CC Bill and BADDD SITES
 

http://LOLITA-AGE.COM

a site CCBill proccesses

Anyone know any OTHER Quality sites like this that CC bill processes for

Trying to deflect attention from the super targetted "marketing" emails your company sent out to every single domain in the world?

*YAWN*

Nope fatttttt

i responded to that thread

But THANX for asking Dude

:thumbsup

Here's a tip, if you got a complaint about a site, email ccbill. They will check it out, if its ILLEGAL they will cancel the account. I dont think they care about anyone's "moral" stance. I havent looked at that site, but theres a difference between legal and illegal.

Do you think CCBILL will jepordize their business for a few extra K processing for a kiddy porn site??? Please.

Gary
did KK wake you up screaming about meeeeee

:Graucho

LOLITA is as BAD as KP

Come on Garry

let KK stand for herself

She ducked this question on 2 boards yesterday
and wanted her to respond somewhere about them

Discreet Billing Provided By CCBill / 3rd Party Secure Billing

___________________________________

From the billing page

I couldnt find an 2257 info

can anyone find It?

Hmmmm someone is trying to pick a fight.

No
Just trying to get her to respond

This was posted on 2 other boards yesterday that she posts on Regularly and she Ducked Both boards

maybe she will answer here

forest = morality police

hehehehehe

garry

I want to CLEAN up this INDUSTRY
ONE website at a time

:thumbsup

Forest: Your from interclimax/amsterdam cash right?
Why dont you pay people you fucked out of cash instead of bitching about other peoples sites?

If im right and you are from amsterdam cash go fuck yourself.

Huh? Ive seen lolita sites with 40 year old crack whores on it. Lolita is a word. A very overused word. KP is a crime. What part of this dont you understand? I'll explain if i got time, but Survivor starts in 20 minutes

NO
I MARKET for them

1. I am NOT employed by them
2. I dont mail for them

:winkwink:

Well, I am no expert on KK, but odds are you will get the blanket response that ANY processor would give you, and that would be to report the site to the processor. KK is no lawyer, so it is not really in her best interest to make legal judgement calls. If I get questions regarding technical issues of any program I am associated with, I direct those questions to those best suited to answer that question, the coders. If I did decide to answer, my answer (while it may be slightly informed), wont be nearly as comprehensive and precise as one of my programmers would be able to do. So I am assuming your question is best posed to the ccbill legal department.

Yes, some of the images are iffy... but is it just the fact that they use the term "lolita"? This whole damn industry is fueled by sites that insinuate underage. Its an idea as old as porn itself. It doesnt matter, they will have to comply with Visa soon anyhow on the whole "lolita" issue.

And how many sites you see out there with 2257s? 99% of newbs have no idea what that is while they are spewing out thousands of galleries and AVS sites a day. Im not saying its right, its just a fact of life. I have never heard of a website being busted for lack of it. Content producers seem to care, but joe webmaster could give a rats ass. Again, that doesnt make it right, but you only point it out to nitpick.

I am halfway thru a session of some of the ugliest weed I have ever smoked so I have no idea if any of that made any sense.

i dont know if you have noticed, but almost EVERY SINGLE questionable site like that, CCBill is their processor =-)

Forest,
Take your moron ass on back over to the thread that is calling you on the carpet for spamming. Or better yet, go tell your bosses to stop fucking spamming webmasters, you know how many useless times I got that email today? On domains that are NEVER used for anything???

And by the way, IF you'd get your facts in order BEFORE you try to go slinging shit just BECAUSE you see other idiots doing it, you'd have clicked on thru that join page -- something that NO ONE ever seems to do. I don't host that site so I have no control over what join page they use, or what content they have on that server. Whether or not it works is another matter, you ignorant ass.

Pretty sad when Labret makes more sense in the state he's in than you do.

HAHAHAHAHAHAH

AND she still DIDNT even comment on the site or her comapnies processing for it

Way to Go KK

:thumbsup

Services provided by:
CCBILL LLC.
888 906 0666 (U.S.)
480 449 8819 (International)
Email address: [email protected]

Let me type this s-l-o-w-l-y for you, idiot, and truly you are.

Try to join.

I'm going to dinner, I'm done giving kindergarten lessons to you, idiot.

KK
Im not putting ANY info in there

why would they LIE and say u process for them

WHAT are u doing about this SLANDER ( if it is)

Forest: If your working for those assholes you can still Go Fuck Yourself i havent been in that paysite but have know people that ran lolita paysites and they allways used 18+ content so unless you got some pics that you can say are under 18 i dont think ccbill or anyone gives a fuck what you think.

Forest, do you think its possible that their account has been canceled???

OK so where is their 2257 info

I cant find it but then again acording to KK im an IDIOT

:1orglaugh

all i find is stuff like this

Authorized Sales Agent for:
Lolita-age.com
913159-0000
is CC bill

Then why wouldnt KK say that and put this all to rest???

