GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Extreme Paychecks Us2257 Announcment (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=477535)

woj 06-06-2005 08:40 PM

200........,

lagwagon 06-06-2005 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shooting_Manic
Yep, fuck the people that put that money in your pocket just so your standard of living does not change. Damn dude, you are not the Chris I know.

Damn.


Your right fuck over all our affiliates too. Sorry I wont do that.

Extreme John 06-06-2005 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DonovanPhillips
Exactly right.


I'll promise you this: this thread is being bookmarked. If an "Extreme" model is harmed or, God forbid, killed, I'll be the first to call the DA as a witness for the prosecution. You guys have had the risks spelled out in this thread and have been offered plenty of viable options that don't endanger models.


Excellent would you like me to maybe copy to a hard disk and mail it to you as well incase you get a computer virus and lose the bookmark?? Or I can print it out for you as well and send it to you. Im here to help Donavans Cause.

Donny 06-06-2005 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Extreme John
Yup well maybe one of the people buying the content you shoot will become fascinated with one of your models and want to stalk them, but lemme guess thats not the same right.

If Kim Nielsen, Louis Bajjali, or the select few others I sell to stalk a model I'll be happy to turn myself in and help prosecute myself.

Shooting_Manic 06-06-2005 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lagwagon
Your right fuck over all our affiliates too. Sorry I wont do that.


Dude, you are WAY smarter then that. Arnt you guys in AZ? You guys need a lesson from Lightspeed again. Drive over to Glendale and sit down with a company that has figured out a way to keep their models safe and their affiliates happy. It will be worth your time and Im know he will be happy to share.

ChrisExtreme 06-06-2005 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DonovanPhillips
Exactly right.


I'll promise you this: this thread is being bookmarked. If an "Extreme" model is harmed or, God forbid, killed, I'll be the first to call the DA as a witness for the prosecution. You guys have had the risks spelled out in this thread and have been offered plenty of viable options that don't endanger models.

You want to play dirty little games I'll make sure that if one of your models (god forbid) is hurt, I'll do the same. Or did you forget that you also photograph girls and distribute their I.D.'s?

You really are showing everyone what a classes person you really are. It's one thing to have a different opinion, it's another to make ridiculous statements.

FleshJoe2005 06-06-2005 08:44 PM

I think ExtremeJohn and FTV are forgetting that there's a lot of nasty people out there and that affiliates are people, so some are nasty (how's that for logic, LOL).

OK so now you've got an affiliate that youve built a relationship of trust with over a few months, and then there's a dispute, lets say about conversions or such. Now imagine a conversation like this:

ExtremeJohn: OK affiliate Joe you're out, I dont want to have anything more to do with you. And by the way I am also forfeiting your $2431.72 that I still owe you.

Affiliate Joe: Oh no you don't. I have the goods on Jane Model and ... and Zoey Model. Unless you pay up by tomorrow, their info is free for all on the net. And not only that, I want 75% payout from now on.

OK, do you guys really want to expose yourself to that possibility? I'd say FHG is the only way to go, or free 2257-exempt content for everyone, whether affiliate by signup or not.

lagwagon 06-06-2005 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DonovanPhillips
You're pretty freakin' gullible, aren't ya? You don't think "busy-amateurs.com" can happen again? Particular with an AFFILIATE who ISN'T making over $400k per month like BA? Then you're trusted "affiliate" makes it his job to "save the porn models for Jesus" and who knows what happens.

Or an affiliate gets a fascination with one of your models and starts stalking her.

There are SO MANY other possibilities.

Yes there is always "other possibilities".

Donny 06-06-2005 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shooting_Manic
Dude, you are WAY smarter then that. Arnt you guys in AZ? You guys need a lesson from Lightspeed again. Drive over to Glendale and sit down with a company that has figured out a way to keep their models safe and their affiliates happy. It will be worth your time and Im know he will be happy to share.


:thumbsup

3piece chicken Dinner 06-06-2005 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FleshJoe2005
Lets say that was true (for the moment lets just say).

Does this mean that hotlinking images means you dont need 2257 docs for those images? Lets say I store the images on imageshack and hotlink them, does this absolve me of the requirement to keep 2257 records? I think not.

What about IFRAME?

