GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   VISA - continues (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=159275)

sexeducation 08-01-2003 05:42 PM

Whoever this person is - if he won his cases - he has fought for the existance of THIS board.

Ice 08-01-2003 05:42 PM

:GFYBand

[Labret] 08-01-2003 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts


the word "fantasy" appears NOWHERE in the thread that started this topic.

Someone from the left brought it in, to try and change the actual topic, as they usually do to try and justify their opinion.

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts


So child porn would be ok, if it were just fantasy?
hmmm

sexeducation 08-01-2003 05:46 PM

NO - child porn is banned because it is illegal.

2257 - is retarded. But acceptable Considering the emerging global informaton age in third world countries. Let's just say it is well known children will work 12 hour days 7 days a week - to feed themselvs.

The Truth Hurts 08-01-2003 05:46 PM

Was that the first post?
No.
It was a fucking reply to the guy who brought fantasy into the discussion.

Having problems following the entire discussion?

Webby 08-01-2003 05:49 PM

VISA........

(a) Visa is a business. They are entitled to accept or reject any clients they wish. They are also a monopoly.

(b) I can't "blend" with the idea of bestiality sites, child porn, rape, torture sites. However, each country has their own laws on this and they differ - and they are entitled to make their own "rules".

If VISA have taken upon themselves some form of censorship, this is bad. Next week *anything* can be censored irrespective of whether this is legal or not in the country where VISA do business. It may be, depending on the country and their laws, that there is a legal arguement for "restrictive trade practices".

If what VISA are doing is selecting the companies they wish to deal with on the basis of content, there is an arguement that this is not censorship, but simply a choice they are entitled to make.
This is, in a way, is similar to ticket sales where there are considerable problems - VISA has a free choice to deal with ticket sales companies or not.

The main problem is that VISA is a monopoly operating globally and controlling the majority of the card market. This is unhealthy for both consumers and merchants. No one organization needs to hold this power. If that situation existed within one country, such as the US, there would be FTC intervention as happened with the US media recently.

Either way.. there is a no win here - either trade with VISA or not :)

The Truth Hurts 08-01-2003 05:50 PM

Quote:

They are also a monopoly.

MasterCard, Discover, and AMEX say "Hi.".

sexeducation 08-01-2003 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts
Was that the first post?
No.
It was a fucking reply to the guy who brought fantasy into the discussion.

Having problems following the entire discussion?

Nope ...
Who ever he was - he knows his stuff.

Webby 08-01-2003 05:55 PM

sexeducation:

Quote:

NO - child porn is banned because it is illegal.
PEDO DAD ... Since you *know* child porn is illegal in the location of your host and in Canada, why did you have child porn images on your "website"??

I have copies of your "website" with the images and also the images you stole - just let me know if you want a copy zipped up and sent thru! It may jog your memory!

Now...:321GFY

directfiesta 08-01-2003 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
Whoever this person is - if he won his cases - he has fought for the existance of THIS board.
In fact, I fought first for my own survival in a free world ( literrally). If I had lost, the Queen of England, who was suing me in criminal court, would of fine me 500.00 for the first conviction ( cost 75,000.00 to defend the case). I had 160 titles in distribution.... 2nd offence : 5000.00 Third offence: 5 years in Jail ( that is a max security prison )... The cops already had charged me with about 50 different titles...

By winning for me, I cleared the path for others to enter the same field of activity..


BTW, the lawyer was Milton Hartman. He was also the Canadian lawyer for Penthouse and Hustler. Tough younger than I , he died 7 years ago jogging... He wanted to stay fit and in shape...

For me to say that a lawyer was a nice and honest man is not usual...

Anyway, baxk to get the fucking Ibill " webgood " pages to work....

Sarah_Jayne 08-01-2003 06:01 PM

so who decides what is VERY hard spanking? Do they have a redness chart that we can all reffer to or do they just deicde to pull your site is they are in a bad mood that day?

Webby 08-01-2003 06:01 PM

The Truth Hurts:

Quote:

MasterCard, Discover, and AMEX say "Hi.".
Not valid. An organization that holds over 70% of an industry *is* a monopoly.

The FTC were slammed for considering an increase over 35% in US media holdings by a group of corps. Even then, they were only proposing 40 something % - not in any way near the monopoly power of VISA.

sexeducation 08-01-2003 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta


In fact, I fought first for my own survival in a free world ( literrally). If I had lost, the Queen of England, who was suing me in criminal court, would of fine me 500.00 for the first conviction ( cost 75,000.00 to defend the case). I had 160 titles in distribution.... 2nd offence : 5000.00 Third offence: 5 years in Jail ( that is a max security prison )... The cops already had charged me with about 50 different titles...

By winning for me, I cleared the path for others to enter the same field of activity..


BTW, the lawyer was Milton Hartman. He was also the Canadian lawyer for Penthouse and Hustler. Tough younger than I , he died 7 years ago jogging... He wanted to stay fit and in shape...

For me to say that a lawyer was a nice and honest man is not usual...

Anyway, baxk to get the fucking Ibill " webgood " pages to work....

then you are the person I need to know ...

Webby 08-01-2003 06:06 PM

directfiesta:

Quote:

In fact, I fought first for my own survival in a free world ( literrally). If I had lost, the Queen of England, who was suing me in criminal court, would of fine me 500.00 for the first conviction ( cost 75,000.00 to defend the case). I had 160 titles in distribution.... 2nd offence : 5000.00 Third offence: 5 years in Jail ( that is a max security prison )... The cops already had charged me with about 50 different titles...
Gotta feeling I may know you and we may share some common contacts! :Graucho

Yep.. sadly no one is fuck all in the adult biz until they have been thru the legal censorship routine! :thumbsup

Webby 08-01-2003 06:09 PM

sexeducation:

Quote:

then you are the person I need to know ...
PEDO... you gotta be joking!!!

I don't think *anyone* in this business wants to know you... so just :321GFY

Honeyslut 08-01-2003 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by [Labret]
its like battle of the tards in here.

both sides of the fence in here shouldnt be allowed to speak.

Its like listening to two guys from the ghetto argue over who was the better impressionist, Monet or Renoir. Its Monet of course, but thats besides the point.


hehehe:thumbsup

jimmyf 08-01-2003 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts



MasterCard, Discover, and AMEX say "Hi.".

They lost a recent case and the court said *They are also a monopoly*.

Wal-Mart and others sued them, thought most on this board knew this.

PbG 08-01-2003 07:06 PM

As sad as this is you guys are cracking me up ROFL

. . .sheep fuckers lol

Quote:

Originally posted by Carrie


Okay, IMX - show me how my signature compares with sheep fuckers, shit eaters, and rapists.
You would defend someone's right to rape and make money from it?


The Truth Hurts 08-01-2003 07:18 PM

Again, I don't care what the court said.

Monopoly by definition means exclusive control... meaning there are no alternatives.

Webby 08-01-2003 07:26 PM

sarah_webinc:

Quote:

so who decides what is VERY hard spanking? Do they have a redness chart that we can all reffer to or do they just deicde to pull your site is they are in a bad mood that day?
I can hear VISA's defence counsel now...

"In this disgusting filth on photograph we have a girl with a redder than red ass Your Honour. Therefore VISA International does not want their reputation tarnished by associating with these deviant companies....." :1orglaugh

Irony is.. I always found barristers/bankers/accountants totally fascinated by the adult biz and likely get billed for 20 memberships a month. :)

Webby 08-01-2003 07:28 PM

The Truth Hurts:

Quote:

Again, I don't care what the court said.
Somehow I guessed that! :1orglaugh

Konda 08-02-2003 02:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by NewView
From inside information:

Visa planned to write to all bestiality merchant account holders in the next two weeks a letter that their account will me terminated if they continue clearing for this content type.

They also want to be banned for the near future:

Scat
Rape
Very hard spanking

So whats next? This is BAD :feels-hot

Time to new payment options, looking forward for solutions.

Your 'inside information' is wrong. The letter comes from Interpay (NL), which is almost the only merchant provider who still alows bestiality transactions.

Because of the heat they have been getting from Visa lately, they are being forced to stop the services they provide for bestiality sites (although it's completely legal under Dutch laws).

