If your site is available in Utah you may be going to jail soon? - GoFuckYourself.com

Mr.Fiction · 02-23-2005, 07:55 PM

makes it a crime to send, distribute, publish, exhibit, advertise or perform pornographic (not "obscene") material to anyone within the state, although this bill raises each offense from a Class A misdemeanor to a third degree felony with a mandatory jail term of not less than 30 days, and a fine of not less than $1,000.

http://www.avn.com/index.php?Primary...tent_ID=217419

Anti-American religious fanatics trying to take away people's constitutional rights again.

This is what Republicans want for America.

FunForOne · 02-23-2005, 07:59 PM

Under the bill, ISPs are apparently required to block material deemed harmful to minors at the server level for any consumer who requests it, at no cost to the consumer:............

,,............although if the ISP has less than 5,000 subscribers, it can charge consumers for blocking software ? but can't make a profit in doing so.

FunForOne · 02-23-2005, 08:04 PM

I read the article and it seems they are trying to implement a rating systems based on the honor system. An official database of URLS.

As far as the legal mumbo jumbo, it seems to change the burden from the consumer to the site owner.

The bigger story:

SALT LAKE CITY - Supporters may have failed to secure official approval for a .xxx top-level domain

Anyone else get a better understanding.

ps. Religious Fanatics are not classified as Anti-American. Thats a whole new group.

gornyhuy · 02-23-2005, 08:08 PM

They obviously don't want their 5 wives seeing any smut....

jimb · 02-23-2005, 08:11 PM

Damn, I wanna see someone take them to the supreme court over this

Def. a violation of the first ammendment.

Jim

Mr.Fiction · 02-23-2005, 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FunForOne

ps. Religious Fanatics are not classified as Anti-American. Thats a whole new group.

If people are brainwashed by religious leaders to try to take away the Constitutional rights of other Americans, how are they not anti-American?

How can you argue that someone attacking the First Amendment is not anti-American?

These people hate that other Americans have freedom of speech and they are trying to take away that freedom and other freedoms as well.

They are anti-American.

FunForOne · 02-23-2005, 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimb

Damn, I wanna see someone take them to the supreme court over this

Def. a violation of the first ammendment.

Jim

dont think it will get that far

warlock5 · 02-23-2005, 09:07 PM

They are more than just religious fanatics in Utah -- they are cultist fanatics

Speaking of which.. I wonder how polygomy traffic converts..

sickkittens · 02-23-2005, 09:08 PM

Does anyone here live in Utah?

BRISK · 02-23-2005, 09:11 PM

I gaurantee that if you ask people like that what they think makes America great, they would answer "freedom"

SykkBoy · 02-23-2005, 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sickkittens

Does anyone here live in Utah?

I'm related to a large majority of Utah...all of my cousins, aunts and uncles live there, all have big families and are all Mormons...

tungsten · 02-23-2005, 09:12 PM

utah is fucked up

SykkBoy · 02-23-2005, 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FunForOne

ps. Religious Fanatics are not classified as Anti-American. Thats a whole new group.

you mean: it depends which God they are fanatical about...

theking · 02-23-2005, 09:19 PM

Has anyone heard of community standards and State Rights?

FunForOne · 02-23-2005, 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SykkBoy2

you mean: it depends which God they are fanatical about...

There is a colorado professor that claims Wall Street is evil and the people in the trade towers deserved to be killed because that were part of america that kills people all of the world. There was a guy who lived in a shack in the woods and mailed bombs to goverment officials. Those guys aren't religious fanatics. One claims to be an indian. That is a separate group.

The religous fanatics are the ones who protest network television shows and take the bible litterally.

Most people wrongly assume that political affiliations can be plotted on a horizontal line. Example. Far right and far left.

Thats really not true. Its more like a circle. The extreme far left wackos and the extreme far right wackos are closer together in philosophy than you would think.

Mr.Fiction · 02-23-2005, 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking

Has anyone heard of community standards and State Rights?

Who believes in state rights? Bush sheep are against state rights when it comes to things like consumer lawsuits and medical marijuana.

Are you saying they are suddenly supporters of state rights on the issue of porn?

You are the biggest Bush ass kissing sheep on GFY.

GatorB · 02-23-2005, 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking

Has anyone heard of community standards and State Rights?

They don't apply here. Communtiy stabdard wer put in because back in the old days people didn't want perverts coming into thier town to buy smut and whores coming in trying to get johns. How does the internet apply. Websites come into your HOME. So called unwanted perverts are not going to come from out of town to my house to watch porn they will do it from their own home. Communtiy standards apply to businesses. The "community" can not tell me what to allow and not allow in my own house.

latinasojourn · 02-23-2005, 09:47 PM

the responsible adult webmaster already uses ICRA.

this allows parents who are presumably the ones bringing computers into their homes, to take 30 seconds and set content filtering on their browsers.

now, i would love to see a UTAH court convict a webmaster for willfully providing smut to minors under that scenario.

IMO, it won't happen.

get ICRA on your websites if you don't already have it.

