Scott Peterson , OJ Simpson Deja Vue? - GoFuckYourself.com

Juicy D. Links · 12-03-2003, 09:03 AM

He is one guilty mother fucker man .....

Sad part is he will prob get off scott free also..

Ice · 12-03-2003, 09:04 AM

My dick is hard

BlueFly · 12-03-2003, 09:10 AM

He will not walk from this. He doesn't have any public supporters... or the race card. Not that OJ got off because he was black, he got off because he was famous.

jennym · 12-03-2003, 09:20 AM

O.J. (guilty as a mother fucker) got off because the cops and the prosecution were a bunch of fucking idiots.

Scott Peterson will not be so lucky.

jabula · 12-03-2003, 09:20 AM

Who cares!

Candice · 12-03-2003, 09:38 AM

I'm very concerned that he's going to get off, I've followed that case every day since last December...it's awful and everyone knows he's guilty as a motherfucker and cocky on top of that.

I guess we'll see, but god I hope he gets the death penalty....what he did was the most horrible crime a husband and father could ever commit....makes you really think hard aobut our justice system....

jennym · 12-03-2003, 09:46 AM

I agree. He comes off VERY cocky in court. That will turn the jury off big time.

Serge_Oprano · 12-03-2003, 09:48 AM

if he gets off,
Lensman will sign him up to moderate GFY...

Buff · 12-03-2003, 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano
if he gets off,
Lensman will sign him up to moderate GFY...

I think I'd make a good moderator here.

Serge_Oprano · 12-03-2003, 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Buff

I think I'd make a good moderator here.

you are too soft....no pun intended
;-))))

BVF · 12-03-2003, 10:20 AM

OJ is innocent. They're just too lazy to find the REAL killer.

They have nothing but circumstancial bullshit evidence on Peterson..Even if he's guilty, they gotta do better than a hair in the boat. They have absolutely no proof that scott did it.

rdunn404 · 12-03-2003, 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by BVF
OJ is innocent. They're just too lazy to find the REAL killer.

They have nothing but circumstancial bullshit evidence on Peterson..Even if he's guilty, they gotta do better than a hair in the boat. They have absolutely no proof that scott did it.

Exactly. It's not a jury's job to judge how 'cocky' Peterson is, but if it can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that he did it. And I still think there are some reasonable doubts out there on this one.

jennym · 12-03-2003, 10:45 AM

I did not say they should convict because he is cocky...I said the jury wouldn't like him.

As for O.J. - I watched the entire trial on TV. (yes, I was a bored housewife back then). I thought he was guilty as fuck. But, I would have had to find him not guilty because of the question of evidence being mishandled.

As for Scott Peterson, we don't know enough facts about the case. I do find it VERY odd that he told his girlfriend this would be his first Christmas without his dead wife.

Buff · 12-03-2003, 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano

you are too soft....no pun intended
;-))))

Just because I give flowers to all the girls I do scenes with?

Juicy D. Links · 12-03-2003, 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Buff

Just because I give flowers to all the girls I do scenes with?

Buff · 12-03-2003, 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by juicylinks

I'd take 'em to dinner, but I can't afford it.

Peter Romero · 12-03-2003, 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Buff

I think I'd make a good moderator here.

Uhm... that's my copywritten picture of Sabrine Maui in your sig. Wanna take that fucker off?

Bansheelinks · 12-03-2003, 01:44 PM

Holy fuck, ppl posting on this board that they watched the first OJ trial and would have let that guilty motherfucker walk?

Did IQs drop in winter too, along with the temperatures. People who say things like this watch too may tabloid shows or have no backgrounds in the physical sciences.

His blood was all over the place, so was his hair in the knit cap, a nice mix of everyone's blood was on the glove, in his van etc etc.

I suggest some ppl on this board actually acquaint themselves with the IMPOSSIBILITY that all that evidence was planted, and that over 100 ppl who never met each other before decided to get together in a criminal conspiracy, which also they couldn't have in that period of time and the fact they were all strewn all over different areas and scenes..............ahhhhhhhhh fuck.........need i go on?

LOL.............what are there, a bunch of massivecock clones on this board now?

