Government testing the waters? - GoFuckYourself.com

brassmonkey · 06-04-2012, 06:10 PM

they have no right to tell you what to buy.

assholes

NEW YORK (AP) ? About half of New Yorkers say Mayor Michael Bloomberg's proposed ban of sugary drinks over 16 ounces from the city's eateries is an example of government going too far, while 42 percent say it would be good health policy, according to a poll released Monday.

Of the 500 adults surveyed Sunday for the NY1-Marist poll, 53 percent said the proposal is a bad idea, while 42 percent praised the concept ? which would make New York the first American city to so directly attempt to limit portion sizes in an attempt to fight obesity.

Forty-five percent of those polled said they think the ban would help people lose weight, while 52 percent said it wouldn't make a difference. More than half the people surveyed said they never order a sugary drink large enough to be banned.

The pollsters contacted people at random on cell phones and land lines on Sunday. The survey has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.5 percentage points. Last week, Bloomberg proposed limiting portion sizes of sugary drinks to 16 ounces at the city's restaurants, delis, food trucks, movie theaters and sporting arenas. Regular soda and sports drinks would be affected, while diet sodas wouldn't. Any drink that's more than half milk or more than 70 percent juice would be exempt.

Grocery stores and many convenience stores are regulated by the state and wouldn't be impacted. Marc La Vorgna, a spokesman for Bloomberg, said the poll showed New Yorkers weren't overwhelmingly set against the proposal.

"We didn't propose it because we thought it would be popular, but it should come as no surprise that the numbers are so close since New Yorkers always have had an openness to bold ideas when taking on intractable problems," he said in a statement.

The ban has been denounced by the soft-drink industry and critics who accuse the mayor of trying to institute a "nanny state" rather than allowing individuals to make their own choices. It's expected to win the approval of the Bloomberg-appointed Board of Health and take effect as early as March.

wehateporn · 06-04-2012, 06:15 PM

Now that people are working out how to reverse Diabetes Type 2 naturally, they want you to have Aspartame instead of sugar; as Chemo is more profitable.

brassmonkey · 06-04-2012, 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

Now that people are working out how to reverse Diabetes Type 2 naturally, they want you to have Aspartame instead of sugar; as Chemo is more profitable.

red meat is bad for you. ban burgers! sliders only

and you can only buy 2 per day

Mr Pheer · 06-04-2012, 06:23 PM

Not sure where I stand on this. I dont like being told what I can buy or not, but I can see the other side of this as well.

Just Alex · 06-04-2012, 06:31 PM

Racists !

thegreatestporn · 06-04-2012, 06:55 PM

Won't people just buy 2 drinks if they really want that much? Or go get a refill...

Major (Tom) · 06-04-2012, 06:56 PM

They gonna ban purple stuff too?
not cool
ds

brassmonkey · 06-04-2012, 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DukeSkywalker

They gonna ban purple stuff too?
not cool
ds

what purple stuff? your meds?

TheSwed · 06-04-2012, 07:05 PM

but cigarettes is okay to sale
the land of freedom

romancexcore · 06-04-2012, 07:34 PM

In the US they have to put a disclaimer on a commercial so people watching it will know a pickup truck can't actually snowboard. Not the brightest country in the world so I guess the theory is most people will hurt themselves accidentally unless told which way to walk.

Just Alex · 06-04-2012, 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brassmonkey

what purple stuff? your meds?

You do not want to know Jamal! It will break your heart if its true.

CyberHustler · 06-04-2012, 07:41 PM

It ain't going to fly...

ShoeBox · 06-04-2012, 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brassmonkey

what purple stuff? your meds?

sippin on some syzurp

alias · 06-04-2012, 07:47 PM

Big money in bootleg big gulps.

brassmonkey · 06-04-2012, 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberHustler

It ain't going to fly...

if it passes you can start a large soda biz

CyberHustler · 06-04-2012, 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShoeBox

sippin on some syzurp

R.I.P. Pimp C

brassmonkey · 06-04-2012, 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShoeBox

sippin on some syzurp

thunderbird and grape kool aid

jigg · 06-04-2012, 08:33 PM

42% of people are fucking morons

BIGTYMER · 06-04-2012, 08:37 PM

Car manufactures were against seat belts
Cigarette companies were against public smoking bans

This is a good idea. Just buy 2 drinks if you want to be a fat pig.

