GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   What if you met the woman of your dreams, then 2 months into it you found out... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=741342)

CDSmith 06-10-2007 09:02 AM

What if you met the woman of your dreams, then 2 months into it you found out...
 
...up until she met you she was casually banging her ex-husband? Maybe she tells you something along the lines of "it was nothing serious, he's still single, I was single, yada yada yada..."

Would you be pissed?

Moreover, would you dump her because of it?

Before you answer consider that she is totally devoted to you from virtually the time you started officially being together and exclusive. She is quite possibly everything you could want in a woman, except for this one thing.

And no, I'm not in this situation, but have been in similar situations in the past.


Discuss...

KimJI 06-10-2007 09:06 AM

I fucked my X when I was single, nothing wrong in that, as long as you arent fuckign other people at the same time(for health reasons)

GooSearch 06-10-2007 09:06 AM

its a fuck buddy

mortenb 06-10-2007 09:07 AM

I'd say that the "up until" part is what matters.. Why would you care who she fucked in the past? Are you telling her about all of your previous partners?

ServerGenius 06-10-2007 09:08 AM

I'd punish shakira for making her hips lie

D 06-10-2007 09:08 AM

key words = "up until she met you."

If you dump her because of it, you're an ass and deserve to loose her, imho.


Haven't you ever watched "Chasing Amy?"

Scootermuze 06-10-2007 09:09 AM

Too many men expect choir girl virgins when they meet them..

What if she said she was bangin' the neighbor.. or the ups guy..

It's not as if she was sitting around waiting for the right one to come along, nor should she be expected to..

It's not the past that's the problem.. it's an insecurity on the guy's part... He was no doubt bangin' a few here & there... no difference..

KimJI 06-10-2007 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scootermuze (Post 12576507)
Too many men expect choir girl virgins when they meet them..

What if she said she was bangin' the neighbor.. or the ups guy..

It's not as if she was sitting around waiting for the right one to come along, nor should she be expected to..

It's not the past that's the problem.. it's an insecurity on the guy's part... He was no doubt bangin' a few here & there... no difference..

Well said. Dont understand why a sane person would look at it any other way

CDSmith 06-10-2007 09:15 AM

Interesting responses so far. All quite accepting and tolerant, which is okay.

Anyone in the "What's wrong with not having sex until you meet someone" camp?

What about the argument of "How do I know her ex husband wasn't out banging other chicks and could have brought god-knows-what diseases to her?"


There are few discussions where only one opinion is "sane".

Rochard 06-10-2007 09:16 AM

I don't have time for games, lies, or bullshit in my relationships. Time is too precious for that. The very moment a woman doesn't live up to my expectations I drop kick them without a second thought.

Before I got married, my last girlfriend upset me, and I walked without a second thought. The best part was she kept coming back, begging, on her hands and knees.

No, in this case if she told me she was still banging her ex-husband I would have said "Well, let me know how that works for you. Laters".

KimJI 06-10-2007 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 12576539)
Interesting responses so far. All quite accepting and tolerant, which is okay.

Anyone in the "What's wrong with not having sex until you meet someone" camp?

What about the argument of "How do I know her ex husband wasn't out banging other chicks and could have brought god-knows-what diseases to her?"


There are few discussions where only one opinion is "sane".

If you are not ready to trust her, you are not ready for a relationship

mikeyddddd 06-10-2007 09:17 AM

If she stopped banging him when she started fucking you, then it's cool.

Otherwise, call Jerry Springer. Especially, if you're a toothless trailer dwelling alcoholic drug addict from Alabama who's also fucking her sister.

CDSmith 06-10-2007 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KimJI (Post 12576549)
If you are not ready to trust her, you are not ready for a relationship

For some, trust may only go so far when talking about possibly getting HIV.

KimJI 06-10-2007 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 12576545)
I don't have time for games, lies, or bullshit in my relationships. Time is too precious for that. The very moment a woman doesn't live up to my expectations I drop kick them without a second thought.

Before I got married, my last girlfriend upset me, and I walked without a second thought. The best part was she kept coming back, begging, on her hands and knees.

No, in this case if she told me she was still banging her ex-husband I would have said "Well, let me know how that works for you. Laters".

that is a different discussion.

He meet a new girl, and they start a relationship. The second they meet, she stop fucking her X. How on earth do that compare with your flaky X that want you back?

