Congratulations President Obama : 7.1 Million sign ups to obamacare. - Page 3 - GoFuckYourself.com

TheSquealer · 04-02-2014, 03:50 PM

100 clowns who need government assistance in perpetuity because they are incapable of taking care of or providing for themselves and their families.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

More bullshit. You guys believe everything you hear don't you?

The healthcare law itself says just the opposite.

Look you dumb fuckwit... An amendment was later introduced BY A REPUBLICAN to change that and disallow the exemptions after so much fucking public outcry that you apparently are completely unaware of as with everything else you talk about. So once again you are posting misleading bullshit to try to rewrite history.

Go back to trying to sell traffic from your flagship site rochardsbunnyranch.com on Juicy Ads with your estimated click volume of 3 uniques per day. No fucking wonder you can't wait to siphon tax payer money into your pockets.

L-Pink · 04-02-2014, 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by **********

Hi L-Pink,

I don't have any democratic homies and I don't know anything about health insurance in the states, or anyone being forced to use anything, so I really could not answer your question.

What I'm asking now is why would people believe republican lawmakers like Bachman when they say crazy, flat out lies?

Or, do you think she is telling the truth?

Why only pick on idiots that are Republican? Why only post about Republican wrong doings? Why always with such obvious hate?

You are now know for such a slanted view that anything you say is also viewed as crazy ranting.

(except for Tesla posts, lol)

.

2MuchMark · 04-02-2014, 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda

you know you're a moron right? not one of the 7.1 mil members is in the US congress because it's such shitty ins the US congress got themselves exempted

Why are you calling me a moron? I didn't say anything about anyone on congress getting obamacare and I really don't know anything about it.

But since you brought it up, I found this:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...rom-obamacare/

Quote:

The final rule would keep the subsidy in place only for members of Congress and affected staff who enroll in a Small Business Health Options Program (SHOP) plan available in the District of Columbia. Such plans most commonly will be aimed at employees of businesses with fewer than 50 workers, but perhaps the theory is that each lawmaker and his or her staff constitute a small business. In any case, lawmakers and their staffs are not eligible for the tax credits that other Americans using the exchanges might qualify for.

peace.

TheSquealer · 04-02-2014, 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

Why only pick on idiots that are Republican? Why only post about Republican wrong doings? Why always with such obvious hate?

You are now know for such a slanted view that anything you say is also viewed as crazy ranting.

(except for Tesla posts, lol)

.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHhh...

I see where the confusion is.

You missed his previous explanation in another thread that he is not biased at all. He claims he doesn't lean left or right... I'm not sure if he even knows he's Canadian.

2MuchMark · 04-02-2014, 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

Why only pick on idiots that are Republican? Why only post about Republican wrong doings? Why always with such obvious hate?

You are now know for such a slanted view that anything you say is also viewed as crazy ranting.

(except for Tesla posts, lol)

.

Hi L-Pink,

I'm really trying hard not to be slanted. I am trying to make nice with Vendzilla, and give everyone a chance to educate us dumb Canadians.

Let me change the tone a little and remove Democrats and Republicans from this conversation completely, and ask this question:

Do you believe what Michelle Bachman (the love of my life) says about Obamacare? Is what she is saying true? And if you don't believe her, would you trust her again?

Of course my next question might be the same thing about another law maker, but for now, lets do baby steps.

Cheers.

2MuchMark · 04-02-2014, 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHhh...

I see where the confusion is.

You missed his previous explanation in another thread that he is not biased at all. He claims he doesn't lean left or right... I'm not sure if he even knows he's Canadian.

Hi Sqealer,

Very good point, and you are right, I am demo-leaning for sure. But I will try to repress that side of me from now on and remain as neutral as possible. I will see no more democrats, no more republicans. No more white people, no more black people. Just people, people, people.

And yes I am totally Canadian. I put Maple Syrup on my Back Bacon at breakfast, wash it down with a cold Canadian beer, sing "Cooo, roo coo coo, coo roo coo coo!" to the Canadian flag every morning and then say Pardon me, just to practice my politeness. So in honour and in a manner of being Canadian, I will no longer insult any republicans.

L-Pink · 04-02-2014, 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by **********

Hi L-Pink,

I'm really trying hard not to be slanted. I am trying to make nice with Vendzilla, and give everyone a chance to educate us dumb Canadians.

Let me change the tone a little and remove Democrats and Republicans from this conversation completely, and ask this question:

Do you believe what Michelle Bachman (the love of my life) says about Obamacare? Is what she is saying true? And if you don't believe her, would you trust her again?

Of course my next question might be the same thing about another law maker, but for now, lets do baby steps.

Cheers.

Ok, on one hand you have someone making crazy negative assumptions about a bill they never read. On the other hand you have people aggressively preaching the positives of a bill they haven't read. How can you tolerate either stance much less take sides.

.

crockett · 04-02-2014, 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Vendzilla cannot debate anything to save his life. He just cuts and pastes from the sites he reads and accepts it all as fact.

My favorite debate with him was the Waco one. He read a single comment by a single Congressman who claimed the Congressional report into Waco discovered that the fires were set by the FBI, without ever reading the report - which said the direct opposite.

It's the same as with any conspiracy theorist that thinks the moon landings were faked or the bible thumpers whom think Jesus rode a Trex. No amount of evidence against what they believe will ever change their mind as there is not a open mind to be changed.

Biggy · 04-02-2014, 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Sure. I would imagine putting Romneycare into place at the state level would be simple. Easy to do, no huge debates at the national level, and no one spending years and all of their efforts to defeat a bill that is already a law.

