Looks like Ibill is blowing off Adult.com's lawyers. - Page 3 - GoFuckYourself.com

Tipsy · 10-14-2004, 03:05 AM

100 very expensive lawyers in suits.

TonyL · 10-14-2004, 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kimmykim
Sorry to burst your bubble, but you're wrong. As long as the banks, IPSPs, and card associations agree, this happens all the time. It has nothing to do with today's Visa/Mastercard, and I'm completely clueless as to where you keep coming up with this statement when people who are in processing continue to correct you.

You are the authority around here Kim so I'll take your word for it. However my experience has been different with the merchant accounts and aggregates I have used.

-Tony

pradaboy · 10-14-2004, 11:31 AM

bump for big L... this is interesting stuff

Trixxxia · 10-14-2004, 12:13 PM

Hopefully KimmyKim is around to see my question & can answer:

Hypothetically speaking - if an IPSP is still rebilling & processing for sites but not releasing funds & 'let's say' they should go out of business tomorrow - the sites don't have to honour the 'membership' if it hasn't been paid - forcing the member to chargeback & either stop all together or start with the new processor.

Does the chargeback history get tagged on the site or remain with the defaulting processor for not having paid out the funds to the site owners which ultimately gave them no choice but to block out the members still using that processor?

quiet · 10-14-2004, 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by TopBucksTrixxxia
Hopefully KimmyKim is around to see my question & can answer:

Hypothetically speaking - if an IPSP is still rebilling & processing for sites but not releasing funds & 'let's say' they should go out of business tomorrow - the sites don't have to honour the 'membership' if it hasn't been paid - forcing the member to chargeback & either stop all together or start with the new processor.

Does the chargeback history get tagged on the site or remain with the defaulting processor for not having paid out the funds to the site owners which ultimately gave them no choice but to block out the members still using that processor?

bump :)

10-14-2004, 03:05 AM	#101
Tipsy Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: See sig Posts: 6,989	100 very expensive lawyers in suits. __________________ Ignorance is never bliss.

10-14-2004, 11:31 AM	#103
pradaboy sell me your banners Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: on the tubes Posts: 12,931	bump for big L... this is interesting stuff __________________ Media Buyer - Sell me your traffic! FREE to register domains... Better than 99% of the crap sold here!

10-14-2004, 12:13 PM	#104
Trixxxia Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Montreal, Canada Posts: 5,600	Hopefully KimmyKim is around to see my question & can answer: Hypothetically speaking - if an IPSP is still rebilling & processing for sites but not releasing funds & 'let's say' they should go out of business tomorrow - the sites don't have to honour the 'membership' if it hasn't been paid - forcing the member to chargeback & either stop all together or start with the new processor. Does the chargeback history get tagged on the site or remain with the defaulting processor for not having paid out the funds to the site owners which ultimately gave them no choice but to block out the members still using that processor?