c-span 2:30 ET net porn hearing.. - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

After Shock Media · 01-19-2006, 01:31 PM

BTW you foreners they are keeping you in mind as well and talking about you all.

Joan · 01-19-2006, 01:32 PM

don?t now if you show the story about CP in the WSJ yesterday ? http://online.wsj.com/article_email/...zQxNjc2Wj.html

ASACP provided info on these billing companies since 2002 and AVN reported on it over two years:

http://www.avn.com/index.php?Primary...ntent_ID=69702

The Truth Hurts · 01-19-2006, 01:32 PM

cambria...

bringer · 01-19-2006, 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SykkBoy2

I'm just listening to the audio while working, but peeking over once in awhile and have noticed this too...but really, we don't have any "friends" in congress on either side...

absolutely. they'd all shut us down in a second but i found it odd that the party many here think to be on our side and often praise as an alterntive to the evil republicans are actually the same.

FightThisPatent · 01-19-2006, 01:36 PM

Listening to CPAN now on the hearing...

Good thing cambria is on the panel...

Fight the bump!

After Shock Media · 01-19-2006, 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FightThisPatent

Listening to CPAN now on the hearing...

Good thing cambria is on the panel...

Fight the bump!

I am reserving judgement on Cambria being on the panel until I hear him speak and address this Pornographer = Pedophile/CP connection.

cool1g · 01-19-2006, 01:40 PM

sounds like the guy on now has been surfing TGPs and free sites!

Damian_Maxcash · 01-19-2006, 01:40 PM

$2.5 Bln!!! WFT? - I knew you guys where shaving!!

and that bitch can stop "training" my goverment right now

SykkBoy · 01-19-2006, 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bringer

absolutely. they'd all shut us down in a second but i found it odd that the party many here think to be on our side and often praise as an alterntive to the evil republicans are actually the same.

we are definitely in agreement there

I just feel better with the democrats because they'll lock things up in gridlock a little better ;-)

mikeyddddd · 01-19-2006, 01:46 PM

"There is no substitute for parental involvement." - Tatiana Platt

No shit

FightThisPatent · 01-19-2006, 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media

I am reserving judgement on Cambria being on the panel until I hear him speak and address this Pornographer = Pedophile/CP connection.

exactly... the federal prosecutors and Oprah have equated porn to CP.. which is completely insane, FBI field agents who bust pedofiles, rarely find porn with the CP images... CP is a mental sickness and they don't look at porn.

you don't all of a sudden become a pedo... it usually occurs in the developing years, usually through personal trauma, continues through growth, or surfaces later in adulthood....

you don't become a pedo because you see pics of underage kids.. there is more brain synapses that have to get fired off that taps into the mental illness.

Fight the Pedros!

bringer · 01-19-2006, 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SykkBoy2

we are definitely in agreement there

I just feel better with the democrats because they'll lock things up in gridlock a little better ;-)

thats very true. thank god for the democrats ineffectiveness with pushing threw bills

mikeyddddd · 01-19-2006, 01:51 PM

Cambria's up.

FightThisPatent · 01-19-2006, 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeyddddd

"There is no substitute for parental involvement." - Tatiana Platt

for those not watching Tatiana is the Chief Trust Officer and Senior VP at AOL.

Fight the 411!

Tom_PM · 01-19-2006, 01:57 PM

Yes! He's mentioning .kids domain. Very good.

After Shock Media · 01-19-2006, 01:58 PM

Yes finally a .kids talk.

FightThisPatent · 01-19-2006, 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom

Yes! He's mentioning .kids domain. Very good.

.XXX = bad
.KIDS = good

Fight the .$$$!

Tom_PM · 01-19-2006, 02:00 PM

All of my sites are labeled "Adults Only" with a warning page. Does the chairman suggest "adults only" labels on nekkid pictures?

FlexxAeon · 01-19-2006, 02:00 PM

lol...why old dude chewing out cambria?

