GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Fact: Russia is facist state, Putin is close to repeat Hitler's fame (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1134699)

awm521218521 03-02-2014 11:31 AM

Quote:

Al-Qaida was behind 9/11, the hundreds of thousands of people that died or got mutilated in Afghanistan and Iraq were not. And we had troops in both wars just like did many other European countries, so don't take this as me attacking the Americans or something of that sort.
Ukraine nationalist leader calls on 'most wanted' terrorist Umarov 'to act against Russia'
rt.com/news/yarosh-nationalist-address-umarov-380/
Umarov=Al-Qaida

pornmasta 03-02-2014 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by awm521218521 (Post 20001619)
Ukraine nationalist leader calls on 'most wanted' terrorist Umarov 'to act against Russia'
rt.com/news/yarosh-nationalist-address-umarov-380/
Umarov=Al-Qaida

http://rt.com/news/yarosh-nationalis...ss-umarov-380/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Count_Dooku

MaDalton 03-02-2014 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20001479)
Is there anybody who said that life in Eastern Germany was better than in the Western one? Is there anybody who said that life in the USSR was better than life in Russian Federation? Nobody wants to live under commies or any other political ideology :2 cents:

what now - just recently you praised all the good things the russians brought to these countries

cant be between 1945 and 1949 - in that time russians took down all industry they could get their hands on and raped and pillaged their way through former german areas (btw - the rape thing is still kept under the rug - my grandmother could tell you a different story if she was still alive)

between 1949 and 1989 the eastern german government were puppets directed by the soviet union - which you just said was inferior to western germany (hard to deny when you look at the state of the country and industry in 1989)

and you can't mean after 1991 either - recently in Cuba someone told me how he ate banana peels due to a hunger epidemic because in that time russia had too many of their own problems to send food to them

btw - i have absolutely no problems with Russia and Russian people - nor do i have a problem with anyone else

but from a national pride point of view, you and Vendzilla are on the same level now - with equally absurd arguments from time to time

(and please spare me the "the germans did this and that too" arguments, i know all that already. we have like 10 documentaries about 33-45 on TV every day)

klinton 03-02-2014 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 20001652)
but from a national pride point of view, you and Vendzilla are on the same level now - with equally absurd arguments from time to time

I would say - rather Rochard's...the only difference is that one of them is retarded, the other is cynical ;-)
(now you may guess who is who/what :1orglaugh)

just a punk 03-02-2014 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 20001652)
what now - just recently you praised all the good things the russians brought to these countries

Is my English that bad? I didn't say anything about Russians (if I did please do a favor and quote me). I was talking about the USSR which was as Russian as the whole EU is German. Also if you read my posts carefully, you'll see that I told exactly the folowing: Eastern Europe after Soviet control has ended up much better than Iraq or Libya after the US "liberation". Evil Soviets were noе even close to the modern USA that killing people left and right around the Globe in the name of the freedom and democracy :2 cents:

P.S. Personally you live in a free world only because 6 millions (approximately) of Soviet soldiers have lost their lives fighting Nazis. Don't forget that.

awm521218521 03-02-2014 12:11 PM

Quote:

what now - just recently you praised all the good things the russians brought to these countries
Russia empire start at kiev :1orglaugh

klinton 03-02-2014 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20001683)
P.S. Personally you live in a free world only because 6 millions (approximately) of Soviet soldiers have lost their lives fighting Nazis. Don't forget that.

don't forget about aid from US during WW2 to USSR...it helped too :)

awm521218521 03-02-2014 12:19 PM

Quote:

don't forget about aid from US during WW2 to USSR...it helped too
we remember that :thumbsup

awm521218521 03-02-2014 12:24 PM

Quote:

my grandmother could tell you a different story if she was still alive
mine too, and my relatives in Germany too will tell as they became relatives with Germans. and about rapes too.
Quote:

i have absolutely no problems with Russia and Russian people - nor do i have a problem with anyone else
+100500

mineistaken 03-02-2014 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kolargol (Post 20001426)
Easier to compare East and West Germany - if someone saw these two countries in 1990 (I did) it was very easy to say which one was under Soviet occupation.

Indeed. Before WW2 Eastern Europe was not lagging tat much behind in Europe. And then Soviets came and destroyed the economy, installed bad mentality (slacking at work, stealing from work, drinking etc etc) which lead to complete decline of economy. Not speaking about decline in morals.
Yet some stupid fuck is claiming that soviets actually helped those countries.
Seriously, how much of brain dead idiot you must be to spit fantasies like that? :Oh crap

awm521218521 03-02-2014 12:53 PM

Quote:

Soviets came
don't go to ussr and they won't come to you - everything simply :1orglaugh

klinton 03-02-2014 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 20001717)
.....installed bad mentality (slacking at work, stealing from work, drinking etc etc) which lead to complete decline of economy. Not speaking about decline in morals.

they've been drinking in Eastern Europe also before Soviets ;-)

Sid70 03-02-2014 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornmasta (Post 20000591)
i think that you are not an election

Yes, I'm not, I happened to happily miss the Soviet Man DNA wreckage a lot of people
suffered and keep suffering as I can see.

