US Plans on Invading Iraq... - GoFuckYourself.com

B40 · 07-05-2002, 01:09 PM

Not only that but with land, air and sea forces..

And from the North, South and West..

They're not fucking around.

funkmaster · 07-05-2002, 01:10 PM

... now that´s news ... where were you hiding for the past 2 years ??

kenny · 07-05-2002, 01:14 PM

Sadam wouldn't let weapons inspectors inspect, bush says he isn't going to wait to see what Iraq has.

B40 · 07-05-2002, 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by funkmaster
... now that´s news ... where were you hiding for the past 2 years ??

Umm...it actually is news..

http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/07/05/ira...eut/index.html

Posted 11:41 am today..

So go fuck yourself

Marcus · 07-05-2002, 01:19 PM

whatever happened to capturing Osama?
Shouldn't that be the #1 priority?

B40 · 07-05-2002, 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Marcus
whatever happened to capturing Osama?
Shouldn't that be the #1 priority?

Gave up looking for him?

nocostporn · 07-05-2002, 01:20 PM

WW3 is upon us... Sadam won't go out like a pussy

kenny · 07-05-2002, 01:21 PM

He is hanging with Sadam they will get them both at ounce

mike503 · 07-05-2002, 01:21 PM

why invade. we should nuke.

who will miss them?

hyper · 07-05-2002, 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Marcus
whatever happened to capturing Osama?
Shouldn't that be the #1 priority?

They are idiots.
if they cant capture osama what makes you think they can capture saddam.

they are just gonna make him run and hide somewhere.

All this media attention is fucking stupid.
just go in there wipe them out, then let CNN have the story

Just the Village Idiot · 07-05-2002, 01:23 PM

Quote:

WW3 is upon us... Sadam won't go out like a pussy

Sadam is a pussy! Just like his "armed forces"!

LOL!

Iraq

kenny · 07-05-2002, 01:28 PM

Even if Iraq does have nukes they don't have the means to deliever them, with their PS2 technology

Just the Village Idiot · 07-05-2002, 01:28 PM

Quote:

They are idiots. if they cant capture osama what makes you think they can capture saddam.

I personally know a sniper who had Sadam in the crosshairs during the gulf war and couldn't get the order to fire -- it too bad.

We want him gone -- he's gone... no doubt about it!

Marcus · 07-05-2002, 01:29 PM

These poor families that lost people in 911, it's bad enough that their loved ones died horrible painful deaths but nothing was fucking done about it. We freed a bunch of Afgan people.

um..yay

what about the people who did this to us? No fucking retribution, just "he's in hiding somewhere. Oh and watch your back because there are thousands of cells waiting to stike when you least expect it. And since theres nothing we can do about it we're going to go after another Sadam. Have a nice day"

playa · 07-05-2002, 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by nocostporn
WW3 is upon us... Sadam won't go out like a pussy

LOL,,, did you say the samething in Desert Storm?

or maybe after 10 years Iraq's armed forces got better soldiers,,

playa · 07-05-2002, 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kenny
Even if Iraq does have nukes they don't have the means to deliever them, with their PS2 technology

you must of forget their superior scud missiles
not to mention their great Air Force
(if they can get them off the ground)

i'd just be worried more with terrorist attacks here in the states

kenny · 07-05-2002, 01:33 PM

Since Xbox came out, Iraq's forces are more advanced

nocostporn · 07-05-2002, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by playa

LOL,,, did you say the samething in Desert Storm?

or maybe after 10 years Iraq's armed forces got better soldiers,,

Yeah true but shit seems a hell of a lot different now...People are getting desperate for their "cause"... As soon as 1 country goes nuclear,and it will happen eventually,be prepared...
With all the technology now you don't think an event can take place 5x's more devastating than any other war?... it will happen and most likely will happen to the U.S. if anybody...

funkmaster · 07-05-2002, 01:46 PM

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2000/...in233586.shtml

... so where have you been hiding, smartfuck ?