After Shock Media · 01-19-2006, 02:01 PM

That was a pretty harsh threat.

Umm people go register your sites with ICRA if you have not yet.

luv$ · 01-19-2006, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlexxAeon

lol...why old dude chewing out cambria?

I know man - overkill.

he doesn't even know what he's talking about (old dude)

- Jesus Christ - · 01-19-2006, 02:01 PM

Freedom is so quaint.

Our jail cells await, See you there!

p.s. the "old dude" is ted stevens... bridge to nowhere ring a bell?

Tom_PM · 01-19-2006, 02:01 PM

I think that was the opprtunity to mentioned warning pages, and icra labels.

FlexxAeon · 01-19-2006, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom

All of my sites are labeled "Adults Only" with a warning page. Does the chairman suggest "adults only" labels on nekkid pictures?

exactly....we've been labeling sites with ratings/warnings for years....

SykkBoy · 01-19-2006, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bringer

thats very true. thank god for the democrats ineffectiveness with pushing threw bills

exactly

a congress in gridlock is a good thing when we can be beneficiaries of that gridlock

mikeyddddd · 01-19-2006, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media

Umm people go register your sites with ICRA if you have not yet.

Already do.

After Shock Media · 01-19-2006, 02:18 PM

I am really becoming to like the Hawaiian senator.

Tom_PM · 01-19-2006, 02:18 PM

This is why I suggest IE blocks everything but .kids by DEFAULT preinstalled. Adults will quickly learn how to unblock the .com's etc....

After Shock Media · 01-19-2006, 02:30 PM

umm fuck mark pryor.

FlexxAeon · 01-19-2006, 02:30 PM

:mad why do they have such a boner for .xxx???

anyone with half a brain can see that it WON'T WORK!!

Tom_PM · 01-19-2006, 02:32 PM

Yep, .xxx would be stupid. We all know that, he seems to have an interest in it as opposed to other solutions.

- Jesus Christ - · 01-19-2006, 02:33 PM

Mark Pryor is a stupid hick.

luv$ · 01-19-2006, 02:35 PM

Mark Pryor OBVIOUSLY has a financial motivation for his questions.

Furthermore he doesn't even listen to the answers after he asks a question.

What a fuck, the cowboy attitude is irritating too.

mikeyddddd · 01-19-2006, 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeyddddd

IFFOR must have gotten into Mark Pryor's pocket.

See above.

Damian_Maxcash · 01-19-2006, 02:36 PM

At least he got the last word in - I think he did well

TheDoc · 01-19-2006, 02:37 PM

Paul isn't much all the ball with good answers. These people need to sit down with a few of us and learn how to answer these questions in ways that would crush them.

FightThisPatent · 01-19-2006, 02:47 PM

One of the congressman asked Cambria about .KIDS that couldn't a porn site operator get a .KIDS domain and therefore gain exposure to kids.

Cambria didn't have a strong answer like he had with the other questions.

What he should have mentioned is that whoever is the registrar for .KIDS would have a review committee that would ensure that the website that owns the .KIDS domain would be screened and validated to be kid friendly.

That this registrar would also monitor the websites to ensure compliance.

This is why a .KIDS domain would cost like $200/year

As a policy, any .KIDS website that snuck in porn, and after a review process, would lose the domain.

.KIDS is the only effective tool that can protect children.

Some will argue that the .KIDS.US extension did some pitiful that there is no support for a .KIDS

.KIDS.US is not a good extension, and it really takes technology companies like Microsoft and AOL to put in a .KIDS filter to make this a reality.

Then ISP will offer proxy services to filter... third party products like zone alarm, norton firewall, etc could put in the white listing filter.

The senator from VA was the most tech savvy, and he said that he would rather see technology solve this problem, not congress.

Self-labelling with ICRA is great, labelling content is great.. but the problem is those that don't take that responsibility causes the problem.