Mr.Fiction · 02-23-2005, 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB

They don't apply here. Communtiy stabdard wer put in because back in the old days people didn't want perverts coming into thier town to buy smut and whores coming in trying to get johns. How does the internet apply. Websites come into your HOME. So called unwanted perverts are not going to come from out of town to my house to watch porn they will do it from their own home. Communtiy standards apply to businesses. The "community" can not tell me what to allow and not allow in my own house.

The King will justify anything that right wing hypocrites do. He doesn't care about freedom or the constitution. He just cares about kissing ass to right wingers in power. That's why he is known as a sheep around here.

Dirty Dane · 02-23-2005, 10:29 PM

Move to China

Furious_Female · 02-23-2005, 11:32 PM

Utah has deranged people and traditions but I'm surprised more states don't have laws like this... I mean, there's like what, 2 blue states to the left and right of Jesusland? lol

02-23-2005, 07:55 PM	#1
Mr.Fiction Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Free Speech Land Posts: 9,484	If your site is available in Utah you may be going to jail soon? makes it a crime to send, distribute, publish, exhibit, advertise or perform pornographic (not "obscene") material to anyone within the state, although this bill raises each offense from a Class A misdemeanor to a third degree felony with a mandatory jail term of not less than 30 days, and a fine of not less than $1,000. http://www.avn.com/index.php?Primary...tent_ID=217419 Anti-American religious fanatics trying to take away people's constitutional rights again. This is what Republicans want for America. __________________ Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU \| Free Speech Coalition \| EFF \| IMPA

02-23-2005, 08:08 PM	#4
gornyhuy Chafed. Join Date: May 2002 Location: Face Down in Pussy Posts: 18,041	They obviously don't want their 5 wives seeing any smut.... __________________ icq:159548293

02-23-2005, 09:08 PM	#9
sickkittens I am a meat popsicle. Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 25,100	Does anyone here live in Utah? __________________ HIGHEST PAYOUTS FOR NO-CONSOLE TOURS IN THE ENTIRE INDUSTRY! THIS SIG CAN BE YOURS FOR $200 - ICQ: 78881543

02-23-2005, 09:11 PM	#10
BRISK Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 12,240	I gaurantee that if you ask people like that what they think makes America great, they would answer "freedom" __________________ I post on GFY so that when people ask me what I do, I can tell them that I work with the mentally retarded.

02-23-2005, 09:12 PM	#12
tungsten Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 10,579	utah is fucked up __________________ VOYEUR /HOMEMADE, HENTAI / CARTOON, Reality, Amateur, Shemale, Hardcore, Cuckold, Celebrity, Retro/Vintage, ect...ALL OUR SITES >> Unbelievable Ratio \| High % of Rebills \| Bi-Monthly Payments (also to E-Passporte) Ton's of EXCLUSIVE Free content & FHG's \|=> GREAT REVENUE $$$ GUARANTEED!

02-23-2005, 07:59 PM	#2
FunForOne Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: USA Posts: 8,704	Under the bill, ISPs are apparently required to block material deemed harmful to minors at the server level for any consumer who requests it, at no cost to the consumer:............ ,,............although if the ISP has less than 5,000 subscribers, it can charge consumers for blocking software ? but can't make a profit in doing so.

02-23-2005, 08:04 PM	#3
FunForOne Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: USA Posts: 8,704	I read the article and it seems they are trying to implement a rating systems based on the honor system. An official database of URLS. As far as the legal mumbo jumbo, it seems to change the burden from the consumer to the site owner. The bigger story: SALT LAKE CITY - Supporters may have failed to secure official approval for a .xxx top-level domain Anyone else get a better understanding. ps. Religious Fanatics are not classified as Anti-American. Thats a whole new group.

02-23-2005, 08:11 PM	#5
jimb Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Costa Rica Posts: 2,514	Damn, I wanna see someone take them to the supreme court over this Def. a violation of the first ammendment. Jim

02-23-2005, 09:07 PM	#8
warlock5 Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Uranus Posts: 2,808	They are more than just religious fanatics in Utah -- they are cultist fanatics Speaking of which.. I wonder how polygomy traffic converts..

02-23-2005, 09:19 PM	#14
theking Nice Kitty Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: The good old USA!!! Posts: 21,053	Has anyone heard of community standards and State Rights? __________________ When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me! FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

02-23-2005, 09:47 PM	#18
latinasojourn Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 3,191	the responsible adult webmaster already uses ICRA. this allows parents who are presumably the ones bringing computers into their homes, to take 30 seconds and set content filtering on their browsers. now, i would love to see a UTAH court convict a webmaster for willfully providing smut to minors under that scenario. IMO, it won't happen. get ICRA on your websites if you don't already have it.

02-23-2005, 10:29 PM	#20
Dirty Dane Sick Fuck Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: www Posts: 9,491	Move to China

02-23-2005, 11:32 PM	#21
Furious_Female Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Upstate, New York Posts: 8,187	Utah has deranged people and traditions but I'm surprised more states don't have laws like this... I mean, there's like what, 2 blue states to the left and right of Jesusland? lol __________________ Skype: j3nn.com ICQ 160370494 My current favorite high-converting sponsor: CrakRevenue