GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post - Why it makes me embarressed to be a member of FSC

roscoe98 · 06-24-2005, 12:19 PM

I am a member of FSC but what gets me is these to commenst they have posted on their site

("Free Speech Coalition is the trade organization of the adult entertainment industry. Its mission is to safeguard the industry from oppressive governmental regulation and to promote good business practices within the industry.")

Then to see this on the same page

("An injunction hearing is scheduled for August 8 and August 9, and the deal applies only to those who are members of the FSC by 2 p.m. Pacific time on June 25.

I don't like the idea that they are portraying themselves to have all in the industry best interests at heart but yet this deal only includes THEIR members.

Like i said im a member simply because i believe in the cause..but I can't say i agree with what this has turned out to be.
I mean if the DOJ had such a bad case why not jut go and push the injuction thru right then and there and cover everybody?

What did i miss here?

06-24-2005, 12:19 PM
roscoe98 Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 689	Why it makes me embarressed to be a member of FSC I am a member of FSC but what gets me is these to commenst they have posted on their site ("Free Speech Coalition is the trade organization of the adult entertainment industry. Its mission is to safeguard the industry from oppressive governmental regulation and to promote good business practices within the industry.") Then to see this on the same page ("An injunction hearing is scheduled for August 8 and August 9, and the deal applies only to those who are members of the FSC by 2 p.m. Pacific time on June 25. I don't like the idea that they are portraying themselves to have all in the industry best interests at heart but yet this deal only includes THEIR members. Like i said im a member simply because i believe in the cause..but I can't say i agree with what this has turned out to be. I mean if the DOJ had such a bad case why not jut go and push the injuction thru right then and there and cover everybody? What did i miss here?