you should feel lucky YOUR still even IN this contest!!! your 1st pic of dildos spelling out GFY and a printed out picture of juicy was stupid & looks like it took a whole 5 mins to do!!!!!! be careful of what you speak of, take a look at yourself before you judge! :2 cents:

SHE SHOULD STAY!!!!!!!!! She has been a GREAT contestant thus far, there was nothing technically in the rules saying "have to show logo". :thumbsup

Thanks


Could someone from adult.com please hit me up on icq 139-752-770. I would be happy to resubmit my pic.

Hmm.. if you look REAL close, you can kinda make out some yellow in the headlight cover..

cool i didnt see it cause i read the first page of posts.

nice pic.

im for you staying. good luck. :thumbsup

some people here take this too serious, this aint the olympics or something.

she stays in my opinion.

she did what the contest called for, you wanted the logo visable it should have been stated. :2 cents:

You must disqualify her!

You must also disqualify those who failed to wear either of the two assigned articles of clothing.

You must also disqualify anyone who cannot be seen wearing both articles of clothing. If you can?t see the article of clothing (on their body in the photo) then you cannot be sure that either item is actually being worn.

In addition, the girls who in fact, did wear the articles, but posed in such a way that the logos cannot be read should be kicked out. Some of the logos are at such extreme angles that the viewer has no idea what the logo is (or says).

Sometimes you can see the logo on one article, but not the other and I think that since the logo is on both the tank top and the panties, it is obvious that both logos were understood to be displayed in the photo in such a way so that the viewer could clearly read both of the logos.

All of the contestants who failed to follow these common sense issues should be kicked out.



Actually I am being sarcastic. Next time you should be very specific so everyone will know exactly what is expected for each competition. The contest is about the "beauty" of the women . . . so that is what should be emphasized when judging, not the technical aspects of the photos.

Furthermore, these contestants don?t allow the viewer to see/perceive the logos anyway since the human eye cannot separate from those luscious figures and faces. I didn't even know there were logos involved in any of the photos.

Great photos and great contest!

She didn't break the rules. The rules simply weren't specific enough. Why make it so cut and dry? Give her a chance to submit a similar pic where you can see the logos. Simple.

So just because all the other contestants assumed they needed to follow some rule that didn't exist you wanna disqualify Bo because she didnt follow suit? I happen to know Bo personally and she's brighter than most. If the rules would have stated she needed to show the logo I have no doubt she would have. Don't blame her because you made an assumption. :2 cents:

I agree, let her submit new photo showing the logo and put this thread to rest.

you cant brake the rules dude its not far on every one elesthen is it

read the thread then come back and make a post :2 cents:

You are forever trying to bash me, Baba...just hilarious! :1orglaugh

You know what...it did take 5 minutes to shoot my first weeks entry image....some of us girls in the contest spend the other 95% of our time in front of a computer instead of in front of a camera.

When you get nekkid for a pic, please share with me, so I can give you some feedback as well LMFAO

Ivy

First off, I wish people would quit talking about 'creativity'. That was for the first round, not round 3!

Second, I vote no. I don't think she should be disqualified. If the rules did not specifically state that you HAVE to show the GFY logo, then she didn't break any rules.

Simple as that! :)


Edit: She shouldn't even have to submit another photo. She showed other pics already in this thread...it's obvious she had the outfit on. Why would she NOT? It would just be a waste of time and another delay IMO.

Once again, I think she should be able to stay....but all these people saying submit a new photo.....for what?
There is no reason for it.
Let's just go forward.

She should stay! It wasn't stated in the rules that you had to SEE the logo and also true that some of the girls are not wearing both panty and top, so then they too would have to be dq'd.

This is starting to get better and better, the claws are coming out...can't wait for the next round RAWR! LOL

I don't think she should be disqualified because per the rules, she is wearing the GFY tank top and panties! Thus she should stay as long as she's not in the bottom 10! If it was imperative that the GFY logo must be seen, it should have said so in the rules.

I agree.....yes, my opinion is that to represent GFY the logo should be shown, but it's all done and over with. We've had enough holdups... she looks hot, it's a great pic, and if she won , she won. Let's just move on so the next round doesn't take a month or more ....At the rate we're going, it will be Christmas before this "10 week" contest is over :1orglaugh

Ivy

She didn´t break the rules so see should stay in not her problem if the person that came up with the rules wasn´t specific enough.