Simple.

No one read the bill? Shame on them for not doing their jobs.

They debated it for a year; They dicked around on the language exact language for months. They wrote the fucking bill. They have staffs to read and understand the bill, and if not they have lobbiests to push them around.

How could they have done that. The Republican party - and the people who put it together - wanted to kill this law at all costs. They still do to this very day.

That's a cute little sound bite.

Are you honestly telling me that Congress voted on the bill without knowing what was in it? If that is the case... They should all be arrested.

At the time obamacare got passed, the democrats controlled all chambers of government - the presidency, the senate, congress. So they jammed it thru.

The republicans then took congress back in the next midterm shortly thereafter and have hated obama ever since, because he didn't give a fuck about them and right when he stepped into office jammed a law thru that they hated, all in the name of his legacy - he was going to be the president that finally reformed healthcare!!!! so yes all the democrats should go to jail starting with pelosi, because they passed a law they didnt read because they voted with the party line.

Let's recap;

1. Repubs have always hated obamacare.
2. Dems controlled all chambers of government and forced it thru. There was a debate but it didn't matter they got it to pass without needing any republican support. The public was also against it.
3. Republicans handed democrats the loss of the house / congress just after obama forced it thru. Because more people were against it then for it at the time. It was the main issue in the mid-terms, and the people voted accordingly.
4. Repubs then challenged the constitutionality of it in court while hating obama and blocking him at every turn. Obamacare is why they hate him. In first year of president, he fucked them and threw them to the curb. For everyone who blames obstructionist Republicans, but doesnt want to pin any blame on Obama, how willing would you be to negotiate with someone if the first thing they did in office was fuck you over?
5. Now everyone hates obamacare except those who benefit from it which is less than the people who will get fucked by it.

Let's see what happens in this years midterm election and let's am see what the next democratic presidential nominee says about it / supports it. We don't need to wait. Theyre expecting to lose the Senate and I don't think there is hope for the Dems to take the house. Democratic candidates are distancing themselves away from Obamacare.

If you benefit from the law great - we understand why you support it. Just know your benefits came from somewhere. It didn't exist out of thin air, its because your win became other people's losses. And there are more losers than winners, and a lot of people are starting to think the government shouldnt pick winners and losers, and needs to become smaller not bigger. this law will eventually get repealed, enjoy it while it lasts.

kane · 04-02-2014, 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Biggy

At the time obamacare got passed, the democrats controlled all chambers of government - the presidency, the senate, congress. So they jammed it thru.

The republicans then took congress back in the next midterm shortly thereafter and have hated obama ever since, because he didn't give a fuck about them and right when he stepped into office jammed a law thru that they hated, so yes all the democrats should go to jail starting with pelosi.

Let's recap;

1. Repubs have always hated obamacare.
2. Dems controlled all chambers of government and forced it thru. There was a debate but it didn't matter they got it to pass without needing any republican support. The public was also against it.
3. Republicans handed democrats the loss of the house / congress just after obama forced it thru. Because more people were against it then for it at the time. It was the main issue in the mid-terms, and the people voted accordingly.
4. Repubs then challenged the constitutionality of it in court while hating obama and blocking him at every turn. Obamacare is why they hate him. In first year of president, he fucked them and threw them to the curb. For everyone who blames obstructionist Republicans, but doesnt want to pin any blame on Obama, how willing would you be to negotiate with someone if the first thing they did in office was fuck you over?
5. Now everyone hates obamacare except those who benefit from it which is less than the people who will get fucked by it.

Let's see what happens in this years midterm election and let's am see what the next democratic presidential nominee says about it / supports it. We don't need to wait. Theyre expecting to lose the Senate and I don't think there is hope for the Dems to take the house. Democratic candidates are distancing themselves away from Obamacare.

If you benefit from the law great - we understand why you support it. Just know your benefits came from somewhere. It didn't exist out of thin air, its because your win became other people's losses. And there are more losers than winners, and a lot of people are starting to think the government shouldnt pick winners and losers, but should get the fuck out of the way.

The big gauge of how the public really feels about Obamacare will likely come in the election later this year. You know every republican will be running on a platform of repealing Obamacare. If people really want it repealed they should pick up seats in the house and take back the senate.

It will be interesting to see how it turns out.

arock10 · 04-02-2014, 04:53 PM

I can only imagine how social security was when it was first passed.

"What you are going to take my money so I can't touch it until I'm 60??? This is terrible!"

PornoMonster · 04-02-2014, 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

This is what people don't seem to understand - Every year people loose and or change their healthcare plans. Every fucking year.

Saying "people had their healthcare canceled" is incorrect and a huge over statement. They didn't loose their healthcare, but instead were forced to pick a different plan. This is because their plans failed to meet the basic federal requirements. They are trying to spin this as a bad thing when in fact it's a good thing - a very good thing. If your plan failed to meet the basic requirements of the federal law, you were paying for a plan that wasn't gong to help you much when you needed it most.

You think it is bad now losing or changing, wait till all the waivers run out!

stickyfingerz · 04-02-2014, 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clickhappy

This is what the Republitards want. If someone doesnt have insurance "Let him die".
Listen to how happy they are to let someone die because they couldn't afford overly expensive insurance.

So... Ron Paul isn't, nor has he ever been.. part of the Tea Party. Not sure where the person that made the video got that.

stickyfingerz · 04-02-2014, 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

Let me tell you a real story.

Last year, someone I know, who was uninsured, was loading his mud-bogging 4x4 monster Jeep onto a trailer with a hoist -- the vehicle was disabled and it was too wide for the trailer. He had the trailer mickey moused to hold the Jeep's width (stupid -- accident waiting to happen) -- the truck slipped off the trailer and he ended up with broken ribs and a punctured lung.

