Legally speaking - are a transvestite's boobs 'breasts' ? - GoFuckYourself.com

who · 12-16-2006, 09:00 PM

Don't ask why I'm thinking about this issue, please.

I wonder, though, in the legal world, say for example a tranny pops her tits out - can she be arrested for public nudity? I mean, if a topless man in the same situation is perfectly ok.

Can she argue that they aren't breasts and she's a man and there's no law against a man hooning around without a top on?

BoyAlley · 12-16-2006, 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by who

Can she argue that they aren't breasts and she's a man and there's no law against a man hooning around without a top on?

I've seen this question before, and it makes Christian Evangelical's, and most Republican's, heads explode, so watch out for flying dark matter.

On one hand, they don't want the government to recognize them legally as women, on the other hand, they don't want them to be able to flash their titts. They're in a no-win situation.

I have NO IDEA what the actual laws are on this though.......

who · 12-16-2006, 09:08 PM

Hmm. Well, thanks for the reply.

-SECCO- · 12-16-2006, 09:10 PM

i'd have to touch them first to be able to decide

BoyAlley · 12-16-2006, 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by who

Hmm. Well, thanks for the reply.

As a matter of fact, I have no idea why men are allowed to walk around topless but women aren't. Seems kind of ridiculous to me, but then again maybe that's cuz I'm gay.

I mean, I understand it's because breasts are objects of sexual lust, but......

I'd think breasts would become less of an object of sexual lust if they were openly displayed, and not something hidden away all of the time.

Hell, in some countries a bare ankle or wrist on a women is an object of lust, as they're always covered in public.

Crazy breeders and their crazy breeder laws...............

OG LennyT · 12-16-2006, 09:21 PM

Tranny boobs at http://ladyboyoasis.com

who · 12-16-2006, 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoyAlley

As a matter of fact, I have no idea why men are allowed to walk around topless but women aren't. Seems kind of ridiculous to me, but then again maybe that's cuz I'm gay.

I mean, I understand it's because breasts are objects of sexual lust, but......

I'd think breasts would become less of an object of sexual lust if they were openly displayed, and not something hidden away all of the time.

Hell, in some countries a bare ankle or wrist on a women is an object of lust, as they're always covered in public.

Crazy breeders and their crazy breeder laws...............

Well the people making the laws are often sexually deprived men who are so far beyond the 'age of consent' that they've poked through to the other side. They are not sexually active. They think nobody else should be. They do they uttmost to deprive others of the things they are deprived of. That is, nobody should be allowed to see breasts because, they never get to.

For goodness sake, us humans are demented. We allow some of us to create laws which the rest of us disagree with, but nevertheless we force ourselves to comply with them. We are so... unnatural.

What about women breast feeding their children in public - illegal? Yes. (irrc)

Why? Because we're all deeply ashamed of our bodies. Why are we? Because of laws that force us to mask them and consider them to be 'dirty'.

Arrgh I can't even think coherently

My brain can't remember the topic anymore.

Z · 12-16-2006, 09:36 PM

I'm with boyalley on this one. Women should walk around topless, freely and legally.

spacedog · 12-16-2006, 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Z

I'm with boyalley on this one. Women should walk around topless, freely and legally.

fuck yeah

well, except the fat ones, old ones & ugly ones.

websiex · 12-16-2006, 09:52 PM

I don't know specific local laws, but I'd guess that when a tranny gets a ticket for public nudity, the defense "I am a man and they're fake" wouldn't work. I doubt it says 'women' specifically in laws because that would be a "status offense" type crime except the offender is a woman and not a minor.

Most laws just say something like 'vulgar and offensive nakedness in a public place'. Guilty as charged if breasts are considered vulgar and offensive in that local.

Spunky · 12-16-2006, 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -SECCO-

i'd have to touch them first to be able to decide

Homo

who · 12-16-2006, 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by websiex

I don't know specific local laws, but I'd guess that when a tranny gets a ticket for public nudity, the defense "I am a man and they're fake" wouldn't work. I doubt it says 'women' specifically in laws because that would be a "status offense" type crime except the offender is a woman and not a minor.

