To those that wonder why the towers fell - Page 4 - GoFuckYourself.com

John69 · 09-12-2006, 07:53 PM

150

Quote:

Originally Posted by RF_Erick

Ok I see 47 columns, If a pancake theory happened, how do 47 metal beams break off all the way to the ground? Wouldnt the metal beams on lower floors still stand while the floors around collapse at free fall speed? Can 47 thick metal beams just vaporize?

Thermate was used to melt them in the lower 5 floors in the basement, then charges were set at key floors to blow them out, that's why all you see is a plume.

hershie · 09-12-2006, 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John69

The one i think they declined to do was Alex Jones.

You are a true believer so I understand why you are so easily dismissive of every fact and expert that you confront.

hershie · 09-12-2006, 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John69

150

Thermate was used to melt them in the lower 5 floors in the basement, then charges were set at key floors to blow them out, that's why all you see is a plume.

Puffs Of Dust
CLAIM: As each tower collapsed, clearly visible puffs of dust and debris were ejected from the sides of the buildings. An advertisement in The New York Times for the book Painful Questions: An Analysis Of The September 11th Attack made this claim: "The concrete clouds shooting out of the buildings are not possible from a mere collapse. They do occur from explosions." Numerous conspiracy theorists cite Van Romero, an explosives expert and vice president of the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, who was quoted on 9/11 by the Albuquerque Journal as saying "there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse." The article continues, "Romero said the collapse of the structures resembled those of controlled implosions used to demolish old structures."

FACT: Once each tower began to collapse, the weight of all the floors above the collapsed zone bore down with pulverizing force on the highest intact floor. Unable to absorb the massive energy, that floor would fail, transmitting the forces to the floor below, allowing the collapse to progress downward through the building in a chain reaction. Engineers call the process "pancaking," and it does not require an explosion to begin, according to David Biggs, a structural engineer at Ryan-Biggs Associates and a member of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) team that worked on the FEMA report.

Like all office buildings, the WTC towers contained a huge volume of air. As they pancaked, all that air--along with the concrete and other debris pulverized by the force of the collapse--was ejected with enormous energy. "When you have a significant portion of a floor collapsing, it's going to shoot air and concrete dust out the window," NIST lead investigator Shyam Sunder tells PM. Those clouds of dust may create the impression of a controlled demolition, Sunder adds, "but it is the floor pancaking that leads to that perception."

Demolition expert Romero regrets that his comments to the Albuquerque Journal became fodder for conspiracy theorists. "I was misquoted in saying that I thought it was explosives that brought down the building," he tells PM. "I only said that that's what it looked like."

Romero, who agrees with the scientific conclusion that fire triggered the collapses, demanded a retraction from the Journal. It was printed Sept. 22, 2001. "I felt like my scientific reputation was on the line." But emperors-clothes.com saw something else: "The paymaster of Romero's research institute is the Pentagon. Directly or indirectly, pressure was brought to bear, forcing Romero to retract his original statement." Romero responds: "Conspiracy theorists came out saying that the government got to me. That is the farthest thing from the truth. This has been an albatross around my neck for three years."

John69 · 09-12-2006, 08:03 PM

copy and paste for you:

THE DAY ITSELF - EVIDENCE OF COMPLICITY

1) AWOL Chain of Command
a. It is well documented that the officials topping the chain of command for response to a domestic attack - George W. Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Myers, Montague Winfield - all found reason to do something else during the actual attacks, other than assuming their duties as decision-makers.
b. Who was actually in charge? Dick Cheney, Richard Clarke, Norman Mineta and the 9/11 Commission directly conflict in their accounts of top-level response to the unfolding events, such that several (or all) of them must be lying.
2) Air Defense Failures
a. The US air defense system failed to follow standard procedures for responding to diverted passenger flights.
b. Timelines: The various responsible agencies - NORAD, FAA, Pentagon, USAF, as well as the 9/11 Commission - gave radically different explanations for the failure (in some cases upheld for years), such that several officials must have lied; but none were held accountable.
c. Was there an air defense standdown?

3) Pentagon Strike
How was it possible the Pentagon was hit 1 hour and 20 minutes after the attacks began? Why was there no response from Andrews Air Force Base, just 10 miles away and home to Air National Guard units charged with defending the skies above the nation's capital? How did Hani Hanjour, a man who failed as a Cessna pilot on his first flight in a Boeing, execute a difficult aerobatic maneuver to strike the Pentagon? Why did the attack strike the just-renovated side, which was largely empty and opposite from the high command?

4) Wargames
a. US military and other authorities planned or actually rehearsed defensive response to all elements of the 9/11 scenario during the year prior to the attack - including multiple hijackings, suicide crashbombings, and a strike on the Pentagon.
b. The multiple military wargames planned long in advance and held on the morning of September 11th included scenarios of a domestic air crisis, a plane crashing into a government building, and a large-scale emergency in New York. If this was only an incredible series of coincidences, why did the official investigations avoid the issue? There is evidence that the wargames created confusion as to whether the unfolding events were "real world or exercise." Did wargames serve as the cover for air defense sabotage, and/or the execution of an "inside job"?

5) Flight 93
Did the Shanksville crash occur at 10:06 (according to a seismic report) or 10:03 (according to the 9/11 Commission)? Does the Commission wish to hide what happened in the last three minutes of the flight, and if so, why? Was Flight 93 shot down, as indicated by the scattering of debris over a trail of several miles?

THE DAY - POSSIBLE SMOKING GUNS

6) Did cell phones work at 30,000 feet in 2001? How many hijackings were attempted? How many flights were diverted?

7) Demolition Hypothesis
What caused the collapse of a third skyscraper, WTC 7, which was not hit by a plane? Were the Twin Towers and WTC 7 brought down by explosives? (See "The Case for Demolitions," the websites wtc7.net and 911research.wtc7.net, and the influential article by physicist Steven Jones. See also items no. 16 and 24, below.)

FOREKNOWLEDGE & THE ALLEGED HIJACKERS

8) What did officials know? How did they know it?
a. Multiple allied foreign agencies informed the US government of a coming attack in detail, including the manner and likely targets of the attack, the name of the operation (the "Big Wedding"), and the names of certain men later identified as being among the perpetrators.
b. Various individuals came into possession of specific advance knowledge, and some of them tried to warn the US prior to September 11th.
c. Certain prominent persons received warnings not to fly on the week or on the day of September 11th.