Sid70 03-02-2014 02:08 PM

Shit started boiling long ago actually.

Putin sent a fuckturd Yanukovich to get his hands on Ukraine. But Yuschenko took over to please people, I believe it was Putin's plan B - get a "good" cop Yuschenko instead to be a president. Then Yuschenko had betrayed the opposition taking Yanukovich aboard as a Prime Minister ( dafuk is that if its not a betrayal? ). Now Yuschenko lives his happy ever after - sonomabitch!

All this time Putin and Yanukovich have been robbing Ukraine and the people. People, especially, retards in the east were unable to find a job or make a decent living due to their con nature, so they went on and on and started to believe Yanukovich who always spoke their retard language, and I dont even mean Russian but the language of the retarded masses in the Eastern Ukraine.

just a punk 03-02-2014 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sid70 (Post 20001822)
Putin sent a fuckturd Yanukovich to get his hands on Ukraine.

Putin sent him, you have voted for him. So who is an idiot there?

Sid70 03-02-2014 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20001830)
Putin sent him, you have voted for him. So who is an idiot there?

I did not, and nobody I know did. It did the Russian political technology via Eastern Ukrainian corruption mechanism. Educate yourself, as you love to say.

just a punk 03-02-2014 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sid70 (Post 20001834)
I did not, and nobody I know did. It did the Russian political technology via Eastern Ukrainian corruption mechanism. Educate yourself, as you love to say.

LOL :1orglaugh Yanukovich was elected when all political technologies on Ukraine were driven by Yushenko (the "hero" of your Maidan). Corruption you say? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

directfiesta 03-02-2014 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20001583)
The people directly responsible for this were in Afghanistan. And when the US came knocking instead of assistance, we were told "no". No matter how you try to spin it, al qaeda was behind 9/11, and at that time al qaeda was in Afghanistan.

Sorry, but Atta and his crew were taking flight lessons in the US of A .... , going to strips joints and so on ... So, as I said, I could spin and say:
Quote:

People in the USA attacked civilians in the US , killing thousands ....
The Afghani people have no responsability in 9/11.

pornmasta 03-02-2014 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 20001872)
The Afghani people have no responsability in 9/11.

and the talibans ?

directfiesta 03-02-2014 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornmasta (Post 20001874)
and the talibans ?

... and the Republicans ?????

PS: Talibans were in power, but not controlling a lot of the territory ( just like now in Afghanistan and/or Pakistan ) .

pornmasta 03-02-2014 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 20001883)
... and the Republicans ?????

PS: Talibans were in power, but not controlling a lot of the territory ( just like now in Afghanistan and/or Pakistan ) .

they were winning the war against massoud...

Rochard 03-02-2014 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 20001872)
:
The Afghani people have no responsability in 9/11.

That might be true.

You can argue that the Afghani people allowed the Taliban to take control of the country, and the Taliban allowed and even encouraged Al-Qaeda to attack the US.

The US didn't attack the Afghani people. We attacked the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. I don't recall many reports of US troops attacking Afghanis; I'm currently reading The Outpost by Jake Tapper and they haven't mentioned that yet.

You seem to saying that the US did not have the right to attack Afghanistan. Thousands of Americans died for no reason, billions of dollars of damage and... You expected us to do what? Nothing?

pornmasta 03-02-2014 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20002009)
That might be true.

You can argue that the Afghani people allowed the Taliban to take control of the country, and the Taliban allowed and even encouraged Al-Qaeda to attack the US.

The US didn't attack the Afghani people. We attacked the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. I don't recall many reports of US troops attacking Afghanis; I'm currently reading The Outpost by Jake Tapper and they haven't mentioned that yet.

You seem to saying that the US did not have the right to attack Afghanistan. Thousands of Americans died for no reason, billions of dollars of damage and... You expected us to do what? Nothing?

and what would you do if you were putin ?
think about syria and venezuela

Rochard 03-02-2014 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornmasta (Post 20002013)
and what would you do if you were putin ?
think about syria and venezuela

What would I do if I was Putin? Dunno. I fail to understand Putin and what he is doing here. If Putin wants Crimea, it would be a lot easier to do it peacefully than by force. Seems seventy percent of Crimea identifies themselves with Russia, and if that is the case have a vote and if the people of Crimea want to become a Russian state (or whatever) then they can go - willingly.

Odd how this hasn't been an issue since 1954 and suddenly it's so important that Ukraine has to be invaded?

