GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Michael Moore Used Fake Newspaper Headline (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=333994)

scoobydookc 07-30-2004 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tam
Which part of Kansas City? I lived there for a little while in like 81-83.... on the East Side of it..... I was pretty young, but I still have family there. :)
The Lee's Summit side if anyone who knows the area asks :)

Right now in Independence --- for taxing purposes, but I would never claim it. Meth capital of the United States?

But yeah, I'm on the east side as well :)

scoobydookc 07-30-2004 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BigG
Do you ever wonder why there was never a successful terrorist strike on the United States while Clinton was President?

He was president during the OKC Bombing, right?

swoop 07-30-2004 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by scoobydookc
He was president during the OKC Bombing, right?
And during the first WTC bombing right?

dig420 07-30-2004 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by EZRhino
Yes Clinton didnt do his job to prepare this country. If you saw what I did in the 90's you would come to the same conclusion
Guess what? The outgoing Clinton administration told the incoming Bush administration that AQ and Bin Laden should be their #1 priority. They didn't want to hear it, because they had it in mind to go after pornographers instead. You just swallowed more right-wing bullshit. The WTC got bombed because your 'war president' was asleep at the wheel.

For you Moore bashers, I have to congratulate you. You haven't been able to find out any lies MM told about the President or his utter and complete incompetence in his position, but you caught him photoshopping a headline! ALRIGHT!!

It's almost as good as catching Clinton getting a BJ, but not quite eh?

dig420 07-30-2004 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by scoobydookc
He was president during the OKC Bombing, right?
A bombing close to the heart of all you super-patriots that want to suspend civil liberties and ruin everything else that makes this country great. He was one of you.

BigG 07-30-2004 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by scoobydookc
Actually I believe Clinton bombed Iraq the day of the impeachment vote... Not bin Laden :)
What?

Are you on crack?

You are supposed to point out something bad about Clinton.


I think the fact that Bin Laden was only able to successfully attack the U.S. while George "Corn Cob" Bush was asleep at the wheel should be something that bothers you.

The fact that you continue to defend the "idiot" makes me wonder what you have invested in that fuck.


Bush would rather take a vacation than worry about the problems of the U.S.


Is that the type of President you want? An alcoholic, lazy, fuckwad????

swoop 07-30-2004 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420
For you Moore bashers, I have to congratulate you. You haven't been able to find out any lies MM told about the President or his utter and complete incompetence in his position, but you caught him photoshopping a headline! ALRIGHT!!
Well the 9/11 Commission report has found mishaps on his movie

scoobydookc 07-30-2004 09:45 PM

"Cock smokers like you were complaining that Clinton was trying to distract our attention from the Lewinsky matter when he tried to get Bin Laden."

I don't remember ONCE Clinton going after bin Laden. Not even to sway the news from his BJ/impeachment. Didn't foreign authorities even offer bin Laden to Clinton?

He did bomb an aspirin factory or some shit in Iraq to do just that.

And I pointed out something good he did?

Explain.

DarkBob 07-30-2004 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by swoop
And during the first WTC bombing right?
The 1st trade center bombing happened a month after Clinton took office, and the terrorists responsible were caught and sentenced to like 200 years in prison, weren't they?

swoop 07-30-2004 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BigG
Do you ever wonder why there was never a successful terrorist strike on the United States while Clinton was President?
Are you going to look this up yet?

marzzo 07-30-2004 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420
ALRIGHT!!

It's almost as good as catching Clinton getting a BJ, but not quite eh?

Yeah, almost, but not as good.

DarkBob 07-30-2004 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by scoobydookc
He did bomb an aspirin factory or some shit in Iraq to do just that.

I believe the asprin factory was in Sudan. It was suspected they were producing chemical weapons there. I guess we should have know better, if they really were the sign would have said "illegal chemical weapons factory" instead of "aspirin factory"

EZRhino 07-30-2004 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BigG
Another way to look at it . . . how many terrorist strikes to Osama successfully complete during the 90's???

YAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!! You got it!!!!!!!!

That's right bitch . . . GW needs to take a permanent vacation and leave our country's defense to someone who cares!!!


We won't survive another 4 years of that fucker riding his bike and wiping out when we need him worrying about our country!!!

Listen Bitch do you remember a little thing that happened at the WTC in the underground parking. I think a 5 story hole in the parking structure of the WTC counts as a succesful attack.
Now STFU

dig420 07-30-2004 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by scoobydookc
"Cock smokers like you were complaining that Clinton was trying to distract our attention from the Lewinsky matter when he tried to get Bin Laden."

