Right there is what decides this issue for me. The first time I saw her entry pic I did notice right away that the GFY logo wasn't visible, and come to think of it that is partly why I didn't include her in my five votes.

But if it ain't in the rules, then her pic should stand.

It's a non-issue from where I sit.

Yeah you were for the two seconds to take the pic and then you pulled them back on that finger like a rubber band and flung them at me :winkwink:

So i guess that pic was submitted after the fact that there was debate started so that is not the one she submitted for the contest or there would not be a discussion on this... right?

resubmitting is the worst idea of all. maybe all the girls can resubmit, maybe we can just cancel the whole thing.

LOL...Bo is very sexy, and we must think alike because I shot in a shop with a 73 Bronco and grease smeared on me as well :Graucho


No...no competition.... I was stating my opinion on this issue and it has nothing to do with her. Even if she were disqualified I have nothing to gain by that, I was way down on votes...so no competition issue here LOL

I just think that in the spirit of GFY , the logo should be shown.

Carry on... And Bo, I agree it was a very sexy pic! You look smokin hot in it !! I had some pics that I didn't show the logo in as well, that I thought were sexier than my entry on.

Ivy

She is hot, Didn't break the rules!

Didnt break any rule - unless can be proven she wasnt in GFY top and panties. Perhaps another couple of photos from same set would prove this.

Perhaps the competition organisers need to be more specific in what they want moving forward :D

Why is this being brought up now? why not when the pics were first seen by adult.com? as before you can shut up now.

I feel sorry for Lens. What started out as a fun idea is turning into a complete clusterfuck. Im sure Lens is sitting there scratching his head wondering how we come up with the nit picky things we type as a response. There has not been one round of this competition that hasn't had some drama around it.

When it's done we should all chip in and pay for the holes in Len's office created from him beating his head against the walls :glugglug

she has to stay `cause the rules didn`t specify the logo has to be visible:)

Now that answer sounds alot more diplomatic lol.

i didnt know the pic belongs to NakedBo

ban(g) her!

take a wild guess, ummm maybe complaints from other girls. if it was a problem the adult.com people would have handled it before the voting began and when she submitted the pic. it's sad that it's even being brought to the board for a poll or discussion, it's sad that they think she should resubmit, unfair to her and the others and so on.

:winkwink:

Keep her in, this is very petty, and is not a valid reason.

we have not been dealing with specifics thus far, why now?

I VOTE STAY!

Relax. He is cutting you a fair deal. The simple fact Lensman questioned your submissions mean he thinks there are grounds for bumping you. He gave you a second chance. Accept it.

I agree. If this was an issue it should have been brought up BEFORE the voting at the same time as the controversy about Alysha's fisting pic (which I think should have stayed in too).

Let's just move onto the next round without disqualifying anyone else on an unwritten technicality. Although I think the logo should be showing, it should have been addressed sooner if it was going to be grounds for disqualification.

I agree that the logo should have been the focus of every girls entry. However, Bo did not break any LISTED rules, and nothing was mentioned at the time of entry allowing her to make a change (like the chance given to the fisting picture entry). So, I think she should be allowed to stay. If she is disqualified, they have to be that strict with every entry in every round (no double-standards, treat every entry the same). :2 cents:

Everything I'll say has been in one post or another, but I'm adding my input anyways.

She followed the written rules... she's in her GFY tank and panties. Nothing was specified about the logo having to be visible. Granted, if I were in the contest I would have been sure to show the logo. Regardless, she broke no written rules. If it was so important that the logo be shown, it should have been stated clearly in the rules.

To sum it all up, she shouldn't be disqualified because of vague rules.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't you one of the board harddicks who spends and inordinate amount of time with his tongue up the ass of some of these "dim bulbs"?

I apologize if it's not you, but I'm thinking you are the valiant Knight who rides in to save bulbs like Heather Hampton and the like, all in the hopes of some free imaginary fuck or personalized jackoff material.

If I'm thinking of someone else, I apologize. Let me know if you're not the hero I was referring to, and I'll even make a thread saying I'm sorry.

I agree with you. :)

its funny to see how much (some)girls congratulate each others all the time... saying things like..."you look smokin' hot" .. "you are so adorable" . "where's my sexy girlies at?" ... and yet... when one is in trouble.... their solidarity seems to evaporate pretty quickly... lol

I know, and I will if they want me too. It sounded a bit harder then it was ment to be. I just think this is unfair.

Funny how most of the other contestants want her out. I think she should stay, but keep this incident in mind for the future.

BTW: you guys got owned when she posted the front view :1orglaugh

No, she should not be disqualified.

Don't we all have something better to do with our time?






Oh, wait, no we don't. :Graucho

the rules for this round were a bit vague, keep her in.

if it were up to me i would probably be a bit more specific in future rounds though, hehe. :winkwink:

I am thinking the same thing. Thanks for saving me the words. :1orglaugh

I say let her stay..... the rules didn't specifically say that it had to be visible and that is a loophole that was not forseen, making it not her fault..... If it was specific that it had to be visible, rather than just implied that it would be, I'd say disqualify her, but it didn't say that. :winkwink:

:1orglaugh


that's great :thumbsup

Let her stay :)

Thank you :thumbsup

if it didn't say "YOU MUST SHOW THE LOGO, etc" - you cannot throw her out.

you can only disqualify the person if they broke the rule. Nothing can be assumed or implied, it must be spelled out clearly.

I voted for her to stay - everyone else has already stated the obvious reasons why...

Suggestion for future rounds: All disqualifications should be made before the voting is started (whether they are instantly disqualified, or all bad entries are given 24 hours to resubmit). No sense voting on disappearing entries. :2 cents:

Yeah I vote for this !!

bah.

No sense me insulting the intelligence of 1/3 of the people who voted in this thread :)

edit.

Sweet! I was waiting for something like this to happen! Women are too damn competitive for an issue like this not to come up!

I want to see fighting!

I am sorry for posting so late but I actually had to work all doay shooting, I like sitting at the computer fucking off much better lol. If it was a problem it should of been a problem when she sent the picture in. Why wait til after the contest is over makes no sense. Wait I forgot this is the online adult industry whats wrong with me lol.

Thx for that but I didn't need answers to those questions, they were to shut up NBDesign and they seemed to work. :glugglug

im not giving back your purse!

CAT FIGHT!!!

Let her stay... IF she was ugly, then kick here out... :Graucho

:1orglaugh

This thread is a poll that is apparently deciding the issue, and so far 80% + agree that it wasnt a techincal breaking of the stated rules.
Too many beautiful women for me to vote anyway, but I voted for the letter of the rules, rather than the implied, in the poll.

so i stuck up for heather... so what? I got nothing from it... nothing. your point? so one dim buld... not many... and no I did not have my tongue up her ass... would not put my tongue in anyones ass,,, that is just gross.

Listen up BITCH! I'm very proud of my pink purse and I went through hell to get the damn thing. I'm getting it back!

Psst... we'll post the fight video on NaughtySly.com :Graucho

Argument against:
The rules do not say you have to see the logo.


there's your answer

No Logo=No Luck...

I say keep her in.



:glugglug

Disqualified for something the rules do not state? Of course she should NOT be disqualified.

If you dont specify it, it isnt a rule