Against America and/or The War? - READ THIS! - Page 3 - GoFuckYourself.com

J B · 02-15-2003, 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks

wait until we start flexing our muscles.
the *people* of the US are tired of the fucking french, tired of the other obstructionists of europe. When the american people have had it with you, you're in trouble.

How will we be in trouble???

Jay_StandAhead · 02-15-2003, 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jimboc
.They are wrong *IF* they go to war without the UN.

The UN has issued a number of resolutions since the early 90's,resolution 1441 say's that if Iraq does not account for a list of weapons thay admitted having years ago and hard them over for distruction or explain where they are they would be in breach

All members of the UN signed this, so to go against it now would be not following what was supposed to be the final resolution, it would make the UN a farce.

If the US / UK forcefully disarmed Iraq they would be following the resolution not breaking it as other countries propose

So why don't the US bring this up? Comon dude...

Fact is, Hussein can try whatever he wants, he UN inspectors are there, and if he doesn't cooperate, the UN will attack.

There are multiple steps in resolving a crisis, as there is in entering war.

Step 1: Try to resolve the crisis by diplomatic manners, or adopt UN resolutions to deal with the conflict (in this case, send UN inspectors to disarm Iraq).

Step 2: If step 1 fails, attack them. If it succeed, no need to attack.

Any country who skips step 1 is causing great damage to international right. I am not concerned about the US attacking Iraq, I am concerned with all the other countries that will use this as an excuse to justify a war against another country (china vs pakistan or india, ETC).

America is the greatest power in the world, but with great power comes great resonsibilites. If Hussein is a menace, the UN will agree to attack. One step at a time.

Joe Sixpack · 02-15-2003, 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by J B

How will we be in trouble???

You'll be in trouble... if the Americans can find your country... but with their knowledge of world geography I wouldn't be too concerned!!

jimboc · 02-15-2003, 07:37 PM

Well Tony you are lucky to live in the US or which ever country you are in, because if you disagreed with Saddam in Iraq you would probarbly be subject to the "systematic widespread abuse and torture inflicted on the people of Iraq by their Government" not my words!

These include acid baths, cutting off of hands and other bits of the body, the most unimaginable painful tortues.

The guy has even killed many members of his family, his brother and he regularly sleeps with women and then personally tortures and kills them.

jimboc · 02-15-2003, 07:40 PM

Step 1: Try to resolve the crisis by diplomatic manners, or adopt UN resolutions to deal with the conflict (in this case, send UN inspectors to disarm Iraq).

Obvouisly you have not followed the UN resolutions for the last 10 years idiot, they have tried every route, only trading with Iraq for medicines and aid, and so on.

He blocks the aid and deliberatly starves the people, they all failed.

jimboc · 02-15-2003, 07:41 PM

Next lol! I am George W lol

Jay_StandAhead · 02-15-2003, 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jimboc

These include acid baths, cutting off of hands and other bits of the body, the most unimaginable painful tortues.

The guy has even killed many members of his family, his brother and he regularly sleeps with women and then personally tortures and kills them.

Agreed, but there's a double standard.

There are many other evil dictators. Why only get rid of Hussein?

If you decide to get rid of evil dictators, get rid of them all, not only this one.

Meanwhile, in North Korea, there's a dictator that ADMITTED having nuclear weapons, and threatened to use them.

Jay_StandAhead · 02-15-2003, 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jimboc
Step 1: Try to resolve the crisis by diplomatic manners, or adopt UN resolutions to deal with the conflict (in this case, send UN inspectors to disarm Iraq).

Obvouisly you have not followed the UN resolutions for the last 10 years idiot, they have tried every route, only trading with Iraq for medicines and aid, and so on.

He blocks the aid and deliberatly starves the people, they all failed.

Well all the countries sitting at the UN are idiots. They have resolutions that allow them to attack, but suddenly "forgot" about them.

What the fuck will attacking Iraq now will change? There is tremendous pressure right now on the inspections, and if they fail, there will be war.

What more do you want?

12clicks · 02-15-2003, 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by tony404

How can you say that , what am I lying about lol..

I can keep pointing out your lie if you'd like to keep childishly pretending its not here:

Quote:

Originally posted by tony404

In all my years I have never seen a administration that supports the idea if you disagree with us you are unamerican.

Go find a quote from the administration that says,"if you disagree with us you are unamerican"

you won't because you're a liar.

