View Single Post
Old 12-26-2003, 09:52 PM  
Centurion
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: SeATtle
Posts: 6,033
[QUOTE]Originally posted by mr rick
[B]
Quote:
Originally posted by Centurion


I guess I can't draw a straight line for you, but I can connect the dots for myself. In fact, I could care less if there is direct evidence linking Saddam to 9/11 specifically. I believe we have to think beyond 9/11 and consider the potential harm/danger he presented. Sorry dude, when people start blowing up buildings in NYC, preemptive strikes are the way to go.

We're talking about the same guy that tried to assassinate a US President and gassed his own people, right? Are you defending Saddam, or just hate GW so much that you will attack anything he does?
You're right..it's not a straight line..it's one HUGE wavy line that goes all over the place. Somehow "preemptive strikes" are going to prevent terrorists attacks against the US?

Here's a novel idea..instead of that..why don't we go after the people that have actually been attacking us?
Centurion is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote