Is Private Ivy stealing your content? - Page 4 - GoFuckYourself.com

mailman · 12-11-2004, 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PlatinumPimp
Ivy I am not gonna choose sides but I am sure you read every post in this thread so I am gonna ask it again.

A few months back you had a problem with HeatherHamptons, YOU decided to take it to the boards, why didn't you handle it through ICQ or e-mail back then?

Yes I think now after reading up and finding more about that, why do you feel we should give you special treatment?

PrivateIvy · 12-11-2004, 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PlatinumPimp
Ivy I am not gonna choose sides but I am sure you read every post in this thread so I am gonna ask it again.

A few months back you had a problem with HeatherHamptons, YOU decided to take it to the boards, why didn't you handle it through ICQ or e-mail back then?

I posted a statement, actually a press release, on the board back then because their were untrue accusations being made about my business and I felt the need. A model broke her contract with me , cost me money and because I enforced my contract, she made up reasons and excuses that were untrue. End of story....

Ivy

Platinumpimp · 12-11-2004, 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by mailman
Yes I think now after reading up and finding more about that, why do you feel we should give you special treatment?

"We" ?

Dude I am just stating the obvious, thats all. And she replied

PrivateIvy · 12-11-2004, 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by mailman
Yes I think now after reading up and finding more about that, why do you feel we should give you special treatment?

It's not special treatment... it's common courtesy and more than that, because I actually was an affiliate it is professional courtesy. Instead of a quick email or ICQ to say hey, you can't use those thumbnails on your site or whatever, you come to the board with "Is PrivateIvy Stealing Your Content? "

Ivy

pussyluver · 12-11-2004, 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by mailman
Okay on topic... glad you reposted about the images sorry you missed the first time... facts are facts...

Second... not to start shit but this is not the place nor the time to get into the whole exits thing. But so you know, we have removed exits we did realize that some webmasters were unhappy with them so we acted on it, I never got an email from you or any contact for that matter so I can not speak for Kevin (Medium Pimpin) and what yourself and Kevin have discussed all but again they have been removed and I will apologize for any miscommunication that has happened in the past. If there is any way we can gain you back as a webmaster or anything we can do to please you contact me and let?s talk!

We all know programs will do things that will not make all their webmasters happy and what we did was one of them but we have acted on it and resolved the issue. So with that like I have mentioned I would like to burry it with you also, put it behind us... Seems stupid to sit here and dwell on it?

Thanks for the reply post. The thread hit a nerve and I went off a bit and off topic. The exits argument could go on for ever, you are right.. MP links have been back for awhile. Call it burried!

Looks like all is being resolved between the parties. Ok, a little tense. That's the way it happens sometimes.

High respect for Ivy still intact. I see the logic she used and it is resolved now. Drama good for GFY post count. Ivy makes a good point about resolving things off the boards when possible.

PrivateIvy · 12-12-2004, 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by pussyluver
Thanks for the reply post. The thread hit a nerve and I went off a bit and off topic. The exits argument could go on for ever, you are right.. MP links have been back for awhile. Call it burried!

Looks like all is being resolved between the parties. Ok, a little tense. That's the way it happens sometimes.

High respect for Ivy still intact. I see the logic she used and it is resolved now. Drama good for GFY post count. Ivy makes a good point about resolving things off the boards when possible.

Thanks for the support

For the record, after reading more of this thread that I missed because I was out all evening, my members area is NOT made up of tons of sponsor content. I have over 10,000 images of myself, over 100 of my own videos, my live camshows, etc. etc.

My "Girlfriends" section started in 2002 doing girlfriend gallery exchanges with other models ( you know they feature me to their members, I feature them) It worked really well and when I ran out of time to seek out new trades, I started using sponsor content and conversions were awesome. Until today, I didn't realize how large that section had gotten , LOL and have actually just finished removing all the older galleries.

My own content is what dominates my members area, having been updated weekly since 2002, and that is why my members stay with me and my affiliates enjoy awesome rebills.

And now, I'm done with the drama LOL .... I should have crashed an hour ago , but I'm climbing into bed now so you guys can drama by yourselves

Ivy

Jace · 12-12-2004, 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by PrivateIvy
It's not special treatment... it's common courtesy and more than that, because I actually was an affiliate it is professional courtesy. Instead of a quick email or ICQ to say hey, you can't use those thumbnails on your site or whatever, you come to the board with "Is PrivateIvy Stealing Your Content? "

Ivy

actually, on GFY someone else came and posted it, mailman had nothing to do with the initial posting here on GFY...