Syria.... LOL. Best case scenario for Russia is the Syrian government wins, has sanctions for the next fifty years, and is hated by most of their people.

Venezuela... That's two fistfuls of crazy right there. This new government has taken over all of the major companies and is slowly running everything into the ground. They can't fucking keep TP in stock. Volkswagon refuses to send parts to it's own Volkswagon plant because Venezuela has used up all of it's credit and is not getting any more.

Fuck Syria and fuck Venezuela - Let the Russians help them out.

pornmasta 03-02-2014 06:15 PM

Well here is my opinion (i'm not pro putin but i would perhaps do the same thing):

- First: we have syria, venezuela and ukraine: they are more and less friends with Russia (at least when Ianoukovitch was the leader)
In a short period of time these countries had revolutions and it seems to be revolutions that benefit to the USA or the Europe side. It involves a loss of power for russia while putin like to show his muscles.
This is just not the image of Russia he wants to give to the world: he wants to looks strong but his allies are taken down by forces that are not for him.
This is the first reason why i would show "my" muscles too: to keep my influence, to show that i'm here and that i'm a country that matters.

-2 During the war in libya there was a vote at the UN security council.
They voted to prevent a massacre and in fact France (UK too i think), used this as an excuse to sustain a revolution.
So... we lied in our diplomaty and we tried to restart the same trick with syria.
This could be seen as an insult toward china and russia, 2 countries that want to be leaders meanwhile we have here in europe an economic crisis. We were already playing with them.

3- Do you know what you can do when you think that you are getting economically weaker ?
Well, if you have still a good army, you can try to expand your influence and this is what... france did in libya, but also in mali and in Central African Republic (yes, they speak french, so we have to help them, don't worry their opponents aren't very strong and there is a lot of guys of these countries in our armies...).
Who claimed here that france is hitler ? We are doing the same thing...
Oh yes, there is terrorists...
Of course, USA is used to do this too...

Even for france, being a totally downgraded country is not an option for us too...
(You can expect here a problem of ressources that USA and Russia won't have or at least far later).

China and Russia understand our politics like this too, so they have to prevent a loss of influence because of OUR wars.
You can try to manipulate civilians with the same goal, it is even cheaper.
Since we have 3 countries of the russian block that have a revolution in a short period of time, they can imo legitimately find this as an imperialistic move...
This is also why i think that WE started these aggressions, even if i would probably do the same thing here too (it is just playing with other pawns)

-4
Quote:

"If Putin wants Crimea, it would be a lot easier to do it peacefully than by force. Seems seventy percent of Crimea identifies themselves with Russia"
So like i wrote before, putin wants to show his muscles, so this is the first reason to come with an army, perhaps at least to prevent a further agression: i don't think he will stop and i wouldn't stop either.
Second reason: there is revolutions in countries that are his allies and i think he understand that russia is the next in the list, so if you feel menaced you strike before it's too late and at least before you are too weak yourself !
(It's weird that suddently gays are friends of our countries, they seem to be a good excuse for diplomacy)
I think that his goal is not war but the goal is to impress its opponents: it's a stop signal.

3rd reason: there is revolutions among his allies, so he can comes and explain "i have to protect the russians in crimea" + urkrainians removed to russian as langage, so these russians speaking ukrainian could feel rejected/unsulted.
I heard that many of them are only russian-speaking.
There is a legitimate reason to expect a revolution is crimea and putin can come and explain that he is here to prevent it.

conclusion: expect 2 blocks in a near future...

nnweb 03-02-2014 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornmasta (Post 20002059)
Second reason: there is revolutions in countries that are his allies and i think he understand that russia is the next in the list

This is probably his main reason. Let his people know who is in control.

He has Russians so brain washed I don't see it happening anytime soon.

pornmasta 03-02-2014 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nnweb (Post 20002075)
This is probably his main reason. Let his people know who is in control.

He has Russians so brain washed I don't see it happening anytime soon.

in fact promoting revolutions is cheaper than a war.
Yes this is WWIII, a generalized civil war

ZiggiZiggiCrew 03-02-2014 09:50 PM

неполживые сми фиксируют просто ниибический всплеск патриатизма в Украине
http://www.gazeta.ru/politics/2014/0..._5933409.shtml

цитатко:
"? Повестки нет, но есть информация, что российские войска введены через границу Украины, поэтому как гражданин Украины я обязан ее защитить, ? отвечает доброволец"

откуда инфа? ну не могут же украинские сми тиражировать заведомую ложь! НЕ ВЕРЮЮЮЮЮ!

"еще цитатко"
"В праворадикальной организации «Правый сектор», которая объявила мобилизацию по всем регионам, заявили, что будут координировать свои действия с Вооруженными силами Украины, СБУ и МВД.
«Правый сектор» проводит настоящие боевые учения уже второй день. Бойцы учатся вести войну в городе, обращаться с оружием, участвуют в стрельбах."