And as a national study found, over 75% of free content porn comes from outside the US.. so any blacklisting filtering like .XXX just won't work...it will be like swiss cheese.

Lobbying MS and AOL is needed!

Fight the .XXX!

Tom_PM · 01-19-2006, 02:55 PM

Yep, .KIDS would be nowhere better policed than the adult industry itself as well IMHO.

.KIDS trying to host adult content would be like a criminal in prison for child abuse, and we all know what that means.

.XXX would simply double overnight the number of porn sites on the net. Duh.

FightThisPatent · 01-19-2006, 02:55 PM

The chairman was trying to point fingers at the adult industry as being the problem.

The statistics gather by asacp.org over the last 2 years,has conclusively pointed out that CP is prevalent in the US! but. it is mainstream companies that are inadvertantly hosting, billing,and domain registration for CP.

There will be more talk about the asacp.org data to government to refute the fingering pointing at adult.

Fight the numbers!

erehwon · 01-19-2006, 02:56 PM

Gotta love the one quote from Sen. Mark Pryor...

"I like that dot XXX"

I'm sure he does...

SykkBoy · 01-19-2006, 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by erehwon

Gotta love the one quote from Sen. Mark Pryor...

"I like that dot XXX"

I'm sure he does...

I wonder if he also favors a .bribe domain ;-)

FightThisPatent · 01-19-2006, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SykkBoy2

I wonder if he also favors a .bribe domain ;-)

probably more like .contribution

Fight the semantics!

d00t · 01-19-2006, 03:35 PM

is there a transcript or recorded cast of this?

tony286 · 01-19-2006, 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FightThisPatent

One of the congressman asked Cambria about .KIDS that couldn't a porn site operator get a .KIDS domain and therefore gain exposure to kids.

Cambria didn't have a strong answer like he had with the other questions.

What he should have mentioned is that whoever is the registrar for .KIDS would have a review committee that would ensure that the website that owns the .KIDS domain would be screened and validated to be kid friendly.

That this registrar would also monitor the websites to ensure compliance.

This is why a .KIDS domain would cost like $200/year

As a policy, any .KIDS website that snuck in porn, and after a review process, would lose the domain.

.KIDS is the only effective tool that can protect children.

Some will argue that the .KIDS.US extension did some pitiful that there is no support for a .KIDS

.KIDS.US is not a good extension, and it really takes technology companies like Microsoft and AOL to put in a .KIDS filter to make this a reality.

Then ISP will offer proxy services to filter... third party products like zone alarm, norton firewall, etc could put in the white listing filter.

The senator from VA was the most tech savvy, and he said that he would rather see technology solve this problem, not congress.

Self-labelling with ICRA is great, labelling content is great.. but the problem is those that don't take that responsibility causes the problem.

And as a national study found, over 75% of free content porn comes from outside the US.. so any blacklisting filtering like .XXX just won't work...it will be like swiss cheese.

Lobbying MS and AOL is needed!

Fight the .XXX!

I cant believe Cambria didnt say porn site operators dont want kids exposed to their sites and only want adults duh.Also the biggest preditors of children online are in mainstream chatrooms not on porn sites. Fuck this pisses me off.

mikeyddddd · 01-19-2006, 08:02 PM

The program is going to repeat at 10:25 PM ET on C-SPAN.

01-19-2006, 01:31 PM	#51
After Shock Media It's coming look busy Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn". Posts: 35,299	BTW you foreners they are keeping you in mind as well and talking about you all. __________________ [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

01-19-2006, 01:32 PM	#52
Joan Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: LA Posts: 191	Regpay don?t now if you show the story about CP in the WSJ yesterday ? http://online.wsj.com/article_email/...zQxNjc2Wj.html ASACP provided info on these billing companies since 2002 and AVN reported on it over two years: http://www.avn.com/index.php?Primary...ntent_ID=69702 __________________ ASACP - Protecting Your Business By Protecting Children