Zesty Chesterfield 06-10-2007 09:21 AM

That is not a problem. Do you know how many ex's have sex? All of them.

Peaches 06-10-2007 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 12576539)
Interesting responses so far. All quite accepting and tolerant, which is okay.

Anyone in the "What's wrong with not having sex until you meet someone" camp?

What about the argument of "How do I know her ex husband wasn't out banging other chicks and could have brought god-knows-what diseases to her?"


There are few discussions where only one opinion is "sane".

How do you know she doesn't have any diseases from screwing him while they were married? :helpme

If she's not screwing anyone while you're together, no one should care. Screwing her ex, the pool boy, her neighbor, etc. before you started dating means nothing, nada. And NOT having sex is just dumb :thumbsup

KimJI 06-10-2007 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 12576557)
For some, trust may only go so far when talking about possibly getting HIV.

She could have gotten HIV 3 years prior to meeting you, I fail to see the connection.

This is getting off topic, I'm out

CDSmith 06-10-2007 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KimJI (Post 12576558)
The second they meet, she stop fucking her X.

Read my first post closer. In the 3rd little paragraph I said "she is totally devoted to you from virtually the time you started officially being together and exclusive."

Rochard may have read that as for the first week or 2 of dating she was still banging him, and only after an exclusive relationship was established did she quit with her ex.

Does that change your stance at all?

DamageX 06-10-2007 09:26 AM

I was expecting "she used to be a man". :)

CDSmith 06-10-2007 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KimJI (Post 12576562)
This is getting off topic, I'm out

Relax sparky, this is a discussion, not an argument.

CDSmith 06-10-2007 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamageX (Post 12576570)
I was expecting "she used to be a man". :)

That thread has been done before.


Come to think of it this one probably has too. :D

mikeyddddd 06-10-2007 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zesty Chesterfield (Post 12576559)
That is not a problem. Do you know how many ex's have sex? All of them.

Not me. When I'm done, I'm done.

CDSmith 06-10-2007 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peaches (Post 12576560)
And NOT having sex is just dumb :thumbsup

Can be true but not in all cases, but nowadays so too is it dumb to be having sex with just anybody.

I'm just wondering if there is anyone here who is of the opinion that it's not unreasonable for someone to actually wait until they meet someone they want to be in a relationship with before having sex. I would go so far as to say I know several people who would no more go having casual sex than they would swallow rat poison.

Some people really do prefer to wait until they're with someone they care about, and not in the way that one might care about an ex. I don't necessarily see that as a bad thing or a "dumb" thing either.

Nor do I think those saying they would just accept her regardless are wrong (or dumb). My motto has always been go with what works for you. Hard to argue with it when it works.

selena 06-10-2007 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 12576567)
Read my first post closer. In the 3rd little paragraph I said "she is totally devoted to you from virtually the time you started officially being together and exclusive."

Rochard may have read that as for the first week or 2 of dating she was still banging him, and only after an exclusive relationship was established did she quit with her ex.

Does that change your stance at all?

No, it doesn't. If an exclusive relationship has not been established, then it is none of anyone's business who the chick in the scenario was banging. The game begins, so to speak, when the official relationship and exclusive bit begins.

digifan 06-10-2007 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mortenb (Post 12576497)
I'd say that the "up until" part is what matters.. Why would you care who she fucked in the past? Are you telling her about all of your previous partners?

I agree 100% :thumbsup

Peaches 06-10-2007 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 12576614)
Can be true but not in all cases, but nowadays so too is it dumb to be having sex with just anybody.

I'm just wondering if there is anyone here who is of the opinion that it's not unreasonable for someone to actually wait until they meet someone they want to be in a relationship with before having sex. I would go so far as to say I know several people who would no more go having casual sex than they would swallow rat poison.

Some people really do prefer to wait until they're with someone they care about, and not in the way that one might care about an ex. I don't necessarily see that as a bad thing or a "dumb" thing either.

Nor do I think those saying they would just accept her regardless are wrong (or dumb). My motto has always been go with what works for you. Hard to argue with it when it works.

