$200,000 CASH for shooting a black guy

[Choker]

Seems to be a profitable gig. Wow

[19teenporn]

No thaks. I'm retired

[L-Pink]

I know I can shoot at least 3 per hour if I'm in the right part of town. So, 3 X $200,000 .......

.

[SleazyDream]

shot one photo of a black guy.


$200,000 please

[Choker]

After it's all said and down he will get over a million in donations for this.

[Spunky]

Leave the brothers alone

[Robbie]

Only if you're hispanic.

The Latino community seems to be pretty tight. He coulda shot a yellow, red, or white guy and if it had somehow become the center of the universe of news reporting (while thousands of young blacks are killed by other blacks every year without a peep from the media)....the Latino community would have still gave him as much money as they could to defend himself.

The $200,000 won't last long anyway. Sounds like a lot of money, but it's not really. He can't work. His family probably can't go to work either. So many threats have been made against him. AND he has to pay that lawyer.

[L-Pink]

I would hope most of the donations are from those supporting the "don't back down" laws hoping he will be found innocent and the laws left unchanged.

.

[Robbie]

Originally Posted by L-Pink

I would hope most of the donations are from those supporting the "don't back down" laws hoping he will be found innocent and the laws left unchanged.

.

Those laws are state by state. And I was watching the news the other night and it looks like the majority of the U.S. has that kind of law. Most of them called "Castle Laws" which mean that if somebody breaks into your home you can kill them whether they are running from you or not...just the fact they are in your home gives you the right to kill them.

And then some states have taken it to the Florida type law that says ANYWHERE you are at if you feel threatened you can take action. Apparently these laws were written after shit happened to people out on the streets and they got tired of being assaulted and killed. But I guess that isn't a "sexy" enough story for the press to really go into.

[smutnut]

I donated fiddy cent

[Choker]

Originally Posted by Robbie

Those laws are state by state. And I was watching the news the other night and it looks like the majority of the U.S. has that kind of law. Most of them called "Castle Laws" which mean that if somebody breaks into your home you can kill them whether they are running from you or not...just the fact they are in your home gives you the right to kill them.

And then some states have taken it to the Florida type law that says ANYWHERE you are at if you feel threatened you can take action. Apparently these laws were written after shit happened to people out on the streets and they got tired of being assaulted and killed. But I guess that isn't a "sexy" enough story for the press to really go into.

I may be wrong but I think Florida introduced this bill because of car jackings.

[nikki99]

I don´t understand, who is gonna get killed?

[epitome]

Originally Posted by L-Pink

I would hope most of the donations are from those supporting the "don't back down" laws hoping he will be found innocent and the laws left unchanged.

.

That and people who are probably disgusted with the fact that this case is being tried by the media.

I can imagine a lot of people giving money regardless of if they think he is guilty or not.

One thing that has finally been solved is his Dad was certainly not a well off, well connected judge.

[Robbie]

Originally Posted by Choker

I may be wrong but I think Florida introduced this bill because of car jackings.

That makes sense.

I'm not sure if this Zimmerman/Martin case is really a "stand your ground" case though.
He kinda "started it" by following the kid. I guess he could claim normal old "self defense"...but I don't know if that will fly. 'Cause that would mean that everytime you got in a fight and started losing the fight...you could shoot and kill the other guy because you're scared.

[shimmy2]

you guys may remember my house got robbed last year here in DR and i caught the guy in the act, he fled and jumped out a 2nd story window with my canon. when i told this to local gringos/expats here they tell me my only options in hindsight were to either do nothing and let it go, or take the guy out and delete all tracks, hide body etc. these are the only options... otherwise you'll end up on the wrong side of the law here for standing your ground, i get all these rambo WW2/vietnam era expats telling me all the tough guy shit they would have done if they were in my shoes, but seriously is it worth being locked up for months/years/forever for a damn slr... nope. and my same logic applies to the florida case. he should have left the kid alone, even IF he was doing something wrong. the instance you put your hands on someone unprovoked you're headed down the wrong path

[RebelR]

Originally Posted by Robbie

That makes sense.