Steve · 07-05-2002, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by nocostporn
WW3 is upon us... Sadam won't go out like a pussy

so you mean it will take MORE than four days to waste this jack-off?

B40 · 07-05-2002, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by funkmaster
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2000/...in233586.shtml

... so where have you been hiding, smartfuck ?

That says nothing about attacking by land, air and sea, yes it is old news about invading Iraq. But the report about attacking by land air and sea and from the North, South, and West is new.

Choker · 07-05-2002, 01:50 PM

That is just contingency plans. Hell we even got those made in case we ever need to invade Canada.

Gutterboy · 07-05-2002, 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Choker
That is just contingency plans. Hell we even got those made in case we ever need to invade Canada.

I fear it is Shrub's re-election plans. Before Sept. 11th Shrub was a 1 term president with no mandate, questions about the legitimacy of his administration, and an approval rating in the low 50's. Afterwards he became Shrub the Magnificent, protector and defender of the free world. The only political talent he has shown is the ability to use the patriotism arising from Sept. 11th to stifle dissent and debate over his administrations failings in pretty much every other area of domestic and international policy.

Unfortunately that Sept. 11th political capital is running out. His approval ratings are again falling, and people are beginning to speak openly about the large number of non-combatant Afghan civillians that have been mistakenly killed in this "war." This wouldn't be so bad if there were tangible positive results. So far the progress consists of the Taliban being replaced with an only slightly less repressive group of Islamic fundamentalists.

We all should remember what happened to Bush Sr. 10 years ago. His ratings soared after the Gulf War for a year, then died, and he lost the election over policy issues 2 years later. Shrub apparently learned from that. When his ability to flog this "war" for votes and ratings points fails, he'll just start another one.

But maybe I'm just cynical!

.:Frog:. · 07-05-2002, 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Marcus

um..yay

what about the people who did this to us? No fucking retribution, just "he's in hiding somewhere. Oh and watch your back because there are thousands of cells waiting to stike when you least expect it. And since theres nothing we can do about it we're going to go after another Sadam. Have a nice day"

Thats the truth.

FATPad · 07-05-2002, 02:44 PM

So I take it none of you were listening when everyone and their mother who was in a position to know said this had the potential to be an operation that went on for years, right?

Maybe the rest of the world is right...Americans are stupid people with no ability to last in a long conflict. They want everything tidied up and done in 2 months, and if it's not they'll start whining about how nothing is being done.

kenny · 07-05-2002, 02:46 PM

God damn it why can't we just hurry the fuck up and take over the world

J/K

toddler · 07-05-2002, 02:49 PM

and a couple days back they say they caught his stepson entering the us illegally to go to flight school. gee.

Gutterboy · 07-05-2002, 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by FATPad
So I take it none of you were listening when everyone and their mother who was in a position to know said this had the potential to be an operation that went on for years, right?

Welll.. its arguable they said that because they knew in advance this operation was going to turn into the giant clusterfuck that it has. But, the people demanded something be blown up, so something had to be blown up, dammit! And after blowing up mounds of dirt, afghan civillians, and making some noise, they find out what everyone knew all along - the only way to catch a guy who lives in caves and has tens of thousands of square miles of the harshest, most remote wilderness on earth in which to hide is to wait for him to fuck up or die.

The death toll to Afghan civillians is going to be the death knell for this one, not the length of time. There is *alot* of that sort of stuff that has yet to be widely publicized.

FATPad · 07-05-2002, 03:05 PM

It's also arguable that they said it because...well..they knew it would be a long operation and they didn't want the country looking for a 2 month war.

Plenty of things *had* to be blown up. Al Qaeda and the Taliban did have a number of military targets that required destruction. They were destroyed.

What people are failing to remember is the magnitude of this entire operation. It's a lot more than flying to Afghanistan and dropping a bomb on Bin Laden's head after he puts his big, bad guy, black hat on so we can see him easily.