9) Able Danger, Plus - Surveillance of Alleged Hijackers
a. The men identified as the 9/11 ringleaders were under surveillance for years beforehand, on the suspicion they were terrorists, by a variety of US and allied authorities - including the CIA, the US military's "Able Danger" program, the German authorities, Israeli intelligence and others.
b. Two of the alleged ringleaders who were known to be under surveillance by the CIA also lived with an FBI asset in San Diego, but this is supposed to be yet another a coincidence.
10) Obstruction of FBI Investigations prior to 9/11
A group of FBI officials in New York systematically suppressed field investigations of potential terrorists that might have uncovered the alleged hijackers - as the Moussaoui case once again showed. The stories of Sibel Edmonds, Robert Wright, Coleen Rowley and Harry Samit, the "Phoenix Memo," David Schippers, the 199i orders restricting investigations, the Bush administration's order to back off the Bin Ladin family, the reaction to the "Bojinka" plot, and John O'Neil do not, when considered in sum, indicate mere incompetence, but high-level corruption and protection of criminal networks, including the network of the alleged 9/11 conspirators. (Nearly all of these examples were omitted from or relegated to fleeting footnotes in The 9/11 Commission Report.)

11) Insider Trading
a. Unknown speculators allegedly used foreknowledge of the Sept. 11th events to profiteer on many markets internationally - including but not limited to "put options" placed to short-sell the two airlines, WTC tenants, and WTC re-insurance companies in Chicago and London.
b. In addition, suspicious monetary transactions worth hundreds of millions were conducted through offices at the Twin Towers during the actual attacks.
c. Initial reports on these trades were suppressed and forgotten, and only years later did the 9/11 Commission and SEC provide a partial, but untenable explanation for only a small number of transactions (covering only the airline put options through the Chicago Board of Exchange).

12) Who were the perpetrators?
a. Much of the evidence establishing who did the crime is dubious and miraculous: bags full of incriminating material that happened to miss the flight or were left in a van; the "magic passport" of an alleged hijacker, found at Ground Zero; documents found at motels where the alleged perpetrators had stayed days and weeks before 9/11.
b. The identities of the alleged hijackers remain unresolved, there are contradictions in official accounts of their actions and travels, and there is evidence several of them had "doubles," all of which is omitted from official investigations.
c. What happened to initial claims by the government that 50 people involved in the attacks had been identified, including the 19 alleged hijackers, with 10 still at large (suggesting that 20 had been apprehended)? http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/n...,1825231.story

RF_Erick · 09-12-2006, 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

Lets see millions of tons coming down on a beam will it stay standing or fall downward with the rest of the debris?... *scratches head*

But wouldnt a pancake collapse fall around the central core of 47 beams that holds the most resistance at free fall speed with 0 resistance? I can understand concrete collapsing but 47 steal beams...

John69 · 09-12-2006, 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RF_Erick

But wouldnt a pancake collapse fall around the central core of 47 beams that holds the most resistance at free fall speed with 0 resistance? I can understand concrete collapsing but 47 steal beams...

your correct the beams would be still in place, at
least a few hundred feet in ther air instead of melting.

HomeFry · 09-12-2006, 08:13 PM

sheeeeppp

Webby · 09-12-2006, 08:16 PM

This shit thread still bouncing along with silly comments from stupid Sticky?

Hey.. cumon - the ass is a 30 something naive retard with nada education and living in a $250K home which only has $50K equity (according to him) and he's whoring for SI. He's not exactly the businessman of the year or some fucking scientific genius - he's a toll trying to justify his paycheck. He'd piss his frilly panties if reality hit home.

This also reflects on Splitinfinity who permit trash to represent them in this crass manner. Would you have confidence in a host to let their floor sweeper be a smartass with potential customers??? Tho, hell - some folks will try anything for a buck, - depends how low you want to go in running a business and losing any professionalism.

Excuse me while I watch more of the comedy channel - Fox

Scootermuze · 09-12-2006, 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

I assume you have a link to this right? Ive been reading Popular mechanics since I was about 8 or 9 years old. My grandfather got it for years and years before that. Im unaware of either PM or Fox being owned by the government, but continue showing what a fuckin wackjob you are.

Btw here is a hint Rupert Murdoch is from Austrailia and he owns Fox.

Date: Thursday, 17 March 2005
A brutal purge of the senior staff at Popular Mechanics preceded the publication of last month's scandalous propaganda piece about 9/11. Pulling the strings is the grand dame of Hearst Magazines and behind the scene is her obscure husband, a veteran propaganda expert and former special assistant to the director of the C.I.A.

In the months leading up to the Chertoff (Cousin to Head of Homeland Security) article in PM, a brutal take-over occurred at the magazine. In September 2004, Joe Oldham, the magazine's former editor-in-chief was replaced by James B. Meigs, who came to PM with a "deputy," Jerry Beilinson, from National Geographic Adventure. In October, a new creative director replaced PM's 21-year veteran who was given ninety minutes to clear out of his office.

A former senior editor at PM, who is forbidden from openly discussing the coup at PM, told AFP that the former creative director was abruptly told to leave and given severance pay of two weeks wages for every year spent at PM. "Three or four" people have been similarly dismissed every month since, he said. He said he was astounded that the coup at PM had not been reported in the mainstream media.

PM has long been a supporter of the U.S. military. The magazine ran a full page ad in support of the troops in Iraq and Afghanistan in May 2003. Since the purge last September, however, PM readers have noticed that government propaganda has replaced scientific writing. A letter to the editor in the current issue says, "I think you guys are just another tool in the government's propaganda machine."

Keep reading PM and see if it's changing...

ParlourCash Karl · 09-12-2006, 08:21 PM

Believe what the fuck you want but you obviously did not loose anyone in 9/11, there is no conspiracy....the only conspiracy is in peoples individual minds.......fuck reality is : terrorism is a reality...wake up and smell the roses.......it is an uncurable cancer.....

John69 · 09-12-2006, 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scootermuze

Date: Thursday, 17 March 2005
A brutal purge of the senior staff at Popular Mechanics preceded the publication of last month's scandalous propaganda piece about 9/11. Pulling the strings is the grand dame of Hearst Magazines and behind the scene is her obscure husband, a veteran propaganda expert and former special assistant to the director of the C.I.A.

In the months leading up to the Chertoff (Cousin to Head of Homeland Security) article in PM, a brutal take-over occurred at the magazine. In September 2004, Joe Oldham, the magazine's former editor-in-chief was replaced by James B. Meigs, who came to PM with a "deputy," Jerry Beilinson, from National Geographic Adventure. In October, a new creative director replaced PM's 21-year veteran who was given ninety minutes to clear out of his office.

A former senior editor at PM, who is forbidden from openly discussing the coup at PM, told AFP that the former creative director was abruptly told to leave and given severance pay of two weeks wages for every year spent at PM. "Three or four" people have been similarly dismissed every month since, he said. He said he was astounded that the coup at PM had not been reported in the mainstream media.