FleshJoe2005- I have seen you ask this question a few times. I don't know if anyone has answered you clearly.

Crop a thumb from a softcore thumb ( does not require you to have ID's) send to the roughest , most explicit FHG you want.

Crop a Hardcore image into a softcore thumb-you need Id and releases.

This is how my people have explained this to me.

and of course I suggest your consult YOUR legal counsel for confirmation.

Extreme John 06-06-2005 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DonovanPhillips
If Kim Nielsen, Louis Bajjali, or the select few others I sell to stalk a model I'll be happy to turn myself in and help prosecute myself.

Yup as in everything else, your missing the point. As much as you want to think so anything can happen, not to mention you put their names on here, OMG what if someone stalked and killed them, you would be in trouble....

lagwagon 06-06-2005 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DonovanPhillips
If Kim Nielsen, Louis Bajjali, or the select few others I sell to stalk a model I'll be happy to turn myself in and help prosecute myself.

whoa no full name using, wtf

Donny 06-06-2005 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisExtreme
You want to play dirty little games I'll make sure that if one of your models (god forbid) is hurt, I'll do the same. Or did you forget that you also photograph girls and distribute their I.D.'s?

You really are showing everyone what a classes person you really are. It's one thing to have a different opinion, it's another to make ridiculous statements.

You won't think these are ridiculous statements if you become responsible for rape, injury or death with you idiotic stance on model IDs. I've been in this business for 8 years. Models are to be protected as much as possible at all times.

Extreme John 06-06-2005 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FleshJoe2005
I think ExtremeJohn and FTV are forgetting that there's a lot of nasty people out there and that affiliates are people, so some are nasty (how's that for logic, LOL).

OK so now you've got an affiliate that youve built a relationship of trust with over a few months, and then there's a dispute, lets say about conversions or such. Now imagine a conversation like this:

ExtremeJohn: OK affiliate Joe you're out, I dont want to have anything more to do with you. And by the way I am also forfeiting your $2431.72 that I still owe you.

Affiliate Joe: Oh no you don't. I have the goods on Jane Model and ... and Zoey Model. Unless you pay up by tomorrow, their info is free for all on the net. And not only that, I want 75% payout from now on.

OK, do you guys really want to expose yourself to that possibility? I'd say FHG is the only way to go, or free 2257-exempt content for everyone, whether affiliate by signup or not.

I clearly understand your point (althouugh I will say we have never killed an affiliate EVER for bad conversions, nor have we forfieted anyone's earning EVER).

And again I do clearly understand that, again we made a Business decision it could turn out the be the "New Coke" that everyone hated or the Adult Industry will go on business as usual.

Donny 06-06-2005 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lagwagon
whoa no full name using, wtf

Everyone already knows these names.

Extreme John 06-06-2005 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DonovanPhillips
You won't think these are ridiculous statements if you become responsible for rape, injury or death with you idiotic stance on model IDs. I've been in this business for 8 years. Models are to be protected as much as possible at all times.

Since your all over knowing all and assuming that this will surely happen.

Let me pose 2 questions to you (1 of which I posed before that you ofcourse ignoed).

1) Do you think Extreme will be the only company to make this decision?

2) Do you think that every model we have ever filmed has only worked for us therefore we would automatically be the one's to blame?

Have you considered either of those two things?

Donny 06-06-2005 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FleshJoe2005
I think ExtremeJohn and FTV are forgetting that there's a lot of nasty people out there and that affiliates are people, so some are nasty (how's that for logic, LOL).

OK so now you've got an affiliate that youve built a relationship of trust with over a few months, and then there's a dispute, lets say about conversions or such. Now imagine a conversation like this:

ExtremeJohn: OK affiliate Joe you're out, I dont want to have anything more to do with you. And by the way I am also forfeiting your $2431.72 that I still owe you.

Affiliate Joe: Oh no you don't. I have the goods on Jane Model and ... and Zoey Model. Unless you pay up by tomorrow, their info is free for all on the net. And not only that, I want 75% payout from now on.

OK, do you guys really want to expose yourself to that possibility? I'd say FHG is the only way to go, or free 2257-exempt content for everyone, whether affiliate by signup or not.


There are more scenarios like this than can be possibly covered tonight. Short term thinking is keeping them from finding the right solution.