Most laws just say something like 'vulgar and offensive nakedness in a public place'. Guilty as charged if breasts are considered vulgar and offensive in that local.

Ok I see what you mean. But again, she can argue that they aren't breasts. I suppose they'd be able to say 'nipples' though.

Barefootsies · 12-16-2006, 10:12 PM

SPACE GLIDER · 12-16-2006, 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by who

Don't ask why I'm thinking about this issue, please.

I wonder, though, in the legal world, say for example a tranny pops her tits out - can she be arrested for public nudity? I mean, if a topless man in the same situation is perfectly ok.

Can she argue that they aren't breasts and she's a man and there's no law against a man hooning around without a top on?

Are they mammary glands biologically like a woman's. if so, yes. If not, no.

12-17-2006, 12:12 AM

Cans

5.6.7.8

kmanrox · 12-17-2006, 12:29 AM

a transvestite wouldnt have boobs... a transexual would though.. and yes, a fake boob is a fake boob no matter which way you look at it..

Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE · 12-17-2006, 09:26 AM

Very nice valid question

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoyAlley

I'd think breasts would become less of an object of sexual lust if they were openly displayed, and not something hidden away all of the time.............

Alot of women lust for mens nipples also, 9 out of ten women I have been with loved to play with my nipples, and it is sexually stimulating to me....

I say mens nipples are way more a sexual object then womens due to the fact that womens breast/nipples serve a non sexual purpose as were mens have no other purpose, but to make our cock rise when attention is paid to them!

Quote:

Originally Posted by who

What about women breast feeding their children in public - illegal? Yes.

Don't hold me to this, but I believe it is not illegal... I have three kids that where all breast fed, and in many cases it was done in public with no problems ever!

ajrocks · 12-17-2006, 09:38 AM

Who cares they still have man nipples! ACK!

dragon9 · 12-17-2006, 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Z

I'm with boyalley on this one. Women should walk around topless, freely and legally.

I agree

-SECCO- · 12-17-2006, 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spunky

Homo

in the name of law of course

madawgz · 12-17-2006, 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Z

I'm with boyalley on this one. Women should walk around topless, freely and legally.

that would be the day

Nookster · 12-17-2006, 12:35 PM

Uhm, technically men and women both have 'breasts'. Taken biology...ever?
Here's a quote from Wiki...

Quote:

Originally Posted by wikipedia

This article focuses on human female breasts, but male humans also have breasts (although usually less prominent) that are structurally identical and homologous to the female, as they develop embryologically from the same tissues.

DutchTeenCash · 12-17-2006, 01:06 PM

hmm same issue with trannies and toilets

didnt somebody post trannies have to go to the mens room in some asian country? EVEN if they had like a complete sexchange operation even.

Fucked up.

who · 12-17-2006, 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nookster

Uhm, technically men and women both have 'breasts'. Taken biology...ever?
Here's a quote from Wiki...

Are we talking biology or criminal law? Please at least read the thread title. Thanks for your post.

Crasy Bitch · 12-17-2006, 01:20 PM

I always thought they were called Bitch Tits

aico · 12-17-2006, 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoyAlley

I've seen this question before, and it makes Christian Evangelical's, and most Republican's, heads explode, so watch out for flying dark matter.

On one hand, they don't want the government to recognize them legally as women, on the other hand, they don't want them to be able to flash their titts. They're in a no-win situation.

I have NO IDEA what the actual laws are on this though.......

Thanks for clearing that up for us.

Chris Corn · 12-17-2006, 06:12 PM

Its 100% legal here in Ontario and yet i have NEVER seen to this day a girl topless in public! I dont go looking, but despite it being recently legal, in the last 5 years no girl does it! Why not? Because they dont want people stare at them. It has nothing to do with the law, rather the law was to protect women (and their husbands) from showing off something that is naturally sexual.

reynold · 12-17-2006, 06:34 PM

I thought breasts are boobs are breasts and breasts are boobs..

bizman2960 · 12-17-2006, 06:38 PM

I checked with my lawyer. He said the legal rule is if they can titty-fuck, then they are boobs.

SPACE GLIDER · 12-18-2006, 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ajrocks

Who cares they still have man nipples! ACK!

why do guys have nipples anyway?

