Of course he wasn't he aopposed the agreement. Along with Winston Churchill and Anthony Eden.

"On 29th September, 1938, Chamberlain, Adolf Hitler, Edouard Daladier and Benito Mussolini signed the Munich Agreement which transferred to Germany the Sudetenland, a fortified frontier region that contained a large German-speaking population."

Is Chewbacca a wookie? If Chewbacca is a wookie Israel should kick the palestinians ass. So, is Chewbacca a wookie?

"On 29th September, 1938, Chamberlain, Adolf Hitler, Edouard Daladier and Benito Mussolini signed the Munich Agreement which transferred to Germany the Sudetenland, a fortified frontier region that contained a large German-speaking population."


Yes in other words Czechoslovakia was betrayed by UK and France.

Again Chewbacca Defense.

You are as weak as the people you persecute or whine to defend.

Step off that soap box.

You're right Labret hard to even have a conversation when someone picks at the little things and dodges overall words... eh, gotta run folks, later.

Again Chewbacca Defense.

You are as weak as the people you persecute or whine to defend.

Step off that soap box.



--------------------------
WTF are you talking about.
It is obvious you dont have a clue what happened in Munich.
And you dont have a clue about military pact
Czechoslovakia had with UK and France before Munich.

Ya, they told Hitler its unacceptable, than sold Suddets to him and after returh, fucking Chamberlain said:

"My good friends, for the second time in our history, a British Prime Minister has returned from Germany bringing peace with honour. I believe it is peace for our time...
Go home and get a nice quiet sleep."




:1orglaugh

Munich was the ultimate British diplomatic disaster.
The best time to stop Hitler was a rhineland.the second best was munich. Germans would face minimum of three armies french,Czech and british.with bit of luck the other allies of Czechoslovaks would come in to play as well (Yugoslavia and Romania and maybe even Russia). Now Czechs had at that time very capable army, well fortified borders and very good armaments industry. Mobilized Czechoslovakia had 300 000
troops at the border with Germany.Czech tanks were better than the German. Also the front line would be in the mountains.Mountains are not very high but still difficult for a army to pass if as it was the case the defenders hold the high ground and are well fortified.czech air force had very skilled pilots and planes of reasonable quality.(and i do recommend seeing the DARK BLUE WORLD movie)so i am pretty sure that had the British and french stuck to their guns and put their foot down the Hitler would not fight not in 1938. Hitler would be denied access to Czech armament industry and Czech arms and would decently not be ready to start the war when he did.
England paid a big price for Chamnberlain's folly...
In 1938, german army was not strong and had to really on horses for most of its transport.its tanks were very light panzers 1 and 2,and even these were not available in sufficiently large numbers.luftwafe might looked scary but i would like to point to the fact that the prototypes of spitfire me-109 and hurricane flew at proximately the same time the spitfire even earlier than me-109 i think

Yeah, so anyway, like Labret was saying about the middle east....

pardon me but isn't this thread about Israel?

I am sure this all makes sense to Rose.

No this thread was about Cubiclehadeen warrior Labret
jerking off to the article named "Israel faces 'mega-terror' attacks, Sharon warned" and trying to impress the others how rich and educated he is. And something about his Holy war also.

Rose. I am not joking when I say that that is funny shit. My new title.

Cubiclehadeen

I am glad you like it:Graucho

BTW about me bringing 1938 to this.
The policy of appeasing dictators, fanatics and idiots is always a mistake.
1938 or 2002

When war came in 1939 there was a very half-hearted offensive campaign against Germany from the west. With that in mind I don't think Czechoslovakia really stood a chance. The deal that was done might just have been the only really plausible hope for them. But with someone of the mindset of Hitler, compromise is weakness. You can see that in Saddam Hussein today.

Now back to the topic in hand. :winkwink:

When war came in 1939 there was a very half-hearted offensive campaign against Germany from the west. With that in mind I don't think Czechoslovakia really stood a chance. The deal that was done might just have been the only really plausible hope for them. But with someone of the mindset of Hitler, compromise is weakness. You can see that in Saddam Hussein today.