Mr Pheer · 06-04-2012, 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by romancexcore

Not the brightest country in the world

Keep telling yourself that.

Major (Tom) · 06-05-2012, 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brassmonkey

what purple stuff? your meds?

lol I be notz on any medz cept foe whens I cants gets me sleeps!!
ds

Major (Tom) · 06-05-2012, 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by romancexcore

In the US they have to put a disclaimer on a commercial so people watching it will know a pickup truck can't actually snowboard. Not the brightest country in the world so I guess the theory is most people will hurt themselves accidentally unless told which way to walk.

the disclaimer is not because america is not dumb it is however, very litigious.
ds

Major (Tom) · 06-05-2012, 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Alex

You do not want to know Jamal! It will break your heart if its true.

Paaaaaahhhh! Awesome
ds

Paul Markham · 06-05-2012, 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIGTYMER

Car manufactures were against seat belts
Cigarette companies were against public smoking bans

This is a good idea. Just buy 2 drinks if you want to be a fat pig.

Maybe the Government should also say "If you obese and get medical problems, it's your fault. So if you can't pay. Die."

Ultimately it's the rest of the US who pick up the tab for poor people's poor health. So all those screaming freedom, best not complain when their taxes go up.

DWB · 06-05-2012, 02:16 AM

There is a long history with the USA and the sugar industry. The USA fucked a lot of international sugar cane farmers back in the day and that was what caused the boom in them growing marijuana, and you know the rest of that story.

Some fascinating sugar history to read if you have some time to get your google on. Here is a cliff notes basic timeline, but if you want the gritty stuff you need to dig a little deeper: http://sugarreform.org/why-reform/hi...sugar-program/

uniquemkt · 06-05-2012, 02:41 AM

I'd love to see more non-soda options at restaurants, but I'm against legislating that opinion.

SuzzyQ · 06-05-2012, 02:55 AM

Jon Steward put it all in perspective

romancexcore · 06-05-2012, 02:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DukeSkywalker

the disclaimer is not because america is not dumb it is however, very litigious.
ds

Litigious, yeah, though Animal Planet did just run a fake documentary about Mermaids that half their viewers didn't realize was fake and got very mad when they found out from the internet that mermaids don't exist

TheSwed · 06-05-2012, 03:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuzzyQ

Jon Steward put it all in perspective

Sorry, currently our video library can only be watched from within the United States

BlackCrayon · 06-05-2012, 04:51 AM

i don't agree with this but think its pretty stupid of people that they can't stop killling themselves with "food".

DWB · 06-05-2012, 06:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon

i don't agree with this but think its pretty stupid of people that they can't stop killling themselves with "food".

Food, smokes, plastics... we consume what is drilled into our heads by the media.

sperbonzo · 06-05-2012, 06:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

Maybe the Government should also say "If you obese and get medical problems, it's your fault. So if you can't pay. Die."

Ultimately it's the rest of the US who pick up the tab for poor people's poor health. So all those screaming freedom, best not complain when their taxes go up.

True. I run 3 to 6 miles every other day, and work out in between. People should be forced to exercise so that we won't have to pay the cost of their health care. It will be easy. Just have everyone wear a monitor so that we can see that they are doing the government mandated exorcise properly, and we won't have to put them in jail or fine them!

.

Choopa_Pardo · 06-05-2012, 07:04 AM

instead of banning gigantic servings of soda, just tax the shit out of them in the same way NY city taxes cigarettes.