The fucker was guilty...........first trial.............second trial..........

Now as for Petersen..........thats really scary..........this man has repeatedly lied about so many things and has already been caught in these lies.............first he says he was golfing, like OJ lied about, then when he COULD HAVE been placed near the area, then he says oh yeah, I was fishing.

But his lies aren't enough to convict, and they don't have much physical evidence so far. This monster may walk.

jennym · 12-03-2003, 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bansheelinks
Holy fuck, ppl posting on this board that they watched the first OJ trial and would have let that guilty motherfucker walk?

Did IQs drop in winter too, along with the temperatures. People who say things like this watch too may tabloid shows or have no backgrounds in the physical sciences.

His blood was all over the place, so was his hair in the knit cap, a nice mix of everyone's blood was on the glove, in his van etc etc.

I suggest some ppl on this board actually acquaint themselves with the IMPOSSIBILITY that all that evidence was planted, and that over 100 ppl who never met each other before decided to get together in a criminal conspiracy, which also they couldn't have in that period of time and the fact they were all strewn all over different areas and scenes..............ahhhhhhhhh fuck.........need i go on?

LOL.............what are there, a bunch of massivecock clones on this board now?

The fucker was guilty...........first trial.............second trial..........

Now as for Petersen..........thats really scary..........this man has repeatedly lied about so many things and has already been caught in these lies.............first he says he was golfing, like OJ lied about, then when he COULD HAVE been placed near the area, then he says oh yeah, I was fishing.

But his lies aren't enough to convict, and they don't have much physical evidence so far. This monster may walk.

Did you watch the ENTIRE trial, or just get that information from the news highlights. Yes, I thought he was guilty, but, there was a small question in my mind about it because of SLOPPY police work. If you don't TOTALLY CONVINCE me that somebody committed murder, I sure as hell am not going to send them to prison for life.

I never heard Scott Peterson was golfing. He gave the cops his receipt from the marina when he reported his wife missing. He placed HIMSELF at the scene, nobody else did.

twistyneck · 12-03-2003, 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jennym
As for O.J. - I watched the entire trial on TV. (yes, I was a bored housewife back then). I thought he was guilty as fuck. But, I would have had to find him not guilty because of the question of evidence being mishandled.

Then you are retarded. Even if you throw away all of the allegedly mishandled evidence, there is a shitload more where that came from and it all points right at OJ. And just because evidence was mishandled doesn't make it invalid, it just means you need to take a closer look at it.

Those jurors should all be taken out and shot. There is no fucking way they even looked at the evidence. Months of testimony and they came back in what, 3 or 4 hours? Fucking racists.

Webby · 12-03-2003, 02:08 PM

I'm amazed at the "trial by TV" and the comments by, supposed legal professionals on TV. Also the extent to which any court/judge/cops/prosecutors indulge the press with details about the case.

The trial ain't even started yet but we have a considerable amount of detailed information in public knowledge - an amazing legal system!!

Hell, why bother with a trial... just execute him!

JamesK · 12-03-2003, 02:09 PM

They have absolutely no proof that scott did it.

atomic2500 · 12-03-2003, 02:13 PM

the dude is guilty
http://www.soaponarope.com

jennym · 12-03-2003, 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by twistyneck

Then you are retarded. Even if you throw away all of the allegedly mishandled evidence, there is a shitload more where that came from and it all points right at OJ. And just because evidence was mishandled doesn't make it invalid, it just means you need to take a closer look at it.

Those jurors should all be taken out and shot. There is no fucking way they even looked at the evidence. Months of testimony and they came back in what, 3 or 4 hours? Fucking racists.

Hey asshole, where do you get off calling me retarded? Answer the question I asked the other big mouth? How much of the trial did you watch? Did you get most of your info from the news "highlights"? People are racist because they disagree with you? It didn't even take me 3 or 4 hours to decide the prosecution did not convince me BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT. I said I thought the fucker was guilty, but what I think is not the law in this country. You should be grateful for that, or you would be convicted of being a cluless moron.

jhauser · 12-03-2003, 02:32 PM

At the end of the day Lacy and her little boy were killed and thats so sad. If Scott did it he lives with that for the rest of his life and if he didnt then he lives with knowing someone killed his first born son and wife. Tragic event..

