Al Qaeda vows "back-breaking" strike. - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

Centurion · 12-26-2003, 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks
dear child, once you mature, you'll learn that adults can do two things at once. Where are the taliban and al quaeda today? hiding in holes threatening us with messages.

And over 2 years later, WHERE are the Taliban? They are re-massed and fighting back in Afghanistan! Even the United Nations and other relief organizations are pulling out of Afghanistan because it has become so unsafe! Kabul is the only place where it is even half way safe..and that's if you're wear head to toe armor!

And WHY have the taliban been able to re-group? Because Bush called off the war on terrorism and the pursuit of the Al Quadea network in Afghantistan and the Taliban and went after Hussein!

130,000 trooops in Iraq.
13,000 troops in Afghanistan.

Buzz_Aziani · 12-26-2003, 03:01 PM

Damn, I might as well have a drink,,,

Pleasurepays · 12-26-2003, 03:02 PM

hmmm ... Al Queda threatening attacks?

is this new?

funkmaster · 12-26-2003, 03:02 PM

... all they have is towels and tape recorders ... wanna bet nothing is going to happen until feb 2004 ... or better, right until bush gets re-elected ??

Theo · 12-26-2003, 03:11 PM

doing a major attack again in states it's easy. A big van full of explosives can kill from hundreds to thousands people in a major street. What about 5 vans? 10 vans at the same time in different areas? Such attacks are not extremely hard to be achived. Think about it. I really doubt if there's a next attack it will come from a hijacked airline. Let's hope nothing will happen and it's just another of their bs messages because nobody can fight blind heats.

EZRhino · 12-26-2003, 03:13 PM

Blah blah blah, fucking Al Qaeda shit heads.

Pornwolf · 12-26-2003, 03:49 PM

I agree with Escort Biz and KRL. Spot on.

Clovis · 12-26-2003, 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by TheLegacy
hate to say it.. but its a game. Al Qauda just wants to keep in the public eye and not be forgotten - homeland security wants to display that its money worth spent.

Simply put - homeland can raise a terror alert - then when nothing happens, they did their job - "why look no terrorist attacks, God was with us!!!"

Al Quauda seens saddam captured, it takes away from their show plus they want to prove that terrorism is the way to go and that USA could not do anything, so they threaten showing the world that when they speak, America jumps!!! Al Quauda screams - "why look the Americans are afraid of us, God was with us!!!"

cat and mouse

Very well put indeed. A climate of fear serves not only the terrorists but also the goals of the current administration.

Fletch XXX · 12-26-2003, 04:53 PM

we will all die screaming

mr rick · 12-26-2003, 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion

And I ask you: WHAT terrorist threat to America from Iraq was there?

money, weapons. training, safe haven, etc.....

I Am Saddam! · 12-26-2003, 06:03 PM

bush and the cia are going to make another government funded terrorist attack and all you sheep will fall for again so he can rip away your rights and start another war........HAVNT YOU LEARNT A DAM THING?

69pornlinks · 12-26-2003, 06:12 PM

Like 'they' would use the term 'back breaking'

the selected adminstarion have been listening to too many hollywood movies....oh wait they do have hollywood on the payroll

Quote:

Hollywood has already been involved in the so-called war on terrorism on another level. According to Variety, the FBI, in reaction to the events of September 11, approached some of Hollywood's top writers to help them come up with possible terrorist attack scenarios, in order to aid in preparation of homeland security.

http://www.cnn.com/2001/SHOWBIZ/Movi...hollywood.war/

12clicks · 12-26-2003, 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion

And over 2 years later, WHERE are the Taliban? They are re-massed and fighting back in Afghanistan! Even the United Nations and other relief organizations are pulling out of Afghanistan because it has become so unsafe! Kabul is the only place where it is even half way safe..and that's if you're wear head to toe armor!

And WHY have the taliban been able to re-group? Because Bush called off the war on terrorism and the pursuit of the Al Quadea network in Afghantistan and the Taliban and went after Hussein!

130,000 trooops in Iraq.
13,000 troops in Afghanistan.