--------------------------------
Not really true. In 1938 the Russians offered help to Czechoslovakia. ( Sadly it was only them)
Russia viewed the rise of Nazi Germany with great concern
at that time. They tried to create an anti-Nazi coalition during the period leading up to the Munich crisis. They declared a willingness to assist Czechoslovakia and go to war with the Third Reich, provided that either Poland or Romania allowed the Red Army transit rights through their territory and Britain and France also went to war.
One year after Munich, Britain and France were at war with the Third Reich anyway while the Russia abandoned its pro-western policy in favor of signing the Nazi-Soviet Pact.

we're appeasing you. Are you saying that's wrong?

jammyjenkins I noticed before that you are just another terrorist lover. You dont have to prove it again.

terrorist lover? hahahaha

burp

That might have been their public position, but even if they would have followed through with it, the Soviet Army of 1938 wasn't really capable of that kind of offensive action after the purges. And the cure would have been just as bad as the illness, anyway.

That might have been their public position, but even if they would have followed through with it, the Soviet Army of 1938 wasn't really capable of that kind of offensive action after the purges. And the cure would have been just as bad as the illness, anyway.
--------------------------------

Yes I somehow agree. But the German Army of 1938 wasn't really capable also.
Czechoslovak army alone was capable holding nazis in the mountains for months. All they needed was a little help.

You can't re-write the history. Problem is people who make the history right now have the same level of stupidity and corruption as it was before and WILL make the same mistakes again.

wow

I'm blinded by the strength of your argument

so intelligent

so thought through

you sound like an israeli lover

and they bomb women and children

you must be so proud

canada really should tighten up it's immigration policy...

jammyjenkins dont worry about Canada. Canada is just fine.
Worry about your Arab brothers

you sound like an palestinian lover

and they bomb women and children

you must also be so proud

oops nm

jammyjenkins
people like you are trying to say that the poor palestinians
are nice and peacefull people. Then tell me why
Jordan killed thousands of these nice people 30 years ago.
And why Kuwait forcibly evicted about 300,000 Palestinians
just short 10 years ago. After Gulf War.
Even Saudi Arabia kicked out about 350,000 Palestinians
after Gulf War.
And BTW why after King Hussein drove Arafat and his Palestinians into Lebanon, Arafat began a reign of terror against
Lebanese people. 1 000's of Lebanese were murdered, raped and tortured by Arafat's Palestinians.

Why?

Quoting...

Jordan was the only Arab country to welcome the Palestinians and grant them citizenship (to this day Jordan is the only Arab country where Palestinians as a group can become citizens). King Abdullah considered the Palestinian Arabs and Jordanians one people. By 1950, he annexed the West Bank and forbade the use of the term Palestine in official documents.

Jordan ROUTINELY kills Palestinian militants.




Quoting...

The treatment of the refugees in the decade following their displacement was best summed up by a former director of UNRWA, Ralph Garroway, in August 1958: "The Arab States do not want to solve the refugee problem. They want to keep it as an open sore, as an affront to the United Nations and as a weapon against Israel. Arab leaders don't give a damn whether the refugees live or die."

Little has changed in succeeding years. Arab governments have frequently offered jobs, housing, land and other benefits to Arabs and non-Arabs, excluding Palestinians. For example, Saudi Arabia chose not to use unemployed Palestinian refugees to alleviate its labor shortage in the late 1970's and early 1980's. Instead, thousands of South Koreans and other Asians were recruited to fill jobs.

The situation grew even worse in the wake of the Gulf War. Kuwait, which employed large numbers of Palestinians but denied them citizenship, expelled more than 300,000 of them. "If people pose a security threat, as a sovereign country we have the right to exclude anyone we don't want," said Kuwaiti Ambassador to the United States, Saud Nasir Al-Sabah (Jerusalem Report, June 27, 1991).

Certain Muslim states fear militant Islam spreading in their country. Even Saddam Hussein kills militants at every chance that try and infiltrate from Iran.


Rose.

For someone so knowledgeable on middle eastern relations, you sure as fuck dont pay much attention.