Quote:

Originally posted by tony404

You know the tone of the nation, unless you live in a cave lol..

The tone of the nation is the tone of the people not the administration. You'd know that unless you went to school in a cave.

Quote:

Originally posted by tony404
choose not blindly believe, I think so I need proof,..

Thoughtful people don't need to wait for the kind of "proof" you need.

Quote:

Originally posted by tony404
I love my country and having a opinion that doesnt follow the herd is my right and makes my country great in case you forgot.

ah, yes. Call the majority the herd. yeah, you're *so* much smarter than the *majority*

Quote:

Originally posted by tony404
Muslims are hiding bin laden so that means we give up on finding him and go on to the easy one lol.

Muslims are hiding bin laden so that means we lgive all the other terrorists free rein. We can't possibly do 2 things at once. After all, if bidladen releases another tape from the hole he's hiding in, it will be the end of us. lol

Quote:

Originally posted by tony404
We know for a fact Bin Laden caused 9/11 his head on a platter should still be the main focus until its achieved. That will stop more terrorism because it shows fuck with us and we will hunt you down til the end of days.

The simple minded do one thing at a time. The rest of us do as many things that *need* to be done as possible.

Quote:

Originally posted by tony404
Also I always find it so amusing the most ball less people are the ones that talk toughest on the web lol.

Ask around, I'll happily tell you all this to your face, tough guy. lol

tony286 · 02-15-2003, 07:46 PM

I live in the USA . Its terrible what happens to those people in Iraq but with our economy in the toilet to me this isnt the best time to play world savoir.

jimboc · 02-15-2003, 07:49 PM

Iraq HAS used chemical / bio weap. before and Korea is a future threat, but we have not had 10 years of talks and UN pressure on Korea yet, we have with Iraq, which is deemed the greatest risk / biggest threat the world faces today, if he is allowed to keep collecting this shit, (which the US under UN agreements cannot develop), the risk is that we may have planes and missiles but he could have something of equal power, a nuclear bomb, or chemical weapons, WW3....

tony286 · 02-15-2003, 07:49 PM

Quote:

Ask around, I'll happily tell you all this to your face, tough guy. lol

Great will you be at internext in Aug? I like making new friends

If trashing me makes you feel special God bless you, I am glad I can help.

jimboc · 02-15-2003, 07:52 PM

From what I understand the US has been very clever and has developed sound weapons which are highly effective, I think we may see these used very soon, the UN have not banned them yet, they include very low frequency vibrations which affect the brain

12clicks · 02-15-2003, 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by tony404

Great will you be at internext in Aug? I like making new friends
If trashing me makes you feel special God bless you, I am glad I can help.

if pointing out your lies is what you call trashing you, God bless you, I'm glad I can help.

tony286 · 02-15-2003, 07:56 PM

and you are the great speaker of the truth. lol You're a funny guy

ChrisH · 02-15-2003, 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by the indigo
I expect 10x more terrorist attacks on US after Bush attacks IRAQ...

That's the same as thinking there are terrorists in position to attack but aren't. I don't buy that for a second! If they could nuke DC, NY, and LA tomorrow morning they fucking would.

I in no way think Iraq had anything to do with the Attacks on Sept. 11th. But that still doesn't mean that he is abidding by the 17 UN Resolutions of the last 12 years.

Take out Saddam, and you stabalize the entire region!

jimboc · 02-15-2003, 07:57 PM

We need to be united the whole world over, as many countries as we can to show Iraq that there is only one choice. He feeds on our weakness and Germany, France and other countries are making him more dangerous.

Jay_StandAhead · 02-15-2003, 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jimboc
From what I understand the US has been very clever and has developed sound weapons which are highly effective, I think we may see these used very soon, the UN have not banned them yet, they include very low frequency vibrations which affect the brain

Then we should disarm the US, shouldn't we?

ChrisH · 02-15-2003, 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jay[neX]

Agreed, but there's a double standard.

There are many other evil dictators. Why only get rid of Hussein?

If you decide to get rid of evil dictators, get rid of them all, not only this one.

Meanwhile, in North Korea, there's a dictator that ADMITTED having nuclear weapons, and threatened to use them.

It may seem like a double standard. However, he invaded two other countries in 90/91. These other dictators you speak of have not.

Joe Sixpack · 02-15-2003, 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jay[neX]

Then we should disarm the US, shouldn't we?