The officiall letter will go out in December or January (a month before they terminate all bestiality merchants).

hvidlogspusher 08-02-2003 05:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts
Well, beastiality is illegal, rape is illegal, hard spanking can be percieved as torture, which would be illegal, and scat is just fucking disgusting.
wrong beastiality is legal except a few states in the usa and some arabian countries, wrong rape as rape in the porn industry is legal because its just acting and some people like scat so let them fucking pay!

appleboy 08-02-2003 05:56 AM

the only thing is that is upsetting is anyone can go to a xxx video store and buy these very tapes without any problem with their mc/visa/amex or what ever, I just see mc as wanting to regulate the industry and you can bet more terms like interracial , black , asian, gay or any other terms they find unacceptable will soon be on the list.But since I'm just a webmaster and not a sponsor , I really don't have any thing to say about what happens just diversify away from adult anything.

titmowse 08-02-2003 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts
Again, I don't care what the court said.

Monopoly by definition means exclusive control... meaning there are no alternatives.

http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f11700/11793.htm

lexr 08-02-2003 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts
Again, I don't care what the court said.

Monopoly by definition means exclusive control... meaning there are no alternatives.

Fine, if you must get technical.. oligopoly.

But that's not really much better than a monopoly.

steffie 08-02-2003 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta


In fact, I fought first for my own survival in a free world ( literrally). If I had lost, the Queen of England, who was suing me in criminal court, would of fine me 500.00 for the first conviction ( cost 75,000.00 to defend the case). I had 160 titles in distribution.... 2nd offence : 5000.00 Third offence: 5 years in Jail ( that is a max security prison )... The cops already had charged me with about 50 different titles...

By winning for me, I cleared the path for others to enter the same field of activity..


BTW, the lawyer was Milton Hartman. He was also the Canadian lawyer for Penthouse and Hustler. Tough younger than I , he died 7 years ago jogging... He wanted to stay fit and in shape...

For me to say that a lawyer was a nice and honest man is not usual...

Anyway, baxk to get the fucking Ibill " webgood " pages to work....

I was also sued in 1999 for obscenity and plead guilty to assignation ( after 2 years in court). This was a battle I won't forget and now with Sodomy overturned I would not even had to go to court, however,

Walmart has banned Maxxim (the man magazine)
and Spain doesn not allow access to non spain hostest sites
and China does not allow access to porn

There is censorship everywhere, from smalltown (suing me) to countries. Visa is a monopoly and knows its power and plays it well. Coming on the board and saying they should ban this or that is not thinking correctly. It will backfire at you one day.

First you censor "rape" pictuers than you censor Gangbangs and fish hooks because it might look like rape.

I am just saying be careful what you wish for.

The Truth Hurts 08-02-2003 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by hvidlogspusher


wrong beastiality is legal except a few states in the usa

at least 30 states have specific beastiality laws making it illegal.


Quote:

[i]and some arabian countries[/B]
Canada, UK, and NZ have have specific beastiality laws making it illegal. There are no doubt countless others, but I'm not about to look them all up for you.

Quote:

wrong rape as rape in the porn industry is legal because its just acting and some people like scat so let them fucking pay! [/B]

Anyone that gets off on rape, simulated or real, and shit should be in an institution.

[Labret] 08-02-2003 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts

at least 30 states have specific beastiality laws making it illegal.

and its a misdemeanor offense.

Sodomy and oral sex is illegal in some states. Time to start killing off all the blowjob and anal sites.

Stop fantasizing about blowjobs as well.

The Truth Hurts 08-02-2003 09:32 PM

you'd equate anal sex and blowjobs with rape?

The first two, would be consensual acts.... rape isn't consensual.
there is your distinction.

[Labret] 08-02-2003 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts
you'd equate anal sex and blowjobs with rape?

The first two, would be consensual acts.... rape isn't consensual.
there is your distinction.

No, I equate illegal acts with illegal acts. As that is your primary concern is it not? Rape and beast are illegal so there should be no websites. Shit eating is not "natural" so they should not be allowed either. Taking a 14 inch cock in your ass is not natural.

Show me a website with women actually being raped.

Edit. re-read. So now its not a legal issue, its a consent issue?