Best-In-BC · 06-05-2012, 07:06 AM

That kind of government makes you Canadian I think ;)

Radical Bucks · 06-05-2012, 07:08 AM

Time to leave the us

brassmonkey · 06-05-2012, 07:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon

i don't agree with this but think its pretty stupid of people that they can't stop killling themselves with "food".

theirs more dangerous things. cigs,alcohol,red meat what about triple cheese burgers and big macs? and taco bell loco taco

LeeD · 06-05-2012, 07:16 AM

I can see the reasoning behind the ban, but not sure I like it though. Wouldn't it be better just to put some kind of a tax on it?

Tom_PM · 06-05-2012, 07:25 AM

NY city banned eating in the subway a while back too. Big deal. They banned smoking in many places and there was huge outcry from smokers. Now it's a yawn. This is no different. It's a good idea and if I lived there I'd have supported it too. There never should have been approval in the 80's for drink cups the size of childrens beach pails.

There is no attempt to tell you not to drink your weight in soda every day. Just on the size of container a food establishment can serve it in. You can get unlimited refills. The premise that the gov. is trying to tell you what you can eat or drink is false. Everyone will get over it if it passes, which it might not.

brassmonkey · 06-05-2012, 07:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom

NY city banned eating in the subway a while back too. Big deal. They banned smoking in many places and there was huge outcry from smokers. Now it's a yawn. This is no different. It's a good idea and if I lived there I'd have supported it too. There never should have been approval in the 80's for drink cups the size of childrens beach pails.

There is no attempt to tell you not to drink your weight in soda every day. Just on the size of container a food establishment can serve it in. You can get unlimited refills. The premise that the gov. is trying to tell you what you can eat or drink is false. Everyone will get over it if it passes, which it might not.

wow so you want the government to baby sit you.

reminds me of a calif town trying to ban fast food

sperbonzo · 06-05-2012, 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom;18987024NY city banned eating in the subway a while back too. Big deal. They banned smoking in many places and there was huge outcry from smokers. Now it's a yawn. This is no different. It's a good idea and if I lived there I'd have supported it too. There never should have been approval in the 80's for drink cups the size of childrens beach pails.

There is no attempt to tell you not to drink your weight in soda every day. Just on the size of container a food establishment can serve it in. You can get unlimited refills.

. The premise that the gov. is trying to tell you what you can eat or drink is false. Everyone will get over it if it passes, which it might not.

Sorry, but that is EXACTLY what they are trying to do. If I, as a private business owner, cannot sell people my product in the sizes that I choose to, then that is the government telling you what you can and cannot eat or drink. I don't understand how you can't see that? Since when is it the governments business to "approve" the size of a drink container??? It's between the business and the customer.

As to your other examples of how the government taking away freedoms one by one, and people becoming used to it, so that it's "no big deal", I agree. This is how freedom disappears... a little bit at a time, until it doesn't exist at all anymore.

It's the same way you boil a live frog. If you drop it in hot water, it will jump out, so you put it in cold water, and slowly heat it up until the frog boils. Smart governments work the same way. Each little step will be "no big deal", a "yawn", and after a few decades they control everything.

People who think like you do are exactly the kind of people that governments love....

.

brassmonkey · 06-05-2012, 07:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

Sorry, but that is EXACTLY what they are trying to do. If I, as a private business owner, cannot sell people my product in the sizes that I choose to, then that is the government telling you what you can and cannot eat or drink. I don't understand how you can't see that? Since when is it the governments business to "approve" the size of a drink container??? It's between the business and the customer.

As to your other examples of how the government taking away freedoms one by one, and people becoming used to it, so that it's "no big deal", I agree. This is how freedom disappears... a little bit at a time, until it doesn't exist at all anymore.

It's the same way you boil a live frog. If you drop it in hot water, it will jump out, so you put it in cold water, and slowly heat it up until the frog boils. Smart governments work the same way. Each little step will be "no big deal", a "yawn", and after a few decades they control everything.

People who think like you do are exactly the kind of people that governments love....

.

preach it!