PM has long been a supporter of the U.S. military. The magazine ran a full page ad in support of the troops in Iraq and Afghanistan in May 2003. Since the purge last September, however, PM readers have noticed that government propaganda has replaced scientific writing. A letter to the editor in the current issue says, "I think you guys are just another tool in the government's propaganda machine."

Keep reading PM and see if it's changing...

that's a great read, they have as much credibility as Sticky Fingers

RF_Erick · 09-12-2006, 08:31 PM

Why does everybody have to resort to attacks. Cant we be civilized?
We are all here on gfy to make friends do business debate topics, read fake drama.

We dont all have to agree on everything but lets be proffesional no?
No need for personal attacks.

John69 · 09-12-2006, 08:34 PM

if you had a time machine and could go back to
9/11 what site would you bring your video camera to?

For me I would tape all 3 angle's of the pentigon.

trying to tell anyone before hand would be a waste of time, no one would listen.

Phoenix · 09-12-2006, 08:39 PM

i often wonder if it is just ostrich syndrome or do some of the people arguing for the right wingers..believe in it and hope to curry favour some how.

i mean seriously...why bother to fight...all they do is insult

Scootermuze · 09-12-2006, 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hershie

I picked up parts of the plane with the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section of the plane, and I found the black box." Kilsheimer's eyewitness account is backed up by photos of plane wreckage inside and outside the building. Kilsheimer adds: "I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my hands, including body parts. Okay?"

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Searchers on Friday (9/14) found the flight data and cockpit voice recorders from the hijacked plane that flew into the Pentagon and exploded, Department of Defense officials said.

This guy exaggerated his claims a bit, so his account is somewhat useless..

hershie · 09-12-2006, 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John69

that's a great read, they have as much credibility as Sticky Fingers

I follow the business end of the media and I see lots of so called
"brutal purges" at lots of magazines, newspapers...all the time. You can use six degrees or separation on anyone and come up with a cousin or husband that had a connection to someone else so I am not sure if you are saying the editors and all the experts were compromised because a husband of the publisher was secretly pulling the strings of everyone? Another conspiracy to cover up a conspiracy? This is a leading magazine exposing the truth behind product claims...that has and is trusted and followed by millions and you guys just take small little things and turn this and impugne all the EXPERTS quoted and act smug and dismissive of the facts revealed. No way all the editors and reporters and experts...were paid off or told what to say. IMPOSSIBLE.

Scootermuze · 09-12-2006, 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

Alex Jones..... Hero of yours? lol this splains alot..

Two hours before he was to debate a member of "Scholars for 9/11 Truth" on a Seattle radio talk show, a research editor for "Popular Mechanics" magazine pulls out.
Richard Curtis, PhD, an Adjunct Professor of Philosophy at several Seattle area colleges and an active member of "Scholars for 9/11 Truth," was scheduled to debate Davin Coburn, a research editor at Popular Mechanics and one of the contributors to the book Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up To The Facts, on Munson's radio show. Munson, furious about the last minute cancellation, said that the books PR firm was responsible for the decision and that none of the contributors to the new book would be allowed on the air with anyone from "Scholars for 9/11 Truth."

That could splain even more..

John69 · 09-12-2006, 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scootermuze

Two hours before he was to debate a member of "Scholars for 9/11 Truth" on a Seattle radio talk show, a research editor for "Popular Mechanics" magazine pulls out.
Richard Curtis, PhD, an Adjunct Professor of Philosophy at several Seattle area colleges and an active member of "Scholars for 9/11 Truth," was scheduled to debate Davin Coburn, a research editor at Popular Mechanics and one of the contributors to the book Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up To The Facts, on Munson's radio show. Munson, furious about the last minute cancellation, said that the books PR firm was responsible for the decision and that none of the contributors to the new book would be allowed on the air with anyone from "Scholars for 9/11 Truth."

That could splain even more..

This was the one I was reffering to, they bowed out.

John69 · 09-12-2006, 09:00 PM

The "smoking gun" at the Pentagon, he observed, is the clear, smooth and unblemished lawn. "It would have been especially unlikely that an inexperienced pilot like Hanjour could have flown a large airplane so close to the ground and not collided with it," Fetzer remarked. "That is a feat even experienced pilots would have found very difficult to accomplish."

"No one watching these clips over and over, focusing on each frame, can find unambiguous support for a large aircraft, much less a Boeing 757," he added. "How much less likely that bypassers in the vicinity, who only had a brief chance to notice this happening, could have figured out what they saw. Nothing here remotely resembles a Boeing 757."

Even the Pentagon itself is covered with cameras. The most serious question raised by the release of these videos may be why other videos, which would provide clearer and far more revealing information, have not been released. "The most plausible explanation for withholding this evidence from the American public," Griffin observed, "is that the American government has a great deal to hide."

John69 · 09-12-2006, 09:03 PM

THE HIDDEN HAND OF THE CIA - 9/11 and Popular Mechanics

Scootermuze · 09-12-2006, 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hershie

BTW, I'm not even American. You have a few video frames while Popular Mechanic had these experts looking at conspirasist theories, so who is the close minded idiot here?:

A few video frames..?
I have a list too where they go into great detail complete with charts and actual research.. While P.M failed to mention many of the most important things about 9/11.. Their biggest thing was to go after the most far fetched conspiracy nuts, so anyone is bound to agree with em..

physics911

Robert Ballan
Norwood, NY, USA
MSc & JD: Clarkson College
Chemistry & Law

Kevin Barrett
Lone Rock WI, USA
PhD U of Wisconsin
Islamic Studies
Walter Davis

Kent, OH, USA
PhD: U of Connecticut
Kinesiology

A. K. Dewdney
London, Canada
PhD: U of Waterloo
Mathematics

Derrick Grimmer
Ames, IA, USA
PhD: Washington University
Physics

David Heller
Berkeley, CA
BS: Physics Bard College
MA: S. F. Inst. Architecture
Architect and Builder

Annie Higgins
Gainesville, FL
PhD University of Chicago
Arabic Language & Literature

Timothy P. Howell
Upsala, Sweden
PhD: U. of Edinburgh
Computer Science

Don Trent (Four Arrows) Jacobs
Sequim, WA
Ed. D. Boise State University
Professor, Fielding Graduate U

Steven E. Jones
Provo, Utah
PhD: Vanderbilt University
Physicist, Brigham Young U.

Peter J. Kirsch
Western Cape, South Africa
MD: University of Witwatersrand
Forensic Pathology

Karen Kwiatkowski
Mt. Jackson, VA
PhD Catholic University
Lieut. Col. USAF (ret.)

Jerry Longspaugh
Fort Worth, TX, USA
MSc: Brooklyn Polytechnic
Aerospace Engineer

Brad Mayeaux
Kenner, LA, USA
Electr. &Tech. Inst. of New Orleans
Cellphone Engineer
George F. Nelson

Huntsville, AL, USA
FAA A&P Licence
US Airforce Colonel (ret.)