Bansheelinks · 12-03-2003, 02:59 PM

Sorry Jennym.........although Twistyneck may have been harsh with you, he's right. Take a factual look at things, OJ's blatant lies and inconsistencies, the fact he can't account for his blood and hair being all over the place, at the Bundy crime scene (even though he denied having bled there, which was a lie), his ADMITTING he bled at Rockingham on THE NIGHT OF THE MURDERS, his conflicting statements about how he cut his finger, which one could also term LYING, the fact there was a trail of HIS BLOOD from the murder scene all the way INTO HIS HOME........lets be reasonable........

He got off because a spineless judge let the trial runaway and get out of his control via the defense's antics, and he also got off due to a biased and jaded jury, jaded due to recent events and also probably personal bad experiences in dealing with the police.

He did not get off because the evidence was flimsy or the reasonable doubt theory. And once again, ask yourself, how did over 100 people manage to psychically figure out that they would conspire, DESPITE NOT ALL OF THEM MEETING, and frame a sack of shit named OJ Simpson? All it takes is reason and logic, & anyone well grounded in the scientific method would conclude this.

Unlike jurors like Aldana, whose favorite shows were "Inside Edition" and "Hard Copy". And yes, I watched it all, or rarely missed it as I was very interested in the DNA findings.

jennym · 12-03-2003, 03:27 PM

First of all Bansheelinks, I completely respect the opinions of others, but hate it when people feel the need to personally attack me.

I never bought into the conspiracy theory. Do I think it is possible that one or two rogue cops could have done some things wrong? Yes. The cops, and the criminalists seemed full of shit almost as often as O.J. and his lawyers. I think the fucker is a cold-blooded murderer, who got away with it. But I also know that it is the cops, criminalists, and prosecutors responsibility to do things right, and to not leave me with any question about his guilt. As a white, southern female, I seriously doubt that MY opinion is based on racism, as Twistyneck eluded to. So, if I were on that jury, I am not sure I could have convicted him. On the other hand, I sure wouldn't feel bad if he took a bullet to the head one day.

HarlotCash Dyker · 12-03-2003, 03:27 PM

He got off because a spineless judge let the trial runaway and get out of his control via the defense's antics, and he also got off due to a biased and jaded jury, jaded due to recent events and also probably personal bad experiences in dealing with the police.

In my opinion, I think you are wrong -

I think he got away with it because the whole thing was played out like a monster movie on the tv -

They should ban tv and reporting from all courts until a person has been covicted or aquitted -

completetosser · 12-03-2003, 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by HarlotCash Dyker

I think he got away with it because the whole thing was played out like a monster movie on the tv -

They should ban tv and reporting from all courts until a person has been covicted or aquitted -

I must admit that speaking as a Brit who now lives in the US I find it unbelievable the way some of these high profile cases are played out on TV before the trial. How anyone in those cases can get a fair trial is beyond me. It wouldn't happen in the UK, and I'm convinced that the legal system in the UK would have convicted OJ had he been tried at the Old Bailey.

Peterson is a different case because all the evidence is circumstantial. I would think that most reasonable people believe he is guilty, but whether or not there is sufficient evidence to get a conviction is another matter.

Ic3m4nZ · 12-03-2003, 03:58 PM

Why do people care so much about her ?

cold_ice · 12-03-2003, 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Wildcard
They have absolutely no proof that scott did it.

Why would you say that? Do you know cops in the case? Scott will find himself in prison. IMO. That cocky fucker just got caught cheating. With no support from the community he is as go as gone I'm sure thats why they would like to move the trail out of Modesto. I live in a little town a few hours away and here everyone already tossed him in prison for life.

sperbonzo · 12-03-2003, 04:14 PM

I wonder if crowds of white people across the country will jump up and down applauding and cheering if Scott Peterson is found not guilty?

12-03-2003, 09:03 AM	#1
Juicy D. Links So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: N.Y. -Long Island -- Posts: 122,992	Scott Peterson , OJ Simpson Deja Vue? He is one guilty mother fucker man ..... Sad part is he will prob get off scott free also..