Al Qaeda was spread throughout the world. It involved squeezing them in every way possible, from killing their funding, to seizing their assets, to removing their asylums, to destroying what little military they had, to all kinds of crap. It was a large, complex operation.

Watching CNN doesn't give anyone a true glimpse of everything that is going on, and anyone who thinks they know the whole situation from that little stream of info is nuts.

Our military is trained well and provided with top notch equipment...it doesn't mean everything gets done in a day. I'm more than willing to let the people who are trained to do this shit, do it, and have a little patience in the meantime.

mike503 · 07-05-2002, 03:22 PM

kill em all, let god sort em out.

Socks · 07-05-2002, 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by B40

Umm...it actually is news..

http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/07/05/ira...eut/index.html

Posted 11:41 am today..

So go fuck yourself

Did you *read* the article? It's all hearsay. There's no way they're going to tip their hand like that.

Scootermuze · 07-05-2002, 03:30 PM

"Citing a person familiar with the document, the newspaper said the highly classified plan calls for air, land and sea-based forces to attack from three directions in a campaign to topple Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein......."

I realize the White House leaks what they want to be published, but to give this information about the hows and wheres is a bit much I'd think..

Gutterboy · 07-05-2002, 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by FATPad
It's also arguable that they said it because...well..they knew it would be a long operation and they didn't want the country looking for a 2 month war.

All possibly true. What bothers me most is that the Bush administration and its allies have aggressively exploited patriotism and nationalistic sentiment to completely stifle the democratic process of discussion and debate on this issue. No elected official can say a thing for fear of the administration and its right wing nutso allies screaming about any discussion giving "aid and comfort to our enemies", as DeLay put it after Tom Daschle voiced some very mild concern a couple of months ago. That is the root of every sort of tyranny.

Hermann Goering said it best:

"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."

FATPad · 07-05-2002, 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gutterboy

All possibly true. What bothers me most is that the Bush administration and its allies have aggressively exploited patriotism and nationalistic sentiment to completely stifle the democratic process of discussion and debate on this issue. No elected official can say a thing for fear of the administration and its right wing nutso allies screaming about any discussion giving "aid and comfort to our enemies", as DeLay put it after Tom Daschle voiced some very mild concern a couple of months ago. That is the root of every sort of tyranny.

Hermann Goering said it best:

"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."

Hush, you unpatriotic commie.

Actually, I agree with most of that. I don't like a lot of things Bush said during this whole period. But I'm also not about to second guess the military.

Rag on the way politicians do things? I'm there. I love bashing politicians. They all say stupid shit, and most of them are dumb opportunists with the collective backbone of a jellyfish.

Rag on the military blowing up some people in Afghanistan or not having killed Bin Laden already? I'm not there. It happens during military conflicts, I couldn't do any better if I was there, and I'm happy as hell someone else is off fighting so I don't have to. I will always support the military, and except in cases of EXTREME negligence (bombing London by mistake for example), I'm not really too quick to jump on people who are out there risking their lives while I sit on my ass behind a computer.

richard123 · 07-05-2002, 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Marcus
whatever happened to capturing Osama?
Shouldn't that be the #1 priority?

They ran out of places to look for him. Last I heard, they were looking up GWBs asshole to see if he crawled up there (for security reasons, they said they were "looking for cancer". http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/...sts/index.html)
Fair enuff too, since GWB wouldn't know if his ass was on fire - let alone if Osama's hiding there...

jammyjenkins · 07-05-2002, 05:04 PM

One of the most intelligent pieces about America I've read in a long time...

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/issue_j...llerstein.html

Pathfinder · 07-05-2002, 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jammyjenkins
One of the most intelligent pieces about America I've read in a long time...

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/issue_j...llerstein.html

It is a clever article, but provides misinformation and wrong headed conclusions, which makes the article not useful.

foe · 07-05-2002, 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Marcus
whatever happened to capturing Osama?
Shouldn't that be the #1 priority?

