TGP, 2257, Gallery submitters, and YOU.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • badmrfrosty
    Confirmed User
    • May 2003
    • 500

    #1

    TGP, 2257, Gallery submitters, and YOU.

    I figured one of those topics probably applies to every single person on this forum.

    My thing is this.. assuming the new 2257 resolution is adopted, I have about 60 or so galleries floating around out there on various TGPs (hosted on my server of course) that have no 2257 links on them. Of course THE SPONSOR has 2257 links on the tour pages/whatever because i only use reputable companies as sponsors. My point is this.

    Assuming this resolution is adopted by whomever decides these things, possibly hundreds of thousands of galleries will need to be modified. The ass tickler comes in here: most TGP scripts will delete/ban your galleries if you modify them *especially* if you modify the LINKS on the galleries. I think what we need to do, in the *Interim* is get all of the "Major TGP software" guys together and say look, you need to allow the "addition" of a link with certain parameters, that wont set off your "third-reich delete scheme".

    Maybe i'm overreacting to this? But I remember one time I had a broken link to sponsor on a gallery and i fixed it, it was like I took a dump on the hood of someone's car or something.

    My
  • European Lee
    Confirmed User
    • Dec 2002
    • 7133

    #2
    For those of us who have been utilizing ssi on their galleries this really isnt going to be a problem at all.

    Regards,

    Lee
    YOUR TRAFFIC IS SAFE WITH US - CONDOM CASH
    PUTTING THE GAY ADULT INDUSTRY ON YOUR PC!!
    AFFORDABLE 2257 COMPLIANT GAY + BI CONTENT

    Comment

    • dready
      Confirmed User
      • Oct 2002
      • 5247

      #3
      There will have to be an amnesty period... that I'm sure a ton of scammers will take advantage of.
      ICQ: 91139591

      Comment

      • badmrfrosty
        Confirmed User
        • May 2003
        • 500

        #4
        Originally posted by European Lee
        For those of us who have been utilizing ssi on their galleries this really isnt going to be a problem at all.

        Regards,

        Lee
        Uhh..

        SSI wont prevent the content of your page from changing, I completely miss your point.

        BMF

        Comment

        • Anna_O
          Confirmed User
          • Oct 2002
          • 5773

          #5
          I thought this law only affected galleries published after the law went into place?


          Fetish by Anna Paysite - Nylons Bondage Latex Lesbians Glamour

          Annas Dungeon - 70k / day Fetish TGP
          ICQ 246797915

          Comment

          • Jace
            FBOP Class Of 2013
            • Jan 2004
            • 35562

            #6
            Originally posted by Anna_O
            I thought this law only affected galleries published after the law went into place?
            this law effects ALL content from 1991 and above

            hire a lawyer and get educated, don't depend on boards

            Comment

            • Anna_O
              Confirmed User
              • Oct 2002
              • 5773

              #7
              Originally posted by JaceXXX
              this law effects ALL content from 1991 and above

              hire a lawyer and get educated, don't depend on boards
              Thanks for clearing that up


              Fetish by Anna Paysite - Nylons Bondage Latex Lesbians Glamour

              Annas Dungeon - 70k / day Fetish TGP
              ICQ 246797915

              Comment

              • Matt 26z
                So Fucking Banned
                • Apr 2002
                • 18481

                #8
                Even by the old regs you should have been including a 2257 link in galleries all along. Nobody did this, but if they had then nobody would be worrying about updating and getting banned.

                ....But TGP's are at least partly to blame for people not having 2257 links.

                They don't scan the gallery HTML for a link containing the word "2257" to exempt that link from the link count. So it's encouraged every gallery maker to break the law for years.

                The bottom line though is that it's the gallery maker who didn't include the link by their own choice. So no, TGP's should not have to offer a grace period to change galleries.

                Comment

                • Basic_man
                  Programming King Pin
                  • Oct 2003
                  • 27360

                  #9
                  For sure it will get alot of confusion !
                  UUGallery Builder - automated photo/video gallery plugin for Wordpress!
                  Stop looking! Checkout Naked Hosting, online since 1999 !

                  Comment

                  • Doctor Dre
                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                    • Jan 2001
                    • 51692

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Matt 26z
                    Even by the old regs you should have been including a 2257 link in galleries all along. Nobody did this, but if they had then nobody would be worrying about updating and getting banned.

                    ....But TGP's are at least partly to blame for people not having 2257 links.

                    They don't scan the gallery HTML for a link containing the word "2257" to exempt that link from the link count. So it's encouraged every gallery maker to break the law for years.

                    The bottom line though is that it's the gallery maker who didn't include the link by their own choice. So no, TGP's should not have to offer a grace period to change galleries.
                    ROFL ... nobody knew about that god damn law . And most tgp webmasters are followers that just try to copy each others.
                    Originally posted by rayadp05
                    I rebooted, deleted temp files, history, cookies and everything...still cannot view the news clip. All I see is that fucking gay ass music video from "Rick Roll". Anyone else have a different link to the news clip?

                    Comment

                    Working...