crazy! see sig!

webgeek · 03-19-2007, 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by p1mpdogg

EpicCash is very clean and will count every hit for hit. feel free to audit our stats.

Click the member's login on the tour.
http://whatafreak.com/index_no.html?...1174310451n448
click cancel sends you to another site with another linking code...

you're not as clean as you tought. I suggest a good soap and dish cloth

webgeek · 03-19-2007, 06:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Ghost

Island Dollars <-- Zero traffic leaks

Affiliate tours
Joon Mali
Asha Kumara
Lily Koh

There isn't one single traffic leak on our tours. Feel free to check

Other than the webmaster's linking code not working at
http://www.lilykoh.com/tour2/index.p...OjI6Mg,0,0,0,0
(http://nats.islanddollars.com/track/%3C?=($_GET['nats']?$_GET['nats']:'MDowOjM')?%3E/)
you're site looks really cool... congrats!

Quick Buck · 03-19-2007, 06:52 AM

shouldnt be a single leak on any quickbuck tour. if anybody finds one we'd love to know so we can plug it.

webmasterchecks · 03-19-2007, 06:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jayeff

In reality that is rarely true. The cliché derives from the very narrow perspective that if a given transaction would legitimately earn - say - $30 and via a "trick" of some kind, that can be turned into $50, that equates to "more money".

And of course, on that single transaction it does and all those extra $20 dollars mount up to reinforce the illusion. But now compare the number of scams big enough for people to remember, against the number of regular businesses making profits year in and year out.

A few scammers think on a large scale (and are smart enough to pull something off and get away with it), but the majority are small-time, unambitious and short-sighted. How can they be anything else, when by their nature, most scams are ways to cut a bigger slice of the existing cake. Scammers rarely try to bake a bigger cake and even fail to notice when their activities make the cake smaller.

Right now quite a lot of the people center-stage in this industry use dubious methods of one kind or another. But that is less an endorsement of their tactics than because this industry is in its infancy. Check back in 5 years or so and see how many are still around...

let me make a few points, the line drawn is subjective, and by scam, i was not only referring to the huge blow-outs like xpics that are cemented in peoples minds, but in the common little tricks you mentioned in your first paragraph

2 prechecked crossells, in some cases with little to no information on how to cancel anything other than the initial sale. bear in mind that the crossell information does not get translated for foreign surfers, so they have no idea what that is, or if its any different than the opt-in "i am 18 or older" txt

companies have done this for years and continue to do so, i can name 10 off the top of my head right now

10 step, non-intuative cancellation process

a sponsor that pays on trials, but makes their trials impossible to cancel until after the first rebill

just a few examples, all those people are still around and they will be years from now.

ive learned that there is not always justice in this world. i used to thing that people that do scams will get caught and stop. ive learned, in most cases, that not to be true. if they have to, they change, they make arguments, and they do what they have to to stay in business, but they stay

the problem is that i like business, and those are the big cats, so im not willing to name names

SkeetSkeet · 03-19-2007, 07:01 AM

we are fucking spotless www.starlightbucks.com ... all affiliate links carry your code too ... and your surfers can browse through our family of sites at the bottom of all of our tours, and yes, your unique code carries endlessly through all of them.

xcitecash · 03-19-2007, 07:12 AM

we are dirty....

CDSmith · 03-19-2007, 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xcitecash

we are dirty....

That would make for a good t-shirt slogan.

jayeff · 03-19-2007, 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by THEMASKEDRIDER

i used to thing that people that do scams will get caught and stop. ive learned, in most cases, that not to be true. if they have to, they change, they make arguments, and they do what they have to to stay in business, but they stay

It doesn't really have much to do with justice, people getting caught, etc. And sometimes there is a fine line between a scam and legitimately pushing the envelope. There will always be people doing both.

