Does a sponsor lose credibility when they.... - GoFuckYourself.com

Number1Thumb · 01-11-2004, 09:24 PM

switch from ccbill to "their" own software for tracking stats? Just curious as I received an email from a certain sponsor just now.

4Pics · 01-11-2004, 09:26 PM

i think it depends on the sponsor, but it's been shown you can shave atleast 2 different ways with ccbill so I dont see how that makes it any different.

The best part of CCbill is your checks don't bounce and arrive ontime.

MadCap · 01-11-2004, 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 4Pics

The best part of CCbill is your checks don't bounce and arrive ontime.

amen

PurrrsianPussyKat · 01-11-2004, 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Number1Thumb
switch from ccbill to "their" own software for tracking stats? Just curious as I received an email from a certain sponsor just now.

You only got 1? I got 16!

Nickless · 01-11-2004, 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Number1Thumb
switch from ccbill to "their" own software for tracking stats? Just curious as I received an email from a certain sponsor just now.

yes.

Number1Thumb · 01-11-2004, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PurrrsianPussyKat

You only got 1? I got 16!

well ya I got 7 from the same sponsor. And it is just weird after there name was tossed into the mix at the same time another sponsor has just switched to "their" own software also. NO THANKS ill pass, its not like here arent a million programs that work with ccbill

OY · 01-11-2004, 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Number1Thumb
switch from ccbill to "their" own software for tracking stats? Just curious as I received an email from a certain sponsor just now.

Only if the sponsor (if it is CCBill, Epoch, Jettis, IBill, or any other processor) does not intent to use MULTIPLE processors as the new solution is their new software.

If they are going to use multiple processors in their new software, then it will only MAKE YOU MORE MONEY, so I would not worry if that was the case.

I am sure there is more to this "story"... Details please...

Nasty · 01-11-2004, 09:35 PM

I got 12, if they cant get their fucking email software to work, Im sure not trusting them to manage my affiliate traffic any better

Number1Thumb · 01-11-2004, 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Oystein

Only if the sponsor (if it is CCBill, Epoch, Jettis, IBill, or any other processor) does not intent to use MULTIPLE processors as the new solution is their new software.

If they are going to use multiple processors in their new software, then it will only MAKE YOU MORE MONEY, so I would not worry if that was the case.

I am sure there is more to this "story"... Details please...

Oystein stop with the MPA2 spam, LOL its not directed towards cascading billing in anyway. Im just askin why would they switch? Knowing webmasters have a certain comfort level with ccbill. Its just shady in my eyes and I wont be riding that train.

4Pics · 01-11-2004, 09:38 PM

Whats the program that is switching?

Sosa · 01-11-2004, 09:39 PM

I got 8 of em... All from the same sponsor.

lock · 01-11-2004, 09:40 PM

just moves which way you point your finger.

OY · 01-11-2004, 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Number1Thumb

Oystein stop with the MPA2 spam, LOL its not directed towards cascading billing in anyway. Im just askin why would they switch? Knowing webmasters have a certain comfort level with ccbill. Its just shady in my eyes and I wont be riding that train.

Funny you should say that buddy, I never even mentioned MPA2 even though I should have - since it does make you more MONEY!

I was just stating a fact...

PurrrsianPussyKat · 01-11-2004, 09:42 PM

I was disappointed to see that they were switching.. don't know if I'm gonna keep promoting them yet.

I like using ccbill sponsors, because I KNOW I'm gonna get my check. All these rogue sponsor programs seem to end up tits up and I'm left with no check.

blackmonsters · 01-11-2004, 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Nasty
I got 12, if they cant get their fucking email software to work, Im sure not trusting them to manage my affiliate traffic any better

You are quite wise!!!

If they can't send email then their stats will be fucked...no dout!!

Number1Thumb · 01-11-2004, 09:46 PM

Oystein your MR MPA2 so you need not mention it, also I like my weekly checks that havent missed in over a year so I will be moving on. Bad move IMO

DBS.US · 01-11-2004, 09:53 PM

Matt 26z · 01-11-2004, 09:55 PM

It's a pretty foolish business decision for any accused sponsor to move away from CCBill stats right now reguardless of their guilt or innocence.

If I was one of those sites and it truly was a mistake, then my damage control would be to simply stay with CCBill and promote the fact that I can't shave even if I wanted to now that the setting is open for public view by CCBill.

By moving away from CCBill stats, accoused sponsors realistically can't do anything to correct the assumption that they are con's.

What's going to happen is the industry will develop a notion that accused sponsors are moving to their own stats immediately because of a financial dependance on making the supposed shaves.

4Pics · 01-11-2004, 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Number1Thumb
Oystein your MR MPA2 so you need not mention it, also I like my weekly checks that havent missed in over a year so I will be moving on. Bad move IMO

Oystein's checks don't bounce

Number1Thumb · 01-11-2004, 09:57 PM

Im not talking about scam artist extraordanaire Perfection Jeff btw. A close buddy though I think

Number1Thumb · 01-11-2004, 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 4Pics

Oystein's checks don't bounce

Never said they did I use them on my mainstream affiliate program. Good guys and cascading rocks

OY · 01-11-2004, 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Number1Thumb
Oystein your MR MPA2 so you need not mention it, also I like my weekly checks that havent missed in over a year so I will be moving on. Bad move IMO

I hear you... It is truly a safety to have the checks coming directly from the processor in a lot of cases. I agree with that - to a certain extent. Dont forget that I used to be with Epoch back in 97-99 - so I know where the safety lies - for the most part... HOWEVER, in cases like GloBill and PSW (and others like them) where they just vanished from the face of this planet,

When you choose a sponsor that use his/hers/companys stand-alone software to track and distribute the checks for the referral traffic, you can now hold THEM liable for the money and collect (a lot of times easier than to collect from a bancrupt processor due to pressure from forums like GFY) - because the owners of the program in question always will be a FACE rather than a COMPANY - - - we all have our own opinions on this, of course, so feel free to comment.

