So does Minte have to pay more taxes now? - Page 6 - GoFuckYourself.com

epitome · 11-09-2012, 10:16 AM

I think everyone would agree that if Minte does for employees what he says he does we need Republicans like him to take back their party.

Since I never see Minte weigh in one way or another on social issues seems like he is the live and let live type.

Minte for President in 16!

Slappin Fish · 11-09-2012, 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

Absolutely. Spending will still go way way up..

sperbonzo · 11-09-2012, 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slappin Fish

How about straight from the CBO.

And I don't care if it's the Dems or the Republicans doing it. It has to stop.

It HAS to stop. Or it will simply stop on it's own. And that won't be pretty....

Slappin Fish · 11-09-2012, 10:49 AM

You said two things. spending will still go way way up and debt will skyrocket. I argued the former, you seem to be under the impression I've argued the latter (which I agree with).

tony286 · 11-09-2012, 11:00 AM

The debt too high crowd, should be embracing this. Raises taxes to pre bush cut rates and cut all programs 20 percent. If you want to cut the debt this should do the trick.

Relentless · 11-09-2012, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by epitome

Minte for President in 16!

Minte and I differ on many issues, but I have zero doubt he wants what is best for the country and would work toward that goal with as much determination as I would. I wouldn't vote for him because our views differ, but if he got elected I wouldn't have a feeling of panic and anger over it the way I did when GWB was elected.

I miss the days of being able to favor one candidate without having to fear the other. My main hope for 2016 is two candidates who are not crazy or dangerous. So we can choose one and still respect the other. Hillary Vs. Christie or Bloomberg for example...

Robbie · 11-09-2012, 11:05 AM

I saw on the news that the "Fiscal Cliff" (which is nothing more than the program Congress passed and the President signed and CONGRATULATED themselves on doing...that puts in automatic cuts and ends the Bush tax cuts for everyone) will only cut 600 billion dollars...OVER TEN YEARS!

What the fuck??? That means this horrible, dreadful "fiscal cliff" (that Congress was saying was a great thing just a year ago), will only cut the spending by $60 billion a year.

What a fucking joke.

The Feds are spending 10.6 billion dollars a DAY.

That means that with this big, bad "fiscal cliff" they will only cut what they spend in 5 days for the whole year.

Washington D.C. is nothing more than a pack of thieves. Career politicians who don't know how to stop spending.

sperbonzo · 11-09-2012, 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286

The debt too high crowd, should be embracing this. Raises taxes to pre bush cut rates and cut all programs 20 percent. If you want to cut the debt this should do the trick.

The cuts will never happen. They will be SEEN to be happening, by using base-line accounting, Q.E., and other tricks, but nothing will actually be cut IMHO

.

SmutHammer · 11-09-2012, 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless

Minte and I differ on many issues, but I have zero doubt he wants what is best for the country and would work toward that goal with as much determination as I would. I wouldn't vote for him because our views differ, but if he got elected I wouldn't have a feeling of panic and anger over it the way I did when GWB was elected.

I miss the days of being able to favor one candidate without having to fear the other. My main hope for 2016 is two candidates who are not crazy or dangerous. So we can choose one and still respect the other. Hillary Vs. Christie or Bloomberg for example...

Christie is a clown, Nobody would vote for him.

Look at Hillary in just the last few years, At this rate 4 more years and she will be in a hospital bed.

Neither of them would make a decent president

selena · 11-09-2012, 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless

Minte and I differ on many issues, but I have zero doubt he wants what is best for the country and would work toward that goal with as much determination as I would. I wouldn't vote for him because our views differ, but if he got elected I wouldn't have a feeling of panic and anger over it the way I did when GWB was elected.

I miss the days of being able to favor one candidate without having to fear the other. My main hope for 2016 is two candidates who are not crazy or dangerous. So we can choose one and still respect the other. Hillary Vs. Christie or Bloomberg for example...

That's well said. I read something remotely like it the other day. The poster was saying that when comparing a little left to dangerous right that they would vote left every time, even though they personal considered themselves to be conservative.

fistinface · 11-09-2012, 11:14 AM

I am not entirely sure Rochard is able to read what people say before he forms an opinion on what they said (in his head that is.)

Relentless · 11-09-2012, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by selena

That's well said. I read something remotely like it the other day. The poster was saying that when comparing a little left to dangerous right that they would vote left every time, even though they personal considered themselves to be conservative.

That's me exactly... I would love to vote Republican and used to often... in the last few elections it's not possible. GWB, Bachman, Santorum, Cain, Romney, Palin.... the Dems could run almost anyone against that and win. It would be the same if the Dems were running Biden, Al Sharpton and Kuscinich... any Republican beats them.

We need 2016 to be the year of the normal sane people with different ideas from each other. I don't 'like' Christie but he is not insane. Hillary is sane. Bloomberg. Maybe Rubio. It's time to stop gathering people who should be in the Howard Stern whack-pack and calling them Presidential nominees....

Relentless · 11-09-2012, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ed Hammer

Christie is a clown, Nobody would vote for him. Neither of them would make a decent president

I'd have voted for either of them over Romney or Obama. Neither is a dream... but compare them to Santorum, Sharpton, Bachman, Perry and the other retards who have been running as of late.