Extreme John 06-06-2005 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DonovanPhillips
Everyone already knows these names.

And no one knows any models full name right?? Because it's completley immposible to find any of that info out right?

dopeman 06-06-2005 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DonovanPhillips
There are more scenarios like this than can be possibly covered tonight. Short term thinking is keeping them from finding the right solution.

donovan, if i took down all my thumbs and galleries tonight and went all text links, am i exempt from the new regulations?

am i not still responsible for documentation for every pic i have posted since i started doing TGP?

Donny 06-06-2005 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Extreme John
Since your all over knowing all and assuming that this will surely happen.

Let me pose 2 questions to you (1 of which I posed before that you ofcourse ignoed).

1) Do you think Extreme will be the only company to make this decision?

2) Do you think that every model we have ever filmed has only worked for us therefore we would automatically be the one's to blame?

Have you considered either of those two things?


1. I will speak out like this against ANY company that makes such a stupid decision.

2. "But Mr. Police office, OJ killed his wife and got away with it. Why can't I?"

Donny 06-06-2005 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dopeman
donovan, if i took down all my thumbs and galleries tonight and went all text links, am i exempt from the new regulations?

am i not still responsible for documentation for every pic i have posted since i started doing TGP?


1. You would then be compliant.

2. Ask an attorney.

Extreme John 06-06-2005 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DonovanPhillips
There are more scenarios like this than can be possibly covered tonight. Short term thinking is keeping them from finding the right solution.

Your exactly right based on your opinion, which is just that an opinion.

When will you understand and respect the fact that regardless of your "PERSONAL" opinion that this is a business decision made by a Company that has worked closely with their affiliates for 6 years? Nothing more, stop assuming and guessinf at what might happen and letting your wild imagination about what "MIGHT" happen lead you around like a dog on a leash. You voiced your opinion more than once (probably 50x by now), your "OPINION" is clear, and guess what there's others that will share that "OPINION" and others that wont share that "OPINION" in the end we/I will personally live with that decision.

Extreme John 06-06-2005 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DonovanPhillips
1. You would then be compliant.

2. Ask an attorney.

Your wrong on your first answer... DEAD WRONG.

You shouldnt have answered if you didnt know and should have just answered with #2 to begin with.

ChrisExtreme 06-06-2005 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DonovanPhillips
1. I will speak out like this against ANY company that makes such a stupid decision.

2. "But Mr. Police office, OJ killed his wife and got away with it. Why can't I?"

Speaking out is one thing, you managed to make a complete ass of yourself tonight. So if that was your goal, let me be the first to say good job.

Your "high and mighty" stance on this subject really doesn't mean squat since you've been passing on model info. to secondary producers for years. You've been doing exactly what your crying about right here.

Extreme John 06-06-2005 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DonovanPhillips
1. I will speak out like this against ANY company that makes such a stupid decision.

2. "But Mr. Police office, OJ killed his wife and got away with it. Why can't I?"

So basically you avoided both questions, 1 of them by stating youll slap your "OPINION" tag on anything. and the other by refrencing something completley different from the wuestion I asked you.

So in short you did exactly what I thought you would do, thanks for showing your true colors there Genius.

Donny 06-06-2005 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisExtreme
Speaking out is one thing, you managed to make a complete ass of yourself tonight. So if that was your goal, let me be the first to say good job.

Your "high and mighty" stance on this subject really doesn't mean squat since you've been passing on model info. to secondary producers for years. You've been doing exactly what your crying about right here.

My clients aren't secondary producers, by the way. :) That's a whole other story.

As for making an ass out of themselves, Extreme did just fine in that department. You'll realize that in the next few days.

Donny 06-06-2005 09:01 PM

Extreme, with your list of sites there is no doubt whatsoever that model harassment is going to become a very real part of your future. In one way or another, handing out the IDs of the models who appear on your very extreme sites is going to get you into trouble. No fucking doubt. Most likely they'll first hear from Jesus freaks.

I give you 2 months after you start handing out those IDs. Maximum. Wanna stick $100 on that?

Snake Doctor 06-06-2005 09:02 PM

Donavan you're reaching....get over yourself.

My view is you don't give a shit about the models, you care about your own ass and your own business. You're worried that it will be harder to find girls to shoot in the future and that will affect your income. Let's at least get off the soapbox and be honest here.