12-03-2003, 09:04 AM	#2
Ice Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Sunny California Posts: 26,053	My dick is hard __________________ icq 1904905

12-03-2003, 09:10 AM	#3
BlueFly Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: NC, USA Posts: 716	He will not walk from this. He doesn't have any public supporters... or the race card. Not that OJ got off because he was black, he got off because he was famous. __________________ Now Taking Hard Link Trades BTW - NEVER use thexxxhost.com

12-03-2003, 09:20 AM	#5
jabula Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 1,037	Who cares! __________________ Need A Great Adult Host?

12-03-2003, 09:38 AM	#6
Candice Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: JUST CHILLIN' Posts: 1,149	I'm very concerned that he's going to get off, I've followed that case every day since last December...it's awful and everyone knows he's guilty as a motherfucker and cocky on top of that. I guess we'll see, but god I hope he gets the death penalty....what he did was the most horrible crime a husband and father could ever commit....makes you really think hard aobut our justice system.... __________________ You judge me for being different, I laugh because you are all the same!

12-03-2003, 09:20 AM	#4
jennym Confirmed User Join Date: May 2003 Location: the south Posts: 1,622	O.J. (guilty as a mother fucker) got off because the cops and the prosecution were a bunch of fucking idiots. Scott Peterson will not be so lucky.

12-03-2003, 09:46 AM	#7
jennym Confirmed User Join Date: May 2003 Location: the south Posts: 1,622	I agree. He comes off VERY cocky in court. That will turn the jury off big time.

12-03-2003, 09:48 AM	#8
Serge_Oprano So Fucking Banned Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 9,820	if he gets off, Lensman will sign him up to moderate GFY...

12-03-2003, 10:20 AM	#11
BVF Black Vagina Finder Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: The Midwest Posts: 13,975	OJ is innocent. They're just too lazy to find the REAL killer. They have nothing but circumstancial bullshit evidence on Peterson..Even if he's guilty, they gotta do better than a hair in the boat. They have absolutely no proof that scott did it. __________________ Black Pussy Click On Mr Cosby..CCbill, 60/40, 136 FHG's....The Cos Loves Black Ghetto Pussy!!

12-03-2003, 10:45 AM	#13
jennym Confirmed User Join Date: May 2003 Location: the south Posts: 1,622	I did not say they should convict because he is cocky...I said the jury wouldn't like him. As for O.J. - I watched the entire trial on TV. (yes, I was a bored housewife back then). I thought he was guilty as fuck. But, I would have had to find him not guilty because of the question of evidence being mishandled. As for Scott Peterson, we don't know enough facts about the case. I do find it VERY odd that he told his girlfriend this would be his first Christmas without his dead wife.

12-03-2003, 01:44 PM	#18
Bansheelinks Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 6,023	Holy fuck, ppl posting on this board that they watched the first OJ trial and would have let that guilty motherfucker walk? Did IQs drop in winter too, along with the temperatures. People who say things like this watch too may tabloid shows or have no backgrounds in the physical sciences. His blood was all over the place, so was his hair in the knit cap, a nice mix of everyone's blood was on the glove, in his van etc etc. I suggest some ppl on this board actually acquaint themselves with the IMPOSSIBILITY that all that evidence was planted, and that over 100 ppl who never met each other before decided to get together in a criminal conspiracy, which also they couldn't have in that period of time and the fact they were all strewn all over different areas and scenes..............ahhhhhhhhh fuck.........need i go on? LOL.............what are there, a bunch of massivecock clones on this board now? The fucker was guilty...........first trial.............second trial.......... Now as for Petersen..........thats really scary..........this man has repeatedly lied about so many things and has already been caught in these lies.............first he says he was golfing, like OJ lied about, then when he COULD HAVE been placed near the area, then he says oh yeah, I was fishing. But his lies aren't enough to convict, and they don't have much physical evidence so far. This monster may walk.