Osama will not develop nukes in next couple of years

Gutterboy · 07-05-2002, 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by foe

Osama will not develop nukes in next couple of years

You never know when a technique to extract weapons grade Uranium from camel dung will be perfected!

SilverSiR · 07-05-2002, 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Scootermuze
"Citing a person familiar with the document, the newspaper said the highly classified plan calls for air, land and sea-based forces to attack from three directions in a campaign to topple Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein......."

I realize the White House leaks what they want to be published, but to give this information about the hows and wheres is a bit much I'd think..

How else are the americans going to attack? This doesn't reveal anything, it just says "we may attack you, so be prepared". Wow that's not news to Saddam, he obviously knew he was goign to be attacked some day or the other.

Gutterboy · 07-05-2002, 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Pathfinder

It is a clever article, but provides misinformation and wrong headed conclusions, which makes the article not useful.

I agree. Not because I really do agree, but because anyone willing to wade through that lifeforce draining suckhole of an article gets a credibility bump from me.

For everyone else, here is the "For Idiots" version:

US power is waning, and has been for some time. Only hawk strategy lunatics disagree. The japanese built a really, really powerful computer. See! I told you so!

Therefore, the US will continue to decline, so descend gracefully, dammit!

FATPad · 07-05-2002, 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Scootermuze
"Citing a person familiar with the document, the newspaper said the highly classified plan calls for air, land and sea-based forces to attack from three directions in a campaign to topple Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein......."

I realize the White House leaks what they want to be published, but to give this information about the hows and wheres is a bit much I'd think..

btw, that's a fairly common thing to do.

Make the enemy spread his defense out to try and cover every conceivable point of attack. It spreads the defense out, weakening every point(s) of attack you actually intend on using.

Now instead of just stocking up on air defense (for example), he has to try and use his limited resources to cover everything, which makes attacking certain things easier.

Pathfinder · 07-05-2002, 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by FATPad

btw, that's a fairly common thing to do.

Make the enemy spread his defense out to try and cover every conceivable point of attack. It spreads the defense out, weakening every point(s) of attack you actually intend on using.

Now instead of just stocking up on air defense (for example), he has to try and use his limited resources to cover everything, which makes attacking certain things easier.

You are correct. It is a common tactic to make the enemy think you are going to do one thing when in fact you are going to do something different.

If you recall in the Gulf War, Marines were kept off of the coast, and a lot of press covered this, making Sadam's forces think that they would make a landing when the ground war started. This tied down alot of Sadam's forces, while the "Hail Mary" end run was made.

Socks · 07-05-2002, 09:11 PM

White House Downplays Iraaq Invasion Report

http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/07/05/wh.iraq/index.html

Pathfinder · 07-06-2002, 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Socks
White House Downplays Iraaq Invasion Report

http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/07/05/wh.iraq/index.html

Expected.

ChrisH · 07-06-2002, 01:53 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by funkmaster
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2000/...in233586.shtml

... so where have you been hiding, smartfuck ?

Did you bother to check the date???? It's two years old! Catch Up!
Iraq has in the last six months accepted Kuait. For good reason!

ChrisH · 07-06-2002, 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Marcus
These poor families that lost people in 911, it's bad enough that their loved ones died horrible painful deaths but nothing was fucking done about it. We freed a bunch of Afgan people.

um..yay

what about the people who did this to us? No fucking retribution, just "he's in hiding somewhere. Oh and watch your back because there are thousands of cells waiting to stike when you least expect it. And since theres nothing we can do about it we're going to go after another Sadam. Have a nice day"

While I think we can do better. It's not like we aren't catching these assholes around the world. And cutting off their funding where ever possible. We are making progress, and will continue to.

ChrisH · 07-06-2002, 02:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by jammyjenkins
One of the most intelligent pieces about America I've read in a long time...

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/issue_j...llerstein.html

LOL.....

Keep hoping we know better!

