GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   What if you met the woman of your dreams, then 2 months into it you found out... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=741342)

selena 06-10-2007 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 12576977)
Exactly. I'm of the opinion that most wouldn't whether they want to admit it or not.




But we're not talking about one date. We're talking about a situation where you are 2+ months into the relationship, you are quite smitten with this person in all the usual ways people get smitten with one another. Maybe your heart is leaping ahead to what might happen down the road, how great it might be to finally have another long-term (or possibly permanent?) relationship.... then your new love tells you he/she was banging their ex during the first few weeks you were dating.

You're right, I doubt you would like it. I'm quite certain most people wouldn't.

So far we have about 65-70% of people saying it wouldn't bother them or they would ignore, or otherwise deal with it/tolerate it etc,

and about 30% give or take saying they would outright "cut the bitch loose".

I find stuff like this very interesting, and good discussion material. :pimp

None of that is what you said in your original post. You said

Quote:

up until she met you she was casually banging her ex-husband?
How does "up until she met you" translate into "he/she was banging their ex during the first few weeks you were dating."?

No matter, I'm out. :)

selena 06-10-2007 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 12576980)
Its just my opinion but i think a lot of the people who think its ok have been the ones to be fucking around while dating others. Of course going on a first date with someone is nothing but i guess it all depends on your definition of dating. If you are talking every day, hanging out several times a week, sleeping over, fucking, ect. I'd say you've gone from casual to something a bit more and if you just assume unless someone says its not ok, that its ok then it seems you don't have much respect for that person.

The arguement could also be made that several disasters have happened from people assuming that they had exclusive relationships when the other person was assuming that they did not.

Best course to remedy all that is to communicate. :)

CDSmith 06-10-2007 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 12576840)
Good god this is the most STUPID reply I've ever read lately here i think. You should trust a person as soon as you "start" a "relationship" with someone? How can you possibly when you don't really even know them? People throw the word trust around so much i want to throw up. Then people wonder what happened when they get fucked around on because you were just blinded by her big tits and what she chose to let you see.

I find that in relationships, these days especially, trust is a fragile thing. Here you have a situation where while you were dating and getting to know one another your prospective other was secretly still sleeping with their ex-other. One may conjur up images of some of those dates you had or that night you spent snuggling on the couch in the 2nd week and then him/her leaving to supposedly go home but instead they went for a booty call.

People do imagine all sorts of things, it's certainly not uncommon.

I also find that there are people who aren't looking for those little red flags that should be, and there are many who are so distrusting they are overly looking to find fault and causes for concern at every turn.

Being single and dating really is a chess match of sorts.

Violetta 06-10-2007 11:35 AM

as long as she did stop the second we started dating, there wouldnt be anything to do or say imho

Michaelious 06-10-2007 11:36 AM

Yeah i would certainly be pissed off.

CDSmith 06-10-2007 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by selena (Post 12577000)
None of that is what you said in your original post.

How does "up until she met you" translate into "he/she was banging their ex during the first few weeks you were dating."?

I also said:
Quote:

Before you answer consider that she is totally devoted to you from virtually the time you started officially being together and exclusive. She is quite possibly everything you could want in a woman, except for this one thing.
which clearly says "from the time you (they) started being exclusive"... which leaves a length of time where they were merely dating and getting to know each other, no?

Quote:

Originally Posted by selena (Post 12577000)
No matter, I'm out. :)

I hope it's to go out and enjoy the day and not because you are frustrated with me. :D

(we're just talking here, right?)

Pleasurepays 06-10-2007 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 12577009)
I also find that there are people who aren't looking for those little red flags that should be, and there are many who are so distrusting they are overly looking to find fault and causes for concern at every turn.

Being single and dating really is a chess match of sorts.

personally, i always find relationships and peoples views on relationships to be very interesting. you would think that people would kinda have it figured out after 10-20 million years... but anywhere you look, there isn't much evidence to support that notion.

as with any living organism, we are all selfish. everything we do from morning to night is selfish in nature. relationships are selfish in nature. they are about fulfilling selfish needs under the guise of "love", "finding love" etc. often, those needs are very unhealthy, yet we have no problem convincing ourselves that its ok or rationalizing that our behaviors/relationships are normal. that to me, explains the different views. i think that for the most part, everyone is more trying to validate their own feelings/behaviors/insecurities/paranoia more than they are trying to step back and just take an honest, objective, complete look at the situation.

BlackCrayon 06-10-2007 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by selena (Post 12577005)
The arguement could also be made that several disasters have happened from people assuming that they had exclusive relationships when the other person was assuming that they did not.

Best course to remedy all that is to communicate. :)

Kinda sounds more often than not that this is used as a loophole for those who want to "have their cake and eat it too".

CDSmith 06-10-2007 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays (Post 12577033)
personally, i always find relationships and peoples views on relationships to be very interesting. you would think that people would kinda have it figured out after 10-20 million years... but anywhere you look, there isn't much evidence to support that notion.

as with any living organism, we are all selfish. everything we do from morning to night is selfish in nature. relationships are selfish in nature. they are about fulfilling selfish needs under the guise of "love", "finding love" etc. often, those needs are very unhealthy, yet we have no problem convincing ourselves that its ok or rationalizing that our behaviors/relationships are normal. that to me, explains the different views. i think that for the most part, everyone is more trying to validate their own feelings/behaviors/insecurities/paranoia more than they are trying to step back and just take an honest, objective, complete look at the situation.