12-03-2003, 02:08 PM	#21
Webby Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Far far away - as possible Posts: 14,956	I'm amazed at the "trial by TV" and the comments by, supposed legal professionals on TV. Also the extent to which any court/judge/cops/prosecutors indulge the press with details about the case. The trial ain't even started yet but we have a considerable amount of detailed information in public knowledge - an amazing legal system!! Hell, why bother with a trial... just execute him!

12-03-2003, 02:09 PM	#22
JamesK hi Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 16,731	They have absolutely no proof that scott did it. __________________ M3Server - NATS Hosting

12-03-2003, 02:13 PM	#23
atomic2500 Registered User Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: North Cuba Posts: 59	the dude is guilty http://www.soaponarope.com

12-03-2003, 02:32 PM	#25
jhauser Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 2,924	At the end of the day Lacy and her little boy were killed and thats so sad. If Scott did it he lives with that for the rest of his life and if he didnt then he lives with knowing someone killed his first born son and wife. Tragic event.. __________________ TopBucks.com\| PlugInFeeds.com\| PinkVisual.com I am not one of those girls that go Mobi ing around my mobile solution is for you and you only. icq 175789972

12-03-2003, 02:59 PM	#26
Bansheelinks Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 6,023	Sorry Jennym.........although Twistyneck may have been harsh with you, he's right. Take a factual look at things, OJ's blatant lies and inconsistencies, the fact he can't account for his blood and hair being all over the place, at the Bundy crime scene (even though he denied having bled there, which was a lie), his ADMITTING he bled at Rockingham on THE NIGHT OF THE MURDERS, his conflicting statements about how he cut his finger, which one could also term LYING, the fact there was a trail of HIS BLOOD from the murder scene all the way INTO HIS HOME........lets be reasonable........ He got off because a spineless judge let the trial runaway and get out of his control via the defense's antics, and he also got off due to a biased and jaded jury, jaded due to recent events and also probably personal bad experiences in dealing with the police. He did not get off because the evidence was flimsy or the reasonable doubt theory. And once again, ask yourself, how did over 100 people manage to psychically figure out that they would conspire, DESPITE NOT ALL OF THEM MEETING, and frame a sack of shit named OJ Simpson? All it takes is reason and logic, & anyone well grounded in the scientific method would conclude this. Unlike jurors like Aldana, whose favorite shows were "Inside Edition" and "Hard Copy". And yes, I watched it all, or rarely missed it as I was very interested in the DNA findings.

12-03-2003, 03:27 PM	#27
jennym Confirmed User Join Date: May 2003 Location: the south Posts: 1,622	First of all Bansheelinks, I completely respect the opinions of others, but hate it when people feel the need to personally attack me. I never bought into the conspiracy theory. Do I think it is possible that one or two rogue cops could have done some things wrong? Yes. The cops, and the criminalists seemed full of shit almost as often as O.J. and his lawyers. I think the fucker is a cold-blooded murderer, who got away with it. But I also know that it is the cops, criminalists, and prosecutors responsibility to do things right, and to not leave me with any question about his guilt. As a white, southern female, I seriously doubt that MY opinion is based on racism, as Twistyneck eluded to. So, if I were on that jury, I am not sure I could have convicted him. On the other hand, I sure wouldn't feel bad if he took a bullet to the head one day.

12-03-2003, 03:27 PM	#28
HarlotCash Dyker Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: At a whorehouse near you Posts: 1,828	He got off because a spineless judge let the trial runaway and get out of his control via the defense's antics, and he also got off due to a biased and jaded jury, jaded due to recent events and also probably personal bad experiences in dealing with the police. In my opinion, I think you are wrong - I think he got away with it because the whole thing was played out like a monster movie on the tv - They should ban tv and reporting from all courts until a person has been covicted or aquitted - __________________ !!!Harlot Cash<<>>Harlot Cash<<>>Harlot Cash<<>>Harlot Cash!!!

12-03-2003, 03:58 PM	#30
Ic3m4nZ Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Montreal! Posts: 6,285	Why do people care so much about her ?

12-03-2003, 04:14 PM	#32
sperbonzo I'd rather be on my boat. Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Location: Miami, FL Posts: 9,748	I wonder if crowds of white people across the country will jump up and down applauding and cheering if Scott Peterson is found not guilty?