GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Legally speaking - are a transvestite's boobs 'breasts' ? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=687500)

who 12-16-2006 09:00 PM

Legally speaking - are a transvestite's boobs 'breasts' ?
 
Don't ask why I'm thinking about this issue, please. :thumbsup

I wonder, though, in the legal world, say for example a tranny pops her tits out - can she be arrested for public nudity? I mean, if a topless man in the same situation is perfectly ok.

Can she argue that they aren't breasts and she's a man and there's no law against a man hooning around without a top on?

BoyAlley 12-16-2006 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by who (Post 11539946)
Can she argue that they aren't breasts and she's a man and there's no law against a man hooning around without a top on?

I've seen this question before, and it makes Christian Evangelical's, and most Republican's, heads explode, so watch out for flying dark matter.

On one hand, they don't want the government to recognize them legally as women, on the other hand, they don't want them to be able to flash their titts. They're in a no-win situation.

I have NO IDEA what the actual laws are on this though.......

who 12-16-2006 09:08 PM

Hmm. Well, thanks for the reply.

-SECCO- 12-16-2006 09:10 PM

i'd have to touch them first to be able to decide

BoyAlley 12-16-2006 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by who (Post 11539964)
Hmm. Well, thanks for the reply.

As a matter of fact, I have no idea why men are allowed to walk around topless but women aren't. Seems kind of ridiculous to me, but then again maybe that's cuz I'm gay.

I mean, I understand it's because breasts are objects of sexual lust, but......

I'd think breasts would become less of an object of sexual lust if they were openly displayed, and not something hidden away all of the time.

Hell, in some countries a bare ankle or wrist on a women is an object of lust, as they're always covered in public.

Crazy breeders and their crazy breeder laws...............

OG LennyT 12-16-2006 09:21 PM

Tranny boobs at http://ladyboyoasis.com

who 12-16-2006 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoyAlley (Post 11539982)
As a matter of fact, I have no idea why men are allowed to walk around topless but women aren't. Seems kind of ridiculous to me, but then again maybe that's cuz I'm gay.

I mean, I understand it's because breasts are objects of sexual lust, but......

I'd think breasts would become less of an object of sexual lust if they were openly displayed, and not something hidden away all of the time.

Hell, in some countries a bare ankle or wrist on a women is an object of lust, as they're always covered in public.

Crazy breeders and their crazy breeder laws...............

Well the people making the laws are often sexually deprived men who are so far beyond the 'age of consent' that they've poked through to the other side. They are not sexually active. They think nobody else should be. They do they uttmost to deprive others of the things they are deprived of. That is, nobody should be allowed to see breasts because, they never get to. :upsidedow

For goodness sake, us humans are demented. We allow some of us to create laws which the rest of us disagree with, but nevertheless we force ourselves to comply with them. We are so... unnatural.

What about women breast feeding their children in public - illegal? Yes. (irrc)

Why? Because we're all deeply ashamed of our bodies. Why are we? Because of laws that force us to mask them and consider them to be 'dirty'.

Arrgh I can't even think coherently :mad:

My brain can't remember the topic anymore.

Z 12-16-2006 09:36 PM

I'm with boyalley on this one. Women should walk around topless, freely and legally.

spacedog 12-16-2006 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Z (Post 11540033)
I'm with boyalley on this one. Women should walk around topless, freely and legally.

fuck yeah :thumbsup

well, except the fat ones, old ones & ugly ones.

websiex 12-16-2006 09:52 PM

I don't know specific local laws, but I'd guess that when a tranny gets a ticket for public nudity, the defense "I am a man and they're fake" wouldn't work. I doubt it says 'women' specifically in laws because that would be a "status offense" type crime except the offender is a woman and not a minor.

Most laws just say something like 'vulgar and offensive nakedness in a public place'. Guilty as charged if breasts are considered vulgar and offensive in that local.

Spunky 12-16-2006 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -SECCO- (Post 11539968)
i'd have to touch them first to be able to decide

Homo :helpme

who 12-16-2006 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by websiex (Post 11540102)
I don't know specific local laws, but I'd guess that when a tranny gets a ticket for public nudity, the defense "I am a man and they're fake" wouldn't work. I doubt it says 'women' specifically in laws because that would be a "status offense" type crime except the offender is a woman and not a minor.