I understand that this is tough for kids to understand but you the Taliban are on the run in afghanistan, not running the country. The US needs them to regroup so they can be identified and killed. with a big US presence they just turn into your typical towelhead. give them some rope, they become taliban and killable again.
Please, stop typing, its embarrassing

I Am Saddam! · 12-26-2003, 06:17 PM

stop immergration, deport arabs and muslims and bushes, problem solved 100%

directfiesta · 12-26-2003, 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks

I understand that this is tough for kids to understand but you the Taliban are on the run in afghanistan, not running the country. The US needs them to regroup so they can be identified and killed. with a big US presence they just turn into your typical towelhead. give them some rope, they become taliban and killable again.
Please, stop typing, its embarrassing

LOL.. what an idiot!

I Am Saddam! · 12-26-2003, 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks

I understand that this is tough for kids to understand but you the Taliban are on the run in afghanistan, not running the country. The US needs them to regroup so they can be identified and killed. with a big US presence they just turn into your typical towelhead. give them some rope, they become taliban and killable again.
Please, stop typing, its embarrassing

asshat of 2003

ThunderBalls · 12-26-2003, 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks

I understand that this is tough for kids to understand but you the Taliban are on the run in afghanistan, not running the country. The US needs them to regroup so they can be identified and killed. with a big US presence they just turn into your typical towelhead. give them some rope, they become taliban and killable again.
Please, stop typing, its embarrassing

Do us all a favor, go choke on some freedom fries and shut the fuck up.

12clicks · 12-26-2003, 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta

LOL.. what an idiot!

coming from someone of your stature, you can't imagine how hurt I am.

this goes for thunderbells and saddam too.
It hurts so much!

directfiesta · 12-26-2003, 06:50 PM

LOL!!!

12shits, you are an

12clicks · 12-26-2003, 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta
LOL!!!

12shits, you are an

please stop! it hurts so much.

mr rick · 12-26-2003, 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks

I understand that this is tough for kids to understand but you the Taliban are on the run in afghanistan, not running the country. The US needs them to regroup so they can be identified and killed. with a big US presence they just turn into your typical towelhead. give them some rope, they become taliban and killable again.
Please, stop typing, its embarrassing

You are correct - it is not a target rich environment right now.

Centurion · 12-26-2003, 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by mr rick

money, weapons. training, safe haven, etc.....

Great. Where's your proof? Evidence?
Even George Bush finally admitted there was no evidence tying Saddam Hussein to 9/11.

Centurion · 12-26-2003, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks

I understand that this is tough for kids to understand but you the Taliban are on the run in afghanistan, not running the country. The US needs them to regroup so they can be identified and killed. with a big US presence they just turn into your typical towelhead. give them some rope, they become taliban and killable again.
Please, stop typing, its embarrassing

You're a twisted joke that refuses to acknowledge reality.
For you to deny that the Taliban is making a comeback in Afghanistan and that foreign nationals are leaving the country in droves currently is what is laughable, and downright EMBARRASSING for you..showing what an un-educated dimwit you are.

How much of the country OUTSIDE of Kabal is actually SECURE, without Warlord or Taliban control??

12clicks · 12-26-2003, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion

You're a twisted joke that refuses to acknowledge reality.
For you to deny that the Taliban is making a comeback in Afghanistan and that foreign nationals are leaving the country in droves currently is what is laughable, and downright EMBARRASSING for you..showing what an un-educated dimwit you are.

How much of the country OUTSIDE of Kabal is actually SECURE, without Warlord or Taliban control??

Yes, I've got it all wrong yet the US is doing what I say, you've got it all right but can only find a forum here.

It must drive you nuts to be so right yet so irrelevant.

Pornwolf · 12-26-2003, 08:12 PM

I wish I could find the picture of Muhammed el 12clicks with the turban.

mr rick · 12-26-2003, 08:13 PM

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Centurion
[B]

I guess I can't draw a straight line for you, but I can connect the dots for myself. In fact, I could care less if there is direct evidence linking Saddam to 9/11 specifically. I believe we have to think beyond 9/11 and consider the potential harm/danger he presented. Sorry dude, when people start blowing up buildings in NYC, preemptive strikes are the way to go.

