Business New google penalties on mobile pages!? Change in mobile rules!? - GoFuckYourself.com

CrazyWhiteMan · 09-15-2014, 07:24 AM

OK, so on Saturday I got an email from google webmaster tools that read as follows:

Quote:

Google has detected that your site may be showing different pages to users from those that are shown to Google. For example, users visiting from specific browsers, devices, or IP ranges may be redirected in ways that violate our quality guidelines. Cloaking and sneaky redirects are violations of Google's Webmaster Guidelines. As a result of your site using cloaking and/or sneaky redirects, Google has applied a manual spam action to http://wetpussygames.com/. There may be other actions on your site or parts of your site

I got a mobile version of my site at http://m.wetpussygames.com and I've had it for the past 3 years, without any changes really.

I assume google now has a problem with it because my mobile page is a bit different from my desktop page. It never had any problems with it for the past 3 years, so I don't know what's wrong now. I assume they are changing the rules.

What I think google has a problem with is that on my desktop page I got 3 categories: games, cartoons, and hentai videos, while the mobile page only displays the hentai videos (the hentai videos are exactly the same on both desktop and mobile sites). I don't display games and cartoons on mobile site because they are .swf flash so they won't work anyway on mobile...

I'm not sure what would be google-friendly way to do this? Does google want all content on both desktop and mobile to be the same? Even though some content won't work on mobile?

Did anyone else experience this? Any suggestions on what do to would be appreciated.

PornMySex · 09-15-2014, 07:28 AM

Your mobile version looks good to me.

tiramisu · 09-15-2014, 08:00 AM

I assume duplicate contents?

BIGTYMER · 09-15-2014, 08:23 AM

You redirecting via htaccess?

Klen · 09-15-2014, 11:03 AM

Well yes according to guidelines desktop/mobile content must match,you cant have a special version of site for mobile.

Famemonster · 09-15-2014, 11:18 AM

I got hit with that same penalty again. I submitted a malware request to securi, and they have not found anything. All I was doing was redirecting my mobile traffic to a paysite because most mobile devices are not flash compatible. There is no fucking malware, now I can re-direct. @crazywhiteman, you did it the right way! You should not have recieved that penalty. Do you have banners up for a traffic company that could be injecting malware?

Klen · 09-15-2014, 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Famemonster

I got hit with that same penalty again. I submitted a malware request to securi, and they have not found anything. All I was doing was redirecting my mobile traffic to a paysite because most mobile devices are not flash compatible. There is no fucking malware, now I can re-direct. @crazywhiteman, you did it the right way! You should not have recieved that penalty. Do you have banners up for a traffic company that could be injecting malware?

As i said,content must match on both desktop/mobile version.So for example,if you visit domain.com/page.html ,it should redirect to m.domain.com/page.html , not m.domain.com.

Tdash · 09-15-2014, 01:12 PM

Use a fluid layout, no need to make a different version for your mobile site.

Klen · 09-15-2014, 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tdash

Use a fluid layout, no need to make a different version for your mobile site.

It is called "responsive template " and also know as "bootstrap template" as well

Va2k · 09-15-2014, 01:30 PM

Why not just use responsive design?

czarina · 09-15-2014, 01:58 PM

Google sucks!

czarina · 09-15-2014, 02:00 PM

There was a time when AOL "was" the internet. They got too big for their own good and ended up being nothing. Google's time is not too far away. Mark my words.

Matt 26z · 09-15-2014, 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fungus

Why not just use responsive design?

Sounds great on the surface, but the design challenges are pretty steep. I've yet to see a responsive design that looks fantastic in all viewing formats.

If you start from the problem areas - phone browsers - and apply the design up through tablet to desktop, you end up with a less than optimal desktop design.

The ideal approach is to have different designs for each one, but this can get you into trouble with Google if you take advantage of the extra space for content on the desktop and tablet designs.

My theory is that Google is trying to slowly kill desktop use. And a big part of that is telling webmasters that the content of phone and desktop has to be the same.

PornDiscounts-V · 09-15-2014, 04:27 PM

My theory is that there is no conspiracy.

Matt 26z · 09-15-2014, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vvvvv

My theory is that there is no conspiracy.

A world that moves away from Windows machines and uses Android and Chromebooks is more valuable to Google than the current hierarchy.

09-15-2014, 01:30 PM	#10
Va2k I’m still alive barley. Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Va Posts: 10,060	Why not just use responsive design? __________________

09-15-2014, 04:27 PM	#14
PornDiscounts-V Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: L.A. Posts: 5,744	My theory is that there is no conspiracy. __________________ Blog Posts - Contextual Links - Hardlinks on 600+ Blog Network * Handwritten * 180 C Class IPs * Permanent! * Many Niches! * Bulk Discounts! GFYPosts /at/ J2Media.net

09-15-2014, 07:28 AM	#2
PornMySex Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Earth Posts: 577	Your mobile version looks good to me.

09-15-2014, 08:00 AM	#3
tiramisu Isaac W Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 393	I assume duplicate contents?

09-15-2014, 08:23 AM	#4
BIGTYMER Junior Achiever Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Walled Garden Posts: 17,066	You redirecting via htaccess?

09-15-2014, 11:03 AM	#5
Klen Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Little Vienna Posts: 32,235	Well yes according to guidelines desktop/mobile content must match,you cant have a special version of site for mobile.

09-15-2014, 11:18 AM	#6
Famemonster Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2014 Posts: 536	I got hit with that same penalty again. I submitted a malware request to securi, and they have not found anything. All I was doing was redirecting my mobile traffic to a paysite because most mobile devices are not flash compatible. There is no fucking malware, now I can re-direct. @crazywhiteman, you did it the right way! You should not have recieved that penalty. Do you have banners up for a traffic company that could be injecting malware?

09-15-2014, 01:12 PM	#8
Tdash Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2013 Posts: 709	Use a fluid layout, no need to make a different version for your mobile site.

09-15-2014, 01:58 PM	#11
czarina Webmaster Extraordinaire Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: A beautiful beach... Posts: 10,745	Google sucks!

09-15-2014, 02:00 PM	#12
czarina Webmaster Extraordinaire Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: A beautiful beach... Posts: 10,745	There was a time when AOL "was" the internet. They got too big for their own good and ended up being nothing. Google's time is not too far away. Mark my words.