Iraq is a complete joke that relys on outdated Russian hardware, why do you think that Russia keeps supporting them? Because they don't want their Migs, and Scuds (LMAO) tested against a real military force.

Let's not forget that the "NATIONAL GUARD" is a joke, and the Iraqi Army surrendered to CNN... LMAO.... LOL....

This isn't a rouge group that can RUN, and HIDE whilst they send there children into suicide missions, this is a nation that will have a new leader soon

Plus for you non-Americans.... they have almost the same amount of oil as the Saudis do.... So we want it :D

Vendot · 07-06-2002, 01:28 PM

> WW3 is upon us... Sadam won't go out like a pussy

Finally someone with a brain cell.

There's no question that Sadam or allies will hit back in one way or another and if september 11 is anything to go by, it will be very well put together and ultimately probably catastrophic for the world.

Don't underestimate the vengeance, there would be huge support behind it.

ChrisH · 07-07-2002, 03:03 AM

yea, we will have a real tough chicken shoot this time.

This time i say they surrender to FOX news, not CNN. This will completely upset the natural balance of the Iraqi surrender, and could possibley cause a shift in the natural Iraqi surrender policy

If you don't feed your troops, they will not fight for you. just a note that I thought the Iraqi Government needs to know!!

07-05-2002, 01:14 PM	#3
kenny Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2002 Posts: 7,245	Sadam wouldn't let weapons inspectors inspect, bush says he isn't going to wait to see what Iraq has. __________________ 7

07-05-2002, 01:20 PM	#7
nocostporn Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Maryland Posts: 5,228	WW3 is upon us... Sadam won't go out like a pussy __________________ CashTheChecks.com -coming soon- "Exclusive sites for Exclusive Webmasters" ICQ-119966868,add me first don't message

07-05-2002, 01:21 PM	#8
kenny Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2002 Posts: 7,245	He is hanging with Sadam they will get them both at ounce __________________ 7

07-05-2002, 01:21 PM	#9
mike503 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2002 Location: oregon. Posts: 2,243	why invade. we should nuke. who will miss them? __________________ php/mysql guru. hosting, coding, all that jazz.

07-05-2002, 01:28 PM	#12
kenny Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2002 Posts: 7,245	Even if Iraq does have nukes they don't have the means to deliever them, with their PS2 technology __________________ 7

07-05-2002, 01:09 PM	#1
B40 Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 7,020	US Plans on Invading Iraq... Not only that but with land, air and sea forces.. And from the North, South and West.. They're not fucking around. __________________

07-05-2002, 01:10 PM	#2
funkmaster So Fucking Banned Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: shell beach Posts: 7,938	... now that´s news ... where were you hiding for the past 2 years ??

07-05-2002, 01:19 PM	#5
Marcus Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 3,472	whatever happened to capturing Osama? Shouldn't that be the #1 priority?

07-05-2002, 01:29 PM	#14
Marcus Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 3,472	These poor families that lost people in 911, it's bad enough that their loved ones died horrible painful deaths but nothing was fucking done about it. We freed a bunch of Afgan people. um..yay what about the people who did this to us? No fucking retribution, just "he's in hiding somewhere. Oh and watch your back because there are thousands of cells waiting to stike when you least expect it. And since theres nothing we can do about it we're going to go after another Sadam. Have a nice day"

07-05-2002, 01:33 PM	#17
kenny Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2002 Posts: 7,245	Since Xbox came out, Iraq's forces are more advanced __________________ 7

07-05-2002, 01:46 PM	#19
funkmaster So Fucking Banned Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: shell beach Posts: 7,938	http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2000/...in233586.shtml ... so where have you been hiding, smartfuck ?

