![]() |
Michael Moore Used Fake Newspaper Headline
And I thought MM made sure that his movie was without any editing, etc.. What a load of crap this douchebag is.
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...ichael_moore_1 |
"The (Bloomington) Pantagraph newspaper in central Illinois has sent a letter to Moore and his production company, Lions Gate Entertainment Corp., asking Moore to apologize for using what the newspaper says was a doctored front page in the film, the paper reported Friday. It also is seeking compensatory damages of $1. "
$1? :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
lol yea I saw that too.. WTF a dollar? that's gotta be a typo
|
If he did it I say Fuck him on that one but there is so much video of that douchbag bush that I think it overwelms this little fact...
|
It's amazing that your President lies to you about going to war...lies to you about protecting the constitution...on and on and on..but yet so many people would rather focus on a movie.
Seems your priorities just aren't straight. |
Hmm... Like nobody would notice....
|
Did anyone even bother to read the article?
|
Quote:
There is no proof. We impeached Clinton for lying about a blow job, think we couldn't remove Bush for lying about something that was killing people? Let us be reasonable people, please :) |
They are not denying that they ran the article, they are just saying it was on a different date than what Moore showed in the movie?
I wonder how much the Republicans had to pay this paper to sue Moore? Try again, Rush! :1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Do you not even know what the patriot act is? Stick in Kansas Dorothy and fucking Toto. |
Quote:
"It appeared in a Dec. 5, 2001, edition, but the headline was not used on the front page. Instead, it was found in much smaller type above a letter to the editor, which the paper says reflects "only the opinions of the letter writer." " |
Once again..there is so much going on in the world that needs questioning...but the conservatives are too busy spending that time on a movie...LOL
Man Bush really put your blinders on tight...and gonna pull you to the right. |
Quote:
|
Moore fucked up. He was trying to make a point , but did it in entirely the wrong way.
If you read what he did, he took an EDITORIAL headline and made it into a newspaper headline , thats a bit different than simply swapping a 3rd page headline for a top headline. it would be something like quoting lensman with something written by someone completely different on GFY.com. Or it would be even more close if they took a snapshot of www.gofuckyourself.com and replaced a thread topic started by kak_azn as the top logo for the site |
Quote:
|
And I will make this prediction...if Bush does get reelected God forbid...he will be impeached before the term is up.
|
Quote:
For? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
This is a trick question, by the way. As I stated, if there WAS evidence, he would have been/in the process of being impeached. Since there is no evidence, lay off. Since it was bad information, how come other countries came to the same conclusion BEFORE the war, and still stand by it today? Bush must have swayed them as well, no? France, Russia, Britain and US to this day still claim the same as Clinton's appointed George Tenet... "WMDs are a slam dunk." |
Also, the 9/11 Commission report also debunked some parts of the 9/11 movie as well.
If someone was going to make a movie on one of the most important days we have lived through, why did it have to be this AssClown? I would of had someone middle of the road and backed up starting back 8-9 years ago and build up on the Cole Bombing, the first WTC bombings and thos mishaps to give the American public a better sense of the errors we made instead of someone that just had an agenda with one person. Perhaps a movie that followed the 9/11 Commission report. |
|
Quote:
http://moorelies.com |
Quote:
You'd rather focus on a movie and not the leader of our country. :1orglaugh If it's working for you great...but I think there are more pressing issues. |
Quote:
|
I dont really care. I think that some people are out to make moore look bad after farenheit 9/11 and they use anything they can find, its no different to me than the thing about how he was a registered democrat, who the fuck cares. Maybe he used a fake headline but he was making a point and i didnt think that the newspaper made the movie look any more honest than it otherwise would have. The only thing that the paper makes me think is that if he forged that then maybe he forged other things as well but either way if he did it will eventually come out:2 cents:
|
someone get me a beer. im too lazy to get up...
|
Who gives a fuck about something so trivial? You bush fuckwads are really scraping the bottom of the barrel.
|
someone get me a beer. im too lazy to get up...
------------------------------------------------------------- George W. Bush is a 100% alcoholic who would be happy to help you get a beer! He might drink it before you get your hands on it but, you knew he was an alcoholic before you asked. Go GW . . . nobody thinks that you regularly wipe out on your bike and choke on pretzels because you are abstaining from alcohol. Be proud that you are a drunk!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Read Terrorism on the Clinton side. What a load of shit, Clinton had opportunities to take care of/focus on Bin Laden and he never did. There, I'm not focusing on MM and or the movie. |
Quote:
All of you fucking Republicans complained about Clinton's efforts to get Bin Laden !!! You smoke cock and that makes me not listen to anything you say! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Your post has been found to contain too much common sense and rational thinking. Please dumb it down a little. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Do you ever wonder why there was never a successful terrorist strike on the United States while Clinton was President? You know that Osama decided to make the U. S. his favorite target after George Bush Sr. kept our men in Saudi Arabia after the Gulf War. Do you ever wonder why there was a massively successful terrorist attack on the U.S. while Bush was President????? It isn't too hard to figure out. |
I'm a moderate republican and I dont like bush either. But many people paint Moore as the end all be all source of Bush and republican bashing aurguments. And he is fucking lair.
Howard Stern among others use his movie to move public opinion. So if some of us do focus on him, it is because he has an impact on our lives. |
Quote:
If he knows from the get go that he's not going to have to agonize over punitive damages - and all he's left to say is guilty or not guilty - his job is made easier and pyschologically may be more willing to go with the plaintiff. and they get their headline - that Moore is guilty / wrong |
:glugglug
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's a civil trial, there is no Guilt involved in this trial. |
Quote:
You show people proof that Bush lied and sent their kids off to war, there would be a little outrage -- enough to make these Republicans in the house vote for what their constituants want. Besides, the subject hasn't even come up -- and democrats would attempt it just to make Bush look bad -- hasn't happened. Again, where's my proof... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Another way to look at it . . . how many terrorist strikes to Osama successfully complete during the 90's??? YAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!! You got it!!!!!!!! That's right bitch . . . GW needs to take a permanent vacation and leave our country's defense to someone who cares!!! We won't survive another 4 years of that fucker riding his bike and wiping out when we need him worrying about our country!!! |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:40 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123