JoeSuxPrick...... here I am - Page 7 - GoFuckYourself.com

cluck · 03-10-2003, 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MuleScrote
300

Bastard.

Lane · 03-10-2003, 08:54 PM

DavePlays · 03-10-2003, 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Groove

Saddam is a threat to the people of his own country, but he is presently in no position to invade another country. What other country is he threatening to invade? Who is he going to use these weapons against?

If you're arguing that the US should invade Iraq to liberate them from a despotic dictator, then I guess the US will also need to invade most of the other countries in the Middle East, including its so called allies like Saudi Arabia and Egypt.

You REALLY think Saddam needs all his weapons JUST to threaten his OWN people? - All his's gone through for 12 years JUST to keep his own people in line? You really believe that?

Bit of an Over-Kill won't it be? Pardon the Pun.

Invading Egypt compared to Iraq? -
Let's just pretend you didn't make such an asinine comparison.

Groove · 03-10-2003, 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DavePlays
You REALLY think Saddam needs all his weapons JUST to threaten his OWN people? - All his's gone through for 12 years JUST to keep his own people in line? You really believe that?

Bit of an Over-Kill won't it be? Pardon the Pun.

Who is he threatening to attack?

Quote:

Invading Egypt compared to Iraq? -
Let's just pretend you didn't make such an asinine comparison. [/B]

And what are you thoughts about the Saudis?

Groove · 03-10-2003, 09:07 PM

Under international law it is illegal to invade a sovereign state unless they have attacked you or are about to attack you. If the US invades Iraq without the support of the UN it will be committing an illegal act.

DavePlays · 03-10-2003, 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Groove
Under international law it is illegal to invade a sovereign state unless they have attacked you or are about to attack you. If the US invades Iraq without the support of the UN it will be committing an illegal act.

oh well....

Anthony_A · 03-10-2003, 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Groove
Under international law it is illegal to invade a sovereign state unless they have attacked you or are about to attack you. If the US invades Iraq without the support of the UN it will be committing an illegal act.

You are fucking kidding me right?

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/...004766310.html

First Israel, who knows when us.

Groove · 03-10-2003, 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Anthony_A

You are fucking kidding me right?

No, it was a simple statement of fact. It *is* illegal to unilaterally attack another nation unless it attacks you first or it's clear that attack is imminent. The only exception is if the action is approved by the UN.

Quote:

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/...004766310.html

Your point?

The US and the UK say that they intend to invade Iraq because Saddam will not destroy his weapons of mass destruction. I have not heard anyone claim that they're doing so to cut-off Saddam's funding to the families of Palestinian terrorists.

Quote:

First Israel, who knows when us.

Following your logic, it would be OK for any state which feels threatened by the US's weapons of mass destruction and bellicose attitude (and there are many!) to attack the US!

theking · 03-10-2003, 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Groove
Under international law it is illegal to invade a sovereign state unless they have attacked you or are about to attack you. If the US invades Iraq without the support of the UN it will be committing an illegal act.

\

The Administration said from the beginning that it did not have to go to the UN to act. The Administration, will be merely imposing the terms of the cease fire that the UN imposed upon Iraq in 1991, so no it will not be acting illegally. In addition Iraq has been committing acts of war weekly since 1991 in that it has repeatedly fired upon coalition forces (the USA and the British). In addition Saddam has more than once called for the killing of Americans where ever they may be found so a case can be made that he his an imminent threat to the security of US assets abroad and even mainland. Legalities are usually open for interpretation.

theking · 03-10-2003, 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by cluck

If the USA was concerned about the wellfare of Iraqi citizens, they wouldn't have economic sanctions that prevent them from getting medicine. Fact is however many people die at the hands of Saddam over there, more are dying because we won't let them import medicine.

We allow a certain amount of Iraqi oil to be sold for food and medicine. In addition Iraqi has side stepped this program and sold additional oil. Saddam decided to spend the money on things other than medicine, such as continuing to build Palaces. It is Saddam allowing his people to die, no one else.

Groove · 03-10-2003, 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
Legalities are usually open for interpretation.

Very true

Anthony_A · 03-10-2003, 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Groove

Following your logic, it would be OK for any state which feels threatened by the US's weapons of mass destruction and bellicose attitude (and there are many!) to attack the US!

Okie dokie. Suicide bombers and Sept 11th...

Oh yeah, the US has paid families of Nuclear Physists for their sacraficing their lives for ALLAH and to rid the world of the infidels.

Blah blah blah.

Sly_RJ · 03-10-2003, 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by cluck

If the USA was concerned about the wellfare of Iraqi citizens, they wouldn't have economic sanctions that prevent them from getting medicine. Fact is however many people die at the hands of Saddam over there, more are dying because we won't let them import medicine.

Hmm...

http://www.forbes.com/2003/02/26/billionaireland.html

Says here that Saddam is worth at least 2 BILLION dollars. Hmm... I'm wondering how he accumulated that much money, all while his people are short of food and proper medicine. Surely, he's too humane to steal donated supplies and sell them for personal gain.

Pointless · 03-10-2003, 10:13 PM

quiet · 03-10-2003, 10:17 PM

my god.

Groove · 03-10-2003, 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by quiet
my god.

Who?

quiet · 03-10-2003, 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Groove

Who?

my christian god who will no doubt strike you all down for all your sinning.

Groove · 03-10-2003, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by quiet
my christian god who will no doubt strike you all down for all your sinning.

There's a big storm outside...

Looks like I might be first!

quiet · 03-10-2003, 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Groove

There's a big storm outside...

Looks like I might be first!

there's a special place waiting for you, in my god's hell. hehehehehehe.

cluck · 03-10-2003, 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking

We allow a certain amount of Iraqi oil to be sold for food and medicine. In addition Iraqi has side stepped this program and sold additional oil. Saddam decided to spend the money on things other than medicine, such as continuing to build Palaces. It is Saddam allowing his people to die, no one else.

I wasn't talking about Saddam, I was talking about having sanctions on importing medicine. They should allow us to sell it to Iraqi hospitals.

Sly_RJ · 03-10-2003, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by quiet

there's a special place waiting for you, in my god's hell. hehehehehehe.

Damn man! Getting a little frisky tonight, eh?

theking · 03-10-2003, 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by cluck

I wasn't talking about Saddam, I was talking about having sanctions on importing medicine. They should allow us to sell it to Iraqi hospitals.

We do not have sanctions against medicine. Saddam chooses not to buy medicine, and chooses to spend the money on other things.

Sly_RJ · 03-10-2003, 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking

We do not have sanctions against medicine. Saddam chooses not to buy medicine, and chooses to spend the money on other things.

Ding ding ding! We have a winner!

03-10-2003, 08:52 PM	#301
MuleScrote Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 4,601	300 __________________ ICQ 78681003

03-10-2003, 08:54 PM	#303
Lane Will code for food... Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Buckeye, AZ Posts: 8,496	302 __________________

03-10-2003, 10:13 PM	#315
Pointless Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Australia Posts: 2,142	__________________ 355 north Adultdatelink.com

03-10-2003, 09:07 PM	#306
Groove Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 3,852	Under international law it is illegal to invade a sovereign state unless they have attacked you or are about to attack you. If the US invades Iraq without the support of the UN it will be committing an illegal act.

03-10-2003, 10:17 PM	#316
quiet we'll miss you our friend. RIP Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Fernie, BC Posts: 25,115	my god.