Kerry.. UNFIT for Command - Page 3 - GoFuckYourself.com

Pleasurepays · 08-06-2004, 03:19 PM

100 lying scumbag politicians... who will be no better than the last lying scumbag politicians.

DarkBob · 08-06-2004, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BustIt
Clarence Thomas was the dissenting voice required to defeat the latest attempt at COPA.

And he is a Republican appointed by Reagan.

So Reagan will appoint judges posthumously?

BustIt · 08-06-2004, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BustIt
Clarence Thomas was the dissenting voice required to defeat the latest attempt at COPA.

And he is a Republican appointed by Reagan.

He normally can be counted on to follow Scalia, but in this case went his own way

BustIt · 08-06-2004, 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DarkBob
So Reagan will appoint judges posthumously?

The only part that was really relevant was that he was Republican.

I assumed you were expressing fear about Republican-appointed judges threatening the porn business.??

NichePay_Manny · 08-06-2004, 03:32 PM

DarkBob · 08-06-2004, 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BustIt
The only part that was really relevant was that he was Republican.

I assumed you were expressing fear about Republican-appointed judges threatening the porn business.??

I wasn't referring to just any republican, I was referring to George W. Bush

theking · 08-06-2004, 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420
well we know that none of those guys served with Kerry. We know that O'Neill has been a Kerry hit man ever since Nixon recruited him as a hatchet man. We know that everyone who served with Kerry save one said he was a great man and a great commander, and the one who doesn't like him said he was fit for command anyway.

Stupid fucking pothead...aren't you Danny boy.

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
Your statements are incorrectly made. All of the people in the ad...except for one I think (the medical officer)...served with Senator Kerry. They did not serve under Senator Kerry but served with Senator Kerry in Coastal Division Eleven...on other boats in the Division or possibly some may have served in another capacity within the Division. Those that served on the boats...were barracked with Senator Kerry...and their boats would have served side by side of Senator Kerry's boat on some...if not all of the missions...that Senator Kerry's boat went on. Bottom line they would have personally known...or known of...Senator Kerry and the missions that he went on. They would have had their own opinion of Senator Kerry and their opinion of the actions that he took on a mission that they either participated in or heard about. They are entitled to their opinions of any individual and/or actions taken by any individual...in this case their opinion involves Senator Kerry.

Their opinions are of little import...as Senator Kerry's military record stands...as is...as officially recorded by the Navy.
His purple hearts...and other medals the Navy awarded him with... are veted at several different levels within the chain of command. The decision was made at the higher levels that the recommendations for the medals were valid...thus he was awarded the medals. What any single individual...or group of individuals offer as their opinion about the decisions made by the Navy is far above their pay grades...and should be of no import to anyone.

BustIt · 08-06-2004, 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DarkBob
I wasn't referring to just any republican, I was referring to George W. Bush

At least two of the ones appointed by Reagan voted contrary to his opinions many times, the same would probably happen with any appointed by Bush.

Reagan often expressed disappointment over the votes of his appointees, so they're not presidential puppets.

DarkBob · 08-06-2004, 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BustIt
At least two of the ones appointed by Reagan voted contrary to his opinions many times, the same would probably happen with any appointed by Bush.

Reagan often expressed disappointment over the votes of his appointees, so they're not presidential puppets.

I won't argue with that, but my fear is that Bush will go out of his way to find judges that agree with him on certain issues, porn being one of them. It has been said that as many as 3 justices could retire in the next 4 years. He will have an opportunity to change this country drastically, and it won't be the same for years. I don't think he'll miss that opportunity, and I don't want to take that chance.

Quentin · 08-06-2004, 04:27 PM

In reference to:

Quote:

Originally posted by BustIt

Clarence Thomas was the dissenting voice required to defeat the latest attempt at COPA.

And he is a Republican appointed by Reagan.

and

Quote:

At least two of the ones appointed by Reagan voted contrary to his opinions many times, the same would probably happen with any appointed by Bush.

Reagan often expressed disappointment over the votes of his appointees, so they're not presidential puppets.

It's a minor point, since it was a Republican president all the same, but Thomas was actually appointed by George HW Bush (Bush 1), not Reagan.

Your point about Supreme Court justices is well-taken though; they often show more of an independent/objective streak than the pres. who appointed them would like. It's not quite as simple as "appointed by conservative - will vote conservative" or vice versa.

- Q.

dig420 · 08-06-2004, 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
Stupid fucking pothead...aren't you Danny boy.

yes that's me, and you're the old drunk with the big mouth and the wet brain.

08-06-2004, 03:19 PM	#101
Pleasurepays BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: I live in a pile of boogers Posts: 11,913	100 lying scumbag politicians... who will be no better than the last lying scumbag politicians.

08-06-2004, 03:32 PM	#105
NichePay_Manny Registered User Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Los Angeles, Ca Posts: 1,833