I say she should be allowed to stay in. She followed the rules. She even posted another pic with the logo showing.

From now on I say add more details to descriptions of what to do so you don't get anymore of the whinners.

I love claws! They tend to tear/rip clothing off of beautiful women!!!

Exactly what I was going to say. It was a "best" picture, NOT a "best picture of the logo".

LOL. I would have been cool to have it done by Internext too, oh well.
I say...let's just move on and take it from here.

Don't mean to be rude Ivy, but she was trying to say that you should not judge me the way you do. You always seem ready to post that you are soooooo dedicated to GFY, and by saying that you are trying to say that I and other girls are not. Well babe I might not have been around as long as you are, but that does not say a thing! And yes you are behind your computer a lot, But guess what most girls on here are!!

Not trying to be rude or something, just my :2 cents: :winkwink:

looks to me, that she is in the GFY gear, let her stay... and I didn't read the whole topic so if the choice has already been made then.... :321GFY

i can say a shit load of things back, but im not even going to come at you sideways. fuck it, im gettin to old for this catty shit. :glugglug

:)

Let her stay....

I say let that fine ass stay :)
what did Lensman say anyway?

I was reading but then that ass was the only thing in my mind after that post. :thumbsup






:glugglug

The *rules* state "to produce the best pic IN your GFY tank and panties"

Well, she is clearly wearing them. The rules do NOT state that the logo must be visible. In contest rules, things can NOT be assumed, so people can't say "it is a given they wanted the logo showing". If GFY wanted the logo to show then they should have stated it.

And...if you are going to be so picky about rules...if I recall a couple of the girls were not WEARING the panties...they were holding them.

Now, in all fairness to the ladies who were NOT wearing the GFY panties, if you thought they broke the rules then they should have been disqualified PRIOR to the voting. Since you clearly accepted those ladies, as well as the one in question, then you can't go back and disqualify at this point in time.

Is there a lesson here? Sure is! Make your rules CLEAR and to the point in future. Example: Submit a picture of yourself WEARING both the GFY tanktop and GFY thong. The GFY logo on both the tank top and panties MUST be clearly visible in the picture.

You simply can't assume that people will assume something...you want it...state it up front!

Bo, I don't see any statement where I've "judged you" and I don't ever remember any post about how I am soooooo dedicated to GFY. I've also not been around here THAT long, so I'm completely lost as to why you are offended. All I said was I felt the logo should be shown, but I also said it was a great image and you looked hot. The comment about me being on the computer was in reply to baba's forever bashing of my own images/looks,etc. That wasn't directed to you or to any of the girls it was in reply to her telling me my 1st weeks pic looked like it only took 5 minutes.

I'm unsure what I've every typed on this board to offend you. Actually, I didn't even know who you were until this thread.

Regardless....I guess it was time for claws to come out... all the guys have been waiting for a cat fight :Graucho

Ivy

http://www.ellinude.com/banners/avat...100x100-14.jpg


I LOVE THIS FACE!!!
(she's a real cutie pie!)

Hey, I got disqualified and you could clearly see the tank top and panties in my pic. Of course, I did have my fist buried in my pussy... but I didn't see THAT in the rules.

last comment...

Clearly? no.. that could have been ANY white tank and g-string... without seeing the logo... we would never know... from THAT pic. the other pic yea... we can tell... but the one submitted?... no.. cannot tell.

Just my opinion...

When you do decide to come at her, please start a new thread labeled (drama) :winkwink:

Ivy showed us all a few things about herself with those first few posts, and that alone says a lot. Weird that her tone starts to get defensive and slowly start to change. :2 cents:

Looks like her photographer messed up, not her.. And it was GFY who chose that picture, no? I think she's shown that she was indeed wearing the clothes, why would she pick identical non-gfy stuff, in the same colour?

ROFL :1orglaugh

gotta love someone who can laugh about such shit :1orglaugh

BTW: did you ever get around to posting that picture? I think we all wanted to see what we've missed out on. :)

yes, do share.

lol

If any of the contestants or their spokespeople complained about this THEY should be the one(s) disqualified. How's that? Bitch bitch bitch bitch whine whine whine.

Can we just move forward and find out who didn't make it to the next round (me)?

:1orglaugh