Slappin Fish · 11-09-2012, 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie

I saw on the news that the "Fiscal Cliff" (which is nothing more than the program Congress passed and the President signed and CONGRATULATED themselves on doing...that puts in automatic cuts and ends the Bush tax cuts for everyone) will only cut 600 billion dollars...OVER TEN YEARS!

What the fuck??? That means this horrible, dreadful "fiscal cliff" (that Congress was saying was a great thing just a year ago), will only cut the spending by $60 billion a year.

What a fucking joke.

The Feds are spending 10.6 billion dollars a DAY.

That means that with this big, bad "fiscal cliff" they will only cut what they spend in 5 days for the whole year.

Washington D.C. is nothing more than a pack of thieves. Career politicians who don't know how to stop spending.

Where did you see that?

The "fiscal cliff" includes $7 trillion worth of tax increases and spending cuts over a decade. would lead to the biggest single-year drop in the annual deficit as a percent of the economy since 1969.

_________

selena · 11-09-2012, 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless

We need 2016 to be the year of the normal sane people with different ideas from each other. I don't 'like' Christie but he is not insane. Hillary is sane. Bloomberg. Maybe Rubio. It's time to stop gathering people who should be in the Howard Stern whack-pack and calling them Presidential nominees....

Minte · 11-09-2012, 11:25 AM

CNN Money has a good read on what it's all got in the bill

Some of it isn't pretty.

http://money.cnn.com/2012/11/08/news...html?hpt=hp_c1

Sly · 11-09-2012, 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Minte

CNN Money has a good read on what it's all got in the bill

Some of it isn't pretty.

http://money.cnn.com/2012/11/08/news...html?hpt=hp_c1

I read through the first half of that. That could hit the middle class very hard.

Minte · 11-09-2012, 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly

I read through the first half of that. That could hit the middle class very hard.

Medicare doc fix

Expires. Medicare payment rates for physician services drops by 27%

This one will get a lot of peoples attention.

Relentless · 11-09-2012, 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Minte

CNN Money has a good read on what it's all got in the bill
Some of it isn't pretty.http://money.cnn.com/2012/11/08/news...html?hpt=hp_c1

The 'deal' has almost definitely already been made behind closed doors.

My guess is they let the cliff happen so taxes skyrocket and then before anyone pays any of the new rates they announce a deal in January calling it 'the biggest tax reduction in the history of our nation' returning us to the pre-cliff rates

Minte · 11-09-2012, 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Minte

Medicare doc fix

Expires. Medicare payment rates for physician services drops by 27%

This one will get a lot of peoples attention.

Child tax credit: Falls to $500 per child from $1,000. The refundable portion also reduced.

And this one will nail everyone on the opposite end of the age spectrum.
The rest of them are things that the middle class really won't be affected by.

Minte · 11-09-2012, 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless

The 'deal' has almost definitely already been made behind closed doors.

My guess is they let the cliff happen so taxes skyrocket and then before anyone pays any of the new rates they announce a deal in January calling it 'the biggest tax reduction in the history of our nation' returning us to the pre-cliff rates

That might actually be a good PR move. People with cash who have been sitting on the fence would have to see that as a step forward.

11-09-2012, 11:05 AM	#257
Robbie Leaner, Meaner, Faster Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Vegas Posts: 20,959	I saw on the news that the "Fiscal Cliff" (which is nothing more than the program Congress passed and the President signed and CONGRATULATED themselves on doing...that puts in automatic cuts and ends the Bush tax cuts for everyone) will only cut 600 billion dollars...OVER TEN YEARS! What the fuck??? That means this horrible, dreadful "fiscal cliff" (that Congress was saying was a great thing just a year ago), will only cut the spending by $60 billion a year. What a fucking joke. The Feds are spending 10.6 billion dollars a DAY. That means that with this big, bad "fiscal cliff" they will only cut what they spend in 5 days for the whole year. Washington D.C. is nothing more than a pack of thieves. Career politicians who don't know how to stop spending. __________________ -Robbie ClaudiaMarie.Com

11-09-2012, 10:16 AM	#251
epitome So Fucking Lame Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: St. Petersburg, FL Posts: 12,156	I think everyone would agree that if Minte does for employees what he says he does we need Republicans like him to take back their party. Since I never see Minte weigh in one way or another on social issues seems like he is the live and let live type. Minte for President in 16!

11-09-2012, 10:49 AM	#254
Slappin Fish Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Thailand Posts: 2,512	You said two things. spending will still go way way up and debt will skyrocket. I argued the former, you seem to be under the impression I've argued the latter (which I agree with).

11-09-2012, 11:00 AM	#255
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	The debt too high crowd, should be embracing this. Raises taxes to pre bush cut rates and cut all programs 20 percent. If you want to cut the debt this should do the trick.

11-09-2012, 11:14 AM	#261
fistinface Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2012 Posts: 173	I am not entirely sure Rochard is able to read what people say before he forms an opinion on what they said (in his head that is.)

11-09-2012, 11:25 AM	#266
Minte Babemeister Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Madison Posts: 7,081	CNN Money has a good read on what it's all got in the bill Some of it isn't pretty. http://money.cnn.com/2012/11/08/news...html?hpt=hp_c1