Jeff aka NIGHTfall · 12-12-2004, 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by PrivateIvy
I have over 10,000 images of myself, over 100 of my own videos, my live camshows, etc. etc.

..

and you only let me see like 6 of them?

how dare you

PrivateIvy · 12-12-2004, 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by JaceXXX
actually, on GFY someone else came and posted it, mailman had nothing to do with the initial posting here on GFY...

ahhh...but actually, they joined my site, they saw the ref code in my members area that linked to their site to show I was an affiliate , they had an issue, but instead of contacting me , they took it to the boards

Ivy

mailman · 12-12-2004, 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by JaceXXX
actually, on GFY someone else came and posted it, mailman had nothing to do with the initial posting here on GFY...

There it is.. thank you!

People always seem to over look that fact with drama threads of WHO started it...

and PlatinumPimp when I said "WE" I was not talking about you and me I was talking about MP and WE as a company.

PrivateIvy · 12-12-2004, 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jeff aka NIGHTfall
..

and you only let me see like 6 of them?

how dare you

You know I'm saving a very special "Private" collection just for you

Ivy

Jeff aka NIGHTfall · 12-12-2004, 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by PrivateIvy
You know I'm saving a very special "Private" collection just for you

Ivy

call me

mailman · 12-12-2004, 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by PrivateIvy
.... drama by yourselves

Ivy

Nice responce...

This has something to do with you and your site and now after claiming "Until today, I didn't realize how large that section had gotten" this is a total cop out...

Pretty lame...

PrivateIvy · 12-12-2004, 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jeff aka NIGHTfall
call me

I was supposed to crash and turn this machine off 2 posts ago

Since you say you've only seen 6...here's a special one, just shot last week

And I really am getting ready to go to bed !

Nightie Night .....

Ivy

mailman · 12-12-2004, 12:13 AM

Ahhh how nice your trying to make it a happy thread...

go make another thread to post your pictures in!

chodadog · 12-12-2004, 12:19 AM

Affiliate programs should have specific rules about this because it really is a goldmine. It gives people with small paysites the ability to add oodles of free content for members and it will benefit both parties. Obviously the program giving away the free content has got paying customers looking at their shit, and that can only be good.

But obviously it can be abused. If someone puts up 100 pics and has a tiny text link at the bottom of the page, well then, that's no good, is it?

However, if you make a rule like.. 1 prominent link for every 10 pictures, or 15 pictures, etc. Could work out really well.

Of course, permission should always be required.

mailman · 12-12-2004, 12:20 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by pussyluver
Thanks for the reply post. The thread hit a nerve and I went off a bit and off topic. The exits argument could go on for ever, you are right.. MP links have been back for awhile. Call it burried!

Looks like all is being resolved between the parties. Ok, a little tense. That's the way it happens sometimes.

Perfect... Im glad thats done with man!

Like I said contact me if you are looking for tip or tools to promote and get better ratios Im here about 24 hours a day!

SureFire · 12-12-2004, 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by PrivateIvy
Hey Tia,
Not sure how I could be acting like a kid as you stated, because I made one post in this thread that basically explained everything and I didn't see a need to post anything further.

I had active links to MP in all the galleries they provided to me and I have now pulled them down , so end of story on that. ( notice the red x's on their screen caps...those were active links )

As for the page I had on my site that showed small thumbnails of numerous "girlfriends" that I featured in the members area to give them an idea of who was inside, it honestly never ocurred to me that it was considered "stealing" . I had always had that page, since back in 2002 and I'm sure I got the idea from other sites that were doing the same, many of which used my own image and name and I never thought twice about it because I knew they were promoting me in their members area.

So many single model sites use thumbnails on their update pages , etc. to show when they add a new girlfriend feature ( girlfriend gallery exchanges,etc.) and until this thread I never thought anything about it.

I have pulled that page down, because I do understand the point that was made on that.

I don't see any need to stay here and dwell on this issue and reply to every accusation or hate post ? If that makes me childish, then I guess I'm childish.

