|
|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
 |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
06-24-2005, 12:19 PM
|
#1 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 689
|
Why it makes me embarressed to be a member of FSC
I am a member of FSC but what gets me is these to commenst they have posted on their site
("Free Speech Coalition is the trade organization of the adult entertainment industry. Its mission is to safeguard the industry from oppressive governmental regulation and to promote good business practices within the industry.") Then to see this on the same page ("An injunction hearing is scheduled for August 8 and August 9, and the deal applies only to those who are members of the FSC by 2 p.m. Pacific time on June 25. I don't like the idea that they are portraying themselves to have all in the industry best interests at heart but yet this deal only includes THEIR members. Like i said im a member simply because i believe in the cause..but I can't say i agree with what this has turned out to be. I mean if the DOJ had such a bad case why not jut go and push the injuction thru right then and there and cover everybody? What did i miss here? |
|
|
|
06-24-2005, 12:20 PM
|
#2 | |
|
i have man boobies
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: van down by the river
Posts: 13,082
|
Quote:
__________________
333-765-551 |
|
|
|
|
|
06-24-2005, 12:22 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 689
|
Quote:
Sorry if its a SOS question. |
|
|
|
|
|
06-24-2005, 01:40 PM
|
#4 |
|
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,805
|
If that is true, it's pretty fucked
|
|
|
|
|
06-24-2005, 01:41 PM
|
#5 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Tampa Bay, FL
Posts: 393
|
Quote:
__________________
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60. |
|
|
|
|
|
06-24-2005, 01:43 PM
|
#6 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oakville, Canada
Posts: 9,134
|
Sleep through law class?
__________________
Free agent |
|
|
|
|
06-24-2005, 02:26 PM
|
#7 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 689
|
Quote:
It means the law is frozen without going into affect untill its constitutional merits are determind by the court. |
|
|
|
|
|
06-24-2005, 02:37 PM
|
#8 |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In a refrigerator box by the tracks.
Posts: 4,791
|
An injunction only covers the plaintiffs. If a law is being challenged and an injunction has been issued, the enforcement authorities seldom persue enforcement as they know the law is being challenged and would rather wait until the issues are decided because they don't won't to have all their hard work thrown out of court.
However, that being said, the enforcement authorities are NOT restrained by law from busting non-plaintiffs. This is how it was explained to me.... |
|
|
|