The fundamental difference is one of attitude. I think almost everyone who approaches their business with the belief that the sky is the limit and he/she is capable of taking the ride, will tell you that the big picture comes first and that in a sense, the details fall into place naturally. Scammers, just to keep using a convenient term, are small-minded and unambitious because the details are their business. They have no big picture except to keep milking whatever they have for as long as it lasts.

Which isn't to say they never make any money, only that what they achieve will almost always be relatively limited and usually quite short-lived. When scammers are caught, in theory they could change and a handful do. But it comes back to that attitude thing again. Most who go that route in the first place, don't have it in them to go any other route. And in many ways it's a tougher route, because every time a scam has run its course, there has to be another to replace it, you likely can't make a profit any other way. All a straight business has to do, is keep on doing whatever it is doing.

RawAlex · 03-19-2007, 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JamesK

99% of the paysites links to its affiliate program. It's a standard. You are going way to far, go out and find real leaks like a join page link with no code on it, a refresh or simple affiliate id removal from the url would make the affiliate lose its credit

James, just because webmasters in the past have tolerated this ongoing traffic leak, there is no reason it should be tolerated going forward. Quite simply, it is MY traffic, I should get paid for it, no matter what it does (at least up to any exit consoles).

It is a low percentage number, but what does it hurt the program to have it coded with my affiliate link? To me that would just show a program working hard to make sure everything is 100% for their affiliates.

Sexsitesurfer · 03-19-2007, 08:27 AM

www.ddfcash.com

zibril · 03-19-2007, 08:28 AM

Pussycash is the cleanest one for sure...

adamneve · 03-19-2007, 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tempest

PussyCash only has the affiliate code in "some" of their links thus relying on cookies to really do all the tracking. Since we all know some cookies won't be getting set, it's actually a small shave.

Given I'm not impressed with their "technical" expertice (based on all the various errors/issues I've seen), I simply have no faith that they have any sort of strong session tracking (to try an minimize any cookie loss) that you would get with a system like ccbill. But that's just my opinion.

Pussycash has always been a clean and fair company and we never had any problem with the tracking system and it has been working very well.

If you think you have any problem you are welcome to do a test or contact our reps.

RuthB · 03-19-2007, 08:52 AM

Feel free to check out WEGCash! We're clean and our sites convert!

will76 · 03-19-2007, 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by p1mpdogg

if i put cams.com there, what does that tell you?

idiot.

if... if.... if....

So you sell 404 traffic off of your site to another site?

Ditosta · 03-19-2007, 09:39 AM

we are 100% clean,
We also have a leak free tour option in our WM area

xxxice · 03-19-2007, 09:51 AM

jayeff wanted to know your thoughts on this post
https://gfy.com/12101309-post21.html

from this thread
https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-business-discussion/596416-cookies.html

I tried out what was talked about with my links and got the same thing.

Seems if they want to be clean they should fix this

Brad · 03-19-2007, 09:59 AM

Adult Lounge is as clean as a whistle (a new whistle of course because a used whistle probably isn't really all that clean).

jayeff · 03-19-2007, 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vanderweb

Seems if they want to be clean they should fix this

Certainly... although as per a post I made earlier in this thread, it's a shame so many are focused more on ripping into those who are almost clean than on congratulating them for setting a good example.

It's not that I don't agree with someone who replied before, that it would be good to see all these guys taking the last few steps. But we have had a lot of - often long - threads lately on some of the current "tricks". It has become really difficult to keep track of who hasn't shown up in them and I know I could use a simple reference

To be honest I feel bad that some of the people who are way ahead in the "doing the right thing" stakes have ended up getting knocked. A couple of self-promos in this thread are close to taking the p*ss, but otherwise these are the good guys for now at least.

RawAlex · 03-19-2007, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jayeff

Certainly... although as per a post I made earlier in this thread, it's a shame so many are focused more on ripping into those who are almost clean than on congratulating them for setting a good example.