Mulsims kill Muslims. Much in the same way the Christians have killed other Christian. Take the Iran / Iraq war for example. Or Saudi Arabia / Kuwait / Iraq. Or even more recently.. the Taliban versus the Northern Alliance. You try and lump all Muslims into the same category and without much success. Again, apples and oranges Rose. focus.... foooocuuuus. Anyone ever call you scatterbrained? Many women are like that, cant focus on one topic for more than 3 minutes. Or you get them talking and they cover 47 topics in 6 minutes. Anyhow, I digress.

And probably because you didnt catch this the first time:



Largely true.

You can see its effects in Europe where alot of people see through the Zionist bullshit.

Is this also true Labret?




-- Here is the Palestinian war strategy:

-- Kill as many Israeli woman and children as possible.

-- The Palestinians are duplicitous, back-stabbing extortionists saying
"If you don't give us what we want, we will murder your women and children."

-- When Israel retaliates, scream bloody murder

-- The Palestinian terrorists then hide among civilians and their houses, hoping the destruction will horrify the world

-- When the inevitable Israeli pullout occurs, run behind shooting as if they are driving
them out

-- The Palestinians have no military objective they can hope to achieve. Their only aim is to increase their body count and further shock the world.


The Palestinians live in squalor, because their leaders keep them in it, not because of Israel. Its not in the Palestinian leaders best interest, to normalize life for their people. If they did, there would be no need for them.

Eye for an eye.



It should be more something to the effect "if you kill our women and children, we will kill your women and children".



When Palestinians retaliate against Zionist state sponsored terrorism.

If someone killed my children and bulldozed down my house... I would cry as well.



Oh thats right. They should run to their military bases. Oh wait... they dont have any. Raheems apartment is his base dip shit.



Yes, those god damn 14 year olds with their rocks and bottles.



See below.

ohhhhh.... so thats why they are all mad? Lookie everyone, Rose found the root of the Arab / Israeli conflict! Its the Palestinian desire to be unemployed and living in filth.... hopefully one day dying for Allah.

You had blonde hair in that pic you posted yesterday didnt you?

Stop it.... STOP ITTTT!!! Y-You're KILLING ME!!!

I am truly rolling on the fuggin floor laughing my albeitly killer ass off.

:1orglaugh




Interesting debate though. Is it safe to assume that both sides in the conflict (Isreali and Arabic, not Rat and Rose) have legitimate grievances? Each side also has done things that no one should be proud of, correct? Since this is the case, and the situation has been argued to death for decades now, maybe the answer is more basic rather than complex. To me, it comes down to two scenarios.....

1. Isreal vacates the premises.

2. War. Not little border disputes. War. All-out insanity at it's finest.

Since neither side is ever going to back down, one can safely assume that scenario 2 will become reality in a relatively short period of time.
That is, unless..... (you fill in the blank)

You can see its effects in Europe where alot of people see through the Zionist bullshit.
----------------------------------------

Labret you can not be serious.
Have you ever been to Europe.
I spend a month a year in Europe. Almost all my family lives there
(germany and Czech republic).
If you think general population cares about Palestinians
you are dreaming.
People there are mostly racist.
You see racism there a lot more there than here in North America.
I can tell you that they can not stand the Arabs.
Do not listen just to Liberal EU politicians.

I must admit that [Labret] does a fantastic job representing the KKK in this board, and that's ok, the world would be a boring place to live in without a few brave people that spread their hate towards Israel.
I'm a native Israeli who lives in central Israel near Tel Aviv.
Let me react to some of the points that were discussed here.

As far as I'm concerned, I live here because I was born here in 1972 and because the UN voted for the establishment of the state of Israel.
That's all I need to know that I deserve to live here.
This is my country, that's where I live and not me nor the rest of the 6.5 million Israelis who live here have any plans to relocate.
I have no doubt that if tomorrow the Indians will start a terror campaign aimed at American citizens, [Labret] will instantly suggest that all of you should really give back New York, LA, Florida (we can host Internext in other locations) & Chicago.

After all, the Indians were here first - right ? so who will blame them if they will send a suicide bomber to your nearest McDonald's or to your son's school.
You stole their land, you built you "colonies" on it, you humiliated them - it's only fair that you'll give all that land back, pack you bags and move back to Europe, Africa and the rest of the places that you came from.
There can't be a double standard of course, and a Palestinian's blood is not more red than and Indian's who's land has been stolen.