I stand behind my statement that if there was an issue, I should have been contacted via email or ICQ and it would have been handled promptly. I understand bringing drama to the boards as a last result , etc. and this was not the case.

OH, and lastly, thanks MP for the joins :-

Ivy

Ivy, can't you admit that you cheated and got call on it?

mailman · 12-12-2004, 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by chodadog
Affiliate programs should have specific rules about this because it really is a goldmine. It gives people with small paysites the ability to add oodles of free content for members and it will benefit both parties. Obviously the program giving away the free content has got paying customers looking at their shit, and that can only be good.

But obviously it can be abused. If someone puts up 100 pics and has a tiny text link at the bottom of the page, well then, that's no good, is it?

However, if you make a rule like.. 1 prominent link for every 10 pictures, or 15 pictures, etc. Could work out really well.

Of course, permission should always be required.

Well thats about it... we tried to be diffrent and people loved us for it and others just abused teh shit out of it and now when we find someone who we would have assumed knowed better doing wrong we are basicly forced to change it.. shame really but we will still make sure our good webmasters who send more then 50 clicks in a span of 8 months

can get hooked up with the good stuff.

Jeff aka NIGHTfall · 12-12-2004, 12:23 AM

Jace · 12-12-2004, 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by chodadog
Affiliate programs should have specific rules about this because it really is a goldmine. It gives people with small paysites the ability to add oodles of free content for members and it will benefit both parties. Obviously the program giving away the free content has got paying customers looking at their shit, and that can only be good.

But obviously it can be abused. If someone puts up 100 pics and has a tiny text link at the bottom of the page, well then, that's no good, is it?

However, if you make a rule like.. 1 prominent link for every 10 pictures, or 15 pictures, etc. Could work out really well.

Of course, permission should always be required.

well said, and that is exactly how it shoudl be

If I was planning on working with sponsor content in my members area it would work out perfectly...I use sitedepth.com with the upsell banners activated....and each gallery only shows 20 images per page with the upsell banner on top and bottom....so, that would be a perfect scenario for this type of situation

r3ap3r · 12-12-2004, 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jeff aka NIGHTfall

That's my same reaction. Ivy is soooo hot.

Jeff aka NIGHTfall · 12-12-2004, 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by r3ap3r
That's my same reaction. Ivy is soooo hot.

back up... she is mine

SykkBoy · 12-12-2004, 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by chodadog
Affiliate programs should have specific rules about this because it really is a goldmine. It gives people with small paysites the ability to add oodles of free content for members and it will benefit both parties. Obviously the program giving away the free content has got paying customers looking at their shit, and that can only be good.

But obviously it can be abused. If someone puts up 100 pics and has a tiny text link at the bottom of the page, well then, that's no good, is it?

However, if you make a rule like.. 1 prominent link for every 10 pictures, or 15 pictures, etc. Could work out really well.

Of course, permission should always be required.

exactly

I would also add:
there really isn't anything wrong with upselling a member to another site because believe it or not, some surfers will be members at more than one site at a time...

I had a friend who used to be an avid porn site fan (quite a time before TGP's and all the free content available now) and he would often have memberships to 3-4 sites at a time. The reason? some had content the others didn't have.

Think of it this way: you have a specialized site dedicated to ebony women and that's pretty much all you have in your site and it's exclusive content, why not offer another site ina different niche to your members? They might not only keep recurring for you for your exclusive ebony content, but might also stick around to that latina site or anal site you upsold them to.

If you have a great site with loyal members, why not use that trust and recomend other non-competing sites to them?

I do agree 100 pics for one tiny text link would be a slap in the face, but a gallery of 20-25 pics with a prominent link shouldn't be much of a problem, but that should be a sponsor's call.

Bottom line: keep in constant contact with your sponsors.

SureFire · 12-12-2004, 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by PrivateIvy
I was supposed to crash and turn this machine off 2 posts ago

Since you say you've only seen 6...here's a special one, just shot last week

And I really am getting ready to go to bed !

Nightie Night .....

Ivy

Wow...another naked pic of Ivy...

I guess seeing a nude picture will make me forget that your member area lacks.

graphicsbytia · 12-12-2004, 01:27 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by PrivateIvy
Hey Tia,
Not sure how I could be acting like a kid as you stated, because I made one post in this thread that basically explained everything and I didn't see a need to post anything further.