I don't remember ONCE Clinton going after bin Laden. Not even to sway the news from his BJ/impeachment. Didn't foreign authorities even offer bin Laden to Clinton?

He did bomb an aspirin factory or some shit in Iraq to do just that.

And I pointed out something good he did?

Explain.

You are just REAL LOUD dumbass aren't you? Typical Bush nuthugger..
-------------------------

Statement by President Clinton
The President spoke from the White House on his decision to strike 'terrorist-related facilities'

Good afternoon. Today I ordered our armed forces to strike at terrorist-related facilities in Afghanistan and Sudan because of the imminent threat they presented to our national security.

I want to speak with you about the objective of this action and why it was necessary.

Our target was terror. Our mission was clear -- to strike at the network of radical groups affiliated with and funded by Osama bin Laden, perhaps the preeminent organizer and financier of international terrorism in the world today.

http://www.time.com/time/daily/speci...intonwash.html

And he didn't even have a memo telling him AQ was planning to attack inside the US.

BigG 07-30-2004 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by scoobydookc


Explain.


THAT'S IT!!!!!!!!! NO MORE FUCKING BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!

You are posting as both "scoobydookc" and also as "swoop" and I am sick of it you simple minded fuck!


Try posting as yourself and don't worry about the "illusion" of having more than one "Bush fucker" supporter.


Bush is a fucker and you aren't fooling anyone!

EZRhino 07-30-2004 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BigG
What?

Are you on crack?

You are supposed to point out something bad about Clinton.


I think the fact that Bin Laden was only able to successfully attack the U.S. while George "Corn Cob" Bush was asleep at the wheel should be something that bothers you.

The fact that you continue to defend the "idiot" makes me wonder what you have invested in that fuck.


Bush would rather take a vacation than worry about the problems of the U.S.


Is that the type of President you want? An alcoholic, lazy, fuckwad????

Who is the lazy fuckwad who doesnt know that there was 2 terroists attacks in the US during Clintons watch

Joesho 07-30-2004 09:52 PM

Moore, in 04!!!!:thumbsup :1orglaugh

sicone 07-30-2004 09:55 PM

Why is anyone surprised by this.. look at the bullshit he pulled with Hestons speaches in bowling for columbine:2 cents:

scoobydookc 07-30-2004 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BigG
THAT'S IT!!!!!!!!! NO MORE FUCKING BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!

You are posting as both "scoobydookc" and also as "swoop" and I am sick of it you simple minded fuck!


Try posting as yourself and don't worry about the "illusion" of having more than one "Bush fucker" supporter.


Bush is a fucker and you aren't fooling anyone!

Sorry, never even crossed my mind to use a name like "swoop."

swoop 07-30-2004 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BigG
THAT'S IT!!!!!!!!! NO MORE FUCKING BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!

You are posting as both "scoobydookc" and also as "swoop" and I am sick of it you simple minded fuck!


Try posting as yourself and don't worry about the "illusion" of having more than one "Bush fucker" supporter.


Bush is a fucker and you aren't fooling anyone!

You are such a CLASSHOLE. I have no idea who scoobydookc is, there are people on this board that know me from Internext, I'm not a huge player, hopefully some people might read this and back me up. But before you make a fucking stupid comment why don't you get your facts straight. From reading your posts you still haven't answered a question from me so it's clear you are a total moron.

scoobydookc 07-30-2004 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420
<cut>
Our target was terror. Our mission was clear -- to strike at the network of radical groups affiliated with and funded by Osama bin Laden, perhaps the preeminent organizer and financier of international terrorism in the world today.

http://www.time.com/time/daily/speci...intonwash.html

And he didn't even have a memo telling him AQ was planning to attack inside the US.

Like I've been saying all along, I want proof. THAT is proof, I gladly submit I was wrong.

baddog 07-30-2004 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by swoop
When the movie came out he said in interviews that the movie was checked, re-checked without erros and said that you won't find anything untrue.
and you believed that? :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

EZRhino 07-30-2004 09:58 PM

I guess this thread shows the difference between people who are given information and those who go and find out for themselves.
Guess know one told BigG about what happened in the 90's

baddog 07-30-2004 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by crockett
lol yea I saw that too.. WTF a dollar? that's gotta be a typo
no, it is about the principle

BigG 07-30-2004 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by EZRhino
Who is the lazy fuckwad who doesnt know that there was 2 terroists attacks in the US during Clintons watch

List them!!!!


1. ????
2. ????

How many successful attacks were there? How many of the twin towers went down???

