"Cool Mom" gets 30 years. - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

websiex · 11-15-2005, 02:16 PM

Quote:

I hope that fucking bitch rots in prison for the rest of her life!

not a good attitude

J$tyle$ · 11-15-2005, 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by websiex

#1: It isn't a 40 year old man.

#2: Your analogy of old man drugging and raping girls while they are drunk/high is also absurd. That would be rape and she got sexual assault charges; sexual assault is different than what you are describing.

If they were passed out and she sexually touched them, that would be rape, but it wasn't so she got sexual assault. Rape requires force. You just mixed up sexual assault and rape, honest mistake. [Date rape = RAPE btw]

#3: This regarded all young males banging this old woman, so I don't know why you would call her a sexual predator. If anything, the teens are the sexual predators getting free pussy and booze off of this woman.

Point in fact: No Rape charges.

Yeah, anyway, you can make up analogies all you want, but it still goes on a case by case basis. I have no idea why you even called me out on my sentencing. I guess you like seeing really harsh cruel and unusual punishments given out for offenses that don't deserve it. 30 years is a life sentence for her, think about it. I stick with my old statements.

A little touchy? His comparison was right the fuck on.

What's the difference between a 40 yr old woman providing drugs and booze and fucking teen boys and a 40 yr old man providing drugs and booze and fucking teen girls?

Why would it be rape if a man did it and not the other way around?

Your reasoning is flawed. Read what he said carefully and come back again. He didn't say anything about girls being passed out.

BTW - the TRUTH of the matter IS - if this was a 40 yr old man and teen girls insted he'd get the book thrown at him WHICH IS WHY THE JUDGE is saying 30 years FOR HER ... use common sense people ... I know this is GFY, but c'mon

LOL

jennym · 11-15-2005, 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by websiex

not a good attitude

why is that?

J-$ · 11-15-2005, 02:19 PM

well meth = speed... teenagers do em by themselves already, she did encourage though, which is why she got time...30 years? fack aff thats like 30 X 365 consecutive days in a box you fuckin do-gooders

websiex · 11-16-2005, 11:30 AM

Quote:

What's the difference between a 40 yr old woman providing drugs and booze and fucking teen boys and a 40 yr old man providing drugs and booze and fucking teen girls?

The difference is sexual assault charges and not rape... Won't even say any more than that because you don't have knowledge in the law. Sexual assault and rape are two different things. She has no rape charge and is getting 30 years. I am not positive, but I am going to guess the sexual assault charge is just for having sex with minors, although it could be more; that is my guess on that specific charge.

Quote:

Why would it be rape if a man did it and not the other way around?

No, if he didn't drug them and rape them when they were passed out; then no, it would not be rape. He would get the same sexual assault charge.

Quote:

Your reasoning is flawed. Read what he said carefully and come back again. He didn't say anything about girls being passed out.

Point proven, what I was saying is that if they were passed out it would have been rape, and 30 years might have been a justified sentence. Fact is though, she got sexual assault for having sex with minors IMO.

Like someone else in this thread said, a lot of do gooders here that just go with the ol' lock em up and throw away the key ideology.

Quote:

BTW - the TRUTH of the matter IS - if this was a 40 yr old man and teen girls insted he'd get the book thrown at him WHICH IS WHY THE JUDGE is saying 30 years FOR HER ... use common sense people ... I know this is GFY, but c'mon

He would get the same penalty obviously; she DID get the book thrown at her. She got probably the maximum sentence for each crime she had against her. The judge wouldn't be say, "Well, this guy is a male and even though the maximum penalty I can give for this crime is 6 years I'm going to give him 10. It appears to me books have been thrown.

And ... judges have set guidelines with most cases on how much of a sentence they can give. To me, it appears the book has been thrown and it hit her square in the face.

And btw, if you even do respond, first look up rape and sexual assault and know the difference between them before you even post.

Sorry for the old thread bump.

pornguy · 11-16-2005, 11:34 AM

One of the things that bothers me the most about Judges today, is when they give their opinion, and allow that to be part of the judgment. It is supposed to be an impartial judgment. Based on the Facts, not how the judge " Feels "

Dalai lama · 11-16-2005, 11:36 AM

how dumb can you be.

Screaming · 11-16-2005, 11:37 AM

wow that is fucking nuts

chodadog · 11-16-2005, 12:07 PM

Webisex: You'll do well to notice i never said she raped these boys. She certainly did sexually assault them, though. For one, they are obviously underage. Secondly, it seems pretty fucking obvious that she had sex with them while they were either drunk or high. Or do you think she cracked out her DIY breathalizer kit to make sure the lads were below the legal blood-alcohol level before they hopped on for a shag?

Murderous · 11-16-2005, 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by websiex

Wilkes-Barre - It is a city in Northeastern Pennsylvania about 1 hour 30 minutes from New York City. It is located south of Scranton and north of Allentown.

I will be moving back to Bradford Pa soon, that is why I asked

I do know where Wilkes-Barre is, never been there, but If I ever head that direction maybe we can get together and shoot the shit ;)

Murderous · 11-16-2005, 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J$tyle$

A little touchy? His comparison was right the fuck on.

What's the difference between a 40 yr old woman providing drugs and booze and fucking teen boys and a 40 yr old man providing drugs and booze and fucking teen girls?

Why would it be rape if a man did it and not the other way around?

Your reasoning is flawed. Read what he said carefully and come back again. He didn't say anything about girls being passed out.

BTW - the TRUTH of the matter IS - if this was a 40 yr old man and teen girls insted he'd get the book thrown at him WHICH IS WHY THE JUDGE is saying 30 years FOR HER ... use common sense people ... I know this is GFY, but c'mon

LOL

I hate the judicial system. I once lived in a place where someone with burglary charges would get 5-7 in state pen and someone who molested 3 kids, ages 5 - 7 - 11, got 3 months in the county jail and some counseling.

That is simply BULLSHIT! FUCK the court systems!

Gunni · 11-16-2005, 12:20 PM

30 years is completely insane!

11-15-2005, 02:19 PM	#54
J-$ Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 2,090	well meth = speed... teenagers do em by themselves already, she did encourage though, which is why she got time...30 years? fack aff thats like 30 X 365 consecutive days in a box you fuckin do-gooders __________________

11-16-2005, 11:34 AM	#56
pornguy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Homeless Posts: 62,911	One of the things that bothers me the most about Judges today, is when they give their opinion, and allow that to be part of the judgment. It is supposed to be an impartial judgment. Based on the Facts, not how the judge " Feels " __________________ PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com \| Angeles Cid \| Mariana Cordoba \| MAILERS WELCOME!

11-16-2005, 11:36 AM	#57
Dalai lama Strength and Honor Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Europe Posts: 16,540	how dumb can you be. __________________ A program you can trust. Gallerybooster Run multiply TGPs of 1 script

11-16-2005, 11:37 AM	#58
Screaming I can change this!!!!! Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 18,972	wow that is fucking nuts __________________

11-16-2005, 12:07 PM	#59
chodadog Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 9,736	Webisex: You'll do well to notice i never said she raped these boys. She certainly did sexually assault them, though. For one, they are obviously underage. Secondly, it seems pretty fucking obvious that she had sex with them while they were either drunk or high. Or do you think she cracked out her DIY breathalizer kit to make sure the lads were below the legal blood-alcohol level before they hopped on for a shag? __________________ 26 + 6 = 1

11-16-2005, 12:20 PM	#62
Gunni Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Barcelona Posts: 2,385	30 years is completely insane!