Also...if I REALLY wanted to stalk someone, why wouldn't I just hack the servers of the company that hosts the content of the person I want to stalk?
It's alot easier to do than you think......so now what are you going to do? Only sell content to people who have banking class or CIA level security systems on their servers?

What about the guy who wants to follow the stripper home from work at 3am and stalk her? Does the strip club have to provide secret service protection for her at all times in order to live up to your "moral standards"?

People everywhere in every walk of life put themselves in danger everyday, I really don't think this is as big of a deal as you're making it out to be, and I don't think the models will be in any more real danger than they have been in the past.

:2 cents:

Extreme John 06-06-2005 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DonovanPhillips
My clients aren't secondary producers, by the way. :) That's a whole other story.

As for making an ass out of themselves, Extreme did just fine in that department. You'll realize that in the next few days.

Yeah based on Your Opinion your right Extreme did just that..

As for the people you shoot content for and based on your answer to someone else's question it's VERY clear to me your commenting on a law you dont know a fucking thing about. Instead of wasting your time in here Mr. Content Producer I suggest reading up on the law or contacting a lawyer (unless ofcourse you dont care about your Models and they dont know that your sending that content off to "Secondary Producers".

ChrisExtreme 06-06-2005 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DonovanPhillips
Extreme, with your list of sites there is no doubt whatsoever that model harassment is going to become a very real part of your future. In one way or another, handing out the IDs of the models who appear on your very extreme sites is going to get you into trouble. No fucking doubt. Most likely they'll first hear from Jesus freaks.

I give you 2 months after you start handing out those IDs. Maximum. Wanna stick $100 on that?

Aren't you one of those so called "Jesus freaks," you are the son of a pastor correct? Does your job make daddy happy?

bigdog 06-06-2005 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lenny2
Those are exactly the reasons why owning and hosting domains for affiliates isn't an option for us either....I thought about it for all of 15 minutes and when all those issues came up I dropped the idea.

I still host some affiliates for free, but it's their domain that they control so they're responsible for it. As far as that part of our business relationship is concerned I'm a "web host" who doesn't have "editorial control" over the site.


i brought this up before it's going to be impossible to control what somone uploads, and people who don't like you will just use it as a way to mess with you

Extreme John 06-06-2005 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lenny2
Donavan you're reaching....get over yourself.

My view is you don't give a shit about the models, you care about your own ass and your own business. You're worried that it will be harder to find girls to shoot in the future and that will affect your income. Let's at least get off the soapbox and be honest here.

Also...if I REALLY wanted to stalk someone, why wouldn't I just hack the servers of the company that hosts the content of the person I want to stalk?
It's alot easier to do than you think......so now what are you going to do? Only sell content to people who have banking class or CIA level security systems on their servers?

What about the guy who wants to follow the stripper home from work at 3am and stalk her? Does the strip club have to provide secret service protection for her at all times in order to live up to your "moral standards"?

People everywhere in every walk of life put themselves in danger everyday, I really don't think this is as big of a deal as you're making it out to be, and I don't think the models will be in any more real danger than they have been in the past.

:2 cents:

Lenny your points are way too Proffesional, well thought and honestly out of Donny's league.

But oh so true.

Crossed the street l8ly Donny?

mrthumbs 06-06-2005 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisExtreme
Aren't you one of those so called "Jesus freaks," you are the son of a pastor correct? Does your job make daddy happy?

oh boy :1orglaugh

Extreme John 06-06-2005 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigdog
i brought this up before it's going to be impossible to control what somone uploads, and people who don't like you will just use it as a way to mess with you

Exactly, people will do what they want when they want and how they want, having a solid relationship with those you host or keeping the domain registered under THIER name is the only safe bet for a program in this day and age.

FleshJoe2005 06-06-2005 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Extreme John
And you know what, I have respect for them and the decision they have made, why??? Because it's THEIR business. Not once did you hear me say, "Oh no wait Donavan you have to change your rules and your thinking on this matter" I personally dont give two flying fucks what YOUR opinion is on this matter or my decision, I made it and I will either live or die by it regardless of what you think and Im a big boy and more than willing to accept whatever cards come my way.