Yes, lets take away their weapons of mass destruction. They can't be trusted.

Jay_StandAhead · 02-15-2003, 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jimboc
We need to be united the whole world over, as many countries as we can to show Iraq that there is only one choice.

I totally agree with you.

The world is united, expect US and UK.

I am sure that if Hussein fails to disarm within 6 months, the world will be united and will want to attack Iraq. One step at a time...

jimboc · 02-15-2003, 08:02 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by the indigo
I expect 10x more terrorist attacks on US after Bush attacks IRAQ...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If only we had the strength to show them what happens when innocent people living in a free world, honest decent people are killed.

They would jump to attack us anyway, the only way to stop these terrorist attacks is to stand up to them, and stop them getting arms that Saddam and other countries are making.

Jay_StandAhead · 02-15-2003, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ChrisH

It may seem like a double standard. However, he invaded two other countries in 90/91. These other dictators you speak of have not.

North Korea never attacked another country or caused a crisis?

And when Iraq invaded Iran, the US supported and helped them.

I believe both dictators should be removed, starting with North Korea.

12clicks · 02-15-2003, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by tony404
and you are the great speaker of the truth. lol You're a funny guy

wow, you fold up like a cheap suit once you're pressed to prove your story.

I like that in a poster.

jimboc · 02-15-2003, 08:07 PM

The world is united, expect US and UK.

I am sure that if Hussein fails to disarm within 6 months, the world will be united and will want to attack Iraq. One step at a time...

No, No, No, this WAS the final resolution of 10 years worth of resolutions, he always dangles a carot for the UN at the last minute which causes a country or 2 to issue another resolution, thats why it's been 10 years....

Are economies are being damaged by the ever looming threat of war, like I said they think this time it would only take weeks, lets get in and get out and get on.

Jay_StandAhead · 02-15-2003, 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jimboc

They would jump to attack us anyway, the only way to stop these terrorist attacks is to stand up to them, and stop them getting arms that Saddam and other countries are making.

Again, share you proofs, please. That's all France and Germany and the rest of the world want.

I'm not saying Hussein isn't selling arms, but since you seem to know for a fact, you must have proofs. And if you don't, and just believe everything our government tells you, then you're a fool.

That being said, let's disarm Iraq

12clicks · 02-15-2003, 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jay[neX]

I totally agree with you.

The world is united, expect US and UK.

hahahahaha, stop reading the french news papers.

ChrisH · 02-15-2003, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jay[neX]

North Korea never attacked another country or caused a crisis?

And when Iraq invaded Iran, the US supported and helped them.

I believe both dictators should be removed, starting with North Korea.

Dealing with N. Korea is slightly more tedious, that is unless you'd like to see S. Korea and Japan hit buy a Nuke.

The Korean conflict was over 50 years ago. They have attacked anyone in the last 12 years.

The difference between N. Korea and Iraq is that Iraq has run out of time. Do you think they won't be dealt with?

Bottom line! Don't deal with Iraq now, we'll have to in due time and he maybe a nuclear power then. Then he could blackmail the world like Kim Jong Ill is doing now.

Jay_StandAhead · 02-15-2003, 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks

hahahahaha, stop reading the french news papers.

Lol, good one, but I don't read the french news papers

All I was saying is that most of the world is against a war with Iraq without concrete evidence, but some countries are affraid to say it, like China, cause they depend on the US for economical reasons.

12clicks · 02-15-2003, 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jay[neX]

Again, share you proofs, please. That's all France and Germany and the rest of the world want.

I'm not saying Hussein isn't selling arms, but since you seem to know for a fact, you must have proofs. And if you don't, and just believe everything our government tells you, then you're a fool.

what an assclown.

Hussein has chemical and biological weapons. They are the biggest threat from terrorists. They are what could kill thousands in the hands of a few terrorists.

If you think that its ok for Hussein to have these weapons, then you believe everything fraqnce says and you are a fool.

jimboc · 02-15-2003, 08:12 PM

Show you proof???

What do you think they are producing this stuff for? the most deadly chemical weapons available, so dangerous that 1mg could kill hundreds of people, in the hands of a man who has used them on more than 1 occasion before and has a passion to hate America, was sept 11th not a warning of how dangerous these people can be and how little regard they have for innocent human life?