This girl was having sex with someone she trusted enough to marry - seems like THE smartest sex she'll have - including having it with the new guy :winkwink:

Basic needs have to be met. Eat, sleep, sex. What better place to have casual sex than with someone you've already been with? It's like eating fried chicken, mashed potatoes and mac n cheese - pure comfort. By criticizing someone for this, you're shutting the barn door after the horse is out. She already did it. She wanted casual sex and found it with the most logical person she could find. Then she found the NEW person and got rid of the fuck buddy. Happens all the time. Looks like her biggest mistake was telling!! :upsidedow

CDSmith 06-10-2007 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by selena (Post 12576627)
No, it doesn't. If an exclusive relationship has not been established, then it is none of anyone's business who the chick in the scenario was banging. The game begins, so to speak, when the official relationship and exclusive bit begins.

Interesting.

So, for the sake of argument, you yourself don't mind dating a guy and finding out later that he was screwing other people while you were "just dating"?

I'm kind of surprised by that. Most people I know would be of the mind that they wouldn't much like that. "You're either dating me or you're with other people, which is it?" kind of thing.

Very tolerant crowd on GFY today. It must be Sunday. :D

CDSmith 06-10-2007 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peaches (Post 12576662)
This girl was having sex with someone she trusted enough to marry - seems like THE smartest sex she'll have - including having it with the new guy :winkwink:

Basic needs have to be met. Eat, sleep, sex. What better place to have casual sex than with someone you've already been with? It's like eating fried chicken, mashed potatoes and mac n cheese - pure comfort. By criticizing someone for this, you're shutting the barn door after the horse is out. She already did it. She wanted casual sex and found it with the most logical person she could find. Then she found the NEW person and got rid of the fuck buddy. Happens all the time. Looks like her biggest mistake was telling!! :upsidedow

Ah, but you're assuming the ex hubby isn't a complete fucking idiot, for lack of a better term. For all you know he is a needle-sharing junkie, or maybe a bi-curious no-condom-using AIDS risk, and may actually NOT be the "smartest sex" source you're assuming him to be.

Again, there is no one sane or right answer here.

CDSmith 06-10-2007 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornopete (Post 12576685)
Do you live in Jr High?

What part of "this isn't about me" didn't you quite understand hoss?

Peaches 06-10-2007 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 12576672)
Very tolerant crowd on GFY today. It must be Sunday. :D

Or we're just grownups :thumbsup

Until we've had that "OK, we are exclusive" talk, IMO, all bets are off and you can sleep with whomever, whenever, you want. And TBH, it's smart to ASSume anyone you're sleeping with has been with or is a needle-sharing junkie, or maybe a bi-curious no-condom-using AIDS risk and you should protect yourself accordingly. :2 cents:

Pleasurepays 06-10-2007 10:29 AM

i would dump her. thats a huge red flag. next it will be "we're still friends..." ... "oh sure, he calls all the time, but it doesn't mean anything"... "we just had lunch together.. thats all" etc.

then it just goes downhill from there. he is going to continue to try to fuck her every chance he gets because thats what guys do and you know right out of the gate that she isn't too opposed to that idea.

:2 cents:

BlackCrayon 06-10-2007 10:29 AM

Depends if she lied about who she was banging before you found out she was banging the ex before you.

NoWhErE 06-10-2007 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 12576672)
Interesting.

So, for the sake of argument, you yourself don't mind dating a guy and finding out later that he was screwing other people while you were "just dating"?

I'm kind of surprised by that. Most people I know would be of the mind that they wouldn't much like that. "You're either dating me or you're with other people, which is it?" kind of thing.

Very tolerant crowd on GFY today. It must be Sunday. :D



Call me childish or whatnot, but if I'm dating someone and I later found out that while we were dating she was banging some other guy, I'd drop her like a sack of potatoes.

Somehow, it just makes me feel dirty and it gives me the impression that she's not the type of person that can completely invest themselves or have something to hide.

BlackCrayon 06-10-2007 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KimJI (Post 12576549)
If you are not ready to trust her, you are not ready for a relationship

Good god this is the most STUPID reply I've ever read lately here i think. You should trust a person as soon as you "start" a "relationship" with someone? How can you possibly when you don't really even know them? People throw the word trust around so much i want to throw up. Then people wonder what happened when they get fucked around on because you were just blinded by her big tits and what she chose to let you see.

BlackCrayon 06-10-2007 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoWhErE (Post 12576835)
Call me childish or whatnot, but if I'm dating someone and I later found out that while we were dating she was banging some other guy, I'd drop her like a sack of potatoes.