OK John

I'm not gonna call you names and neither the FTV fellow. I just think its not in your best business interests to release the model names. If gallery makers become obsolete by this new regulations, I'm sure they'll find something new to do, they're smart people too :) I just think it exposes you to so much liability it's not worth it especially that there are solutions that work w/o risking the liability.

You asked what DonnovanPhilips can do to assure you his model IDs don't become public info, because he's been providing them for years to his clients (I didn't know that the old 2257 regs required him to do that, that's news to me). Anyways the answer is he can't do squat about it, once he released the info -- if he did -- its out of his control.

But having said that, it doesn't make it -- IMHO again, just a private opinion -- a smart long term decision to release the info to affiliates who will then HAVE to release it to TGPs and so on. In fact, its quite a different scale entirely of information propagation we're talking about here. Donnovan released his info to maybe 10, 15 customers, we're talking about 100s or 1000s of new people who will have SOME information about the models. Quite a different ball game entirely.

WicKed NinJas 06-06-2005 09:16 PM

Good to see you guys taking control of the situation and helping all of us out. The models know that with this job comes a certian level of danger as with many jobs. We all have done all we can to protect the models, dont blame extreme paychecks, blame George W Bush and the morons who voted for and elected him. And if someone wanted a models info bad enough they could get it, even before now.

TexasDreams 06-06-2005 09:19 PM

Extreme John,

WOW, and HOLY SHIT!!! I know that there are a lot of program owners taking the easy way out over this, saying ?just use our soft-core? or ?just use our hosted? or ?we?re leaving, best of luck?. But YOU have stepped up to the plate and BIG-TIME for the affiliates.

My hat is off to you, sir. In the past I had put your program on the back burner because of some things that happened out of your control. I?m going to put that all aside, and start building some serious promotional things once again for EP. You?ve shown you have the balls, AND the spine to stand up for affiliates.

I am sorry that I let things slide to the background on EP promos. It was certainly NOT your fault, and I?ll do my best to support the program a hell of a lot more in the future. THANK YOU for not taking the easy way out. THANK YOU for setting the bar and raising the standards which more programs should follow!!!

Sincerely,
Mark R. Moore (TexasDreams)

:thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup

dopeman 06-06-2005 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FleshJoe2005
OK John

I'm not gonna call you names and neither the FTV fellow. I just think its not in your best business interests to release the model names. If gallery makers become obsolete by this new regulations, I'm sure they'll find something new to do, they're smart people too :) I just think it exposes you to so much liability it's not worth it especially that there are solutions that work w/o risking the liability.

You asked what DonnovanPhilips can do to assure you his model IDs don't become public info, because he's been providing them for years to his clients (I didn't know that the old 2257 regs required him to do that, that's news to me). Anyways the answer is he can't do squat about it, once he released the info -- if he did -- its out of his control.

But having said that, it doesn't make it -- IMHO again, just a private opinion -- a smart long term decision to release the info to affiliates who will then HAVE to release it to TGPs and so on. In fact, its quite a different scale entirely of information propagation we're talking about here. Donnovan released his info to maybe 10, 15 customers, we're talking about 100s or 1000s of new people who will have SOME information about the models. Quite a different ball game entirely.


i dont think you're understanding something here. if you have EVER posted a pic on your website or gallery, and you don't have the documentation from the sponsor - you are in violation and can be charged with a felony. it doesn't matter if you take everything down before the 23rd.

Snake Doctor 06-06-2005 09:25 PM

Hey are any of you Extreme Paychecks guys on ICQ? I'd like to chat with you for a few.

78465690 :)

ChrisExtreme 06-06-2005 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lenny2
Hey are any of you Extreme Paychecks guys on ICQ? I'd like to chat with you for a few.

78465690 :)

Message sent.

FleshJoe2005 06-06-2005 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lagwagon
I agree. No harm done, images can be cropped to a softer image as well.

Sorry, illegal. You cant make a softcore image from a hardcore one.

boneprone 06-06-2005 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FleshJoe2005
Sorry, illegal. You cant make a softcore image from a hardcore one.


LOL...

WTF??????

Snake Doctor 06-06-2005 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FleshJoe2005
Sorry, illegal. You cant make a softcore image from a hardcore one.

It's not illegal to make a softcore image from a hardcore one.

