GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Does a sponsor lose credibility when they.... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=219706)

Number1Thumb 01-11-2004 09:24 PM

Does a sponsor lose credibility when they....
 
switch from ccbill to "their" own software for tracking stats? Just curious as I received an email from a certain sponsor just now.:glugglug

4Pics 01-11-2004 09:26 PM

i think it depends on the sponsor, but it's been shown you can shave atleast 2 different ways with ccbill so I dont see how that makes it any different.

The best part of CCbill is your checks don't bounce and arrive ontime.

MadCap 01-11-2004 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 4Pics


The best part of CCbill is your checks don't bounce and arrive ontime.




amen:thumbsup

PurrrsianPussyKat 01-11-2004 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Number1Thumb
switch from ccbill to "their" own software for tracking stats? Just curious as I received an email from a certain sponsor just now.:glugglug
You only got 1? I got 16!

Nickless 01-11-2004 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Number1Thumb
switch from ccbill to "their" own software for tracking stats? Just curious as I received an email from a certain sponsor just now.:glugglug
yes.

Number1Thumb 01-11-2004 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PurrrsianPussyKat


You only got 1? I got 16!

well ya I got 7 from the same sponsor. And it is just weird after there name was tossed into the mix at the same time another sponsor has just switched to "their" own software also. NO THANKS ill pass, its not like here arent a million programs that work with ccbill

OY 01-11-2004 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Number1Thumb
switch from ccbill to "their" own software for tracking stats? Just curious as I received an email from a certain sponsor just now.:glugglug
Only if the sponsor (if it is CCBill, Epoch, Jettis, IBill, or any other processor) does not intent to use MULTIPLE processors as the new solution is their new software.

If they are going to use multiple processors in their new software, then it will only MAKE YOU MORE MONEY, so I would not worry if that was the case.

I am sure there is more to this "story"... Details please...

:thumbsup

Nasty 01-11-2004 09:35 PM

I got 12, if they cant get their fucking email software to work, Im sure not trusting them to manage my affiliate traffic any better

Number1Thumb 01-11-2004 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Oystein


Only if the sponsor (if it is CCBill, Epoch, Jettis, IBill, or any other processor) does not intent to use MULTIPLE processors as the new solution is their new software.

If they are going to use multiple processors in their new software, then it will only MAKE YOU MORE MONEY, so I would not worry if that was the case.

I am sure there is more to this "story"... Details please...

:thumbsup

Oystein stop with the MPA2 spam, LOL its not directed towards cascading billing in anyway. Im just askin why would they switch? Knowing webmasters have a certain comfort level with ccbill. Its just shady in my eyes and I wont be riding that train.

4Pics 01-11-2004 09:38 PM

Whats the program that is switching?

Sosa 01-11-2004 09:39 PM

I got 8 of em... All from the same sponsor.

lock 01-11-2004 09:40 PM

just moves which way you point your finger.

OY 01-11-2004 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Number1Thumb

Oystein stop with the MPA2 spam, LOL its not directed towards cascading billing in anyway. Im just askin why would they switch? Knowing webmasters have a certain comfort level with ccbill. Its just shady in my eyes and I wont be riding that train.

Funny you should say that buddy, I never even mentioned MPA2 even though I should have - since it does make you more MONEY!

I was just stating a fact...

:winkwink: :thumbsup :2 cents:

PurrrsianPussyKat 01-11-2004 09:42 PM

I was disappointed to see that they were switching.. don't know if I'm gonna keep promoting them yet.

I like using ccbill sponsors, because I KNOW I'm gonna get my check. All these rogue sponsor programs seem to end up tits up and I'm left with no check.

blackmonsters 01-11-2004 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Nasty
I got 12, if they cant get their fucking email software to work, Im sure not trusting them to manage my affiliate traffic any better
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

You are quite wise!!!

If they can't send email then their stats will be fucked...no dout!!

Number1Thumb 01-11-2004 09:46 PM

Oystein your MR MPA2 so you need not mention it, also I like my weekly checks that havent missed in over a year so I will be moving on. Bad move IMO

DBS.US 01-11-2004 09:53 PM

:ak47: http://www.theartofshaving.com/scsto...barber-spa.gif

Matt 26z 01-11-2004 09:55 PM

It's a pretty foolish business decision for any accused sponsor to move away from CCBill stats right now reguardless of their guilt or innocence.