NewView 08-03-2003 03:32 AM

Geez... Did not expect that you start talking about fantasies and so on on this issue.

Seems te be that there are a lot of different opions on: How to run a decent PORN website without being a crook.

Are all the online pornsites not online for one reason: Making money out of it?

Who put the kiddy-shit into this topic?

Get back to the nature of this topic and forget all the regulations in your own state/country.

Visa is not paying attention to that also.

whitey 08-03-2003 04:29 AM

Everyone seems to be forgetting (although pointed out by a few insightful posters)

1. Visa is a private company. They can choose not to do business with anyone they so choose. Claiming they are discriminating against you is like claiming the Hun discriminates against you because he won't list certain types of galleries. Get a life.

2. Visa is not a monopoly. They provide a form of payment. By and large, cash, checks, barter, other charge companies, and other forms of payment, when taken togehter, dwarf Visa's share of the payment processing industry. Forget it folks, Visa to paying my bills is nowehere near Microsoft to running my computer.

3. Visa is not an extension of any government, thus, they cannot censor. They just choose not to do business with some of us.

4. Whole fucking industires, very large ones, exist without ever taking a visa card. They do very fine, thank you.

If you want to offer content featuring people shitting on horses while they fuck their girlfriends, be prepared to think outside of the box on your payment solutions, because there are not alot of people that want to do business with you. That, in and of itself, is a significant business advantage if you know how to use it.

And, btw, this has nothing to do with any particular country. By and large, most countries are far more restrictive on acceptable content than the US, for example (I have had this tiresome argument far to often. Just because it is ok to show tits on a Fench beach does not mean the Spanish are friendly to dog fucking). It is just one fucking company deciding what they want to process for. If you wish to offer content that they choose not to process, find another way to get paid.

lexr 08-03-2003 11:34 AM

Re-read my post about Visa being a private corporation on page 2 of this thread.

That point is still being missed it seems.

wargames 08-03-2003 11:38 AM

visa sucks

directfiesta 08-03-2003 11:57 AM

Quote:

[i] whitey



And, btw, this has nothing to do with any particular country. By and large, most countries are far more restrictive on acceptable content than the US, for example (I have had this tiresome argument far to often.[/B]
Don't understand why you guys always bring that back to the US!
We are not talking about VISA US here, but VISA International. So stop looking at your belly button constantly.

And since you brought it up, All Europe, aside from the anglo-saxons countries, are way more permessive than the US and each of their local sheriff's. Ask Steiner ( Max Hardcore) about that.

Quote:

[i] whitey


Just because it is ok to show tits on a Fench beach does not mean the Spanish are friendly to dog fucking). It is just one fucking company deciding what they want to process for. If you wish to offer content that they choose not to process, find another way to get paid. [/B]
FYI, Beast is legal-tolarated in France and Spain ( I really don't uinderstand your rant...). It is also legal in Italy, Holland and probably other countries.

The point of this thread is to focus on the fact that a private company, which holds a major part of the processing possibilities, can decide not to supply services to a legitimate business.

So if one day there is a political canditate who is not " proper", they could decide to prevent him from using VISA to raise funds for a political campaign...

prostock 08-03-2003 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Carrie
And Visa is not the government. They're a private business who can decide with whom and where they want to do business... just as you are a private business who can decide with whom and where you want to do business.

So if you don't like what Visa decides is good for its bottom line, then quit bitching and take your business elsewhere.
There are plenty of other ways to take a surfer's money, NO ONE is forcing you to use Visa.


wel look at the damn sig you have , if you not like the fact no one spoke out and and not like what they are doing get the fuck out ,
and you are wrong with what you said on a few things ,
those sites are a kind of porn that is a fetish , we dont have to like or agree with others like , but the stuff must sel and sell well tehre is alot of it around , i not care for fisting sites , but that is me i am not going around upset over it ,
you are right they are not goverment , they are higher , the goverment couldnt do hafe what they are doing , so get a life and think more

NewView 08-03-2003 12:47 PM

Quote:

So if you don't like what Visa decides is good for its bottom line, then quit bitching and take your business elsewhere.
Don't know your stats but here Visa is 65% of my earnings.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123