He didn't go to the hospital right away -- the lung got infected. No insurance, yadda yadda, waited until he was nearly dead, had to be talked into consenting for the surgery by a friend in the end. After 10 days in the hospital, the bill was near $245,000.00

He will bankrupt, lose his house, and in the end: The Federal government will reimburse the hospital maybe $35K of the bill. He doesn't have much now and he will have nothing but his future life to live.

For a lot of people that is CapitalistCare in America.

And since Obamacare isn't free..... and doesn't lower the cost for hardly anyone.. how would it of helped your pal exactly? The 5k deductibles would of helped? lol

baddog · 04-02-2014, 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

So are you telling me that Congress passes bills without even reading them?

That is a pretty naive statement; you should watch more C-SPAN if you think congressional debates are made of anything substantial.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

More bullshit. You guys believe everything you hear don't you?

The healthcare law itself says just the opposite.

Pot / kettle

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

And? Your healthcare bill goes up every year. Stop bitching like a little bitch.

Mine went down. A lot.

Have you used your new policy yet?

Barry-xlovecam · 04-02-2014, 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

And since Obamacare isn't free..... and doesn't lower the cost for hardly anyone.. how would it of helped your pal exactly? The 5k deductibles would of helped? lol

Well, say he qualified for subsidised insurance (he would), the insurance would pay for most of the expense. Hospitals bill you for the deductibles. A $5,000 debt is manageable in most cases. The hospital does not ask for the $5,000 (theoretical) deductible while you bleed out on a hospital gurney.

Maybe he could sell that POS Jeep for $2,500 and get 1/2 the deductible paid off :D
There are options.

One thing you can be sure of he's not going to pay that $240K bill. He hasn't the means to.

So, the taxpayer gets stuck reimbursing the hospital -- the hospital gets 1/2 the insurance contract rate: in the final analysis someone pays. The patient goes bankrupt to avoid the debt. It's a lose-lose-lose financially -- there are no winners only losers.

crockett · 04-02-2014, 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

Well, say he qualified for subsidised insurance (he would), the insurance would pay for most of the expense. Hospitals bill you for the deductibles. A $5,000 debt is manageable in most cases. The hospital does not ask for the $5,000 (theoretical) deductible while you bleed out on a hospital gurney.

Maybe he could sell that POS Jeep for $2,500 and get 1/2 the deductible paid off :D
There are options.

One thing you can be sure of he's not going to pay that $240K bill. He hasn't the means to.

So, the taxpayer gets stuck reimbursing the hospital -- the hospital gets 1/2 the insurance contract rate: in the final analysis someone pays. The patient goes bankrupt to avoid the debt. It's a lose-lose-lose financially -- there are no winners only losers.

The Hospital doesn't really lose much if anything. It never really cost that $240k. Anything they claim to of lost gets written up as a tax deduction hence the reason hospitals always claim to be losing money. Hospitals are a business and most are not "non-profit" yet in most places they stay in business year after year..

Claiming the loss on the extremely padded bill is all part of the game.

Rochard · 04-02-2014, 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

From the time the bill was finished and made law? Not long.

And how do you debate something no one has read?

.

But you keep acting like a bill "suddenly appeared" and they voted on it the same day and there was no discussion about it. That's not how it happened at all. It was debate for two years; They had entire committees so they could work out what they could agree on before it became a bill.

They knew exactly what was in it before it became a bill.

Rochard · 04-02-2014, 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

Look you dumb fuckwit...

You are going to call me childish names and then mock a block that pays my mortgage?

Congrats. You just made my ignore list.

2MuchMark · 04-02-2014, 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly

And why would you continue to believe reverse scare tactics by the Democrats?

Reverse Scare tactics? Hmm... So if republican scare tactics are bad, and democratic reverse scare tactics are bad, then who is good? Who should be trusted?

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

And why would you trust someone who approved a healthcare bill they haven't even read much less understood or debated?

.

Okay, then same question... if you can't trust the republicans and you can't trust the democrats, then who can you trust? Who do you personally trust? If that person was running for office and you had to vote for that person today, who would they be?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Vendzilla cannot debate anything to save his life. He just cuts and pastes from the sites he reads and accepts it all as fact.

My favorite debate with him was the Waco one. He read a single comment by a single Congressman who claimed the Congressional report into Waco discovered that the fires were set by the FBI, without ever reading the report - which said the direct opposite.

Now now, let's all be a' friendly-like... Vendzilla and I have had our differences and I'd like to get to know how he really thinks, have a beer with the man, derp-a-derp...

Quote:

Originally Posted by beaner

My healthcare costs have gone up significantly higher (percentage wise) late last year to right now when all these deadlines of Obama care were in place. When I care enough to check... I will post back.

Maybe it went up for you, but isn't it better now?

Rochard · 04-02-2014, 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Biggy

At the time obamacare got passed, the democrats controlled all chambers of government - the presidency, the senate, congress. So they jammed it thru.

Sure.

And? That's not the first time that's ever happened right?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Biggy

The republicans then took congress back in the next midterm shortly thereafter and have hated obama ever since, because he didn't give a fuck about them and right when he stepped into office jammed a law thru that they hated, all in the name of his legacy - he was going to be the president that finally reformed healthcare!!!! so yes all the democrats should go to jail starting with pelosi, because they passed a law they didnt read because they voted with the party line.

So Republicans are pissed because the other side passed a bill through while they were in control? That's not childish at all.

