Government testing the waters? - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

sperbonzo · 06-05-2012, 08:35 AM

Government enforced exercise is also a good idea. It's for peoples own good!

Also, the government should control what we spend our money on. People waste their money on partying, when they should be saving for retirement. We would have a lot less problems if the government simply controlled what we can and can't buy so that we don't fritter our money away foolishly!

Don't you think those are great ideas Tom? Think of how much healthier people will be, and how they will be better off by not being able to waste their money!! I'm sure you would vote for this stuff also, right?

.

.

Tom_PM · 06-05-2012, 08:50 AM

I think if NY city's elected mayor wants to attempt to ban larger cup sizes in food establishments, and the council approves it, that it's ok. The rest? I wouldn't know until it happens.

I asked before about landmines and nobody seems to mind that you can't buy them or make them or bury them in your yard, lol. It seems people accept there should be some regulation, it's a matter of where to draw the line. This particular battle over cup sizes doesn't cross mine. I have said though that NYC is asking for lawsuits by exempting "diet" labeled sodas.

_Richard_ · 06-05-2012, 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom

I think if NY city's elected mayor wants to attempt to ban larger cup sizes in food establishments, and the council approves it, that it's ok. The rest? I wouldn't know until it happens.

I asked before about landmines and nobody seems to mind that you can't buy them or make them or bury them in your yard, lol. It seems people accept there should be some regulation, it's a matter of where to draw the line. This particular battle over cup sizes doesn't cross mine. I have said though that NYC is asking for lawsuits by exempting "diet" labeled sodas.

shouldn't that line be the choices that people make?

the right to wed seems to be regulated down there, baffling enough

06-05-2012, 08:35 AM	#51
sperbonzo I'd rather be on my boat. Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Location: Miami, FL Posts: 9,748	Government enforced exercise is also a good idea. It's for peoples own good! Also, the government should control what we spend our money on. People waste their money on partying, when they should be saving for retirement. We would have a lot less problems if the government simply controlled what we can and can't buy so that we don't fritter our money away foolishly! Don't you think those are great ideas Tom? Think of how much healthier people will be, and how they will be better off by not being able to waste their money!! I'm sure you would vote for this stuff also, right? . . __________________ Michael Sperber / Acella Financial LLC/ Online Payment Processing [email protected] / http://Acellafinancial.com/ ICQ 177961090 / Tel +1 909 NET BILL / Skype msperber

06-05-2012, 08:50 AM	#52
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	I think if NY city's elected mayor wants to attempt to ban larger cup sizes in food establishments, and the council approves it, that it's ok. The rest? I wouldn't know until it happens. I asked before about landmines and nobody seems to mind that you can't buy them or make them or bury them in your yard, lol. It seems people accept there should be some regulation, it's a matter of where to draw the line. This particular battle over cup sizes doesn't cross mine. I have said though that NYC is asking for lawsuits by exempting "diet" labeled sodas. __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.