Jay_StandAhead · 02-15-2003, 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jimboc

Are economies are being damaged by the ever looming threat of war, like I said they think this time it would only take weeks, lets get in and get out and get on.

Take weeks? But I thought you said:

Quote:

Originally posted by jimboc

Iraq is huge

They could be hidden in several buildings anywhere in or even outside of the country

So if it takes weeks to disarm them, let the inspectors do it

12clicks · 02-15-2003, 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jay[neX]

Lol, good one, but I don't read the french news papers

All I was saying is that most of the world is against a war with Iraq without concrete evidence, but some countries are affraid to say it, like China, cause they depend on the US for economical reasons.

wrong. No one is afraid to say it. france and germany are in the minority no matter how you pretend they aren't.

ChrisH · 02-15-2003, 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jay[neX]

Lol, good one, but I don't read the french news papers

All I was saying is that most of the world is against a war with Iraq without concrete evidence, but some countries are affraid to say it, like China, cause they depend on the US for economical reasons.

That is so far from the truth it is insane.

Only The French, Germans, Russia, and China are against this. Oh and Belgium too. Most of the Middle East is behind us.

With France and Germany it's only about oil.

Jay_StandAhead · 02-15-2003, 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks

what an assclown.

Hussein has chemical and biological weapons. They are the biggest threat from terrorists. They are what could kill thousands in the hands of a few terrorists.

If you think that its ok for Hussein to have these weapons, then you believe everything fraqnce says and you are a fool.

Don't misquote me.

I agree with disarming Iraq. THEY SHOULD BE DISARMED NOW.

I said that many times. All I said is that it must be done right, witht the UN approval, to avoid future crisis.

But for god's sake, DISARM IRAQ.

tony286 · 02-15-2003, 08:15 PM

Quote:

wow, you fold up like a cheap suit

You know what I am talking about of course no one came out and said that. The tone comes from the top, it just doesnt appear. I was a rush limbaugh republican and voted for w. What turned me off was when all that corporate scandals came and all those poor old people lost their retirement and I waited for him to speak up and he said nothing. My feelings changed that point and maybe thats why I am more judgemental. Here I gave you more ammo have fun lol. I had a shiity day and this has been the most fun I had lol.

J B · 02-15-2003, 08:17 PM

Of course, Iraq needs to be disarmed... with or without war, we'll see. Will this make the region more stable? I don't know. The inspectors can't find the weapons. What makes you think they will be found after the war is over? You then might have some local dickheads having control over the weapons...

Jay_StandAhead · 02-15-2003, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks

wrong. No one is afraid to say it. france and germany are in the minority no matter how you pretend they aren't.

Well there are 5 veto powers, right?

China, France, Russia are against this war

UK and US are for it.

Who's in minority?

Anyways, if there are proofs that Iraq is fucking with the inspectors, and that the 3 countries against this war don't change their position, I say remove their veto. Untill then...

ChrisH · 02-15-2003, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jay[neX]

Again, share you proofs, please. That's all France and Germany and the rest of the world want.

So what Colin Powell should on the 5th was what? A lie?? Is that what you think?

Also, the French and Germans won't even agree to help a charter member of NATO in Turkey. They are going to tear NATO apart, and it's going to be their fault.

jimboc · 02-15-2003, 08:19 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by jimboc

Are economies are being damaged by the ever looming threat of war, like I said they think this time it would only take weeks, lets get in and get out and get on.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Take weeks? But I thought you said:

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by jimboc

Iraq is huge

They could be hidden in several buildings anywhere in or even outside of the country
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So if it takes weeks to disarm them, let the inspectors do it

The stuff could take ages to find, but a war with Iraq could speel the end of Saddams rule and a turn around of the country, the inspectors cannot disarm Iraq, that has been proven, let the experts go in and do it by force.

No tricks, no pretend officials, no more moving stuff, and the end of Saddam.

Jay_StandAhead · 02-15-2003, 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ChrisH

That is so far from the truth it is insane.

Only The French, Germans, Russia, and China are against this. Oh and Belgium too. Most of the Middle East is behind us.

With France and Germany it's only about oil.

Insane? read the post above about the countries with veto powers.

And I'll repeat it for people with short attention span; I am not against or for a war. I am for the disarmement or Iraq.

DavePlays · 02-15-2003, 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jay[neX]

I totally agree with you.

The world is united, expect US and UK.