Ralph W. Omholt
Kirkland, WA, USA
AAPP University of Alaska
Professional Airline Pilot

Morgan Reynolds
Arkansas, USA
PhD: U of Wisconsin
former Chief Economist,
United States Department of Labor

Kevin Ryan
Bloomington, IN, USA
BSc Indiana University
Chemistry
ASQ Certified Quality Engineer

Nila Sagadevan
Laguna Hills, CA, USA
HBS U. of Edinburgh.
Aeronautical Engineer and Qualified Pilot

David Shayler
Eastbourne, Great Britain
Hon MA Lit. & Linguistics
MI5 (former)

Helen Stace
Perth, Australia
PhD: U of Sydney
Biology

Bernard Windham
Tallahassee, FL, USA
MS Florida State
MS Louisiana State
Statistician

Russ Wittenberg
Carefree, AZ
BBA U. of Miami FL
US Airforce Capt. (ret)
Captain for PAA & UAL

John69 · 09-12-2006, 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scootermuze

A few video frames..?
I have a list too where they go into great detail complete with charts and actual research.. While P.M failed to mention many of the most important things about 9/11.. Their biggest thing was to go after the most far fetched conspiracy nuts, so anyone is bound to agree with em..

physics911

Robert Ballan
Norwood, NY, USA
MSc & JD: Clarkson College
Chemistry & Law

Kevin Barrett
Lone Rock WI, USA
PhD U of Wisconsin
Islamic Studies
Walter Davis

Kent, OH, USA
PhD: U of Connecticut
Kinesiology

A. K. Dewdney
London, Canada
PhD: U of Waterloo
Mathematics

Derrick Grimmer
Ames, IA, USA
PhD: Washington University
Physics

David Heller
Berkeley, CA
BS: Physics Bard College
MA: S. F. Inst. Architecture
Architect and Builder

Annie Higgins
Gainesville, FL
PhD University of Chicago
Arabic Language & Literature

Timothy P. Howell
Upsala, Sweden
PhD: U. of Edinburgh
Computer Science

Don Trent (Four Arrows) Jacobs
Sequim, WA
Ed. D. Boise State University
Professor, Fielding Graduate U

Steven E. Jones
Provo, Utah
PhD: Vanderbilt University
Physicist, Brigham Young U.

Peter J. Kirsch
Western Cape, South Africa
MD: University of Witwatersrand
Forensic Pathology

Karen Kwiatkowski
Mt. Jackson, VA
PhD Catholic University
Lieut. Col. USAF (ret.)

Jerry Longspaugh
Fort Worth, TX, USA
MSc: Brooklyn Polytechnic
Aerospace Engineer

Brad Mayeaux
Kenner, LA, USA
Electr. &Tech. Inst. of New Orleans
Cellphone Engineer
George F. Nelson

Huntsville, AL, USA
FAA A&P Licence
US Airforce Colonel (ret.)

Ralph W. Omholt
Kirkland, WA, USA
AAPP University of Alaska
Professional Airline Pilot

Morgan Reynolds
Arkansas, USA
PhD: U of Wisconsin
former Chief Economist,
United States Department of Labor

Kevin Ryan
Bloomington, IN, USA
BSc Indiana University
Chemistry
ASQ Certified Quality Engineer

Nila Sagadevan
Laguna Hills, CA, USA
HBS U. of Edinburgh.
Aeronautical Engineer and Qualified Pilot

David Shayler
Eastbourne, Great Britain
Hon MA Lit. & Linguistics
MI5 (former)

Helen Stace
Perth, Australia
PhD: U of Sydney
Biology

Bernard Windham
Tallahassee, FL, USA
MS Florida State
MS Louisiana State
Statistician

Russ Wittenberg
Carefree, AZ
BBA U. of Miami FL
US Airforce Capt. (ret)
Captain for PAA & UAL

Now if this was the video the feds had released i may not be posting in this thread.

hershie · 09-12-2006, 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John69

The "smoking gun" at the Pentagon, he observed, is the clear, smooth and unblemished lawn. "It would have been especially unlikely that an inexperienced pilot like Hanjour could have flown a large airplane so close to the ground and not collided with it," Fetzer remarked. "That is a feat even experienced pilots would have found very difficult to accomplish."

"No one watching these clips over and over, focusing on each frame, can find unambiguous support for a large aircraft, much less a Boeing 757," he added. "How much less likely that bypassers in the vicinity, who only had a brief chance to notice this happening, could have figured out what they saw. Nothing here remotely resembles a Boeing 757."

Even the Pentagon itself is covered with cameras. The most serious question raised by the release of these videos may be why other videos, which would provide clearer and far more revealing information, have not been released. "The most plausible explanation for withholding this evidence from the American public," Griffin observed, "is that the American government has a great deal to hide."

Just curious; what happened to that plane, the crew, and all the passengers? I mean they never made it home...

Scootermuze · 09-12-2006, 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hershie

Just curious; what happened to that plane, the crew, and all the passengers? I mean they never made it home...

pocketkangaroo · 09-12-2006, 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hershie

Just curious; what happened to that plane, the crew, and all the passengers? I mean they never made it home...

I've yet to hear a good answer to this. I mean they did find their body parts in the Pentagon.

pocketkangaroo · 09-12-2006, 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scootermuze

What happened to those people?

pocketkangaroo · 09-12-2006, 09:55 PM

The best part of this is that the conspiracy theorists take a screenshot of a website and determines it is more factual proof than hundreds of eyewitnesses, all the plane parts in the Pentagon, and all the dead bodies in the Pentagon.

hershie · 09-12-2006, 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scootermuze

So, all the air traffic controllers...that got the plane into the sky and tracked it on radar are part of the conspiracy. I mean you want to add dozens of people involved in air traffic control on top of the thousands of others who had to be in on the plot to make the whole thing work?

stickyfingerz · 09-12-2006, 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webby

This shit thread still bouncing along with silly comments from stupid Sticky?

Hey.. cumon - the ass is a 30 something naive retard with nada education and living in a $250K home which only has $50K equity (according to him) and he's whoring for SI. He's not exactly the businessman of the year or some fucking scientific genius - he's a toll trying to justify his paycheck. He'd piss his frilly panties if reality hit home.

This also reflects on Splitinfinity who permit trash to represent them in this crass manner. Would you have confidence in a host to let their floor sweeper be a smartass with potential customers??? Tho, hell - some folks will try anything for a buck, - depends how low you want to go in running a business and losing any professionalism.