Somehow, it just makes me feel dirty and it gives me the impression that she's not the type of person that can completely invest themselves or have something to hide.

I agree, i didn't realize this situation had her banging him *while* you guys were dating.

CDSmith 06-10-2007 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peaches (Post 12576771)
Or we're just grownups :thumbsup

Actually, what I meant by "it must be Sunday" is that the more moralistic side of the board might be away at church, while the more tolerant crowd is here, thus making the discussion up to that point a tad lop-sided. That's all.

I see there are a few from the "I'd dump her" camp on now though. :D

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peaches (Post 12576771)
Until we've had that "OK, we are exclusive" talk, IMO, all bets are off and you can sleep with whomever, whenever, you want. And TBH, it's smart to ASSume anyone you're sleeping with has been with or is a needle-sharing junkie, or maybe a bi-curious no-condom-using AIDS risk and you should protect yourself accordingly. :2 cents:

You do of course realize that works both ways. I find it funny how opinions vary once the shoe is on the other foot, and you the woman is smitten with a new love only to find out later that your prize beau was laying the proverbial pipe to his still-available ex wife while you and he were still in "just dating" mode.

I understand what you''re saying, I just find it hard to believe that your view isn't in the minority. It's definitely a very modern progressive opinion, I'll give you that. But in my experience the fact is most women have a little green monster inside them and the claws do tend to come out swinging when another woman is in their "zone" if you will. :1orglaugh

selena 06-10-2007 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 12576672)
Interesting.

So, for the sake of argument, you yourself don't mind dating a guy and finding out later that he was screwing other people while you were "just dating"?

I'm kind of surprised by that. Most people I know would be of the mind that they wouldn't much like that. "You're either dating me or you're with other people, which is it?" kind of thing.

Very tolerant crowd on GFY today. It must be Sunday. :D


Would I like it? Not particularly. But if the door has been left open for me to do the same, then I have no reason to bitch. Just dating means just dating to me. And that means both parties are free to do whatever or whoever. Once we move from 'just dating' to seeing each other exclusively, then it's a whole 'nother ballgame.

While I can understand this part of your post....

Quote:

"You're either dating me or you're with other people, which is it?" kind of thing.
I also find it a bit unrealistic. By that train of thought, if you go out on one date with a person, does it mean you have locked in to them?

CDSmith 06-10-2007 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by selena (Post 12576948)
Would I like it? Not particularly.

Exactly. I'm of the opinion that most wouldn't whether they want to admit it or not.


Quote:

Originally Posted by selena (Post 12576948)
I also find it a bit unrealistic. By that train of thought, if you go out on one date with a person, does it mean you have locked in to them?

But we're not talking about one date. We're talking about a situation where you are 2+ months into the relationship, you are quite smitten with this person in all the usual ways people get smitten with one another. Maybe your heart is leaping ahead to what might happen down the road, how great it might be to finally have another long-term (or possibly permanent?) relationship.... then your new love tells you he/she was banging their ex during the first few weeks you were dating.

You're right, I doubt you would like it. I'm quite certain most people wouldn't.

So far we have about 65-70% of people saying it wouldn't bother them or they would ignore, or otherwise deal with it/tolerate it etc,

and about 30% give or take saying they would outright "cut the bitch loose".

I find stuff like this very interesting, and good discussion material. :pimp

BlackCrayon 06-10-2007 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by selena (Post 12576948)
Would I like it? Not particularly. But if the door has been left open for me to do the same, then I have no reason to bitch. Just dating means just dating to me. And that means both parties are free to do whatever or whoever. Once we move from 'just dating' to seeing each other exclusively, then it's a whole 'nother ballgame.

While I can understand this part of your post....



I also find it a bit unrealistic. By that train of thought, if you go out on one date with a person, does it mean you have locked in to them?

Its just my opinion but i think a lot of the people who think its ok have been the ones to be fucking around while dating others. Of course going on a first date with someone is nothing but i guess it all depends on your definition of dating. If you are talking every day, hanging out several times a week, sleeping over, fucking, ect. I'd say you've gone from casual to something a bit more and if you just assume unless someone says its not ok, that its ok then it seems you don't have much respect for that person.

Jarmusch 06-10-2007 11:25 AM

a) murder her ex-husband.
b) carry on with the relationship.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123