TGP, 2257, Gallery submitters, and YOU. - GoFuckYourself.com

badmrfrosty · 08-23-2004, 11:28 AM

I figured one of those topics probably applies to every single person on this forum.

My thing is this.. assuming the new 2257 resolution is adopted, I have about 60 or so galleries floating around out there on various TGPs (hosted on my server of course) that have no 2257 links on them. Of course THE SPONSOR has 2257 links on the tour pages/whatever because i only use reputable companies as sponsors. My point is this.

Assuming this resolution is adopted by whomever decides these things, possibly hundreds of thousands of galleries will need to be modified. The ass tickler comes in here: most TGP scripts will delete/ban your galleries if you modify them *especially* if you modify the LINKS on the galleries. I think what we need to do, in the *Interim* is get all of the "Major TGP software" guys together and say look, you need to allow the "addition" of a link with certain parameters, that wont set off your "third-reich delete scheme".

Maybe i'm overreacting to this? But I remember one time I had a broken link to sponsor on a gallery and i fixed it, it was like I took a dump on the hood of someone's car or something.

My

European Lee · 08-23-2004, 11:29 AM

For those of us who have been utilizing ssi on their galleries this really isnt going to be a problem at all.

Regards,

Lee

dready · 08-23-2004, 11:33 AM

There will have to be an amnesty period... that I'm sure a ton of scammers will take advantage of.

badmrfrosty · 08-23-2004, 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by European Lee
For those of us who have been utilizing ssi on their galleries this really isnt going to be a problem at all.

Regards,

Lee

Uhh..

SSI wont prevent the content of your page from changing, I completely miss your point.

BMF

Anna_O · 08-23-2004, 11:38 AM

I thought this law only affected galleries published after the law went into place?

Jace · 08-23-2004, 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Anna_O
I thought this law only affected galleries published after the law went into place?

this law effects ALL content from 1991 and above

hire a lawyer and get educated, don't depend on boards

Anna_O · 08-23-2004, 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by JaceXXX
this law effects ALL content from 1991 and above

hire a lawyer and get educated, don't depend on boards

Thanks for clearing that up

Matt 26z · 08-23-2004, 12:14 PM

Even by the old regs you should have been including a 2257 link in galleries all along. Nobody did this, but if they had then nobody would be worrying about updating and getting banned.

....But TGP's are at least partly to blame for people not having 2257 links.

They don't scan the gallery HTML for a link containing the word "2257" to exempt that link from the link count. So it's encouraged every gallery maker to break the law for years.

The bottom line though is that it's the gallery maker who didn't include the link by their own choice. So no, TGP's should not have to offer a grace period to change galleries.

Basic_man · 08-23-2004, 12:19 PM

For sure it will get alot of confusion !

Doctor Dre · 08-23-2004, 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Matt 26z
Even by the old regs you should have been including a 2257 link in galleries all along. Nobody did this, but if they had then nobody would be worrying about updating and getting banned.

....But TGP's are at least partly to blame for people not having 2257 links.

They don't scan the gallery HTML for a link containing the word "2257" to exempt that link from the link count. So it's encouraged every gallery maker to break the law for years.

The bottom line though is that it's the gallery maker who didn't include the link by their own choice. So no, TGP's should not have to offer a grace period to change galleries.

ROFL ... nobody knew about that god damn law . And most tgp webmasters are followers that just try to copy each others.

08-23-2004, 11:28 AM	#1
badmrfrosty Confirmed User Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 500	TGP, 2257, Gallery submitters, and YOU. I figured one of those topics probably applies to every single person on this forum. My thing is this.. assuming the new 2257 resolution is adopted, I have about 60 or so galleries floating around out there on various TGPs (hosted on my server of course) that have no 2257 links on them. Of course THE SPONSOR has 2257 links on the tour pages/whatever because i only use reputable companies as sponsors. My point is this. Assuming this resolution is adopted by whomever decides these things, possibly hundreds of thousands of galleries will need to be modified. The ass tickler comes in here: most TGP scripts will delete/ban your galleries if you modify them especially if you modify the LINKS on the galleries. I think what we need to do, in the Interim is get all of the "Major TGP software" guys together and say look, you need to allow the "addition" of a link with certain parameters, that wont set off your "third-reich delete scheme". Maybe i'm overreacting to this? But I remember one time I had a broken link to sponsor on a gallery and i fixed it, it was like I took a dump on the hood of someone's car or something. My

08-23-2004, 11:29 AM	#2
European Lee Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Daytona Beach Posts: 7,133	For those of us who have been utilizing ssi on their galleries this really isnt going to be a problem at all. Regards, Lee __________________ YOUR TRAFFIC IS SAFE WITH US - CONDOM CASH PUTTING THE GAY ADULT INDUSTRY ON YOUR PC!! AFFORDABLE 2257 COMPLIANT GAY + BI CONTENT

08-23-2004, 11:33 AM	#3
dready Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Toronto, ON Posts: 5,247	There will have to be an amnesty period... that I'm sure a ton of scammers will take advantage of. __________________ ICQ: 91139591

08-23-2004, 11:38 AM	#5
Anna_O Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Sweden Posts: 5,773	I thought this law only affected galleries published after the law went into place? __________________ Fetish by Anna Paysite - Nylons Bondage Latex Lesbians Glamour Annas Dungeon - 70k / day Fetish TGP ICQ 246797915

08-23-2004, 12:19 PM	#9
Basic_man Programming King Pin Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Montreal Posts: 27,360	For sure it will get alot of confusion ! __________________ UUGallery Builder - automated photo/video gallery plugin for Wordpress! Stop looking! Checkout Naked Hosting, online since 1999 !

08-23-2004, 12:14 PM	#8
Matt 26z So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: ¤ª"˜¨๑۩۞۩๑¨˜"ª¤ Posts: 18,481	Even by the old regs you should have been including a 2257 link in galleries all along. Nobody did this, but if they had then nobody would be worrying about updating and getting banned. ....But TGP's are at least partly to blame for people not having 2257 links. They don't scan the gallery HTML for a link containing the word "2257" to exempt that link from the link count. So it's encouraged every gallery maker to break the law for years. The bottom line though is that it's the gallery maker who didn't include the link by their own choice. So no, TGP's should not have to offer a grace period to change galleries.