Excuse me while I watch more of the comedy channel - Fox

Wow you are really scraping the bottom of the barrel now, but.... didnt I already predict such action by you earlier in this thread? Ahh I belive I did. I musta hit a nerve eh? Carry on pompuss ass.

stickyfingerz · 09-12-2006, 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John69

copy and paste for you:

THE DAY ITSELF - EVIDENCE OF COMPLICITY

1) AWOL Chain of Command
a. It is well documented that the officials topping the chain of command for response to a domestic attack - George W. Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Myers, Montague Winfield - all found reason to do something else during the actual attacks, other than assuming their duties as decision-makers.
b. Who was actually in charge? Dick Cheney, Richard Clarke, Norman Mineta and the 9/11 Commission directly conflict in their accounts of top-level response to the unfolding events, such that several (or all) of them must be lying.
2) Air Defense Failures
a. The US air defense system failed to follow standard procedures for responding to diverted passenger flights.
b. Timelines: The various responsible agencies - NORAD, FAA, Pentagon, USAF, as well as the 9/11 Commission - gave radically different explanations for the failure (in some cases upheld for years), such that several officials must have lied; but none were held accountable.
c. Was there an air defense standdown?

3) Pentagon Strike
How was it possible the Pentagon was hit 1 hour and 20 minutes after the attacks began? Why was there no response from Andrews Air Force Base, just 10 miles away and home to Air National Guard units charged with defending the skies above the nation's capital? How did Hani Hanjour, a man who failed as a Cessna pilot on his first flight in a Boeing, execute a difficult aerobatic maneuver to strike the Pentagon? Why did the attack strike the just-renovated side, which was largely empty and opposite from the high command?

4) Wargames
a. US military and other authorities planned or actually rehearsed defensive response to all elements of the 9/11 scenario during the year prior to the attack - including multiple hijackings, suicide crashbombings, and a strike on the Pentagon.
b. The multiple military wargames planned long in advance and held on the morning of September 11th included scenarios of a domestic air crisis, a plane crashing into a government building, and a large-scale emergency in New York. If this was only an incredible series of coincidences, why did the official investigations avoid the issue? There is evidence that the wargames created confusion as to whether the unfolding events were "real world or exercise." Did wargames serve as the cover for air defense sabotage, and/or the execution of an "inside job"?

5) Flight 93
Did the Shanksville crash occur at 10:06 (according to a seismic report) or 10:03 (according to the 9/11 Commission)? Does the Commission wish to hide what happened in the last three minutes of the flight, and if so, why? Was Flight 93 shot down, as indicated by the scattering of debris over a trail of several miles?

THE DAY - POSSIBLE SMOKING GUNS

6) Did cell phones work at 30,000 feet in 2001? How many hijackings were attempted? How many flights were diverted?

7) Demolition Hypothesis
What caused the collapse of a third skyscraper, WTC 7, which was not hit by a plane? Were the Twin Towers and WTC 7 brought down by explosives? (See "The Case for Demolitions," the websites wtc7.net and 911research.wtc7.net, and the influential article by physicist Steven Jones. See also items no. 16 and 24, below.)

FOREKNOWLEDGE & THE ALLEGED HIJACKERS

8) What did officials know? How did they know it?
a. Multiple allied foreign agencies informed the US government of a coming attack in detail, including the manner and likely targets of the attack, the name of the operation (the "Big Wedding"), and the names of certain men later identified as being among the perpetrators.
b. Various individuals came into possession of specific advance knowledge, and some of them tried to warn the US prior to September 11th.
c. Certain prominent persons received warnings not to fly on the week or on the day of September 11th.

9) Able Danger, Plus - Surveillance of Alleged Hijackers
a. The men identified as the 9/11 ringleaders were under surveillance for years beforehand, on the suspicion they were terrorists, by a variety of US and allied authorities - including the CIA, the US military's "Able Danger" program, the German authorities, Israeli intelligence and others.
b. Two of the alleged ringleaders who were known to be under surveillance by the CIA also lived with an FBI asset in San Diego, but this is supposed to be yet another a coincidence.
10) Obstruction of FBI Investigations prior to 9/11
A group of FBI officials in New York systematically suppressed field investigations of potential terrorists that might have uncovered the alleged hijackers - as the Moussaoui case once again showed. The stories of Sibel Edmonds, Robert Wright, Coleen Rowley and Harry Samit, the "Phoenix Memo," David Schippers, the 199i orders restricting investigations, the Bush administration's order to back off the Bin Ladin family, the reaction to the "Bojinka" plot, and John O'Neil do not, when considered in sum, indicate mere incompetence, but high-level corruption and protection of criminal networks, including the network of the alleged 9/11 conspirators. (Nearly all of these examples were omitted from or relegated to fleeting footnotes in The 9/11 Commission Report.)

11) Insider Trading
a. Unknown speculators allegedly used foreknowledge of the Sept. 11th events to profiteer on many markets internationally - including but not limited to "put options" placed to short-sell the two airlines, WTC tenants, and WTC re-insurance companies in Chicago and London.
b. In addition, suspicious monetary transactions worth hundreds of millions were conducted through offices at the Twin Towers during the actual attacks.
c. Initial reports on these trades were suppressed and forgotten, and only years later did the 9/11 Commission and SEC provide a partial, but untenable explanation for only a small number of transactions (covering only the airline put options through the Chicago Board of Exchange).

12) Who were the perpetrators?
a. Much of the evidence establishing who did the crime is dubious and miraculous: bags full of incriminating material that happened to miss the flight or were left in a van; the "magic passport" of an alleged hijacker, found at Ground Zero; documents found at motels where the alleged perpetrators had stayed days and weeks before 9/11.
b. The identities of the alleged hijackers remain unresolved, there are contradictions in official accounts of their actions and travels, and there is evidence several of them had "doubles," all of which is omitted from official investigations.
c. What happened to initial claims by the government that 50 people involved in the attacks had been identified, including the 19 alleged hijackers, with 10 still at large (suggesting that 20 had been apprehended)? http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/n...,1825231.story

See this is called the shotgun method. They throw out tons of questions all in one go. Regardless if the questions have any merit or not, weak minded people will grasp them being left unanswered as proving them as fact. Its typical and weak.

stickyfingerz · 09-12-2006, 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scootermuze

Date: Thursday, 17 March 2005
A brutal purge of the senior staff at Popular Mechanics preceded the publication of last month's scandalous propaganda piece about 9/11. Pulling the strings is the grand dame of Hearst Magazines and behind the scene is her obscure husband, a veteran propaganda expert and former special assistant to the director of the C.I.A.

In the months leading up to the Chertoff (Cousin to Head of Homeland Security) article in PM, a brutal take-over occurred at the magazine. In September 2004, Joe Oldham, the magazine's former editor-in-chief was replaced by James B. Meigs, who came to PM with a "deputy," Jerry Beilinson, from National Geographic Adventure. In October, a new creative director replaced PM's 21-year veteran who was given ninety minutes to clear out of his office.