Well, Jayeff, with due respect, why not post up say 5 good examples to the types of traffic leaks that bother you? Rather than beating around the bush and not naming names, why not get to it and take some clean shots. Obviously the programs that you think are fudging it aren't going to come charging into this thread.

My personal issue is that there are programs calling "clean" that aren't totally clean - but they are a version of clean that for some dumbass reason affiliates are suppose to accept because "it's the norm".

Anyway, so who is on your shitlist? Cite some examples!

xxxice · 03-19-2007, 10:49 AM

My intention is not to bash them for doing a good job. It is hard to congratulate a sponsor for good work when I see my affiliate id disappearing on yes a more minor of an issue. But now we are commending sponsors that are almost clean and not holding them accountable for the small stuff. Seems to me all should be evaluated and when the are clean; they are clean; before that they can continue to make changes until they are. I am with you that their should be more focus on the really bad ones though as well, but just wanted to explain why I was posting what I did.

xxxice · 03-19-2007, 10:58 AM

Also I made an error above and used their instead of there lol. Wanted to add there is a chance with the issue of the members login issue that the sponsor does not realize it is a potential problem. I guess it is best just to inform them and see what they do

03-18-2007, 03:28 PM	#51
Rankings Adult SEO Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: A cat with three legs cannot bury shit in a frozen pond. In addition to that, can you cry underwater? Posts: 10,633	50 Clean Sponsors.. SEE SIG! __________________ Your leader for Adult SEO Services 19+ Years Serving the Adult/SEO Industry ICQ: 610-814 Skype: xratedseo

03-18-2007, 04:24 PM	#54
count of monte cristo Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: monte cristo Posts: 473	would you consider a sponsor who has an ATM-style descriptor and charges in $40.00 increments for their price points shady? hypothetically speaking, of course __________________ premier payment sending company

03-18-2007, 04:31 PM	#55
count of monte cristo Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: monte cristo Posts: 473	nm 123456 __________________ premier payment sending company

03-18-2007, 05:30 PM	#58
NTSS Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Da Hood Posts: 5,688	Interesting thread. Were's the rest of the sponsors? This seems like a very small percentage. Maybe after a couple days we will hear from more or maybe they havent responded already because they aren't "clean" and just don't give a fuck. __________________ ICQ: 150-803-430 Email: marketing7(at)cox(dot)net

03-18-2007, 05:34 PM	#59
CDSmith Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Location: My network is hosted at TECHIEMEDIA.net ...Wait, you meant where am I located at? Oh... okay, I'm in Winnipeg, Canada. Oops. :) Posts: 51,460	Nice to see PussyCash already mentioned a few times. Even their models are clean, like Ivory soap girls. __________________ *Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!* ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!! Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket. ICQ me at: 31024634

03-18-2007, 05:25 PM	#57
RogerV Banned! Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 12,591	no leaks here..

03-18-2007, 06:47 PM	#63
thehand 235 Pound Gorilla Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Valhalla Posts: 3,467	At Video Secrets, we take pride in running a "clean" program:-) __________________ Tim Siner Who the Fu#k is TimSiner?

03-18-2007, 09:56 PM	#65
p1mpdogg Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 16,714	EpicCash is very clean and will count every hit for hit. feel free to audit our stats. __________________ A fast fortune is easy to earn! Just go with a winner!

03-18-2007, 10:19 PM	#66
Brooke Anderson Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Missouri, near Kansas City Posts: 346	I'm clean, as are all the girls at 4 Real Cash __________________ www.4realcash.com

03-19-2007, 02:30 AM	#75
Danny B Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 4,423	We behave too. See my sig for a clean and honest sponsor! __________________ Danny B ICQ: 407485488 SKYPE: DAN-DEVELOPMENT

03-19-2007, 03:10 AM	#77
The Ghost IslandDollars.com Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Icq: 176176 Posts: 12,188	Island Dollars <-- Zero traffic leaks Affiliate tours Joon Mali Asha Kumara Lily Koh There isn't one single traffic leak on our tours. Feel free to check __________________ ISLAND DOLLARS 1000's of Exclusive TS scenes / Constant Updates Best TS Network your surfers will ever join Last edited by The Ghost; 03-19-2007 at 03:11 AM..