Legacy? His legacy isn't going to be about healthcare - it's going to be about guiding us out of the recession.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Biggy

1. Repubs have always hated obamacare.

Yes. Because it's a Republican idea.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Biggy

2. Dems controlled all chambers of government and forced it thru. There was a debate but it didn't matter they got it to pass without needing any republican support. The public was also against it.

That's called Democracy. The party who has control gets to pick and choose what they want.

The public was against it? Sure sure. You know, because of the death panels. The smear campaign went on for two years before it became a bill.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Biggy

4. Repubs then challenged the constitutionality of it in court while hating obama and blocking him at every turn. Obamacare is why they hate him. In first year of president, he fucked them and threw them to the curb. For everyone who blames obstructionist Republicans, but doesnt want to pin any blame on Obama, how willing would you be to negotiate with someone if the first thing they did in office was fuck you over?

So Obamacare is bad and Romeny is fine. Why aren't they fighting Romneycare?

So they were made at Obama so they revolted? Fucking childish. The Republican party is pissed because they lost TWICE to a black man who had never accomplished anything.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Biggy

5. Now everyone hates obamacare except those who benefit from it which is less than the people who will get fucked by it.

Seems to me the only people who hate Obamacare are the Republicans on this board.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Biggy

If you benefit from the law great - we understand why you support it. Just know your benefits came from somewhere. It didn't exist out of thin air, its because your win became other people's losses. And there are more losers than winners, and a lot of people are starting to think the government shouldnt pick winners and losers, and needs to become smaller not bigger.

I support this because we need something and Obamacare is better than what we had.

Some people will come out ahead, others will pay more. All of us were going to more NO MATTER WHAT so that's still a win.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Biggy

this law will eventually get repealed, enjoy it while it lasts.

I really hope so. It will prove exactly how petty the Republican party has become - The Republican party is going to spend years fighting something they created (Romneycare) that has made our healthcare better. If they do repeal this law it will be a huge loss - years and billions wasted only to start from square one all over again.

Rochard · 04-02-2014, 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by **********

Now now, let's all be a' friendly-like... Vendzilla and I have had our differences and I'd like to get to know how he really thinks, have a beer with the man, derp-a-derp...

Vendzilla and I are friends.... He's in China right now he tells me.

But he just can't debate to save his life.

noshit · 04-02-2014, 08:21 PM

No clue for six months and suddenly they know to a decimal point how many signed up lol
Then they celebrate the lie to tell you how stupid they think you are

It must be the same 7 million non-existent voters from 2012

Sly · 04-02-2014, 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by **********

Reverse Scare tactics? Hmm... So if republican scare tactics are bad, and democratic reverse scare tactics are bad, then who is good? Who should be trusted?

Ahhh. You see the world as black and white. You and George Dubya have more in common than you would like to admit.

crockett · 04-02-2014, 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by noshit

No clue for six months and suddenly they know to a decimal point how many signed up lol
Then they celebrate the lie to tell you how stupid they think you are

It must be the same 7 million non-existent voters from 2012

Perhaps you should watch news source that actually informs you. They have been giving out numbers on ACA sign ups for some time, since it went live actually. It was only the first month that there was much confusion. There was never a real mystery of how many people were signing up and there was always a last min sign up rush that was expected.

PornDiscounts-V · 04-02-2014, 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude

First time I have had medical coverage since starting my own business 15 years ago (previously denied due to a pre-existing condition).

I'm happy (for now)...

ADG

I hear you brother.

PornDiscounts-V · 04-02-2014, 10:53 PM

If you are a republican in the adult business please leave. Because you are an idiot.

Vendzilla · 04-02-2014, 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Vendzilla and I are friends.... He's in China right now he tells me.

But he just can't debate to save his life.

I'm back, what did I miss?

I bring up mostly facts and BTW, not against the democratic party or the republican party, don't like any of them, who I think is screwing up is the POTUS.

As far as debating, look at the polls, most people in the US agree with me

AmeliaG · 04-02-2014, 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

The Hospital doesn't really lose much if anything. It never really cost that $240k. Anything they claim to of lost gets written up as a tax deduction hence the reason hospitals always claim to be losing money. Hospitals are a business and most are not "non-profit" yet in most places they stay in business year after year..

Claiming the loss on the extremely padded bill is all part of the game.

Crockett and I super duper agree here.

Anything called reform should have addressed this.

If hospitals charged a normal markup, someone like your friend would have been able to just tighten his belt and sell a few toys to pay the bill for surgery, not be deterred and destroyed by the cost.

Vendzilla · 04-02-2014, 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by **********

No Vendzilla, No. I expect a better answer from you. Deflecting, and answering a question with another question, is amateur.

Let me put it another way. In the videos I posted above, republicans scream "death panels" when there were none, and said it would literally kill women. I'm willing to give Bachman some elbow room on this, but still. Please think carefully before answering : How can republican lawmakers, be expected to be taken seriously, when they talk like this?

Every party has it's nuts and fruits, judging a party by the actions of one of them is naive.

Same would be said if you judged all people because you knew one of them that was an idiot.

The democrats passed this law and they are feeling the heat, the people are not happy and all the polls right now show that the the democrats are going to lose seats during the mid terms.

I say that because they passed it with NO help from the GOP.

People were promised they could keep their plans and they were promised that the prices would go down, it's not working out that way. Yes, 7 million people have signed up , but of those numbers, no one is releasing how many are getting insurance that didn't have it before. I just came from China, 7 million people is a shit number, over 4 times that live in Shanghai alone.