PR_Glen · 06-05-2012, 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

Now that people are working out how to reverse Diabetes Type 2 naturally, they want you to have Aspartame instead of sugar; as Chemo is more profitable.

are you really this deep into this delusion that you think the mayor of new york is trying to poison it's people?

how are you not locked up? shut in?

Tom_PM · 06-05-2012, 08:05 AM

Nah, you're all blowing it up beyond the scope when you claim it's telling you what you can and cant do. You can bring a 5 gallon bucket and pour 50 drinks into it then chug it right down.

A business owner is going to make more money by having it limited to 16 ounces. More ice, less product and so forth.

By the way, you also can't buy landmines. You can't even make it yourself (like you can make soda), and you can't even bury them in your own yard. How far do you want to go with it? There are arguments to be made on both sides, which is why a simple poll was 53% to 42%, 5% invisible and a margin of error of probably 3 or 4%. That's pretty close.

If he was banning non-diet sodas and drinks, then I'd agree that it's telling you what you cant drink. But as it is, he's telling food establishments who serve drinks in cups what size is the largest, which is not exactly a terrible thing.

Sorry, but I've never liked the idea of behemoth gulp sized sodas so I'd have voted yes on this before a lot of people were even born. No big deal. My brain is unwashed.

Tat2Jr · 06-05-2012, 08:05 AM

Everybody that's ok with this are going to be singing a different tune when they realize how tiny a 16 ounce drink is! I remember 'em from the 70's and the size is pitiful (plus there was no refills back then).

DudeRick · 06-05-2012, 08:13 AM

Like Obama care?!?

BIGTYMER · 06-05-2012, 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon

i don't agree with this but think its pretty stupid of people that they can't stop killling themselves with "food".

It's a step and it'll help. Research has shown people eat more when given a bigger plate and vice versa.

brassmonkey · 06-05-2012, 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIGTYMER

It's a step and it'll help. Research has shown people eat more when given a bigger plate and vice versa.

it's not the governments job. people over extend credit. you want them to budget your bank account??

Tom_PM · 06-05-2012, 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIGTYMER

It's a step and it'll help. Research has shown people eat more when given a bigger plate and vice versa.

Lots of research on that stuff through at least 50 years or more. When someone on another board asked for dieting advice, I said right off to remove your largest dinner plates from your cabinet. They hold too much food! Common sense. You can always get seconds, or thirds or fourths. Just like with soda.

I make kool aid sometimes, usually I make a 2 calorie mix but sometimes the old cup of sugar, packet of drink, 2 quarts of water stuff. No big deal. It lasts me about a week though compared to 1 sitting.. this is not hard stuff and it's the sort of thing many of us wouldnt even notice since we'd ask for water anyway.

TheSwed · 06-05-2012, 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

Sorry, but that is EXACTLY what they are trying to do. If I, as a private business owner, cannot sell people my product in the sizes that I choose to, then that is the government telling you what you can and cannot eat or drink. I don't understand how you can't see that? Since when is it the governments business to "approve" the size of a drink container??? It's between the business and the customer.

As to your other examples of how the government taking away freedoms one by one, and people becoming used to it, so that it's "no big deal", I agree. This is how freedom disappears... a little bit at a time, until it doesn't exist at all anymore.

It's the same way you boil a live frog. If you drop it in hot water, it will jump out, so you put it in cold water, and slowly heat it up until the frog boils. Smart governments work the same way. Each little step will be "no big deal", a "yawn", and after a few decades they control everything.

People who think like you do are exactly the kind of people that governments love....