Because your an idiot :)
.

she gets more enjoyment out of you making an arse of yourself?

those sites are so pathetic

what a bunch of lame asses to live off that underage porn shit

PETE i agree 100%

and those that process and host them also

and sandman

I LOVE you mannnnnn

:1orglaugh

Forest, you are really an ignorant...

KimmyKim just told you that she canceled their account, before....cant you read between the lines?

They can stop processing for the site, but cannot erase the content on their server, you know..?

Also...I agree with sandman...you fuckers rip me off when I was dooing CJs....Ben told me that I could send all the hits I wanted to their site (exit traffic) and I would be paid...well, guess what? I have not been paid because my traffic was exit traffic....even if Ben approved my way of sending him traffic.

You are just a bunch of cheaters...

:321GFY

KimmyKim just told you that she canceled their account, before....cant you read between the lines?
________________________

Uhhhhh

I only read what it written

Do u have some mystical powers reading between the lines?

:Graucho

I think the best way to sum this up...is Forest has a crush on Kimmy. Sorta like Sleazy dream...heheheheheh

Or Forest was picked last in gym class so now he pics on girls :2 cents:

i wanna see a site with pics of naked adult webmasters... ones like DH, amp, boneprone, aaron (but we'd have to keep snow out of the pic cuz he cant keep his hands off other people's cocks)

what a fucking idiot..

there needs to be a law to allow the cops to crack down faster with out going through courts on child porn / lolita shit

and they need to take off this stupid law of "art" that the word lolita hide behinds

it should be,
site has lolita stuff or childporn, no matter where it is in the world, call up the host, gone, call up the local cops and have buddy arrested.

I have a crush on her

ummm

shucks

It's ok Forest admitting you have a problem is half the battle.

I saw her hung over 1 morning in miami

That did it for me

:1orglaugh

So what have we learned from all this? Does Labret really have the chronic? Is Gary still sleeping on my couch? Is Forest really as dense as a tree or does his reading comprehension level equal that of a 6 year old? Is he a spammer? Damn, I guess I'll have to check that other thread.

Forest isn't a spammer...that's an insult to spammers!

Spammers are usually good enough to only mail you once or twice a day to whatever address they harvested from wherever.....they don't typically email you at every single domain you own... :throwup

But he doesn't work there.. :moon :fart

I just reported that site to ASACP. I think the images go beyond "iffy"

This is from http://www.lolitasex.com meta tags. Fantasyman already posted this in another thread, but still CCBill processes for it. Lolitasex does not have underage models, however they are preying on pedophiles and illegal content promises to make their money. CCBill processes for them... and why? This site sure looks illegal in it's meta tags promoting child porn. "13,14,15" "lolita girls age 14-17"> What in Gods name is that doing on their site? That is illegal in my books, but that is just my opinion. I am disgusted that CCBill processes for these people and I would never use them as my credit card processor. Dirty scum bags. They have known about this site for a long time and they still do nothing about it. What gives?

<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
<META content="Microsoft FrontPage 4.0" name=GENERATOR>
<META
content="lolita, lolita sex, lolita bbs, young lolita, russian lolitas, little lolitas, lolita porn, preteen lolita, nude lolitas, lolita art, lolita girl, naturist, teen, underage, naked, illegal, mpeg, video"
name=Keywords>
<META
content="An Lolita Gallery of young nude russian lolita girls Age 14 to 17"
name=Description>
<META
content="lolita, lolitas, nude teenage girls, naked teenage girls, naked teens, naked young girls, teen nudism, teenage nudism, young teens, underage, under age, under-age, underage models, under age models, under-age models, underage girls, under age girls, under-age girls, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 year old, junior high, little girls, under 18, amateur teens, amateur girls, amateur teenage girls, amateurs, amateur models, cheerleaders, highschool cheerleaders, schoolgirls, nude, nudity, innocentangels, nudes, nude pictures, adolescent, pubescent, photography, david hamilton, jock sturgis, panties, panty, youth, borders, barnes &amp; noble, art photography"
name=Classification></HEAD>


You be the judge. Yuk.

I learned that beastiality is NOT the only thing CCbill is involved with.

Good find, Fantasy Man!

Hmm
From there partner program
Meta tags
content="An Lolita Gallery of young nude russian lolita girls Age 14 to 17"


I think I see now why visa want to take this matter into their own hands.

These guys are the huns biggest advertiser, been there ever since I remember.

Meta tags will be in court soon i guess. If visa mention them then the fbi are more than interested.

As if the rest of the site wasn't bad enough, those metas are absolutely fucking disgusting. :2 cents:

eww.

Those are references to child porn alright. I think they contradicted themselves there.

I think all the billing proccessors should just agree, "let's not proccess for these sites, or imitation sites"

i dont get it
it is not that much money...it is probably alot, but i mean, not the whole boat ;)

Maybe someone should mail Barnes and Noble, they appearin the meta tags. I am sure they have very expensive lawyers with not much to do.