I also want you to remember that Timothy McVeigh was created during the "Gulf War" - that is George Bush Sr. you simple fucking fuck. That is the same shit that created "Osama" you smelly pig fucker.

Clinton had no way to stop what George Bush created during the Gulf War. So . . .

dig420 07-30-2004 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by EZRhino
Who is the lazy fuckwad who doesnt know that there was 2 terroists attacks in the US during Clintons watch
who is the lazy sigwhore who doesn't know that approximately 45 times more people were lost to terrorist activity under Reagan than under Clinton?

baddog 07-30-2004 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mr.Fiction
They are not denying that they ran the article, they are just saying it was on a different date than what Moore showed in the movie?


did you read the article? They never ran that headline. . . . it was a letter to the editor

scoobydookc 07-30-2004 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BigG
List them!!!!


1. ????
2. ????

How many successful attacks were there? How many of the twin towers went down???

I also want you to remember that Timothy McVeigh was created during the "Gulf War" - that is George Bush Sr. you simple fucking fuck. That is the same shit that created "Osama" you smelly pig fucker.

Clinton had no way to stop what George Bush created during the Gulf War. So . . .

I'm obviously blinded here, I found no sense in what he just said. Now it's about who was in office when they flipped their wig?

dig420 07-30-2004 10:02 PM

oh yeah, what was Reagan's response to 240 dead Marines in Lebanon?

to RUN LIKE HELL!!!

baddog 07-30-2004 10:02 PM

. . . . . the headline was not used on the front page. Instead, it was found in much smaller type above a letter to the editor, which the paper says reflects "only the opinions of the letter writer."

dig420 07-30-2004 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by scoobydookc
I'm obviously blinded here, I found no sense in what he just said. Now it's about who was in office when they flipped their wig?
yeah it is. They were bottled up under Clinton and a high priority of the government. We lost about 10 people and a parking ramp to Osama.

Bush wanted to get pornographers and any scientists who believed in global warming instead of the terrorists, and 9-11 happened.

baddog 07-30-2004 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
Moore fucked up. He was trying to make a point , but did it in entirely the wrong way.

If you read what he did, he took an EDITORIAL headline and made it into a newspaper headline , thats a bit different than simply swapping a 3rd page headline for a top headline.

it would be something like quoting lensman with something written by someone completely different on GFY.com.

Or it would be even more close if they took a snapshot of www.gofuckyourself.com and replaced a thread topic started by kak_azn as the top logo for the site

:thumbsup . . . and I never agree with you

EZRhino 07-30-2004 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BigG
List them!!!!


1. ????
2. ????

How many successful attacks were there? How many of the twin towers went down???

I also want you to remember that Timothy McVeigh was created during the "Gulf War" - that is George Bush Sr. you simple fucking fuck. That is the same shit that created "Osama" you smelly pig fucker.

Clinton had no way to stop what George Bush created during the Gulf War. So . . .

So the fact that the towers didnt go down doesnt make it an attack.

And building blow up isnt attack either.

dig420 07-30-2004 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by baddog
. . . . . the headline was not used on the front page. Instead, it was found in much smaller type above a letter to the editor, which the paper says reflects "only the opinions of the letter writer."
so what? Is that the best the right-wingers can do? Not too fucking impressive.

BigG 07-30-2004 10:04 PM

Whoever is President NEXT will have to defend the U.S. against all the fucking crap GW Bush created during his 4 hell fucking shit years.

We will be in a bunch of trouble and only a true master will fucking help us get through it! Someone who works hard and cares about us.

Clearly this excludes GW Bush . . . he just wants to go fuck around on his ranch . . . why don't you let him?

Please, let that alcoholic loser go play on his ranch and spare this country!!!! Vote for anybody but Bush in '04!!!!

dig420 07-30-2004 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by EZRhino
So the fact that the towers didnt go down doesnt make it an attack.

And building blow up isnt attack either.

it was an attack. An unsuccessful attack, unlike the attacks they made under Bush, AFTER he was fully warned.

baddog 07-30-2004 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420
so what? Is that the best the right-wingers can do? Not too fucking impressive.
you want every inaccuracy in the movie pointed out to you? for what purpose? you'd never listen to it anyway

dig420 07-30-2004 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BigG
Whoever is President NEXT will have to defend the U.S. against all the fucking crap GW Bush created during his 4 hell fucking shit years.

We will be in a bunch of trouble and only a true master will fucking help us get through it! Someone who works hard and cares about us.