03-19-2007, 05:40 AM	#78
gtp Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 152	Two gay gay sponsors are clean for sure: Intensecash Blueloot

03-19-2007, 05:48 AM	#79
o0o_Lizard_o0o Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Philippines Posts: 954	clean and convert like crazy! see sig! __________________ email: [email protected]

03-19-2007, 06:52 AM	#82
Quick Buck Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Free-Trials.......... Weekly-Payouts..... 100+Sites Posts: 1,026	shouldnt be a single leak on any quickbuck tour. if anybody finds one we'd love to know so we can plug it. __________________ $50 FREE TRIALS! Every Day til 2008!!! Only at QuickBuck

03-19-2007, 07:01 AM	#84
SkeetSkeet Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: StarlightBucks ! Posts: 5,404	we are fucking spotless www.starlightbucks.com ... all affiliate links carry your code too ... and your surfers can browse through our family of sites at the bottom of all of our tours, and yes, your unique code carries endlessly through all of them. __________________ ICQ 283633188

03-19-2007, 07:12 AM	#85
xcitecash Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Cambridge UK Posts: 801	we are dirty....

03-19-2007, 08:27 AM	#89
Sexsitesurfer Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Porn land Posts: 3,157	www.ddfcash.com __________________ Paul DDF Productions Marketing manager Skype: Marketing.DDF ICQ: 316302313 Cell: +36 30 732 6076 [email protected]

03-19-2007, 08:28 AM	#90
zibril Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 731	Pussycash is the cleanest one for sure...

03-19-2007, 08:52 AM	#92
RuthB Let's Get Paxumized! Industry Role: Join Date: May 2005 Location: Vancouver, Canada Posts: 7,247	Feel free to check out WEGCash! We're clean and our sites convert! __________________ Send & Receive Mass Global Payments - Mass P2P/Wire/EFT/SEPA - Adult Industry Friendly - Award Winning Payment Service - Fast, Reliable & Secure! Paxum ...... Paxum Bank Email: [email protected] ~ Telegram: PaxumRuth

03-19-2007, 09:39 AM	#94
Ditosta Confirmed User Join Date: May 2006 Location: http://www.neonasty.com Posts: 2,107	we are 100% clean, We also have a leak free tour option in our WM area __________________ 306213883 New Pantyhose Fetish Model LilyDouce.com Rhinopays.com

03-19-2007, 09:51 AM	#95
xxxice Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 5,042	jayeff wanted to know your thoughts on this post https://gfy.com/12101309-post21.html from this thread https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-business-discussion/596416-cookies.html I tried out what was talked about with my links and got the same thing. Seems if they want to be clean they should fix this Last edited by xxxice; 03-19-2007 at 09:52 AM..

03-19-2007, 09:59 AM	#96
Brad Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Toronto Posts: 2,510	Adult Lounge is as clean as a whistle (a new whistle of course because a used whistle probably isn't really all that clean). __________________ Affiliate Manager/Media Buyer ICQ 376 978 529 Skype: bradleyjwscott [email protected]

03-19-2007, 10:49 AM	#99
xxxice Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 5,042	My intention is not to bash them for doing a good job. It is hard to congratulate a sponsor for good work when I see my affiliate id disappearing on yes a more minor of an issue. But now we are commending sponsors that are almost clean and not holding them accountable for the small stuff. Seems to me all should be evaluated and when the are clean; they are clean; before that they can continue to make changes until they are. I am with you that their should be more focus on the really bad ones though as well, but just wanted to explain why I was posting what I did.

03-19-2007, 10:58 AM	#100
xxxice Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 5,042	Also I made an error above and used their instead of there lol. Wanted to add there is a chance with the issue of the members login issue that the sponsor does not realize it is a potential problem. I guess it is best just to inform them and see what they do