07-05-2002, 01:50 PM	#22
Choker Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Orlando Posts: 9,024	That is just contingency plans. Hell we even got those made in case we ever need to invade Canada. __________________ ICQ me lets make a deal 116894466 Need dating, cam, or tube traffic? I got it.http://http://www.chokertraffic.com The Original http://www.chokertraffic.com/ Premium country pop-unders from $1.50 per k. I challenge you to compare this traffic to any other brokers. http://www.chokertraffic.com/public/tabs.php?t=o

07-05-2002, 02:44 PM	#25
FATPad Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2001 Posts: 6,693	So I take it none of you were listening when everyone and their mother who was in a position to know said this had the potential to be an operation that went on for years, right? Maybe the rest of the world is right...Americans are stupid people with no ability to last in a long conflict. They want everything tidied up and done in 2 months, and if it's not they'll start whining about how nothing is being done. __________________ <a href="http://www.adultcontent.co.uk">Adult Content UK - Great British Content</a>

07-05-2002, 02:46 PM	#26
kenny Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2002 Posts: 7,245	God damn it why can't we just hurry the fuck up and take over the world J/K __________________ 7

07-05-2002, 02:49 PM	#27
toddler Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: austin, tx Posts: 1,911	and a couple days back they say they caught his stepson entering the us illegally to go to flight school. gee.

07-05-2002, 03:05 PM	#29
FATPad Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2001 Posts: 6,693	It's also arguable that they said it because...well..they knew it would be a long operation and they didn't want the country looking for a 2 month war. Plenty of things had to be blown up. Al Qaeda and the Taliban did have a number of military targets that required destruction. They were destroyed. What people are failing to remember is the magnitude of this entire operation. It's a lot more than flying to Afghanistan and dropping a bomb on Bin Laden's head after he puts his big, bad guy, black hat on so we can see him easily. Al Qaeda was spread throughout the world. It involved squeezing them in every way possible, from killing their funding, to seizing their assets, to removing their asylums, to destroying what little military they had, to all kinds of crap. It was a large, complex operation. Watching CNN doesn't give anyone a true glimpse of everything that is going on, and anyone who thinks they know the whole situation from that little stream of info is nuts. Our military is trained well and provided with top notch equipment...it doesn't mean everything gets done in a day. I'm more than willing to let the people who are trained to do this shit, do it, and have a little patience in the meantime. __________________ <a href="http://www.adultcontent.co.uk">Adult Content UK - Great British Content</a>

07-05-2002, 03:22 PM	#30
mike503 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2002 Location: oregon. Posts: 2,243	kill em all, let god sort em out. __________________ php/mysql guru. hosting, coding, all that jazz.

07-05-2002, 03:30 PM	#32
Scootermuze Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2001 Posts: 4,513	"Citing a person familiar with the document, the newspaper said the highly classified plan calls for air, land and sea-based forces to attack from three directions in a campaign to topple Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein......." I realize the White House leaks what they want to be published, but to give this information about the hows and wheres is a bit much I'd think..

07-05-2002, 05:04 PM	#36
jammyjenkins So Fucking Banned Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 1,371	One of the most intelligent pieces about America I've read in a long time... http://www.foreignpolicy.com/issue_j...llerstein.html

07-05-2002, 09:11 PM	#44
Socks Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2002 Location: Toronto Posts: 8,475	White House Downplays Iraaq Invasion Report http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/07/05/wh.iraq/index.html

07-06-2002, 01:28 PM	#49
Vendot Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2002 Location: Malaysia Posts: 3,376	> WW3 is upon us... Sadam won't go out like a pussy Finally someone with a brain cell. There's no question that Sadam or allies will hit back in one way or another and if september 11 is anything to go by, it will be very well put together and ultimately probably catastrophic for the world. Don't underestimate the vengeance, there would be huge support behind it.

07-07-2002, 03:03 AM	#50
ChrisH Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: New York Posts: 1,355	yea, we will have a real tough chicken shoot this time. This time i say they surrender to FOX news, not CNN. This will completely upset the natural balance of the Iraqi surrender, and could possibley cause a shift in the natural Iraqi surrender policy If you don't feed your troops, they will not fight for you. just a note that I thought the Iraqi Government needs to know!!