Clearly this excludes GW Bush . . . he just wants to go fuck around on his ranch . . . why don't you let him?

Please, let that alcoholic loser go play on his ranch and spare this country!!!! Vote for anybody but Bush in '04!!!!

There is nothing but hatred and contempt for the US globally now. Kerry will have a lot of work to do to clean up this fucking mess.

dig420 07-30-2004 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by baddog
you want every inaccuracy in the movie pointed out to you? for what purpose? you'd never listen to it anyway
what other inaccuracies?

EZRhino 07-30-2004 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420
oh yeah, what was Reagan's response to 240 dead Marines in Lebanon?

to RUN LIKE HELL!!!

No we actually bombed that fuck out of the planners of the attack.
Reagan was known for his love and respect for the US Marine Corps and "I will definately fuck you up" attitude.

swoop 07-30-2004 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by baddog
you want every inaccuracy in the movie pointed out to you? for what purpose? you'd never listen to it anyway
Exactly! There are quite a few in the movie, but they don't want to listen.

BigG 07-30-2004 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by scoobydookc
I'm obviously blinded here, I found no sense in what he just said. Now it's about who was in office when they flipped their wig?

FIRST OF ALL . . . NOBODY NOTICED THAT YOU JUST CREATED THIS SIG.


You fucking sad sack, who do you blame when someone causes something? When Bush leaves our troops in Saudi Arabia to occupy the land and Osama decides that this is enough to dedicate his life to fighting??? Who do you blame?

When Tim McVeigh claims that he was fucked over during the Gulf War and that is why he attacked the U.S. then who do you blame? The leader that made him feel like he was "fucked over" or the President who had to come in and clean up the mess?

You should stick to tinker toys and leave politics to the adults.

dig420 07-30-2004 10:12 PM

no, he didn't. He didn't bomb shit over that, he didn't do shit about it except pull the troops out.

The only time Reagan bombed ANYONE over any terrorist action was when he sent a couple fighter jets and nearly killed Ghaddafi for bombing a nightclub that killed 2 US servicemen. He didn't do SHIT-ALL else.

swoop 07-30-2004 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420
what other inaccuracies?
You never read any of the 9/11 Commission debunking some MM points from the movie?

scoobydookc 07-30-2004 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420
There is nothing but hatred and contempt for the US globally now. Kerry will have a lot of work to do to clean up this fucking mess.
"Clinton administration national security adviser Samuel R. "Sandy" Berger, under criminal investigation for removing copies of highly classified documents from the National Archives, severed his ties to John F. Kerry's campaign yesterday.

Berger, who has been the subject of an investigation since October, stepped down as Kerry's informal adviser on foreign policy and national security as the campaign moved quickly to stem the unfolding story's political damage. "

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...nguage=printer

Good start.

dig420 07-30-2004 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by swoop
Exactly! There are quite a few in the movie, but they don't want to listen.
oh well please enlighten us then! There is not one single substantive point in that movie that can be refuted. There is nothing the Republicans can point to and call a lie. You just ASSUME there is because you heard Hannity sneering about it on Fox News.

MikeHawk 07-30-2004 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by eroswebmaster
It's amazing that your President lies to you about going to war...lies to you about protecting the constitution...on and on and on..but yet so many people would rather focus on a movie.
Seems your priorities just aren't straight.

http://www.smashbucks.com/shut1.jpg

tony286 07-30-2004 10:15 PM

If it wasnt for Clinton most of you would be working at fucking Radio shack. Defend a admin that wants to put you out of business. Thats smart

dig420 07-30-2004 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by scoobydookc
"Clinton administration national security adviser Samuel R. "Sandy" Berger, under criminal investigation for removing copies of highly classified documents from the National Archives, severed his ties to John F. Kerry's campaign yesterday.

Berger, who has been the subject of an investigation since October, stepped down as Kerry's informal adviser on foreign policy and national security as the campaign moved quickly to stem the unfolding story's political damage. "

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...nguage=printer

Good start.

what the fuck does Sandy Berger's mess have to do with this conversation? Are you retarded?

and post with one nick at a time, doubling up just makes you look like a worse idiot.

swoop 07-30-2004 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420
oh well please enlighten us then! There is not one single substantive point in that movie that can be refuted. There is nothing the Republicans can point to and call a lie. You just ASSUME there is because you heard Hannity sneering about it on Fox News.
Actually if you could read any of my posts above I mentioned the 9/11 Commission reports, that was written by Dems. and Reps.

How many times do I have to say this???

Its almost 1:30 am., going to bed..be back in the morning


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123