I am sure that if Hussein fails to disarm within 6 months, the world will be united and will want to attack Iraq. One step at a time...

And you don't think 6 months from now the same people aren't going to crying to give it more time?

You're dreaming - there is no better time than now. - Period.

12clicks · 02-15-2003, 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jay[neX]

I said that many times. All I said is that it must be done right, witht the UN approval, to avoid future crisis.

But for god's sake, DISARM IRAQ.

Then your problem should be with the UN, not the US.
Can you *really* not understand that?

Jay_StandAhead · 02-15-2003, 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jimboc

The stuff could take ages to find, but a war with Iraq could speel the end of Saddams rule and a turn around of the country, the inspectors cannot disarm Iraq, that has been proven, let the experts go in and do it by force.

No tricks, no pretend officials, no more moving stuff, and the end of Saddam.

Ok I see what you mean. It seems like a logical choice if the inspections fails.

12clicks · 02-15-2003, 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jay[neX]

And I'll repeat it for people with short attention span; I am not against or for a war. I am for the disarmement or Iraq.

I think this is the french position to isn't it?

ChrisH · 02-15-2003, 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jay[neX]

Well there are 5 veto powers, right?

China, France, Russia are against this war

UK and US are for it.

Who's in minority?

Anyways, if there are proofs that Iraq is fucking with the inspectors, and that the 3 countries against this war don't change their position, I say remove their veto. Untill then...

What's really funny is that that's ALL that France has. A veto in the UN. And it was a fucking token gesture given to them after they got assfucked by the Germans in WWII.

I tell you this. Many.... MANY people it the US can't comprehend the fact that the French would side with the Germans over the US. And France will rue the day they did too.

Jay_StandAhead · 02-15-2003, 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks

Then your problem should be with the UN, not the US.
Can you *really* not understand that?

I don't have a problem with the US at all, I never said that.

All I am trying to say is that we live in a world where there is an organisation called the "United Nations". We contributed to creating and maintaining this organisation, and we can't just start ignoring it; it would have great consequenses.

Do you understand what I am saying?

ChrisH · 02-15-2003, 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jay[neX]

Insane? read the post above about the countries with veto powers.

And I'll repeat it for people with short attention span; I am not against or for a war. I am for the disarmement or Iraq.

I'm not talking about the Joke of a UN. I'm talking about the countries in the world.

The UN is becoming a joke.

jimboc · 02-15-2003, 08:23 PM

Well there are 5 veto powers, right?

China, France, Russia are against this war

UK and US are for it.

Who's in minority?

Anyways, if there are proofs that Iraq is fucking with the inspectors, and that the 3 countries against this war don't change their position, I say remove their veto. Untill then...

You may be right but remember that not all counties have veto powers, I am not sure which do and don't.

And anyway all of these countries have already signed up to 1441 which say's that further seroius action will be used if iraq does not comply, they have not complied, if nothing other than more weapons inspectors being sent in happens then 1441 has been broken by the counties who veto's it not by the US / UK

Jay_StandAhead · 02-15-2003, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks

I think this is the french position to isn't it?

LOL

I think the French position is against the war.

02-15-2003, 08:17 PM	#137
J B Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Location: StatsRemote.com Posts: 1,804	Of course, Iraq needs to be disarmed... with or without war, we'll see. Will this make the region more stable? I don't know. The inspectors can't find the weapons. What makes you think they will be found after the war is over? You then might have some local dickheads having control over the weapons... __________________ A HUGE TIME SAVER FOR LESS THAN $1 PER DAY! Contact: support A\|T statsremote D\|O\|T com

02-15-2003, 08:23 PM	#149
jimboc Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Internet of course Posts: 1,614	Well there are 5 veto powers, right? China, France, Russia are against this war UK and US are for it. Who's in minority? Anyways, if there are proofs that Iraq is fucking with the inspectors, and that the 3 countries against this war don't change their position, I say remove their veto. Untill then... You may be right but remember that not all counties have veto powers, I am not sure which do and don't. And anyway all of these countries have already signed up to 1441 which say's that further seroius action will be used if iraq does not comply, they have not complied, if nothing other than more weapons inspectors being sent in happens then 1441 has been broken by the counties who veto's it not by the US / UK Last edited by jimboc; 02-15-2003 at 08:25 PM..