Do I sound ridiculous ?
Well, actually I am.
No, the wheel can't be turned back, you will not evacuate your cities and no, you will not go back to wherever you came from and yes, you will kill anybody that will try to attack your citizens in a systematic terror campaign.
Terrorism is not tolerable.
When you send suicide bombers to blow a hotel, a restaurant, a school or the twin towers, I don't give a fuck about your motives.
I will have you killed no matter what, because it's either me or you (and I don't want it to be me).

In 1948 the UN offered to divide the land to 2 states: an Israeli one and a Palestinian one.
We said yes, the Arabs said no and started a war against us with 5 armies.
They lost.
In 1967 the scenario repeated itself.
5 Arab countries, including Jordan and Egypt that ruled the Palestinians at that time (did you know that ?) attacked us again.
They lost and we won their territories in a war that they started.
You can't start a war and then bitch around that your territories have been taken from you after you lose.
In 2000, during the Camp David summit, the Palestinians were offered another peace deal.
Like in 48 - they refused and started the terror campaign.

I'm not an extreme right wing Israeli.
In fact, up until 2000 I always voted for the left and for peace.
Today I know that peace can't be done with terrorists.
That's why you, the Americans, didn't try to reach a deal with Osama Bin Laden and that's why you're not trying to reach a deal with Saddam Hussein.
Terrorists should always be hunted and killed.
It's either them or you and you received a waking call from hell on 9/11.

Many criticize GW Bush.
I don't belong to that camp.
Why should I ? After all he's the first American president that looks at the reality as it is and not putting his head in the sand.
He's leading a global campaign against terror, he turned Afghanistan into a sand box after they fucked with the US and he's after Saddam now (a thing that I strongly support).
I know Saddam very well.
I live in Ramat Gan, the most heavily bombarded city by Scud missiles in 1991 during the gulf war.
I know what he's capable of and I know that if Israel did not bombard his nuclear plant in 1981, that man would have had many nuclear war heads by now.

I hope that some day, a reasonable, terror free Palestinian leadership will emerge.
Then and only then I will be more than happy to sit at the negotiating table and try to cut a deal.
Mean while, I'll support all anti terror steps taken by my government.
In fact, only a couple of days ago, I received a green letter from the army, calling me for 35 days of reserve military service, so I guess I'll be fighting terrorism personally.

2. War. Not little border disputes. War. All-out insanity at it's finest.

---------------------------------------
CDSmith I can not agree more.
There is gonna be a war.

I must admit that [Labret] does a fantastic job representing the KKK in this board
----------------------------

No I dont think that our Cubiclehadeen warrior represents KKK.
Not even KKK is stuck in some 1000's years old Holy War

I found this kind of interesting,
in a primary schoolish sort of way.....

"<i>The word you've entered isn't in the dictionary. Click on a spelling suggestion below or try again using the Dictionary search box to the right."
</i><b>
Suggestions for Cubiclehadeen: </b><i>
1. kickboards
2. captionless
3. capsulized
4. chipboards
5. capacitated
6. capsicums
7. capsulated
8. Septuagesima
9. capsulizes
10. capacitates </i>


The meanings of a few of those words might apply to Labrat, but in an oblique sort of way.
I suppose.


Sorry, I'm just not familiar with the term "cubiclehadeen"... is it a colloquial insult?

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Rose
Cubiclehadeen

I am glad you like it
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I found this kind of interesting,
in a primary schoolish sort of way.....

"The word you've entered isn't in the dictionary. Click on a spelling suggestion below or try again using the Dictionary search box to the right."

Suggestions for Cubiclehadeen:
1. kickboards
2. captionless
3. capsulized
4. chipboards
5. capacitated
6. capsicums
7. capsulated
8. Septuagesima
9. capsulizes
10. capacitates


The meanings of a few of those words might apply to Labrat, but in an oblique sort of way.
I suppose.


Sorry, I'm just not familiar with the term "cubiclehadeen"... is it a colloquial insult?

-----------------------------------

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh
I dont think you can find it in the dictionary...

I dunno...I think if a tribe of American Indians blew up Labret's house, car, cats and girlfriend, he would immediately understand their position, and give them back their land.