RandyRandy · 04-02-2014, 11:20 PM

I don't think that 7 million sign-ups, however pathetic that may be, is the important number. Why isn't anyone mentioning that less than a million have actually paid a premium so far.

This is not sustainable in any way, shape or form.

Axeman · 04-02-2014, 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RandyRandy

I don't think that 7 million sign-ups, however pathetic that may be, is the important number. Why isn't anyone mentioning that less than a million have actually paid a premium so far.

This is not sustainable in any way, shape or form.

Estimates are that 80% of the 7 million have actually paid. However only 1/3 of the 7 million were people previously without insurance. And of that 1/3, just over 50% of them have actually paid their premiums. Which would leave roughly 1 million previously uninsured signed up.

They also estimate currently that between 5-8% of people that paid the first month, did not pay the 2nd month.

Of course until the White House puts out detailed records of all this, its all estimates based on polling of the various insurance companies.

Emma · 04-02-2014, 11:41 PM

Social Security is here to stay, until it changes ... try taking it away.

AmeliaG · 04-03-2014, 01:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Axeman

Estimates are that 80% of the 7 million have actually paid. However only 1/3 of the 7 million were people previously without insurance. And of that 1/3, just over 50% of them have actually paid their premiums. Which would leave roughly 1 million previously uninsured signed up.

They also estimate currently that between 5-8% of people that paid the first month, did not pay the 2nd month.

Of course until the White House puts out detailed records of all this, its all estimates based on polling of the various insurance companies.

And 3 million are, according to the OP site post, recent college grads staying on the parents' insurance longer. This doesn't seem like the population most in need of help in the health area.

Vendzilla · 04-03-2014, 03:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG

And 3 million are, according to the OP site post, recent college grads staying on the parents' insurance longer. This doesn't seem like the population most in need of help in the health area.

Looks like a lot of the uninsured people now getting insured are those that fall into the under 26 that are going to school and get insurance under their parents insurance.

If they don't get the healthy young people they need in the program that don't use insurance, it's going to drive up the cost for those that need it.

Obamacare Insurer WellPoint Sees Double-Digit Rate Rise
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-0...rate-rise.html

12clicks · 04-03-2014, 07:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vvvvv

If you are a republican in the adult business please leave. Because you are an idiot.

you must be a republican as I've never noticed you to be in my business.

Biggy · 04-03-2014, 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Sure.

And? That's not the first time that's ever happened right?

So Republicans are pissed because the other side passed a bill through while they were in control? That's not childish at all.

Legacy? His legacy isn't going to be about healthcare - it's going to be about guiding us out of the recession.

Yes. Because it's a Republican idea.

That's called Democracy. The party who has control gets to pick and choose what they want.

The public was against it? Sure sure. You know, because of the death panels. The smear campaign went on for two years before it became a bill.

So Obamacare is bad and Romeny is fine. Why aren't they fighting Romneycare?

So they were made at Obama so they revolted? Fucking childish. The Republican party is pissed because they lost TWICE to a black man who had never accomplished anything.

Seems to me the only people who hate Obamacare are the Republicans on this board.

I support this because we need something and Obamacare is better than what we had.

Some people will come out ahead, others will pay more. All of us were going to more NO MATTER WHAT so that's still a win.

I really hope so. It will prove exactly how petty the Republican party has become - The Republican party is going to spend years fighting something they created (Romneycare) that has made our healthcare better. If they do repeal this law it will be a huge loss - years and billions wasted only to start from square one all over again.

Obamacare isn't better. The CBO has debunked all that. And the CBO is non-partisan, and their findings seem very logical, so no one is really disputing it. Less jobs, no improvement to how many people are insured, and higher costs.

Not everyone is Republican, I wouldn't qualify myself as Republican although Obama (whom I voted for twice), is certainly pushing me in that direction with his incompetence. A lot of people on this board are likely the same, but got fucked over by Obamacare. If we look at the replies on this board, it seems more people got fucked over by Obamacare than benefitted from it (maybe it's a telling sign).

Democrats are distancing themselves from Obamacare. You don't seem to want to acknowledge that. And the first part of your reply where you said people who dont read bills should go to jail - when I mentioned that Democrats controlled everything and forced it thru, your reply was "thats how democracy works" - so you went from A. "they should go to jail for not reading bills" to B. "this is how democracy works." The reality is you are very partisan, you hate Republicans and don't want to face the facts, or you are so personally invested in the Obamacare situation because of your benefits, you will defend it at any cost even if its illogical where in one moment you say people should go to jail for not reading the bills, to then saying in the next moment that it's how Democracy works and its perfectly OK.

Rochard · 04-03-2014, 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

That is a pretty naive statement; you should watch more C-SPAN if you think congressional debates are made of anything substantial.

If they didn't read the bill before they voted on it, how we did know about the death panels?

I honestly believe that if you think everyone in Congress wasn't fully aware of the bill and what was in, I think you are utterly clueless. This wasn't written up in a few hours, handed to Congress in the morning, and voted on the same afternoon. We had two years of discussions and debates, the bill was written and re-written dozens of times to appease both parties, the bill was examined by dozens of agencies inside and outside of the government, AND it was looked over in detail by the Republican party.

And at the end of the day it all came down to party lines, period. When it was Romneycare the Republicans stood firmly behind it, but now that it's a Democrat bill it's horrible and illegal - Fuck off. That's the bullshit political games.

This bill - now a law - isn't all too bad if you think about it. This law removes "pre exisiting conditions", allows young adults to stay on their parent's plan longer, and has made healthcare easier and less expensive for the people who need it the most. Did it cost some of us more - You betcha, but our healthcare insurance always goes up so that's not much of an issue. Did people have their plans canceled - you betcha, but this happens every year and it's called open enrollment.