PS. On my way to a movie (21 grams), but will check in later to post any replies.

PPS. I want to know if this company went to using JUST CCBill with their own stats or........

Great question btw Number1Thumb

Number1Thumb · 01-11-2004, 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Oystein

I hear you... It is truly a safety to have the checks coming directly from the processor in a lot of cases. I agree with that - to a certain extent. Dont forget that I used to be with Epoch back in 97-99 - so I know where the safety lies - for the most part... HOWEVER, in cases like GloBill and PSW (and others like them) where they just vanished from the face of this planet,

When you choose a sponsor that use his/hers/companys stand-alone software to track and distribute the checks for the referral traffic, you can now hold THEM liable for the money and collect (a lot of times easier than to collect from a bancrupt processor due to pressure from forums like GFY) - because the owners of the program in question always will be a FACE rather than a COMPANY - - - we all have our own opinions on this, of course, so feel free to comment.

PS. On my way to a movie (21 grams), but will check in later to post any replies.

PPS. I want to know if this company went to using JUST CCBill with their own stats or........

Great question btw Number1Thumb

To address one point you made, I have way more confidence in ccbill then some punk kid hiding behind his computer sending me my checks. Trust me just look at likewhoa, no amount of forum pressure will ever get those guys back their servers money or anything else. So I will stick with a company with a presence. Ya know I didnt check to much if they are cascading it or not.

OY · 01-11-2004, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 4Pics

Oystein's checks don't bounce

True dat!

OY · 01-11-2004, 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Number1Thumb

To address one point you made, I have way more confidence in ccbill then some punk kid hiding behind his computer sending me my checks. Trust me just look at likewhoa, no amount of forum pressure will ever get those guys back their servers money or anything else. So I will stick with a company with a presence. Ya know I didnt check to much if they are cascading it or not.

And I agree to the fullest!

Not to change subject here, but we do price MPA2 as a high end product (which it is) just to avoid punks being able to use it. Our business have no use for them. Stay strong with the strong ones...

Unfortunately some of the software packages out there does give "punks" tools they should not have, at a too low price...

Oh well, have to go... cya all later...

01-11-2004, 09:24 PM	#1
Number1Thumb Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 1,135	Does a sponsor lose credibility when they.... switch from ccbill to "their" own software for tracking stats? Just curious as I received an email from a certain sponsor just now.

01-11-2004, 09:35 PM	#8
Nasty Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Sunny Fucking California Posts: 1,575	I got 12, if they cant get their fucking email software to work, Im sure not trusting them to manage my affiliate traffic any better __________________ “Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants. We know more about war than we know about peace, more about killing than we know about living. If we continue to develop our technology without wisdom or prudence, our servant may prove to be our executioner.” ― Omar Bradley (1948)

01-11-2004, 09:40 PM	#12
lock Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Australia Posts: 5,065	just moves which way you point your finger. __________________ Traffic.Tools - 40+ Free Tools Free.Marketing - 150+ Free Tools Submission.Tools - 20+ Free Tools

01-11-2004, 09:42 PM	#14
PurrrsianPussyKat Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Lost in the mountains Posts: 2,088	I was disappointed to see that they were switching.. don't know if I'm gonna keep promoting them yet. I like using ccbill sponsors, because I KNOW I'm gonna get my check. All these rogue sponsor programs seem to end up tits up and I'm left with no check. __________________ Need a reliable, reasonably priced php programmer? Hit me up! 2934409

01-11-2004, 09:53 PM	#17
DBS.US Geo Cities Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: North Captiva Island, Florida USA Posts: 11,832	__________________ Make a Free Chaturbate White Label site in 34 minutes and be making money tonight

01-11-2004, 09:26 PM	#2
4Pics Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Posts: 7,952	i think it depends on the sponsor, but it's been shown you can shave atleast 2 different ways with ccbill so I dont see how that makes it any different. The best part of CCbill is your checks don't bounce and arrive ontime.

01-11-2004, 09:38 PM	#10
4Pics Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Posts: 7,952	Whats the program that is switching?

01-11-2004, 09:39 PM	#11
Sosa In Tushy Land Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Nebraska Posts: 40,149	I got 8 of em... All from the same sponsor.

01-11-2004, 09:46 PM	#16
Number1Thumb Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 1,135	Oystein your MR MPA2 so you need not mention it, also I like my weekly checks that havent missed in over a year so I will be moving on. Bad move IMO

01-11-2004, 09:55 PM	#18
Matt 26z So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: ¤ª"˜¨๑۩۞۩๑¨˜"ª¤ Posts: 18,481	It's a pretty foolish business decision for any accused sponsor to move away from CCBill stats right now reguardless of their guilt or innocence. If I was one of those sites and it truly was a mistake, then my damage control would be to simply stay with CCBill and promote the fact that I can't shave even if I wanted to now that the setting is open for public view by CCBill. By moving away from CCBill stats, accoused sponsors realistically can't do anything to correct the assumption that they are con's. What's going to happen is the industry will develop a notion that accused sponsors are moving to their own stats immediately because of a financial dependance on making the supposed shaves.

01-11-2004, 09:57 PM	#20
Number1Thumb Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 1,135	Im not talking about scam artist extraordanaire Perfection Jeff btw. A close buddy though I think