I had active links to MP in all the galleries they provided to me and I have now pulled them down , so end of story on that. ( notice the red x's on their screen caps...those were active links )

As for the page I had on my site that showed small thumbnails of numerous "girlfriends" that I featured in the members area to give them an idea of who was inside, it honestly never ocurred to me that it was considered "stealing" . I had always had that page, since back in 2002 and I'm sure I got the idea from other sites that were doing the same, many of which used my own image and name and I never thought twice about it because I knew they were promoting me in their members area.

So many single model sites use thumbnails on their update pages , etc. to show when they add a new girlfriend feature ( girlfriend gallery exchanges,etc.) and until this thread I never thought anything about it.

I have pulled that page down, because I do understand the point that was made on that.

I don't see any need to stay here and dwell on this issue and reply to every accusation or hate post ? If that makes me childish, then I guess I'm childish.

I stand behind my statement that if there was an issue, I should have been contacted via email or ICQ and it would have been handled promptly. I understand bringing drama to the boards as a last result , etc. and this was not the case.

OH, and lastly, thanks MP for the joins :-

Ivy

No hon.. what I mean by childish is that you are so reluctant to just admit you were wrong and apologize.

You say you weren't aware it was stealing to use the thumbnails on your tour. Ok, maybe you didn't know.. but it was up to you to find out what the TOS were.. you were wrong not to do that.. and when you're called on it, you make up all these excuses.. that's the part I found childish.

Nobody's going to hate you for doing something wrong.. but if you don't at least own up to it.. it'll tarnish your reputation for sure.

And you know what else Ivy? I like you.. otherwise I wouldn't spend the time explaining what I meant.

EntreNous · 12-12-2004, 01:32 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by chodadog
Obviously the program giving away the free content has got paying customers looking at their shit, and that can only be good.

But obviously it can be abused. If someone puts up 100 pics and has a tiny text link at the bottom of the page, well then, that's no good, is it?

The obvious solution is to watermark (stamp your url on 'em) any content you give away free

It isn't rocketscience

emthree · 12-12-2004, 02:08 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by mailman
Hello welcome back to the thread

I just read this entire thread, it's 4AM on a SUNDAY morning. I think you owe me and the other thread readers some eyecandy now.

offtopic: Didn't PI pull some sneaky backstabbing styled shit on another Miss GFY girl? Correct me if i'm wrong, but I remember this.

IVY: I understand where you stand in your last post, but who the hell snags the ENTIRE set and pushes it as his/her own? Then you drop a tiny ass banner at the bottom, which is somehow suppose to "convert" lol
You run your own set of sites, dont act dumb. The stupid/clueless act wont cut it.

TheEbonyFelony · 12-12-2004, 02:13 AM

Clicky_Bucks · 12-12-2004, 03:21 AM

It must be nice to be a female webmaster. Even when you get caught with your hand in the cookie jar, all you have to do is post a few pics of yourself naked and half the sheep forget what we were even discussing in the first place.

Fake Nick · 12-12-2004, 03:51 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by mailman
There it is.. thank you!

People always seem to over look that fact with drama threads of WHO started it...

and PlatinumPimp when I said "WE" I was not talking about you and me I was talking about MP and WE as a company.

huh ? what are you talking about ? ? didnt you start bashing here about this without contacting her on your own board ? ? how could the topic starter know of this if you hadn't posted it on the boards ?? ?

Fake Nick · 12-12-2004, 03:51 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Clicky_Bucks
It must be nice to be a female webmaster. Even when you get caught with your hand in the cookie jar, all you have to do is post a few pics of yourself naked and half the sheep forget what we were even discussing in the first place.

idiot, what are you talking about ? you are a waste of space

TheFrog · 12-12-2004, 04:53 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by mailman
this is a whole lot to overlook as you say....

Jace · 12-12-2004, 05:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TheFrog

wow, glad you quoted all the images, instead of just one

coolfuck · 12-12-2004, 05:20 AM

lol..
nice topic

Fatalspeed · 12-12-2004, 06:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by JaceXXX
wow, glad you quoted all the images, instead of just one

I bet he did not even read the thread

LadyMischief · 12-12-2004, 06:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by HKS
Looks like public domain content to me! Content is free whoever pays for content is a moron unless it's exclusive!