A former senior editor at PM, who is forbidden from openly discussing the coup at PM, told AFP that the former creative director was abruptly told to leave and given severance pay of two weeks wages for every year spent at PM. "Three or four" people have been similarly dismissed every month since, he said. He said he was astounded that the coup at PM had not been reported in the mainstream media.

PM has long been a supporter of the U.S. military. The magazine ran a full page ad in support of the troops in Iraq and Afghanistan in May 2003. Since the purge last September, however, PM readers have noticed that government propaganda has replaced scientific writing. A letter to the editor in the current issue says, "I think you guys are just another tool in the government's propaganda machine."

Keep reading PM and see if it's changing...

Nice Link??????????
Link?????????
Link?????????

Carry on. This is why I made this thread.

Scootermuze · 09-12-2006, 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo

The best part of this is that the conspiracy theorists take a screenshot of a website and determines it is more factual proof than hundreds of eyewitnesses, all the plane parts in the Pentagon, and all the dead bodies in the Pentagon.

Well my screenshot is from the Federal Bureau of Transportation Statistics

Just found it to be interesting..

It doesn't provide an answer.. just creates more questions..

stickyfingerz · 09-12-2006, 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scootermuze

Well my screenshot is from the Federal Bureau of Transportation Statistics

Just found it to be interesting..

It doesn't provide an answer.. just creates more questions..

Questions sure it does.... the plane never took off. It never hit. It was all a dream......

Scootermuze · 09-12-2006, 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

See this is called the shotgun method. They throw out tons of questions all in one go. Regardless if the questions have any merit or not, weak minded people will grasp them being left unanswered as proving them as fact. Its typical and weak.

Strong minded people can see that the questions could be answered one at a time and question why they remain unanswered.

It's your reply that's typical and weak..
unless you can do as you expect from others and provide reliable links to
pertinent sites that practice this so called shotgun method; making it typical..

Scootermuze · 09-12-2006, 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

Questions sure it does.... the plane never took off. It never hit. It was all a dream......

Hmm.. are you saying that you're questioning the government's information?

stickyfingerz · 09-12-2006, 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scootermuze

Hmm.. are you saying that you're questioning the government's information?

stickyfingerz · 09-12-2006, 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scootermuze

Strong minded people can see that the questions could be answered one at a time and question why they remain unanswered.

It's your reply that's typical and weak..
unless you can do as you expect from others and provide reliable links to
pertinent sites that practice this so called shotgun method; making it typical..

No its the fact that Ive answered those questions over and over and over since around 2002 or 2003. So none of that is new, its all been answered over and over and over. Even right in this thread its already been answered. Shotgun regurgitation. Doesnt matter if it has a lick of truth to it, you'll just repeat it over and over and over untill others repeat it over and over and over. yawn.

Webby · 09-12-2006, 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

No its the fact that Ive answered those questions over and over and over since around 2002 or 2003.

Bullshit - Proove it - where's the links?

stickyfingerz · 09-12-2006, 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webby

Bullshit - Proove it - where's the links?

Away with your snideness. All someone has to do to research you webby is goto your profile, and click the Posts made by you link. 75% of them start with the word "Bush". Telling.... How is your hut doing?

Webby · 09-12-2006, 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

No its the fact that Ive answered those questions over and over and over since around 2002 or 2003.

More bullshit - Proove it - where's the links?

Jensen · 09-13-2006, 02:23 AM

no one touched tower 7 yet? it collapsed and its a lot more interresting that it wasn't hit by anything..

John69 · 09-13-2006, 04:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jensen

no one touched tower 7 yet? it collapsed and its a lot more interresting that it wasn't hit by anything..

Tower 7 was "Pulled" according to Larry Silverstein

Just Pull It Video

Larry Silverstein, WTC 7, and the 9/11 Demolition

"The Harbor Authorities of New York and New Jersey were the owners of the WTC. The two towers, 412 meters high, were completed in 1972 and the costs then amounted to 37 million Dollars. ... Since then the towers have become a desirable address for corporate businesses. From the completion of the buildings the entire office space had always been rented and the rents produced a great return for the owners. ... 430 companies from all over the world rented app. 3.3 million square feet office space in the WTC. More than 40,000 people were employed in the towers." --Die Welt, Berlin, Sep 11, 2001

Three months prior to the destruction of both towers the owners of the WTC leased the buildings, for incomprehensible reasons, to the Jewish real estate tycoon Larry Silverstein. Since then "Silverstein Properties Inc." took in the rent from the 430 tenants and other source income (i.e. tourist admission fees). Silverstein in return paid a leasing fee to the owners: "Only three months before the attack Silverstein signed a rental contract for the WTC. Silverstein agreed to pay over 99 years a total of 3,2 billion Dollars in leasing installments to the Port Authorities: 616 million as an initial payment and then annually 115 million Dollars. The Port Authorities remained the owners of the WTC." --Die Welt, Berlin, Oct 11, 2001.

nico-t · 09-13-2006, 05:02 AM

so whats the point of this thread? to prove it wasnt a conspiracy? So if its not some conspiracy, does that make president bush function any better? NO. He still fucked everything up. Case closed.

John69 · 09-13-2006, 06:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nico-t

so whats the point of this thread? to prove it wasnt a conspiracy? So if its not some conspiracy, does that make president bush function any better? NO. He still fucked everything up. Case closed.

the case will never be closed, till the full story is out.

Scootermuze · 09-13-2006, 06:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

No its the fact that Ive answered those questions over and over and over since around 2002 or 2003. So none of that is new, its all been answered over and over and over. Even right in this thread its already been answered. Shotgun regurgitation. Doesnt matter if it has a lick of truth to it, you'll just repeat it over and over and over untill others repeat it over and over and over. yawn.

The fact that you've answered those questions? It's amazing that lots of physisists, structural engineers, designers, fire inspectors, firemen, FEMA, etc., who were on-site at the time, or shortly afterwards to study what was left can only hypothesize and speculate with varying degrees of certainty what happened, yet you have the answers..

Now that made my day..

Minte · 09-13-2006, 06:57 AM

Most of you people probably don't remember Watergate,but you should all recall Lewinskigate.The real media...CBS,NBC,ABC,CNN spent years investigating Watergate.It led the nightly news for several years.The degree of that investigation forced a sitting president to resign.

President Clinton was impeached because of the investigation powers of the real media.Again,for over a year it's all we heard about on the nightly news.

So,in 5 years the real media has not been able to find a single piece of real evidence to support a 9/11 conspiracy.
Why would that be? There certainly are a lot of people at CBS that would love to nail President Bush's ass to the wall.