01-19-2006, 01:36 PM	#55
FightThisPatent Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 4,090	Listening to CPAN now on the hearing... Good thing cambria is on the panel... Fight the bump! __________________ http://www.t3report.com (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! \| http://www.FightThePatent.com \| ICQ 52741957

01-19-2006, 01:40 PM	#57
cool1g Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Hollyweird adjacent Posts: 977	sounds like the guy on now has been surfing TGPs and free sites! __________________ InterG Media affiliate network (dating, pay per call) EDM Life Affiliates Cash In

01-19-2006, 01:46 PM	#60
mikeyddddd Viva la vulva! Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: you can't please everyone, so you got to please yourself Posts: 16,557	"There is no substitute for parental involvement." - Tatiana Platt No shit __________________ AdultStarProfits AmbyaCash AnilosCash AzianiGold ColdHardCash FlashTheMoney IdolBucks MediumPimpin NSCash Nubiles PussyCash ScoreCash Sextronix SpunkyCash TubeTitans Twistys

01-19-2006, 01:32 PM	#53
The Truth Hurts Zph7YXfjMhg Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: In Your Skull Posts: 15,305	cambria...

01-19-2006, 01:40 PM	#58
Damian_Maxcash So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: MaxCash.com Posts: 12,745	$2.5 Bln!!! WFT? - I knew you guys where shaving!! and that bitch can stop "training" my goverment right now

01-19-2006, 01:51 PM	#63
mikeyddddd Viva la vulva! Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: you can't please everyone, so you got to please yourself Posts: 16,557	Cambria's up. __________________ AdultStarProfits AmbyaCash AnilosCash AzianiGold ColdHardCash FlashTheMoney IdolBucks MediumPimpin NSCash Nubiles PussyCash ScoreCash Sextronix SpunkyCash TubeTitans Twistys

01-19-2006, 01:57 PM	#65
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	Yes! He's mentioning .kids domain. Very good. __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

01-19-2006, 01:58 PM	#66
After Shock Media It's coming look busy Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn". Posts: 35,299	Yes finally a .kids talk. __________________ [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

01-19-2006, 02:00 PM	#68
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	All of my sites are labeled "Adults Only" with a warning page. Does the chairman suggest "adults only" labels on nekkid pictures? __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

01-19-2006, 02:00 PM	#69
FlexxAeon Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 3,765	lol...why old dude chewing out cambria?

01-19-2006, 02:01 PM	#70
After Shock Media It's coming look busy Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn". Posts: 35,299	That was a pretty harsh threat. Umm people go register your sites with ICRA if you have not yet. __________________ [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

01-19-2006, 02:01 PM	#72
- Jesus Christ - Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: ::::::::::::: :::::::::::\|\|::::::::::: :::::::::::\|\|::::::::::: :::::::::::\|\|::::::::::: :::::::::::\|\|::::::::::: :::::::::::\|\|::::::::::: ::::::\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|:::::: :::::::::::\|\|::::::::::: :::::::::::\|\|::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::: Posts: 7,197	Freedom is so quaint. Our jail cells await, See you there! p.s. the "old dude" is ted stevens... bridge to nowhere ring a bell? __________________ Amen Last edited by - Jesus Christ -; 01-19-2006 at 02:02 PM..

01-19-2006, 02:18 PM	#77
After Shock Media It's coming look busy Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn". Posts: 35,299	I am really becoming to like the Hawaiian senator. __________________ [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

01-19-2006, 02:30 PM	#79
After Shock Media It's coming look busy Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn". Posts: 35,299	umm fuck mark pryor. __________________ [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

01-19-2006, 02:32 PM	#81
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	Yep, .xxx would be stupid. We all know that, he seems to have an interest in it as opposed to other solutions. __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