MP's content IS exclusive, you twit. They shoot pretty much all their own, and what they don't shoot is exclusive. Remove head from ass. Smash head into wall. Reinsert head in ass.

LadyMischief · 12-12-2004, 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by PrivateIvy
Hey Tia,
Not sure how I could be acting like a kid as you stated, because I made one post in this thread that basically explained everything and I didn't see a need to post anything further.

I had active links to MP in all the galleries they provided to me and I have now pulled them down , so end of story on that. ( notice the red x's on their screen caps...those were active links )

As for the page I had on my site that showed small thumbnails of numerous "girlfriends" that I featured in the members area to give them an idea of who was inside, it honestly never ocurred to me that it was considered "stealing" . I had always had that page, since back in 2002 and I'm sure I got the idea from other sites that were doing the same, many of which used my own image and name and I never thought twice about it because I knew they were promoting me in their members area.

So many single model sites use thumbnails on their update pages , etc. to show when they add a new girlfriend feature ( girlfriend gallery exchanges,etc.) and until this thread I never thought anything about it.

I have pulled that page down, because I do understand the point that was made on that.

I don't see any need to stay here and dwell on this issue and reply to every accusation or hate post ? If that makes me childish, then I guess I'm childish.

I stand behind my statement that if there was an issue, I should have been contacted via email or ICQ and it would have been handled promptly. I understand bringing drama to the boards as a last result , etc. and this was not the case.

OH, and lastly, thanks MP for the joins :-

Ivy

Can I use YOUR content in a tour for my site?

LadyMischief · 12-12-2004, 06:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by PrivateIvy
It's not special treatment... it's common courtesy and more than that, because I actually was an affiliate it is professional courtesy. Instead of a quick email or ICQ to say hey, you can't use those thumbnails on your site or whatever, you come to the board with "Is PrivateIvy Stealing Your Content? "

Ivy

He had nothign to do with the thread... Someone else not even associated with mp (other than posting on their board) did. How does that make it them?

Fake Nick · 12-12-2004, 06:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by LadyMischief
Can I use YOUR content in a tour for my site?

did you actually read the post you quoted ? ? she clearly states that other people have been doing this to her content for years for promoting her and she is ok with that

hating bandwagon bitch

Fake Nick · 12-12-2004, 06:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by LadyMischief
He had nothign to do with the thread... Someone else not even associated with mp (other than posting on their board) did. How does that make it them?

what are you talking about ? ? he was in this thread like right away , and posted a link to the thread HE started about this on his own board that PI doens't read

he started the drama by posting it on his own board without asking PI for some explanation first

if he didn't start that topic how would the topic starter here have known ? ?

face it ladybitch you are just hating here!

Jace · 12-12-2004, 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by LadyMischief
MP's content IS exclusive, you twit. They shoot pretty much all their own, and what they don't shoot is exclusive. Remove head from ass. Smash head into wall. Reinsert head in ass.

HKS is a troll, just ignore him

LadyMischief · 12-12-2004, 06:40 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fake Nick
did you actually read the post you quoted ? ? she clearly states that other people have been doing this to her content for years for promoting her and she is ok with that

hating bandwagon bitch

Well she is NOT usual in that, then. But I shoot content, and I tell you if this were my situation, a c and d would be issued, or prosecution would start, and the penalties for copyright infringement of this type start at $100,000 per image per use. I'm pretty sure if she simply would have asked someone at MP if she could use the content, it never would have been an issue. I'm not hating on Ivy personally, but she DID make a mistake, one that could have potentially seen her facing a court date. Better to have it done with and over here than in a courtroom, no?

Call me a hating bitch if you want, I call it like I see it.

If I was HATING on Ivy though, one would think I could at least insult her once or twice.

LadyMischief · 12-12-2004, 06:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fake Nick
what are you talking about ? ? he was in this thread like right away , and posted a link to the thread HE started about this on his own board that PI doens't read

he started the drama by posting it on his own board without asking PI for some explanation first

if he didn't start that topic how would the topic starter here have known ? ?

face it ladybitch you are just hating here!

What are you talking about? RICTOR started this thread, RICTOR posted the link. He has no association with MP whatsoever except he posts on their board now and then. Get a clue?

