I agree with you. :)

its funny to see how much (some)girls congratulate each others all the time... saying things like..."you look smokin' hot" .. "you are so adorable" . "where's my sexy girlies at?" ... and yet... when one is in trouble.... their solidarity seems to evaporate pretty quickly... lol

I know, and I will if they want me too. It sounded a bit harder then it was ment to be. I just think this is unfair.

Funny how most of the other contestants want her out. I think she should stay, but keep this incident in mind for the future.

BTW: you guys got owned when she posted the front view :1orglaugh

No, she should not be disqualified.

Don't we all have something better to do with our time?






Oh, wait, no we don't. :Graucho

the rules for this round were a bit vague, keep her in.

if it were up to me i would probably be a bit more specific in future rounds though, hehe. :winkwink:

I am thinking the same thing. Thanks for saving me the words. :1orglaugh

I say let her stay..... the rules didn't specifically say that it had to be visible and that is a loophole that was not forseen, making it not her fault..... If it was specific that it had to be visible, rather than just implied that it would be, I'd say disqualify her, but it didn't say that. :winkwink:

:1orglaugh


that's great :thumbsup

Let her stay :)

Thank you :thumbsup

if it didn't say "YOU MUST SHOW THE LOGO, etc" - you cannot throw her out.

you can only disqualify the person if they broke the rule. Nothing can be assumed or implied, it must be spelled out clearly.

I voted for her to stay - everyone else has already stated the obvious reasons why...

Suggestion for future rounds: All disqualifications should be made before the voting is started (whether they are instantly disqualified, or all bad entries are given 24 hours to resubmit). No sense voting on disappearing entries. :2 cents:

Yeah I vote for this !!

bah.

No sense me insulting the intelligence of 1/3 of the people who voted in this thread :)

edit.

Sweet! I was waiting for something like this to happen! Women are too damn competitive for an issue like this not to come up!

I want to see fighting!

I am sorry for posting so late but I actually had to work all doay shooting, I like sitting at the computer fucking off much better lol. If it was a problem it should of been a problem when she sent the picture in. Why wait til after the contest is over makes no sense. Wait I forgot this is the online adult industry whats wrong with me lol.

Thx for that but I didn't need answers to those questions, they were to shut up NBDesign and they seemed to work. :glugglug

im not giving back your purse!

CAT FIGHT!!!

Let her stay... IF she was ugly, then kick here out... :Graucho

:1orglaugh

This thread is a poll that is apparently deciding the issue, and so far 80% + agree that it wasnt a techincal breaking of the stated rules.
Too many beautiful women for me to vote anyway, but I voted for the letter of the rules, rather than the implied, in the poll.

so i stuck up for heather... so what? I got nothing from it... nothing. your point? so one dim buld... not many... and no I did not have my tongue up her ass... would not put my tongue in anyones ass,,, that is just gross.

Listen up BITCH! I'm very proud of my pink purse and I went through hell to get the damn thing. I'm getting it back!

Psst... we'll post the fight video on NaughtySly.com :Graucho

Argument against:
The rules do not say you have to see the logo.


there's your answer

No Logo=No Luck...

I say keep her in.



:glugglug

Disqualified for something the rules do not state? Of course she should NOT be disqualified.

If you dont specify it, it isnt a rule

Agreed, she should stay, it wasn't stated in the rules that it had to be visable, for contests with that much money riding on the winner nothing should be taken as a given.

My :2 cents:

Smurfette

Good point. If she's going to be disqualified for following the rules (she followed them completely), are you going to disqualify these contestants for breaking the rules?

Makes no sense. She shouldn't have to send in a new photo. She followed the rules. If you want the logo shown you say "Requirement: GFY logo must be shown".

This is all just a small oversight by the contest holders. We all make mistakes but this mistake wasn't hers.

this picture doesnt show her wearing the gfy panties or tank.

they show her wearing a white tank and panties.

the pic doesnt qualify.

but should you disqualify her for a fuck up that was not intentional?

no.

i would have her submit another pic.

I say, let her stay :thumbsup

I already posted this one in this thread before


http://www.hotdutchchicks.com/pictur...pic01klein.jpg


The gear I'm wearing on the pic I submitted is GFY gear

Let her stay.

That is the one you should have submitted for the contest... a little too late IMO... sorry... you are cute..... but... there were others a bit cutier that did follow the rules... not being mean... just stating my opinion.

and looking at the two again... this one is better than the one you originally submitted.... you look much better in this pic. I may have voted for you with this one...

She followed the stated rules as well as everyone :thumbsup

If "You MUST see the logo in the submitted pictures" was a "rule", then it would have been written as such.

There is more validity to the potential arguments that the girls who are merely holding or displaying the clothing should be disqualified.

Just my opinion.

I don't know why I even bother answering this. The rules did not say that the logo had to show, if I would have know this would be an issue I would have submitted another pic. A lot of people already tried to explain this to you, but obviously you don't read you just post to stir things up. It's not working now please be so kind to :321GFY

Thank you

xox

Let her stay.

If you want to kick some contestants out....I will be happy to provide you with a list. :glugglug