We're talking about the same guy that tried to assassinate a US President and gassed his own people, right? Are you defending Saddam, or just hate GW so much that you will attack anything he does?

12clicks · 12-26-2003, 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Pornwolf
I wish I could find the picture of Muhammed el 12clicks with the turban.

you're the second person I know looking for that tonight.

Centurion · 12-26-2003, 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks

Yes, I've got it all wrong yet the US is doing what I say, you've got it all right but can only find a forum here.

It must drive you nuts to be so right yet so irrelevant.

Clicks..I leave it to you to be crazy and continue to render yourself totally irrelevant to what is fact. To say you are a nitwit would be too complimentary!

Centurion · 12-26-2003, 09:52 PM

[QUOTE]Originally posted by mr rick
[B]

Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion

I guess I can't draw a straight line for you, but I can connect the dots for myself. In fact, I could care less if there is direct evidence linking Saddam to 9/11 specifically. I believe we have to think beyond 9/11 and consider the potential harm/danger he presented. Sorry dude, when people start blowing up buildings in NYC, preemptive strikes are the way to go.

We're talking about the same guy that tried to assassinate a US President and gassed his own people, right? Are you defending Saddam, or just hate GW so much that you will attack anything he does?

You're right..it's not a straight line..it's one HUGE wavy line that goes all over the place. Somehow "preemptive strikes" are going to prevent terrorists attacks against the US?

Here's a novel idea..instead of that..why don't we go after the people that have actually been attacking us?

404 · 12-26-2003, 09:59 PM

imagine what the world would be like if old far-right loonies that thought like 12clicks and theking were in positions of power.

hmm, hang on a second...

Ben-MensNiche · 12-26-2003, 10:03 PM

I'm sure with the NSA in charge, we'll all be able to sleep peacefully in our beds...or maybe we should put someone in charge that has a better track record for security, like Brinks...or JFK's bodyguard or the department of immigration...

If Al Qu'aida had the resources to pull something off, they wouldn't be bullshitting about it just now, they'd have done something and we'd all be watching it on the news over and over again for the next week, just like we did last time.

I highly doubt the U.S. has the wherewithall to prevent another well orchestrated attack if it were to come right now.

History has shown us, that very rarely do terrorists give warning with enough time to do anything about it before it happens. When it comes, you'll be watching it on the news before you hear anything about it, and just like last time, the government will be saying, "Oh, I guess that's what that 'we're going to run two planes into the side of the world trade center on September 11th' warning was all about".

mr rick · 12-26-2003, 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion

You're right..it's not a straight line..it's one HUGE wavy line that goes all over the place. Somehow "preemptive strikes" are going to prevent terrorists attacks against the US?

Here's a novel idea..instead of that..why don't we go after the people that have actually been attacking us?

We did. What do you propose we do different?

media · 12-26-2003, 10:57 PM

Al Queda Bows after Break Dancing?

Media

Centurion · 12-27-2003, 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by mr rick

We did. What do you propose we do different?

Iraq attacked us on 9/11?

theking · 12-27-2003, 12:32 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion

Somehow "preemptive strikes" are going to prevent terrorists attacks against the US?

"prevent"...no...help to prevent...yes. 1st rule of defense...go on the offensive...and stay on the offensive.

Quote:

Here's a novel idea..instead of that..why don't we go after the people that have actually been attacking us?

We did...we are...and will continue to do so for years to come...but I do not expect you to ever comprehend this fact.

theking · 12-27-2003, 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion

Iraq attacked us on 9/11?

Read a news paper occasionally...or tune into the news on the boob tube occasionally...the answer is no.

ChumpChange · 12-27-2003, 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion

Iraq attacked us on 9/11?

theking · 12-27-2003, 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ChumpChange

I suppose your post has meaning to you.

12-26-2003, 03:01 PM	#52
Buzz_Aziani Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Las Vegas Posts: 567	Damn, I might as well have a drink,,, __________________ Aziani.com 2Poles1HOle.com

12-26-2003, 03:49 PM	#57
Pornwolf Drunk and Unruly Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Hollywood Posts: 22,712	I agree with Escort Biz and KRL. Spot on. __________________ I've trusted my sites to them for over a decade... Webair, bitches.