.

nice to see that not everybody in here are braindead sheeps

TheSwed · 06-05-2012, 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIGTYMER

It's a step and it'll help. Research has shown people eat more when given a bigger plate and vice versa.

ban sale of big plates will resolve that problem

06-04-2012, 06:10 PM	#1
brassmonkey Pay It Forward Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Yo Mama House Posts: 77,075	Government testing the waters? they have no right to tell you what to buy. assholes NEW YORK (AP) ? About half of New Yorkers say Mayor Michael Bloomberg's proposed ban of sugary drinks over 16 ounces from the city's eateries is an example of government going too far, while 42 percent say it would be good health policy, according to a poll released Monday. Of the 500 adults surveyed Sunday for the NY1-Marist poll, 53 percent said the proposal is a bad idea, while 42 percent praised the concept ? which would make New York the first American city to so directly attempt to limit portion sizes in an attempt to fight obesity. Forty-five percent of those polled said they think the ban would help people lose weight, while 52 percent said it wouldn't make a difference. More than half the people surveyed said they never order a sugary drink large enough to be banned. The pollsters contacted people at random on cell phones and land lines on Sunday. The survey has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.5 percentage points. Last week, Bloomberg proposed limiting portion sizes of sugary drinks to 16 ounces at the city's restaurants, delis, food trucks, movie theaters and sporting arenas. Regular soda and sports drinks would be affected, while diet sodas wouldn't. Any drink that's more than half milk or more than 70 percent juice would be exempt. Grocery stores and many convenience stores are regulated by the state and wouldn't be impacted. Marc La Vorgna, a spokesman for Bloomberg, said the poll showed New Yorkers weren't overwhelmingly set against the proposal. "We didn't propose it because we thought it would be popular, but it should come as no surprise that the numbers are so close since New Yorkers always have had an openness to bold ideas when taking on intractable problems," he said in a statement. The ban has been denounced by the soft-drink industry and critics who accuse the mayor of trying to institute a "nanny state" rather than allowing individuals to make their own choices. It's expected to win the approval of the Bloomberg-appointed Board of Health and take effect as early as March. __________________ TRUMP 2025 KEKAW!!! - The Laken Riley Act Is Law! DACA ENDED - SUPPORT AZ HCR 2060 52R - email: brassballz-at-techie.com

06-04-2012, 06:15 PM	#2
wehateporn Promoting Debate on GFY Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 27,173	Now that people are working out how to reverse Diabetes Type 2 naturally, they want you to have Aspartame instead of sugar; as Chemo is more profitable. __________________ Sexy Girls Teasing

06-04-2012, 06:31 PM	#5
Just Alex Liv Benson to You, Bitch Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Maryland and WV Posts: 6,060	Racists ! __________________

06-04-2012, 06:55 PM	#6
thegreatestporn Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2012 Location: Los Angeles, California Posts: 516	Won't people just buy 2 drinks if they really want that much? Or go get a refill... __________________ CrakRevenue \| WebCamWiz - Free WebCam Whitelabel \|

06-04-2012, 06:56 PM	#7
Major (Tom) Anti Communist Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Null Posts: 29,857	They gonna ban purple stuff too? not cool ds __________________ My mother said, to get things done You'd better not mess with Major Tom

06-04-2012, 06:23 PM	#4
Mr Pheer Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 20,887	Not sure where I stand on this. I dont like being told what I can buy or not, but I can see the other side of this as well.

06-04-2012, 07:05 PM	#9
TheSwed Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Sweden. Posts: 3,483	but cigarettes is okay to sale the land of freedom __________________ Cheap Viagra and Cialis Erectionpills

06-04-2012, 07:34 PM	#10
romancexcore Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 18	In the US they have to put a disclaimer on a commercial so people watching it will know a pickup truck can't actually snowboard. Not the brightest country in the world so I guess the theory is most people will hurt themselves accidentally unless told which way to walk.

06-04-2012, 07:41 PM	#12
CyberHustler Unregistered Abuser Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 25,577	It ain't going to fly...

06-04-2012, 07:47 PM	#14
alias aliasx Join Date: Apr 2001 Posts: 19,010	Big money in bootleg big gulps. __________________ https://porncorporation.com

06-04-2012, 08:33 PM	#18
jigg Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 2,527	42% of people are fucking morons

06-04-2012, 08:37 PM	#19
BIGTYMER Junior Achiever Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Walled Garden Posts: 17,066	Car manufactures were against seat belts Cigarette companies were against public smoking bans This is a good idea. Just buy 2 drinks if you want to be a fat pig.