02-15-2003, 07:37 PM	#104
jimboc Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Internet of course Posts: 1,614	Well Tony you are lucky to live in the US or which ever country you are in, because if you disagreed with Saddam in Iraq you would probarbly be subject to the "systematic widespread abuse and torture inflicted on the people of Iraq by their Government" not my words! These include acid baths, cutting off of hands and other bits of the body, the most unimaginable painful tortues. The guy has even killed many members of his family, his brother and he regularly sleeps with women and then personally tortures and kills them.

02-15-2003, 07:40 PM	#105
jimboc Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Internet of course Posts: 1,614	Step 1: Try to resolve the crisis by diplomatic manners, or adopt UN resolutions to deal with the conflict (in this case, send UN inspectors to disarm Iraq). Obvouisly you have not followed the UN resolutions for the last 10 years idiot, they have tried every route, only trading with Iraq for medicines and aid, and so on. He blocks the aid and deliberatly starves the people, they all failed.

02-15-2003, 07:41 PM	#106
jimboc Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Internet of course Posts: 1,614	Next lol! I am George W lol

02-15-2003, 07:46 PM	#110
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	I live in the USA . Its terrible what happens to those people in Iraq but with our economy in the toilet to me this isnt the best time to play world savoir.

02-15-2003, 07:49 PM	#111
jimboc Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Internet of course Posts: 1,614	Iraq HAS used chemical / bio weap. before and Korea is a future threat, but we have not had 10 years of talks and UN pressure on Korea yet, we have with Iraq, which is deemed the greatest risk / biggest threat the world faces today, if he is allowed to keep collecting this shit, (which the US under UN agreements cannot develop), the risk is that we may have planes and missiles but he could have something of equal power, a nuclear bomb, or chemical weapons, WW3....

02-15-2003, 07:52 PM	#113
jimboc Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Internet of course Posts: 1,614	From what I understand the US has been very clever and has developed sound weapons which are highly effective, I think we may see these used very soon, the UN have not banned them yet, they include very low frequency vibrations which affect the brain

02-15-2003, 07:56 PM	#115
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	and you are the great speaker of the truth. lol You're a funny guy

02-15-2003, 07:57 PM	#117
jimboc Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Internet of course Posts: 1,614	We need to be united the whole world over, as many countries as we can to show Iraq that there is only one choice. He feeds on our weakness and Germany, France and other countries are making him more dangerous.

02-15-2003, 08:02 PM	#122
jimboc Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Internet of course Posts: 1,614	-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Originally posted by the indigo I expect 10x more terrorist attacks on US after Bush attacks IRAQ... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If only we had the strength to show them what happens when innocent people living in a free world, honest decent people are killed. They would jump to attack us anyway, the only way to stop these terrorist attacks is to stand up to them, and stop them getting arms that Saddam and other countries are making.

02-15-2003, 08:07 PM	#125
jimboc Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Internet of course Posts: 1,614	The world is united, expect US and UK. I am sure that if Hussein fails to disarm within 6 months, the world will be united and will want to attack Iraq. One step at a time... No, No, No, this WAS the final resolution of 10 years worth of resolutions, he always dangles a carot for the UN at the last minute which causes a country or 2 to issue another resolution, thats why it's been 10 years.... Are economies are being damaged by the ever looming threat of war, like I said they think this time it would only take weeks, lets get in and get out and get on.

02-15-2003, 08:12 PM	#131
jimboc Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Internet of course Posts: 1,614	Show you proof??? What do you think they are producing this stuff for? the most deadly chemical weapons available, so dangerous that 1mg could kill hundreds of people, in the hands of a man who has used them on more than 1 occasion before and has a passion to hate America, was sept 11th not a warning of how dangerous these people can be and how little regard they have for innocent human life?

02-15-2003, 08:19 PM	#140
jimboc Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Internet of course Posts: 1,614	-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Originally posted by jimboc Are economies are being damaged by the ever looming threat of war, like I said they think this time it would only take weeks, lets get in and get out and get on. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take weeks? But I thought you said: quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Originally posted by jimboc Iraq is huge They could be hidden in several buildings anywhere in or even outside of the country -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- So if it takes weeks to disarm them, let the inspectors do it The stuff could take ages to find, but a war with Iraq could speel the end of Saddams rule and a turn around of the country, the inspectors cannot disarm Iraq, that has been proven, let the experts go in and do it by force. No tricks, no pretend officials, no more moving stuff, and the end of Saddam.