01-19-2006, 02:33 PM	#82
- Jesus Christ - Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: ::::::::::::: :::::::::::\|\|::::::::::: :::::::::::\|\|::::::::::: :::::::::::\|\|::::::::::: :::::::::::\|\|::::::::::: :::::::::::\|\|::::::::::: ::::::\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|:::::: :::::::::::\|\|::::::::::: :::::::::::\|\|::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::: Posts: 7,197	Mark Pryor is a stupid hick. __________________ Amen

01-19-2006, 02:35 PM	#83
luv$ !$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$ Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Paper Street Posts: 6,158	Mark Pryor OBVIOUSLY has a financial motivation for his questions. Furthermore he doesn't even listen to the answers after he asks a question. What a fuck, the cowboy attitude is irritating too. __________________ Domain Auction - now till 12:01AM on the 2nd... Paper Streeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet Cash The Real Workout - Innocent High - Oye Loca - Her Freshman Year - Solo Interviews - This Girl Sucks. ** HQ Fresh ORIGINAL sites.

01-19-2006, 02:36 PM	#85
Damian_Maxcash So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: MaxCash.com Posts: 12,745	At least he got the last word in - I think he did well

01-19-2006, 02:37 PM	#86
TheDoc Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Currently Incognito Posts: 13,827	Paul isn't much all the ball with good answers. These people need to sit down with a few of us and learn how to answer these questions in ways that would crush them. __________________ ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825 It's all disambiguation

01-19-2006, 02:47 PM	#87
FightThisPatent Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 4,090	One of the congressman asked Cambria about .KIDS that couldn't a porn site operator get a .KIDS domain and therefore gain exposure to kids. Cambria didn't have a strong answer like he had with the other questions. What he should have mentioned is that whoever is the registrar for .KIDS would have a review committee that would ensure that the website that owns the .KIDS domain would be screened and validated to be kid friendly. That this registrar would also monitor the websites to ensure compliance. This is why a .KIDS domain would cost like $200/year As a policy, any .KIDS website that snuck in porn, and after a review process, would lose the domain. .KIDS is the only effective tool that can protect children. Some will argue that the .KIDS.US extension did some pitiful that there is no support for a .KIDS .KIDS.US is not a good extension, and it really takes technology companies like Microsoft and AOL to put in a .KIDS filter to make this a reality. Then ISP will offer proxy services to filter... third party products like zone alarm, norton firewall, etc could put in the white listing filter. The senator from VA was the most tech savvy, and he said that he would rather see technology solve this problem, not congress. Self-labelling with ICRA is great, labelling content is great.. but the problem is those that don't take that responsibility causes the problem. And as a national study found, over 75% of free content porn comes from outside the US.. so any blacklisting filtering like .XXX just won't work...it will be like swiss cheese. Lobbying MS and AOL is needed! Fight the .XXX! __________________ http://www.t3report.com (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! \| http://www.FightThePatent.com \| ICQ 52741957

01-19-2006, 02:55 PM	#88
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	Yep, .KIDS would be nowhere better policed than the adult industry itself as well IMHO. .KIDS trying to host adult content would be like a criminal in prison for child abuse, and we all know what that means. .XXX would simply double overnight the number of porn sites on the net. Duh. __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

01-19-2006, 02:56 PM	#90
erehwon Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: A secure undisclosed location... Posts: 3,759	Gotta love the one quote from Sen. Mark Pryor... "I like that dot XXX" I'm sure he does... __________________ Money NEVER $leep$...

01-19-2006, 03:35 PM	#93
d00t Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: In your mind Posts: 3,766	is there a transcript or recorded cast of this?

01-19-2006, 08:02 PM	#95
mikeyddddd Viva la vulva! Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: you can't please everyone, so you got to please yourself Posts: 16,557	The program is going to repeat at 10:25 PM ET on C-SPAN. __________________ AdultStarProfits AmbyaCash AnilosCash AzianiGold ColdHardCash FlashTheMoney IdolBucks MediumPimpin NSCash Nubiles PussyCash ScoreCash Sextronix SpunkyCash TubeTitans Twistys