06-05-2012, 02:16 AM	#25
DWB Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Encrypted. Access denied. Posts: 31,779	There is a long history with the USA and the sugar industry. The USA fucked a lot of international sugar cane farmers back in the day and that was what caused the boom in them growing marijuana, and you know the rest of that story. Some fascinating sugar history to read if you have some time to get your google on. Here is a cliff notes basic timeline, but if you want the gritty stuff you need to dig a little deeper: http://sugarreform.org/why-reform/hi...sugar-program/

06-05-2012, 02:41 AM	#26
uniquemkt Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2012 Posts: 305	I'd love to see more non-soda options at restaurants, but I'm against legislating that opinion.

06-05-2012, 02:55 AM	#27
SuzzyQ Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Along the shore. Posts: 1,557	Jon Steward put it all in perspective

06-05-2012, 04:51 AM	#30
BlackCrayon Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Ottawa Posts: 19,631	i don't agree with this but think its pretty stupid of people that they can't stop killling themselves with "food". __________________ you don't know you're wearing a leash if you sit by the peg all day..

06-05-2012, 07:04 AM	#33
Choopa_Pardo Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: NJ Posts: 1,629	instead of banning gigantic servings of soda, just tax the shit out of them in the same way NY city taxes cigarettes. __________________ AIM - thePardovich Email - [email protected] A World Wide Leader In Hosting! * CHOOPA.COM * Order Now!

06-05-2012, 07:06 AM	#34
Best-In-BC Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 9,506	That kind of government makes you Canadian I think ;) __________________ Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More Unparked domains burning a hole in your pocket? 5 Simple Ways to Make Easy $$$ from Unused Domains

06-05-2012, 07:08 AM	#35
Radical Bucks So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: On the Beach Posts: 673	Time to leave the us

06-05-2012, 07:16 AM	#37
LeeD Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 142	I can see the reasoning behind the ban, but not sure I like it though. Wouldn't it be better just to put some kind of a tax on it?

06-05-2012, 07:25 AM	#38
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	NY city banned eating in the subway a while back too. Big deal. They banned smoking in many places and there was huge outcry from smokers. Now it's a yawn. This is no different. It's a good idea and if I lived there I'd have supported it too. There never should have been approval in the 80's for drink cups the size of childrens beach pails. There is no attempt to tell you not to drink your weight in soda every day. Just on the size of container a food establishment can serve it in. You can get unlimited refills. The premise that the gov. is trying to tell you what you can eat or drink is false. Everyone will get over it if it passes, which it might not. __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

06-05-2012, 08:05 AM	#43
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	Nah, you're all blowing it up beyond the scope when you claim it's telling you what you can and cant do. You can bring a 5 gallon bucket and pour 50 drinks into it then chug it right down. A business owner is going to make more money by having it limited to 16 ounces. More ice, less product and so forth. By the way, you also can't buy landmines. You can't even make it yourself (like you can make soda), and you can't even bury them in your own yard. How far do you want to go with it? There are arguments to be made on both sides, which is why a simple poll was 53% to 42%, 5% invisible and a margin of error of probably 3 or 4%. That's pretty close. If he was banning non-diet sodas and drinks, then I'd agree that it's telling you what you cant drink. But as it is, he's telling food establishments who serve drinks in cups what size is the largest, which is not exactly a terrible thing. Sorry, but I've never liked the idea of behemoth gulp sized sodas so I'd have voted yes on this before a lot of people were even born. No big deal. My brain is unwashed. __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

06-05-2012, 08:05 AM	#44
Tat2Jr Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Sunny California Posts: 4,882	Everybody that's ok with this are going to be singing a different tune when they realize how tiny a 16 ounce drink is! I remember 'em from the 70's and the size is pitiful (plus there was no refills back then). __________________ NICHE MONEY >> Ass Worship • Panties • Solo Teen • Pantyhose Serving up exclusive fetish sites since 1997!

06-05-2012, 08:13 AM	#45
DudeRick Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Tobacco Road Posts: 1,568	Like Obama care?!?