If I was one of those sites and it truly was a mistake, then my damage control would be to simply stay with CCBill and promote the fact that I can't shave even if I wanted to now that the setting is open for public view by CCBill.

By moving away from CCBill stats, accoused sponsors realistically can't do anything to correct the assumption that they are con's.

What's going to happen is the industry will develop a notion that accused sponsors are moving to their own stats immediately because of a financial dependance on making the supposed shaves.

4Pics 01-11-2004 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Number1Thumb
Oystein your MR MPA2 so you need not mention it, also I like my weekly checks that havent missed in over a year so I will be moving on. Bad move IMO
Oystein's checks don't bounce :winkwink:

Number1Thumb 01-11-2004 09:57 PM

Im not talking about scam artist extraordanaire Perfection Jeff btw. A close buddy though I think

Number1Thumb 01-11-2004 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 4Pics


Oystein's checks don't bounce :winkwink:

Never said they did I use them on my mainstream affiliate program. Good guys and cascading rocks

OY 01-11-2004 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Number1Thumb
Oystein your MR MPA2 so you need not mention it, also I like my weekly checks that havent missed in over a year so I will be moving on. Bad move IMO
I hear you... It is truly a safety to have the checks coming directly from the processor in a lot of cases. I agree with that - to a certain extent. Dont forget that I used to be with Epoch back in 97-99 - so I know where the safety lies - for the most part... HOWEVER, in cases like GloBill and PSW (and others like them) where they just vanished from the face of this planet,

When you choose a sponsor that use his/hers/companys stand-alone software to track and distribute the checks for the referral traffic, you can now hold THEM liable for the money and collect (a lot of times easier than to collect from a bancrupt processor due to pressure from forums like GFY) - because the owners of the program in question always will be a FACE rather than a COMPANY - - - we all have our own opinions on this, of course, so feel free to comment.

PS. On my way to a movie (21 grams), but will check in later to post any replies.

PPS. I want to know if this company went to using JUST CCBill with their own stats or........

Great question btw Number1Thumb

:thumbsup

Number1Thumb 01-11-2004 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Oystein


I hear you... It is truly a safety to have the checks coming directly from the processor in a lot of cases. I agree with that - to a certain extent. Dont forget that I used to be with Epoch back in 97-99 - so I know where the safety lies - for the most part... HOWEVER, in cases like GloBill and PSW (and others like them) where they just vanished from the face of this planet,

When you choose a sponsor that use his/hers/companys stand-alone software to track and distribute the checks for the referral traffic, you can now hold THEM liable for the money and collect (a lot of times easier than to collect from a bancrupt processor due to pressure from forums like GFY) - because the owners of the program in question always will be a FACE rather than a COMPANY - - - we all have our own opinions on this, of course, so feel free to comment.

PS. On my way to a movie (21 grams), but will check in later to post any replies.

PPS. I want to know if this company went to using JUST CCBill with their own stats or........

Great question btw Number1Thumb

:thumbsup

To address one point you made, I have way more confidence in ccbill then some punk kid hiding behind his computer sending me my checks. Trust me just look at likewhoa, no amount of forum pressure will ever get those guys back their servers money or anything else. So I will stick with a company with a presence. Ya know I didnt check to much if they are cascading it or not.:glugglug

OY 01-11-2004 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 4Pics


Oystein's checks don't bounce :winkwink:

True dat! :winkwink:

OY 01-11-2004 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Number1Thumb

To address one point you made, I have way more confidence in ccbill then some punk kid hiding behind his computer sending me my checks. Trust me just look at likewhoa, no amount of forum pressure will ever get those guys back their servers money or anything else. So I will stick with a company with a presence. Ya know I didnt check to much if they are cascading it or not.:glugglug

And I agree to the fullest!

Not to change subject here, but we do price MPA2 as a high end product (which it is) just to avoid punks being able to use it. Our business have no use for them. Stay strong with the strong ones...

Unfortunately some of the software packages out there does give "punks" tools they should not have, at a too low price...

:2 cents:

Oh well, have to go... cya all later...


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123