Most laws just say something like 'vulgar and offensive nakedness in a public place'. Guilty as charged if breasts are considered vulgar and offensive in that local.

Ok I see what you mean. But again, she can argue that they aren't breasts. I suppose they'd be able to say 'nipples' though.

Barefootsies 12-16-2006 10:12 PM


SPACE GLIDER 12-16-2006 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by who (Post 11539946)
Don't ask why I'm thinking about this issue, please. :thumbsup

I wonder, though, in the legal world, say for example a tranny pops her tits out - can she be arrested for public nudity? I mean, if a topless man in the same situation is perfectly ok.

Can she argue that they aren't breasts and she's a man and there's no law against a man hooning around without a top on?

Are they mammary glands biologically like a woman's. if so, yes. If not, no.

teh ghey 12-17-2006 12:12 AM

Cans

5.6.7.8

kmanrox 12-17-2006 12:29 AM

a transvestite wouldnt have boobs... a transexual would though.. and yes, a fake boob is a fake boob no matter which way you look at it..

Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE 12-17-2006 09:26 AM

Very nice valid question :thumbsup

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoyAlley (Post 11539982)
I'd think breasts would become less of an object of sexual lust if they were openly displayed, and not something hidden away all of the time.............

Alot of women lust for mens nipples also, 9 out of ten women I have been with loved to play with my nipples, and it is sexually stimulating to me....

I say mens nipples are way more a sexual object then womens due to the fact that womens breast/nipples serve a non sexual purpose as were mens have no other purpose, but to make our cock rise when attention is paid to them!



Quote:

Originally Posted by who (Post 11540003)
What about women breast feeding their children in public - illegal? Yes.


Don't hold me to this, but I believe it is not illegal... I have three kids that where all breast fed, and in many cases it was done in public with no problems ever!

ajrocks 12-17-2006 09:38 AM

Who cares they still have man nipples! ACK!

dragon9 12-17-2006 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Z (Post 11540033)
I'm with boyalley on this one. Women should walk around topless, freely and legally.

I agree:thumbsup

-SECCO- 12-17-2006 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spunky (Post 11540157)
Homo :helpme

in the name of law of course

madawgz 12-17-2006 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Z (Post 11540033)
I'm with boyalley on this one. Women should walk around topless, freely and legally.

that would be the day :thumbsup :thumbsup

Nookster 12-17-2006 12:35 PM

Uhm, technically men and women both have 'breasts'. Taken biology...ever?
Here's a quote from Wiki...

DutchTeenCash 12-17-2006 01:06 PM

hmm same issue with trannies and toilets

didnt somebody post trannies have to go to the mens room in some asian country? EVEN if they had like a complete sexchange operation even.

Fucked up.

who 12-17-2006 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nookster (Post 11542542)
Uhm, technically men and women both have 'breasts'. Taken biology...ever?
Here's a quote from Wiki...

Are we talking biology or criminal law? Please at least read the thread title. Thanks for your post.

Crasy Bitch 12-17-2006 01:20 PM

I always thought they were called Bitch Tits

aico 12-17-2006 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoyAlley (Post 11539958)
I've seen this question before, and it makes Christian Evangelical's, and most Republican's, heads explode, so watch out for flying dark matter.

On one hand, they don't want the government to recognize them legally as women, on the other hand, they don't want them to be able to flash their titts. They're in a no-win situation.

I have NO IDEA what the actual laws are on this though.......

Thanks for clearing that up for us. :upsidedow

Chris Corn 12-17-2006 06:12 PM

Its 100% legal here in Ontario and yet i have NEVER seen to this day a girl topless in public! I dont go looking, but despite it being recently legal, in the last 5 years no girl does it! Why not? Because they dont want people stare at them. It has nothing to do with the law, rather the law was to protect women (and their husbands) from showing off something that is naturally sexual.

reynold 12-17-2006 06:34 PM

I thought breasts are boobs are breasts and breasts are boobs..

bizman2960 12-17-2006 06:38 PM

I checked with my lawyer. He said the legal rule is if they can titty-fuck, then they are boobs.

SPACE GLIDER 12-18-2006 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ajrocks (Post 11542030)
Who cares they still have man nipples! ACK!

why do guys have nipples anyway?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123