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

Have you used your new policy yet?

In fact, we have not.

The costs for our healthcare went down all across the board. We get our healthcare through my wife's work, and before in the past healthcare costs were so expensive that my wife's employer could not afford to cover all three of us so only my wife was covered. Now the overall costs have come down, plus my wife's work has new incentive to provide coverage so we now are all covered.

We have Kaiser Permanente, the same plan we've had for years.

2MuchMark · 04-03-2014, 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly

Ahhh. You see the world as black and white. You and George Dubya have more in common than you would like to admit.

Ugh... not at all..

Obamacare, Climate change / Global warming, Voting laws etc, are all very complicated. There are millions of "where as"'s and "therefore"'s in every law and it is something few people outside the governments that few people will fully understand.

What I am trying to do is boil it all down, to the elected officials that have the job with explaining the situation to the population, and who you trust to deliver the honest message.

Clearly, people don't trust republicans, and others don't trust democrats, or other various groups.

So then: Forgetting the groups, who do you, Sly, trust in government, to tell you the truth about what you want to know? Please name 1 person about 1 subject, and lets take it from there.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla

I'm back, what did I miss?

Welcome back.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla

Every party has it's nuts and fruits, judging a party by the actions of one of them is naive..

Thats fine and I agree with you, but it doesn't really answer my question and not to be rude, but it this is now the second time you have dodged the question. My question again to you is, "How can republican lawmakers, be expected to be taken seriously, when they talk like this?" (Referring to the video clips I posted)

Or if you want, answer the question I put to Sly: Who do you trust in government, to tell you the truth about what you want to know?

I'm not attacking you or poking you for anything.

PornoMonster · 04-03-2014, 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by **********

Ugh... not at all..

Obamacare, Climate change / Global warming, Voting laws etc, are all very complicated. There are millions of "where as"'s and "therefore"'s in every law and it is something few people outside the governments that few people will fully understand.

What I am trying to do is boil it all down, to the elected officials that have the job with explaining the situation to the population, and who you trust to deliver the honest message.

Clearly, people don't trust republicans, and others don't trust democrats, or other various groups.

So then: Forgetting the groups, who do you, Sly, trust in government, to tell you the truth about what you want to know? Please name 1 person about 1 subject, and lets take it from there.

Welcome back.

Thats fine and I agree with you, but it doesn't really answer my question and not to be rude, but it this is now the second time you have dodged the question. My question again to you is, "How can republican lawmakers, be expected to be taken seriously, when they talk like this?" (Referring to the video clips I posted)

Or if you want, answer the question I put to Sly: Who do you trust in government, to tell you the truth about what you want to know?

I'm not attacking you or poking you for anything.

There are quite a few idiots on BOTH sides.
I am embarrassed that Both sides let these people speak, so the entire world can see them. Heck, that they even are in a position the hold...

slabsurfer · 04-03-2014, 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by geedub

Yea, working... If that's what you wanna call it.

My thoughts exactly

crockett · 04-03-2014, 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG

Crockett and I super duper agree here.

Anything called reform should have addressed this.

If hospitals charged a normal markup, someone like your friend would have been able to just tighten his belt and sell a few toys to pay the bill for surgery, not be deterred and destroyed by the cost.

The problem the govt is dealing with when it comes to any sort of meaningful reform is like I mentioned in the other topic in relation to insurance. The govt has to deal with the current market place.

Just like the govt wouldn't go in and nationalize the county's oil fields and refineries or set a maximum price on a gallon of gas, they can't exactly do that with the health sector or insurance either.

Countries that do those kinds of things are dictatorships in most cases. As a so called free society we have to work around various markets that have been created over time due to the status qua. We can't force private companies into that situation instantly. We have to slowly push them in that direction giving them time and ability to change their business models.

Sure it's would be more beneficial for the people to just turn everything into a free system single payer system where anyone could walk into any hospital or doctors office and get treatment doing away with massive bills that put people into bankruptcy and ending the useless leech system that is the health insurance market.

We simply can't do that as a free and open society.

IMO the current Obamacare set up is sort of a stop gap system that is necessary to deal with the insurance problem. It will eventually lead us to a single payer system IMO.

The hospital situation is another situation completely. Obama care wasn't a bill to reform the entire healthcare system, but rather to get people access to healthcare.

Expecting Obamacare to reform the entire system is asking too much of it from the start. It will help drive the costs down but separate or additional reform is needed in that area. A good start would be making a regulation that requires hospitals to show up front what they charge for procedures and make them justify charging people $50 for a aspirin and explain who that is not the same as say price gouging during a national disaster.

slapass · 04-03-2014, 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z

It'll be interesting to see how they handle the penalty.

There were an estimated 30 million uninsured. I'm sure most of this 7.1 million previously had insurance anyway.

I only have anecdotal evidence but it has helped some of my friends so I know at least some people are using it as intended.

Robbie · 04-03-2014, 10:21 AM

crockett...I don't know who hacked your account. But whomever it was is making good sense.

crockett · 04-03-2014, 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornoMonster

There are quite a few idiots on BOTH sides.
I am embarrassed that Both sides let these people speak, so the entire world can see them. Heck, that they even are in a position the hold...

The fact that they are voted into office, tells you a lot about the people living in the areas that voted them into office. It's one thing if someone does a stupid or crazy thing once they were in office. Michele Bachmann was clearly a lunatic before she was elected and people of Iowa still voted her into office. It's not like she turned bat shit crazy over night, so that kinda scares me thinking of the people whom actually voted her into office.