Donny 06-06-2005 09:52 PM

Sorry, had to take a phone call from someone who wanted to call me to vent. Some people can't/won't speak out on this board but believe me, there are some big people watching who agree with me.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Lenny2
Donavan you're reaching....get over yourself.

My view is you don't give a shit about the models, you care about your own ass and your own business. You're worried that it will be harder to find girls to shoot in the future and that will affect your income. Let's at least get off the soapbox and be honest here.

First of all, learn to spell my name. It's right there for you to look at. It's not that freakin' hard to do.

Secondly, you're wrong about my losing business over Extreme's actions. In all likelihood I'll gain business because of them? Why? Let a group of LA models start talking about how their IDs are being given out by ___ company or ___ producer. When companies don't have as much content to choose from in areas that don't have models willing to pose anymore, where do you think they'll turn?

I honestly am simply outraged at the stupid greed I see in this thread.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Lenny2
Also...if I REALLY wanted to stalk someone, why wouldn't I just hack the servers of the company that hosts the content of the person I want to stalk?

It's alot easier to do than you think......so now what are you going to do? Only sell content to people who have banking class or CIA level security systems on their servers?

This assumes someone is stupid enough to put these IDs on a publicly accessible computer.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Lenny2
What about the guy who wants to follow the stripper home from work at 3am and stalk her? Does the strip club have to provide secret service protection for her at all times in order to live up to your "moral standards"?

People everywhere in every walk of life put themselves in danger everyday, I really don't think this is as big of a deal as you're making it out to be, and I don't think the models will be in any more real danger than they have been in the past.

:2 cents:

The difference here is:

The stripper put herself into that position. That's bad. But it's worse when a company like Extreme puts a model into that same position. Expect legal ownage to shortly follow. Don't you think this is what the DOJ has in mind? A model's person data is discovered, a jury is shown how an Extreme porn company could have prevented the situation.

The result: model owns company.

Donny 06-06-2005 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Extreme John
Yeah based on Your Opinion your right Extreme did just that..

As for the people you shoot content for and based on your answer to someone else's question it's VERY clear to me your commenting on a law you dont know a fucking thing about. Instead of wasting your time in here Mr. Content Producer I suggest reading up on the law or contacting a lawyer (unless ofcourse you dont care about your Models and they dont know that your sending that content off to "Secondary Producers".

I've received counsel from two attorneys who specialize in adult. I highly suggest you do the same. Specialize is the key word in that paragraph above.

Donny 06-06-2005 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisExtreme
Aren't you one of those so called "Jesus freaks," you are the son of a pastor correct? Does your job make daddy happy?

Kinda puts me on the inside as to how the Jesus freaks will act about this, dontcha think?

Donny 06-06-2005 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WicKed NinJas
blame George W Bush and the morons who voted for and elected him

I'm sure that's EXACTLY how the courts will see it when a model who has been brutalized decides to sue Extreme for releasing her info. :winkwink:

FleshJoe2005 06-06-2005 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisExtreme
How can you say they don't have a clue?

Because they needed the money for food or something else and signed w/o thinking it thru, or because they just turned 18 and dont have a fucking clue -- I know what I'm talking about here -- and someone showed them a fistful of green... Happens, you know?

Donny 06-06-2005 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FleshJoe2005
Because they needed the money for food or something else and signed w/o thinking it thru, or because they just turned 18 and dont have a fucking clue -- I know what I'm talking about here -- and someone showed them a fistful of green... Happens, you know?

"Yes, your honor, I signed it. I didn't completely understand what it said but I signed it 'cause if I didn't I wouldn't have been paid."

"Has the jury reached a decision yet?"

"Yes, your honor..."



^^^ that situation is scary, and it's more likely to happen if a model's info is released by a big porn company... I can almost hear the saliva dripping from attorney's mouths... it's only a matter of time.

FleshJoe2005 06-06-2005 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dopeman
you are assuming that changing everything NOW is 'compliance'. as has been pointed out, the DOJ is saying you should have been in compliance the entire time. take everything offline now - doesn't change anything. you are still responsible for previous pics you have posted either in a gallery or tgp.

Probably correct but it makes you a slightly harder target than the ones that are simply doing the ostrich thing after June 23 :)


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123