Quote:
Originally Posted by EukerVoorn
I don't get this. Are you talking about 100 sign-ups a day or $100 a day?
If you're talking about 100 sign-ups a day and saying that's bad.... I would say that 100 sign ups a day for one site is fantastic  |
I was talking about the profit needed to fund a live girl.
It's in relationship to my original post. If there is a solution to the mess, is it affordable?
I think you're right. Few sites today do 3,000 a month. and the ones that do are very likely those with Tubes and they lose sales more than any other method we ever had of losing them. Those sales today are coming from smaller fish. Eventually those losses will be theirs.
If there is a solution it might be in paysites offering web cams at a reduced price and exposing the paid dating sites industry for what most of it is. A con. Or offering free dating sites. Hitting the funders of Tubes might be a solution. It's how it can be done that's the problem.
Anyway, fortunately we're sitting pretty. Nothing will change, feel for some of you guys. That's genuine. Even for Damian, when porn eventually gets too small for him to earn a living, he might make it in mainstream. If not the odds on him getting a job with his CV are slim. In offline marketing impossible.
"Let me show you how I was doing split testing on 3 ways Cashes porn sites Mr Employer."