Phoenix · 09-13-2006, 07:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Minte

Most of you people probably don't remember Watergate,but you should all recall Lewinskigate.The real media...CBS,NBC,ABC,CNN spent years investigating Watergate.It led the nightly news for several years.The degree of that investigation forced a sitting president to resign.

President Clinton was impeached because of the investigation powers of the real media.Again,for over a year it's all we heard about on the nightly news.

So,in 5 years the real media has not been able to find a single piece of real evidence to support a 9/11 conspiracy.
Why would that be? There certainly are a lot of people at CBS that would love to nail President Bush's ass to the wall.

I do remember Dan Rather....

Minte · 09-13-2006, 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

I do remember Dan Rather....

Call me rightwing...that's fine.But I do believe that the national media is an integral part of the checks and balances that keep a democracy inline.
In my life,they have done everything that's been required to make politicians accountable. Vietnam would have lasted years longer if it weren't for the media.Iran-Contra,Oliver North,the few I already mentioned.
If there was any conspiracy in 9/11 I will believe it when I see it on the major television networks and newspapers.
Until,then...it's internet chatter.

hershie · 09-13-2006, 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Minte

Most of you people probably don't remember Watergate,but you should all recall Lewinskigate.The real media...CBS,NBC,ABC,CNN spent years investigating Watergate.It led the nightly news for several years.The degree of that investigation forced a sitting president to resign.

President Clinton was impeached because of the investigation powers of the real media.Again,for over a year it's all we heard about on the nightly news.

So,in 5 years the real media has not been able to find a single piece of real evidence to support a 9/11 conspiracy.
Why would that be? There certainly are a lot of people at CBS that would love to nail President Bush's ass to the wall.

Just think of all the thousands of people that would have to be in on the plot to pull a conspiracy off. You cannot just say it was "the gov't" and all the defense contractors and internationalists in black helicopters that pulled it off. Simply impossible that all these ordinary people are blindly following orders of silence all this time.

Minte · 09-13-2006, 07:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hershie

Just think of all the thousands of people that would have to be in on the plot to pull a conspiracy off. You cannot just say it was "the gov't" and all the defense contractors and internationalists in black helicopters that pulled it off. Simply impossible that all these ordinary people are blindly following orders of silence all this time.

Exactly right.Deepthroat/Mark Felt was one of only a handful of people that were in the know during Watergate.And the info he fed to Woodward and Bernstein was all it took to bring down President Nixon.

I think the people that are solidly believing in a 9/11 conspiracy only need to look back about 30 years to realize how powerful the national media has grown.I have faith in CBS,NBC,ABC and CNN.

09-12-2006, 08:03 PM	#154
John69 Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 942	copy and paste for you: THE DAY ITSELF - EVIDENCE OF COMPLICITY 1) AWOL Chain of Command a. It is well documented that the officials topping the chain of command for response to a domestic attack - George W. Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Myers, Montague Winfield - all found reason to do something else during the actual attacks, other than assuming their duties as decision-makers. b. Who was actually in charge? Dick Cheney, Richard Clarke, Norman Mineta and the 9/11 Commission directly conflict in their accounts of top-level response to the unfolding events, such that several (or all) of them must be lying. 2) Air Defense Failures a. The US air defense system failed to follow standard procedures for responding to diverted passenger flights. b. Timelines: The various responsible agencies - NORAD, FAA, Pentagon, USAF, as well as the 9/11 Commission - gave radically different explanations for the failure (in some cases upheld for years), such that several officials must have lied; but none were held accountable. c. Was there an air defense standdown? 3) Pentagon Strike How was it possible the Pentagon was hit 1 hour and 20 minutes after the attacks began? Why was there no response from Andrews Air Force Base, just 10 miles away and home to Air National Guard units charged with defending the skies above the nation's capital? How did Hani Hanjour, a man who failed as a Cessna pilot on his first flight in a Boeing, execute a difficult aerobatic maneuver to strike the Pentagon? Why did the attack strike the just-renovated side, which was largely empty and opposite from the high command? 4) Wargames a. US military and other authorities planned or actually rehearsed defensive response to all elements of the 9/11 scenario during the year prior to the attack - including multiple hijackings, suicide crashbombings, and a strike on the Pentagon. b. The multiple military wargames planned long in advance and held on the morning of September 11th included scenarios of a domestic air crisis, a plane crashing into a government building, and a large-scale emergency in New York. If this was only an incredible series of coincidences, why did the official investigations avoid the issue? There is evidence that the wargames created confusion as to whether the unfolding events were "real world or exercise." Did wargames serve as the cover for air defense sabotage, and/or the execution of an "inside job"? 5) Flight 93 Did the Shanksville crash occur at 10:06 (according to a seismic report) or 10:03 (according to the 9/11 Commission)? Does the Commission wish to hide what happened in the last three minutes of the flight, and if so, why? Was Flight 93 shot down, as indicated by the scattering of debris over a trail of several miles? THE DAY - POSSIBLE SMOKING GUNS 6) Did cell phones work at 30,000 feet in 2001? How many hijackings were attempted? How many flights were diverted? 7) Demolition Hypothesis What caused the collapse of a third skyscraper, WTC 7, which was not hit by a plane? Were the Twin Towers and WTC 7 brought down by explosives? (See "The Case for Demolitions," the websites wtc7.net and 911research.wtc7.net, and the influential article by physicist Steven Jones. See also items no. 16 and 24, below.) FOREKNOWLEDGE & THE ALLEGED HIJACKERS 8) What did officials know? How did they know it? a. Multiple allied foreign agencies informed the US government of a coming attack in detail, including the manner and likely targets of the attack, the name of the operation (the "Big Wedding"), and the names of certain men later identified as being among the perpetrators. b. Various individuals came into possession of specific advance knowledge, and some of them tried to warn the US prior to September 11th. c. Certain prominent persons received warnings not to fly on the week or on the day of September 11th. 9) Able Danger, Plus - Surveillance of Alleged Hijackers a. The men identified as the 9/11 ringleaders were under surveillance for years beforehand, on the suspicion they were terrorists, by a variety of US and allied authorities - including the CIA, the US military's "Able Danger" program, the German authorities, Israeli intelligence and others. b. Two of the alleged ringleaders who were known to be under surveillance by the CIA also lived with an FBI asset in San Diego, but this is supposed to be yet another a coincidence. 10) Obstruction of FBI Investigations prior to 9/11 A group of FBI officials in New York systematically suppressed field investigations of potential terrorists that might have uncovered the alleged hijackers - as the Moussaoui case once again showed. The stories of Sibel Edmonds, Robert Wright, Coleen Rowley and Harry Samit, the "Phoenix Memo," David Schippers, the 199i orders restricting investigations, the Bush administration's order to back off the Bin Ladin family, the reaction to the "Bojinka" plot, and John O'Neil do not, when considered in sum, indicate mere incompetence, but high-level corruption and protection of criminal networks, including the network of the alleged 9/11 conspirators. (Nearly all of these examples were omitted from or relegated to fleeting footnotes in The 9/11 Commission Report.) 11) Insider Trading a. Unknown speculators allegedly used foreknowledge of the Sept. 11th events to profiteer on many markets internationally - including but not limited to "put options" placed to short-sell the two airlines, WTC tenants, and WTC re-insurance companies in Chicago and London. b. In addition, suspicious monetary transactions worth hundreds of millions were conducted through offices at the Twin Towers during the actual attacks. c. Initial reports on these trades were suppressed and forgotten, and only years later did the 9/11 Commission and SEC provide a partial, but untenable explanation for only a small number of transactions (covering only the airline put options through the Chicago Board of Exchange). 12) Who were the perpetrators? a. Much of the evidence establishing who did the crime is dubious and miraculous: bags full of incriminating material that happened to miss the flight or were left in a van; the "magic passport" of an alleged hijacker, found at Ground Zero; documents found at motels where the alleged perpetrators had stayed days and weeks before 9/11. b. The identities of the alleged hijackers remain unresolved, there are contradictions in official accounts of their actions and travels, and there is evidence several of them had "doubles," all of which is omitted from official investigations. c. What happened to initial claims by the government that 50 people involved in the attacks had been identified, including the 19 alleged hijackers, with 10 still at large (suggesting that 20 had been apprehended)? http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/n...,1825231.story __________________ DARKSOUL: thanks but no thanks, your over priced.