12-26-2003, 04:53 PM	#59
Fletch XXX GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!! Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: that 504 Posts: 60,840	we will all die screaming __________________ Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site? Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

12-26-2003, 06:50 PM	#69
directfiesta Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Montreal, Quebec Posts: 29,776	LOL!!! 12shits, you are an __________________ I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT ! But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

12-26-2003, 08:12 PM	#75
Pornwolf Drunk and Unruly Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Hollywood Posts: 22,712	I wish I could find the picture of Muhammed el 12clicks with the turban. __________________ I've trusted my sites to them for over a decade... Webair, bitches.

12-26-2003, 03:02 PM	#53
Pleasurepays BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: I live in a pile of boogers Posts: 11,913	hmmm ... Al Queda threatening attacks? is this new?

12-26-2003, 03:02 PM	#54
funkmaster So Fucking Banned Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: shell beach Posts: 7,938	... all they have is towels and tape recorders ... wanna bet nothing is going to happen until feb 2004 ... or better, right until bush gets re-elected ??

12-26-2003, 03:11 PM	#55
Theo HAL 9000 Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Posts: 34,515	doing a major attack again in states it's easy. A big van full of explosives can kill from hundreds to thousands people in a major street. What about 5 vans? 10 vans at the same time in different areas? Such attacks are not extremely hard to be achived. Think about it. I really doubt if there's a next attack it will come from a hijacked airline. Let's hope nothing will happen and it's just another of their bs messages because nobody can fight blind heats.

12-26-2003, 03:13 PM	#56
EZRhino Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: couch Posts: 6,258	Blah blah blah, fucking Al Qaeda shit heads.

12-26-2003, 06:03 PM	#61
I Am Saddam! So Fucking Banned Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 93	bush and the cia are going to make another government funded terrorist attack and all you sheep will fall for again so he can rip away your rights and start another war........HAVNT YOU LEARNT A DAM THING?

12-26-2003, 06:17 PM	#64
I Am Saddam! So Fucking Banned Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 93	stop immergration, deport arabs and muslims and bushes, problem solved 100%

12-26-2003, 08:13 PM	#76
mr rick Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 104	[QUOTE]Originally posted by Centurion [B] I guess I can't draw a straight line for you, but I can connect the dots for myself. In fact, I could care less if there is direct evidence linking Saddam to 9/11 specifically. I believe we have to think beyond 9/11 and consider the potential harm/danger he presented. Sorry dude, when people start blowing up buildings in NYC, preemptive strikes are the way to go. We're talking about the same guy that tried to assassinate a US President and gassed his own people, right? Are you defending Saddam, or just hate GW so much that you will attack anything he does?

12-26-2003, 09:59 PM	#80
404 Confirmed abUser Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage Posts: 1,154	imagine what the world would be like if old far-right loonies that thought like 12clicks and theking were in positions of power. hmm, hang on a second... __________________ (b] cheap hmtl programer for hire (/b)

12-26-2003, 10:03 PM	#81
Ben-MensNiche Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Victoria, BC, Canada Posts: 726	I'm sure with the NSA in charge, we'll all be able to sleep peacefully in our beds...or maybe we should put someone in charge that has a better track record for security, like Brinks...or JFK's bodyguard or the department of immigration... If Al Qu'aida had the resources to pull something off, they wouldn't be bullshitting about it just now, they'd have done something and we'd all be watching it on the news over and over again for the next week, just like we did last time. I highly doubt the U.S. has the wherewithall to prevent another well orchestrated attack if it were to come right now. History has shown us, that very rarely do terrorists give warning with enough time to do anything about it before it happens. When it comes, you'll be watching it on the news before you hear anything about it, and just like last time, the government will be saying, "Oh, I guess that's what that 'we're going to run two planes into the side of the world trade center on September 11th' warning was all about". __________________ ICQ: 310539245 Email: [email protected] Last edited by Ben-MensNiche; 12-26-2003 at 10:08 PM..

12-26-2003, 10:57 PM	#83
media Confirmed Moneymaker Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Eugene, OR It's Like Jail, Only with Trees! Posts: 9,852	Al Queda Bows after Break Dancing? Media __________________ I'm here for the violence!