12-16-2006, 09:00 PM	#1
who So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: ICQ #23642053 Posts: 19,593	Legally speaking - are a transvestite's boobs 'breasts' ? Don't ask why I'm thinking about this issue, please. I wonder, though, in the legal world, say for example a tranny pops her tits out - can she be arrested for public nudity? I mean, if a topless man in the same situation is perfectly ok. Can she argue that they aren't breasts and she's a man and there's no law against a man hooning around without a top on?

12-16-2006, 09:10 PM	#4
-SECCO- Confirmed User Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 1,145	i'd have to touch them first to be able to decide __________________ what?

12-16-2006, 09:21 PM	#6
OG LennyT Wall Street Pimp Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Phoenix, AZ Posts: 14,345	Tranny boobs at http://ladyboyoasis.com __________________ Tradeking - my online broker \| 4.95 a trade \| make real $$

12-16-2006, 10:12 PM	#13
Barefootsies Choice is an Illusion Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Land of Obama Posts: 42,635	__________________ Should You Email Your Members? Link1 \| Link2 \| Link3 Enough Said. "Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"

12-17-2006, 12:29 AM	#16
kmanrox aka K-Man Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: The Gutter Posts: 29,292	a transvestite wouldnt have boobs... a transexual would though.. and yes, a fake boob is a fake boob no matter which way you look at it.. __________________ Crypto HODLr Crypto mining Angel investor

12-16-2006, 09:08 PM	#3
who So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: ICQ #23642053 Posts: 19,593	Hmm. Well, thanks for the reply.

12-16-2006, 09:36 PM	#8
Z Vidi Vici Veni Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 6,308	I'm with boyalley on this one. Women should walk around topless, freely and legally.

12-16-2006, 09:52 PM	#10
websiex Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Pennsylvania, United States of America Posts: 987	I don't know specific local laws, but I'd guess that when a tranny gets a ticket for public nudity, the defense "I am a man and they're fake" wouldn't work. I doubt it says 'women' specifically in laws because that would be a "status offense" type crime except the offender is a woman and not a minor. Most laws just say something like 'vulgar and offensive nakedness in a public place'. Guilty as charged if breasts are considered vulgar and offensive in that local.

12-17-2006, 12:12 AM	#15
teh ghey Guest Posts: n/a	Cans 5.6.7.8

12-17-2006, 09:38 AM	#18
ajrocks Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: On Uranus Posts: 4,526	Who cares they still have man nipples! ACK! __________________ SEO Strategy - Digital Strategy - Cannabis Lead Generation Skype aj.durden1

12-17-2006, 01:06 PM	#23
DutchTeenCash I like Dutch Girls Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: dutchteencash.com Posts: 21,684	hmm same issue with trannies and toilets didnt somebody post trannies have to go to the mens room in some asian country? EVEN if they had like a complete sexchange operation even. Fucked up. __________________ ICQ 16 91 547 - SKYPE dutchteencash bob AT dutchteencash DOT com ... did you see our newest Sweet Natural Girl Priscilla (18)?

12-17-2006, 01:20 PM	#25
Crasy Bitch Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Ottawa, Canada Posts: 598	I always thought they were called Bitch Tits __________________ Behind every great woman, is a guy looking at her ass.

12-17-2006, 06:12 PM	#27
Chris Corn Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Canada Posts: 237	Its 100% legal here in Ontario and yet i have NEVER seen to this day a girl topless in public! I dont go looking, but despite it being recently legal, in the last 5 years no girl does it! Why not? Because they dont want people stare at them. It has nothing to do with the law, rather the law was to protect women (and their husbands) from showing off something that is naturally sexual. __________________ I shoot video. Corn.Christopher (at) gmail.com ICQ 212-072-421

12-17-2006, 06:34 PM	#28
reynold Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Global Traveler Posts: 51,271	I thought breasts are boobs are breasts and breasts are boobs..

12-17-2006, 06:38 PM	#29
bizman2960 Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 358	I checked with my lawyer. He said the legal rule is if they can titty-fuck, then they are boobs. __________________ The Young Sluts!!! BizMan2960 at gmail.com :: ICQ 486-450-912