09-12-2006, 08:16 PM	#158
Webby Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Far far away - as possible Posts: 14,956	This shit thread still bouncing along with silly comments from stupid Sticky? Hey.. cumon - the ass is a 30 something naive retard with nada education and living in a $250K home which only has $50K equity (according to him) and he's whoring for SI. He's not exactly the businessman of the year or some fucking scientific genius - he's a toll trying to justify his paycheck. He'd piss his frilly panties if reality hit home. This also reflects on Splitinfinity who permit trash to represent them in this crass manner. Would you have confidence in a host to let their floor sweeper be a smartass with potential customers??? Tho, hell - some folks will try anything for a buck, - depends how low you want to go in running a business and losing any professionalism. Excuse me while I watch more of the comedy channel - Fox __________________ XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

09-12-2006, 08:21 PM	#160
ParlourCash Karl Confirmed User Join Date: May 2006 Location: Hawaii Posts: 438	Believe what the fuck you want but you obviously did not loose anyone in 9/11, there is no conspiracy....the only conspiracy is in peoples individual minds.......fuck reality is : terrorism is a reality...wake up and smell the roses.......it is an uncurable cancer..... __________________ www.ParlourCash.com

09-12-2006, 08:31 PM	#162
RF_Erick Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Baltimore,Md Posts: 946	Why does everybody have to resort to attacks. Cant we be civilized? We are all here on gfy to make friends do business debate topics, read fake drama. We dont all have to agree on everything but lets be proffesional no? No need for personal attacks. __________________ Exclusive Reality Feeds - [email protected] - ICQ: 4144516

09-12-2006, 08:34 PM	#163
John69 Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 942	if you had a time machine and could go back to 9/11 what site would you bring your video camera to? For me I would tape all 3 angle's of the pentigon. trying to tell anyone before hand would be a waste of time, no one would listen. __________________ DARKSOUL: thanks but no thanks, your over priced.

09-12-2006, 08:13 PM	#157
HomeFry Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 1,062	sheeeeppp

09-12-2006, 08:39 PM	#164
Phoenix BACON BACON BACON Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Poems everybody, the laddie fancies himself a poet Posts: 35,462	i often wonder if it is just ostrich syndrome or do some of the people arguing for the right wingers..believe in it and hope to curry favour some how. i mean seriously...why bother to fight...all they do is insult __________________ Skype Phoenixskype1 Telegram PhoenixBrad https://quantads.io

09-12-2006, 09:00 PM	#169
John69 Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 942	The "smoking gun" at the Pentagon, he observed, is the clear, smooth and unblemished lawn. "It would have been especially unlikely that an inexperienced pilot like Hanjour could have flown a large airplane so close to the ground and not collided with it," Fetzer remarked. "That is a feat even experienced pilots would have found very difficult to accomplish." "No one watching these clips over and over, focusing on each frame, can find unambiguous support for a large aircraft, much less a Boeing 757," he added. "How much less likely that bypassers in the vicinity, who only had a brief chance to notice this happening, could have figured out what they saw. Nothing here remotely resembles a Boeing 757." Even the Pentagon itself is covered with cameras. The most serious question raised by the release of these videos may be why other videos, which would provide clearer and far more revealing information, have not been released. "The most plausible explanation for withholding this evidence from the American public," Griffin observed, "is that the American government has a great deal to hide." __________________ DARKSOUL: thanks but no thanks, your over priced.

09-12-2006, 09:03 PM	#170
John69 Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 942	THE HIDDEN HAND OF THE CIA - 9/11 and Popular Mechanics __________________ DARKSOUL: thanks but no thanks, your over priced.

09-12-2006, 09:55 PM	#177
pocketkangaroo Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Chicago, IL Posts: 8,452	The best part of this is that the conspiracy theorists take a screenshot of a website and determines it is more factual proof than hundreds of eyewitnesses, all the plane parts in the Pentagon, and all the dead bodies in the Pentagon.

09-13-2006, 02:23 AM	#191
Jensen Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Norway Posts: 3,790	no one touched tower 7 yet? it collapsed and its a lot more interresting that it wasn't hit by anything..

09-13-2006, 05:02 AM	#193
nico-t emperor of my world Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: nethalands Posts: 29,903	so whats the point of this thread? to prove it wasnt a conspiracy? So if its not some conspiracy, does that make president bush function any better? NO. He still fucked everything up. Case closed.

09-13-2006, 06:57 AM	#196
Minte Babemeister Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Madison Posts: 7,081	Most of you people probably don't remember Watergate,but you should all recall Lewinskigate.The real media...CBS,NBC,ABC,CNN spent years investigating Watergate.It led the nightly news for several years.The degree of that investigation forced a sitting president to resign. President Clinton was impeached because of the investigation powers of the real media.Again,for over a year it's all we heard about on the nightly news. So,in 5 years the real media has not been able to find a single piece of real evidence to support a 9/11 conspiracy. Why would that be? There certainly are a lot of people at CBS that would love to nail President Bush's ass to the wall. __________________ You might not be as anonymous as you think you are.