TheSquealer · 04-03-2014, 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by **********

My question again to you is, "How can republican lawmakers, be expected to be taken seriously, when they talk like this?" (Referring to the video clips I posted)
.

This again is the world through the filters of your own bias. All republicans are not one person nor are they the comments of one person and there is just as much stupidity on the democratic side which you ignore because again, you are biased towards democrats. In fact, you continually malign 1/2 of the population of the country, never once stopping to consider the magnitude of the math involved or pondering why its all so confusing to you, that you so easily conclude like so many that 1/2 a nation must be "crazy". This is an example of how you continue to press the same old point. "that team = bad".... "my team = good" (ironically, you aren't technically on either team)

Its all not that complicated.

Since you are a fan of science, i will attempt to explain a bit of well studied science for you.

We are all biased towards our views.

You can say "lets take bias out of it" but what you do not really understand or don't want to accept is that is absolutely 100% impossible. Bias is not a conscious filter. Its unconscious... meaning before you become consciously aware of anything at all, the information has ALREADY passed through all your mental filters and become distorted and perverted to suit your pre-determined narratives and beliefs. This is in part, what makes scientific study difficult and what makes removing bias from a study difficult. I would guess you at least understand that.

You don't have to dig too far to find countless studies of unconscious bias in psychology and neuroscience.... not to mention many many attempts to use them in court. Every single person here that says they are not biased against anything... say "black people",... including black people are lying. They are not intentionally lying... they just don't know. They don't have conscious access to that information. They only have the socially acceptable answers they give and the fabrications (confabulations) they use to defend those answers. And when measured and tested, the results are very very consistent across the board and across tests and across races and cultures.

So... you are biased to see things one way. I am biased to see things another. It's fine. It's exactly how human beings are designed. There is a reason you deny it. And that reason is one of the many which makes the most incredible living thing designed by nature (your brain) so advanced and downright incredible to see in action. It's actually one of the very reasons that true artificial intelligence has yet to be created and likely won't be in our lifetimes.... because our brain is not a computer. It is a million man, multi party legislative body, arguing furiously about every single choice and action and finding the winning argument of millions of arguments with every single decision or action.

You are in denial because it is actually how your brain itself is designed. And for your own survival and that of the tribe, its actually better this way. Much much better. Decisions are much much better. When you make decisions, you have no access to the actual decision making process. When someone offers you 1000.00 to take a cock in the ass on film... you're brain lights up with neural activity and literally millions of decision centers go into action weighing pro's and con's and battling it out. The only thing you are consciously aware of is the final 1 or 2 winning arguments... and with that, conscious thinking becomes the final arbiter. In terms of conscious thinking, you then falsely take credit for a winning argument that you had nothing to do with which simply popped into conscious awareness. Neuroscientist David Eagleman refers to the decision making processes of the brain as a "team of rivals". The best decisions are not made by full agreement on all sides. The best decisions are made by brutal battles where every single point is made and heard and the winning argument rises to the top. To argue.. you need arrogance and confidence in your argument no matter how lopsided or misguided and flat out wrong it may be.

This, no matter what anyone wants to believe, actually mirrors our political system.

You are not special.

You are not enlightened.

You are just ignorant of how the brain actually works and what drives peoples behaviors.

But its not your fault because you don't understand the mental processes involved... you simply react to stimuli like a rodent seeking cheese or escaping danger. And you should. That too, is by design. The brain is costly to run and though insanely efficient, your brain doesn't want to know a whole lot beyond matters directly pertaining to survival and reproduction. Conscious thinking is also slow, clunky and costly in terms of energy spent. It's more energy efficient to cling to a narrative and set of beliefs and dismiss anything which calls them into question.

So... like all, you are so sure of yourself and your own ideas and views as you ignore your own bias', give more weight to your own points and less weight to those against you, more weight to those on your team and less to those on the other.... as you lift your team up and put them on a pedestal and look at the other as the cause of every problem known to man.

That's what teams do. Teams "blind and bind". This again is the brilliance of our design and the human brain. Teams don't need to agree. They are not effective when they agree. When everyone in the tribe agrees that they will have peace for 1000 years... thats when they weaken their security and someone swoops in to destroy them. You need voices expressing all concerns and all sides of the argument with equal veracity. The more people agree, the more blind they become to the possibilities (and future genetic consequences) of being wrong.

You are nothing more than one voice in a sea of millions contributing to an argument with the same old self righteous "my team = good".. "your team = bad", "my team = right"... "your team = wrong" self assured, misguided and deluded arrogance that everyone else has on every. You are a tiny cog in a machine fulfilling your role, never realizing at all that you make no difference whatsoever and change no minds.

A wise person can step back and observe and appreciate the whole process for what it is. An ignorant person only has their own biased narrative and plays their own largely irrelevant role... for the greater good of the group "....a poor player, that struts and frets his hour upon the stage, and then is heard no more. It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing."

Rochard · 04-03-2014, 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

The problem the govt is dealing with when it comes to any sort of meaningful reform is like I mentioned in the other topic in relation to insurance. The govt has to deal with the current market place.

Just like the govt wouldn't go in and nationalize the county's oil fields and refineries or set a maximum price on a gallon of gas, they can't exactly do that with the health sector or insurance either.

Countries that do those kinds of things are dictatorships in most cases. As a so called free society we have to work around various markets that have been created over time due to the status qua. We can't force private companies into that situation instantly. We have to slowly push them in that direction giving them time and ability to change their business models.