I'm not sure if this Zimmerman/Martin case is really a "stand your ground" case though.
He kinda "started it" by following the kid. I guess he could claim normal old "self defense"...but I don't know if that will fly. 'Cause that would mean that everytime you got in a fight and started losing the fight...you could shoot and kill the other guy because you're scared.

Not sure if "following" can be considered instgating it. No more than the guy who gave you a funny look across the bar, or made some off color remark, would be seen as the instigator. Usually, its who touched who first, that the blame gets pinned on. Not sure if there are any witnesses that can vouch for either party in this case. So it will likely come down to a best guess scenario.

[DWB]

Originally Posted by shimmy2

you guys may remember my house got robbed last year here in DR and i caught the guy in the act, he fled and jumped out a 2nd story window with my canon. when i told this to local gringos/expats here they tell me my only options in hindsight were to either do nothing and let it go, or take the guy out and delete all tracks, hide body etc. these are the only options... otherwise you'll end up on the wrong side of the law here for standing your ground, i get all these rambo WW2/vietnam era expats telling me all the tough guy shit they would have done if they were in my shoes, but seriously is it worth being locked up for months/years/forever for a damn slr... nope. and my same logic applies to the florida case. he should have left the kid alone, even IF he was doing something wrong. the instance you put your hands on someone unprovoked you're headed down the wrong path

Qon (onprobation.com) caught a Thai burglar in his place and beat the fuck out him until the police came. Didn't get into any trouble and luckily nothing else happened to him later for causing problems for the guy, but he still may be in jail.

But yea, in most 3rd world situations, you either have to let it go or kill them and hide it. Nothing else you can do or you will end up fucked. I know a story here in Thailand where a guy got caught breaking into a foreigner's house and the foreigner saw his face and knew him, so just told him to leave and let it go. Then the guy came back a few days later and shot the home owner dead because he lost "face" by the guy seeing who he was. Sometimes you can't win from losing in these fucked up places.

[brassmonkey]

id pay 200k to see when he gets caught slippin cause he will

[alextokyo]

[Just Alex]

Originally Posted by shimmy2

and my same logic applies to the florida case. he should have left the kid alone, even IF he was doing something wrong. the instance you put your hands on someone unprovoked you're headed down the wrong path

Or your No_limit_nigga could've dropped his bad ass gangsta attitude and answered one simple question. Instead he chose to assault much smaller person and take matters in his own hands. Ofcourse that logic didn't cross your mind.

[Just Alex]

Originally Posted by brassmonkey

id pay 200k to see when he gets caught slippin cause he will

you dont have 10% of 200K. STFU.

[Choker]

Originally Posted by epitome

That and people who are probably disgusted with the fact that this case is being tried by the media.

I can imagine a lot of people giving money regardless of if they think he is guilty or not.

One thing that has finally been solved is his Dad was certainly not a well off, well connected judge.

And what about how the media was playing that video of him walking thru the jailhouse with no obvious injuries on his head or face? Then he released pics of his head and face, yeah he was fucked up bad. They shut the fuck up fast about that issue once those pics surfaced. Anyone know where those pics are online?

[marlboroack]

I'll do it or a dollar like that one guy in that one movie.

[Mr Pheer]

Originally Posted by Robbie

He can't work. His family probably can't go to work either. So many threats have been made against him.

Really the best thing that could happen to him right now is for a black person to attempt to follow through with one of those threats.

[Best-In-BC]

Originally Posted by Choker

After it's all said and down he will get over a million in donations for this.

Another intelligent thread

[Tofu]

Originally Posted by alextokyo

HA!

[jimmycooper]

Originally Posted by Choker

Seems to be a profitable gig. Wow

What's the going rate for offing crusty old bigots?

[Choker]

Originally Posted by RebelR

Not sure if "following" can be considered instgating it. No more than the guy who gave you a funny look across the bar, or made some off color remark, would be seen as the Iinstigator. Usually, its who touched who first, that the blame gets pinned on. Not sure if there are any witnesses that can vouch for either party in this case. So it will likely come down to a best guess scenario.

I agree with you, what happened before should not matter, but if this goes to a jury they will consider it even if told not to.

[mineistaken]

some muslims put up a bounty on Obama's head or what is it about lol