вообще-то это называется незаконными вооруженными формированиями. В Украине не так? Не эти ли, как политкорректно выражаются на данном форуме англоязычные коллеги unarmed demonstrators, стреляли из снайперок по беркуту?

Sid, а ты записался добровольцем? или тока такие фигуры можешь клятым москалям демонстрировать?
https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/i...7zb9EGtxWdfiFI

Matyko 03-02-2014 10:06 PM

Putin is an evil piece of shit. Free Ukraine!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :pimp

directfiesta 03-02-2014 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20002009)
That might be true.

You can argue that the Afghani people allowed the Taliban to take control of the country, and the Taliban allowed and even encouraged Al-Qaeda to attack the US.

The US didn't attack the Afghani people. We attacked the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. I don't recall many reports of US troops attacking Afghanis; I'm currently reading The Outpost by Jake Tapper and they haven't mentioned that yet.

You seem to saying that the US did not have the right to attack Afghanistan. Thousands of Americans died for no reason, billions of dollars of damage and... You expected us to do what? Nothing?

You are just twisting pseudo-facts and repeating urban legends.

First, the US were doing business with the talibans ( you need pic to be posted again ?)
Secondly, the talibans were not supporting al-quaeda ... ( let's say they were, don't you find it strange that no afghani is part of the plot ...)

Thirdly:

Quote:



theguardian.com, Sunday 14 October 2001 17.19 EDT

President George Bush rejected as "non-negotiable" an offer by the Taliban to discuss turning over Osama bin Laden if the United States ended the bombing in Afghanistan.
I would think that the bombs were landing on afghanis , no ...?

pornmasta 03-02-2014 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 20002258)

I would think that the bombs were landing on afghanis , no ...?

on terrorists and on terrorist states
then they changed their goals because the project was frightening.

just a punk 03-02-2014 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20002009)
The US didn't attack the Afghani people. We attacked the Taliban and Al-Qaeda.

What??? Al-Qaeda was created by CIA. I.e. it's your own product. Don't blame Afghans, blame Ronald Reagan and his administration. Blame the USA.


directfiesta 03-02-2014 11:15 PM

http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/...pakistan-role/

just a punk 03-02-2014 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornmasta (Post 20002059)
Second reason: there is revolutions in countries that are his allies and i think he understand that russia is the next in the list, so if you feel menaced you strike before it's too late and at least before you are too weak yourself !

Perhaps he's really afraid of that but this won't happen. People here are not poor anymore and they have a lot to lose. So nobody wants a revolution here. Even extremely ant-Putin persons like Navalny. They say: Russian needs evolution but not revolution.

Ukraine is a very poor country and the people are completely desperate there. They are ready for everything. Russian citizens is another story. Even Chechens don't want to separate anymore.

Quote:

Originally Posted by nnweb (Post 20002075)
He has Russians so brain washed I don't see it happening anytime soon.

You said brainwashed? Really? What exactly makes you think so? I'm very curious...

just a punk 03-02-2014 11:33 PM

Jewish expert about Ukraine:



:2 cents:

Jakke PNG 03-03-2014 01:58 AM

http://weknowmemes.com/wp-content/up...visits-you.jpg

just a punk 03-03-2014 02:04 AM

Nice one :)

Cherry7 03-03-2014 02:14 AM

The Russians liberated Eastern Europe, they did not plan to invade Eastern Europe it was a result of the nazi attack on them.

They controlled the defence and foreign policy but allowed a the local communist parties a free hand in domestic policy.

The Poland I know in the 70s had a lot to say for it. Full Employment, housing for everyone, free education, free health service, very cheap transport. A polish TV, film industry, books and music.

No advertising - Do you know how great it is to live with no fucking advertising? Advertising is brainwashing.

Polish people were far better informed about the world than the world was about them.

Polish people would see hundreds of American TV programs, Films and books...

How many Polish works have Americans seen?

Was everyone happy ? were there no problems? of course not ...the problems we all hear about non stop a lot of them were real....

But is you have a job and a house it is better than having to leave your country to find work in London living in one room with your wife and kid.

MasterBlow 03-03-2014 02:30 AM

http://rt.com/files/news/22/e6/10/00/23.jpg

It's all about Crimea. The majority of those living in Crimea region are ethnic Russians,almost 1.200.000.

klinton 03-03-2014 02:51 AM

not if you: have job, yet can't buy anything as there (almost) no products on the market
at that was how the situation looked from 1978 :1orglaugh
so i would say: it was different, it wasnt genocide,they build roads, gave education & medcare, but now is better :P a lot of possibilities and choices
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherry7 (Post 20002373)
But is you have a job and a house it is better than having to leave your country to find work in London living in one room with your wife and kid.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123