Sure it's would be more beneficial for the people to just turn everything into a free system single payer system where anyone could walk into any hospital or doctors office and get treatment doing away with massive bills that put people into bankruptcy and ending the useless leech system that is the health insurance market.

We simply can't do that as a free and open society.

IMO the current Obamacare set up is sort of a stop gap system that is necessary to deal with the insurance problem. It will eventually lead us to a single payer system IMO.

The hospital situation is another situation completely. Obama care wasn't a bill to reform the entire healthcare system, but rather to get people access to healthcare.

Expecting Obamacare to reform the entire system is asking too much of it from the start. It will help drive the costs down but separate or additional reform is needed in that area. A good start would be making a regulation that requires hospitals to show up front what they charge for procedures and make them justify charging people $50 for a aspirin and explain who that is not the same as say price gouging during a national disaster.

That's a pretty good post really.

Society has come to expect "instant gratification" and this is rarely the case. You don't become CEO of a company like Ford or General Motors and suddenly the company is making a profit two months later - It just doesn't work like that.

When Obamaboy become President, for the first two years people were like "Why hasn't he fixed this yet?". It's not an instant fix - Our economy was a mess and it's not something that is going to be fixed two years.

The Healthcare law is the first step towards making changes in our healthcare system. There are some real benefits coming out of Obamacare, but instead of being thankful for the positive half of the country is focusing on the negative. If your car gets a flat tire on the side of the road, do you fix the flat or do you sit on the side of the road bitching and crying for two years? Not sure about you, but I expect our government to fix the problems not buy me a new car.

Rochard · 04-03-2014, 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

The fact that they are voted into office, tells you a lot about the people living in the areas that voted them into office. It's one thing if someone does a stupid or crazy thing once they were in office. Michele Bachmann was clearly a lunatic before she was elected and people of Iowa still voted her into office. It's not like she turned bat shit crazy over night, so that kinda scares me thinking of the people whom actually voted her into office.

Politics is amazing.

Think about this for a second - How did Obama become president? He was an unknown Senator with no major accomplishments what so ever. How did he ever get nominated?

Bachman? That was a joke. Seriously, she was added in there just for giggles. Palin isn't much better.

I'm not saying that Obama has done bad, but I wonder if I was wrong about Romney. Thinking back he was so much more qualified. Who is more qualified - a Senator that never accomplished anything or a governor who has accomplished a lot? Makes you wonder.

Barry-xlovecam · 04-03-2014, 12:05 PM

Quote:

The Economic Stabilization Act of 1970 was passed, inaugurating a policy of wage and price controls. Nixon stated in a letter that he wrote to Congress for full support of this act "Our tactics for pursuing this objective are twofold: First, to accomplish much needed and long overdue reform of the manpower programs set up under the Manpower Development and Training Act and subsequent legislation and thus increase their effectiveness in enhancing the employability of jobless workers; and, second, to move toward a broader national manpower policy which will be an important adjunct of economic policy in achieving our Nation's economic and social objectives".[4]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economi...on_Act_of_1970

The Emergency Petroleum Allocation Act of 1973 (EPAA) was a U.S. law that required the President to promulgate regulations for allocation and price controls of petroleum products in response to the 1973 oil crisis.

It was extended by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975. Regulations were withdrawn by President Reagan in Executive Order 12287 of January 28, 1981.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economi...ublic_benefits

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergen...Allocation_Act

Quote:

Just like the govt wouldn't go in and nationalize the county's oil fields and refineries or set a maximum price on a gallon of gas, they can't exactly do that with the health sector or insurance either.

Say what?

Can the Federal government declare a national crisis in healthcare availability and become the biggest competitor for healthcare in the marketplace -- you betcha!

Rochard · 04-03-2014, 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

Say what?
Can the Federal government declare a national crisis in healthcare availability and become the biggest competitor for healthcare in the marketplace -- you betcha!

Sure thing. The President signed a bill into a law and it's been two years of lawsuits - Can you just fucking imagine what they would do if Obama tried that?

04-02-2014, 04:53 PM	#111
arock10 Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 6,218	I can only imagine how social security was when it was first passed. "What you are going to take my money so I can't touch it until I'm 60??? This is terrible!" __________________ Sup

04-02-2014, 10:53 PM	#127
PornDiscounts-V Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: L.A. Posts: 5,744	If you are a republican in the adult business please leave. Because you are an idiot. __________________ Blog Posts - Contextual Links - Hardlinks on 600+ Blog Network * Handwritten * 180 C Class IPs * Permanent! * Many Niches! * Bulk Discounts! GFYPosts /at/ J2Media.net

04-02-2014, 11:41 PM	#133
Emma Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: England Posts: 2,288	Social Security is here to stay, until it changes ... try taking it away. __________________ $250 welcome bonus!

04-03-2014, 10:21 AM	#144
Robbie Leaner, Meaner, Faster Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Vegas Posts: 20,959	crockett...I don't know who hacked your account. But whomever it was is making good sense. __________________ -Robbie ClaudiaMarie.Com

04-02-2014, 08:21 PM	#123
noshit Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Midwest USA Posts: 1,582	No clue for six months and suddenly they know to a decimal point how many signed up lol Then they celebrate the lie to tell you how stupid they think you are It must be the same 7 million non-existent voters from 2012

04-02-2014, 11:20 PM	#131
RandyRandy Clips still sell! Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Crown Heights, Brooklyn Posts: 1,708	I don't think that 7 million sign-ups, however pathetic that may be, is the important number. Why isn't anyone mentioning that less than a million have actually paid a premium so far. This is not sustainable in any way, shape or form.