FrankHolland · 12-12-2004, 06:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by JaceXXX
HKS is a troll, just ignore him

he's the kid with the mom who got called by several gfy members right

Fake Nick · 12-12-2004, 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by LadyMischief
What are you talking about? RICTOR started this thread, RICTOR posted the link. He has no association with MP whatsoever except he posts on their board now and then. Get a clue?

and where did RICTOR get his info from ? ? ? and who was here like right away with a handy link to a thread HE started on HIS OWN BOARD ?? ?

huh ??

MickeyG · 12-12-2004, 06:46 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TheEbonyFelony

Right on

Fake Nick · 12-12-2004, 06:47 AM

7 th reply in this thread someone from MP comes with a link to their board bur quickly realises someone outsmarted them and edits the post

now tell me how they are neutral ?

yeah they did NOT ask Rictor to post that here

LadyMischief · 12-12-2004, 06:50 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fake Nick
and where did RICTOR get his info from ? ? ? and who was here like right away with a handy link to a thread HE started on HIS OWN BOARD ?? ?

huh ??

Pretty obvious that Ivy reads the board because she posted in the thread. However, I do believe if you notice at first, no site names were mentioned etc. I don't see anywhere in the initial posts at all.. Seems to me there was a fair bit of miscommunication, a lot of which could have been simply avoided by her asking permission to use the content. Chances are that she didn't realize people would have the issue they are because SHE doesn't, but her business model doesn't work for everyone. Chances are it was a complete oversight on her behalf, but I also believe that a program that spends tens of thousands of dollars on exclusive content should have the right to defend that, especially in the best interests of their other webmasters. Hopefully all parties can meet somewhere in the middle.

As I said before though, it could just as easily have ended up as litigation. It didn't, so chances are people can still make good by proferring apologies? If that's hating, cuff me :P

Fake Nick · 12-12-2004, 06:54 AM

you changed your tone now ,

your first posts were 100% hating

MP should have contacted PI instead of taking it to the boards

they took it to the boards no one else

they took it to this board and no one else

asking a middle man to post it here makes you just as 'guilty'

12-12-2004, 12:19 AM	#166
chodadog Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 9,736	Affiliate programs should have specific rules about this because it really is a goldmine. It gives people with small paysites the ability to add oodles of free content for members and it will benefit both parties. Obviously the program giving away the free content has got paying customers looking at their shit, and that can only be good. But obviously it can be abused. If someone puts up 100 pics and has a tiny text link at the bottom of the page, well then, that's no good, is it? However, if you make a rule like.. 1 prominent link for every 10 pictures, or 15 pictures, etc. Could work out really well. Of course, permission should always be required. __________________ 26 + 6 = 1

12-12-2004, 12:23 AM	#170
Jeff aka NIGHTfall Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida Posts: 5,162	__________________ Register Now For PimpinPays.com

12-12-2004, 02:13 AM	#179
TheEbonyFelony Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: hidden village of the sand..TRAINING TO KILL NARUTO Posts: 1,964	__________________ no you cannot know what im promoting you nosey fucks!

12-12-2004, 03:21 AM	#180
Clicky_Bucks Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Hawaii Posts: 746	It must be nice to be a female webmaster. Even when you get caught with your hand in the cookie jar, all you have to do is post a few pics of yourself naked and half the sheep forget what we were even discussing in the first place. __________________ SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

12-12-2004, 05:20 AM	#185
coolfuck Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 2,440	lol.. nice topic __________________ WANT TO PLACE YOUR TEXT/BANNER HERE? MSG ME:ICQ Number :43-420-088

12-12-2004, 12:13 AM	#165
mailman Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Ontario, Canada Posts: 6,311	Ahhh how nice your trying to make it a happy thread... go make another thread to post your pictures in!

12-12-2004, 06:47 AM	#198
Fake Nick So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: go troll goo! Posts: 7,708	7 th reply in this thread someone from MP comes with a link to their board bur quickly realises someone outsmarted them and edits the post now tell me how they are neutral ? yeah they did NOT ask Rictor to post that here

12-12-2004, 06:54 AM	#200
Fake Nick So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: go troll goo! Posts: 7,708	you changed your tone now , your first posts were 100% hating MP should have contacted PI instead of taking it to the boards they took it to the boards no one else they took it to this board and no one else asking a middle man to post it here makes you just as 'guilty'