A bit of a dismal view, but essentially correct in a general kind of way I suppose.

I have however met some pretty caring and kind, giving women over the years who think of others and the needs of others before their own, but in general I'd say that what you just said applies to a good many people.

As for how what you said applies to this situation, one could be inclined to say that the very act of availing oneself of the availability of their ex for convenient "safe" gratification of their urges is in itself very selfish. While others would say it would be stupid NOT to, I find the space between those two views to be miles long and frankly, quite amusing. :D

DaddyHalbucks 06-10-2007 11:54 AM

If she is really "the girl of your dreams," you do whatever you need to do to keep her. All within reason, of course.

That means cutting her some slack.

MetaMan 06-10-2007 11:58 AM

i would dump her, there is no way in a committed realationship that you should be sleeping with others.

people should be honest from the get go, i know it is hard to say to someone "i am still banging my ex husband" but this way no one gets hurt and both sides can also have their little flings on the side.

if a girl cheated on me it means she is not an honest person, and honesty is a huge quality a girl must have for me.

wjxxx 06-10-2007 12:03 PM

You should hire n|ggers and castrate him just in case

CDSmith 06-10-2007 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetaMan (Post 12577085)
if a girl cheated on me it means she is not an honest person, and honesty is a huge quality a girl must have for me.

Is it really cheating if she does it while the two of you are "just dating"?

I honestly had no idea those answering "no" to that question would outnumber the yes camp.

MetaMan 06-10-2007 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 12577112)
Is it really cheating if she does it while the two of you are "just dating"?

I honestly had no idea those answering "no" to that question would outnumber the yes camp.

it depends then, i can tell when the line has been set of being committed.

if it is at that early stage then no it is not cheating, depends when the guidelines were set and what the guidelines are.

PS

this thread is about you are your roast beef ass girlfriend isnt it?

badmunchkin 06-10-2007 12:23 PM

no, it's not cheating - when you meet someone their dating history is none of your business - what matters is the current relationship and the boundaries you both choose to place on it - ultimately I personally believe all relationships should be "open" anyways, but that's a whole other story :winkwink:

CDSmith 06-10-2007 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetaMan (Post 12577121)
PS

this thread is about you are your roast beef ass girlfriend isnt it?

ha ha, no. I'm thinking about making an assault on your girlfriend's roast beef pussy though and thought I'd do a little research on it first.

I see you'd be okay with it. :pimp

baddog 06-10-2007 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 12576545)
I don't have time for games, lies, or bullshit in my relationships. Time is too precious for that. The very moment a woman doesn't live up to my expectations I drop kick them without a second thought.

Before I got married, my last girlfriend upset me, and I walked without a second thought. The best part was she kept coming back, begging, on her hands and knees.

No, in this case if she told me she was still banging her ex-husband I would have said "Well, let me know how that works for you. Laters".

You lost me . . . she was banging the ex until you arrived. What was she supposed to do, do out and find someone else to bang until she found you?

baddog 06-10-2007 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 12576557)
For some, trust may only go so far when talking about possibly getting HIV.

She could bang anyone and get HIV. I would think an ex would be someone you could trust a little more than some guy she picked up in a bar.

rapmaster 06-10-2007 01:16 PM

As long as she's not doing him anymore I say its no prob

baddog 06-10-2007 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 12576567)
Read my first post closer. In the 3rd little paragraph I said "she is totally devoted to you from virtually the time you started officially being together and exclusive."

Rochard may have read that as for the first week or 2 of dating she was still banging him, and only after an exclusive relationship was established did she quit with her ex.

Does that change your stance at all?

If you are not exclusive, you are not exclusive. Have none of you juggled girlfriends/boyfriends?

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 12576672)
Interesting.

So, for the sake of argument, you yourself don't mind dating a guy and finding out later that he was screwing other people while you were "just dating"?

I'm kind of surprised by that. Most people I know would be of the mind that they wouldn't much like that. "You're either dating me or you're with other people, which is it?" kind of thing.

Very tolerant crowd on GFY today. It must be Sunday. :D

Same as above.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peaches (Post 12576771)
Or we're just grownups :thumbsup

Until we've had that "OK, we are exclusive" talk, IMO, all bets are off and you can sleep with whomever, whenever, you want. And TBH, it's smart to ASSume anyone you're sleeping with has been with or is a needle-sharing junkie, or maybe a bi-curious no-condom-using AIDS risk and you should protect yourself accordingly. :2 cents:

:thumbsup

baddog 06-10-2007 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 12576567)
Read my first post closer. In the 3rd little paragraph I said "she is totally devoted to you from virtually the time you started officially being together and exclusive."

Rochard may have read that as for the first week or 2 of dating she was still banging him, and only after an exclusive relationship was established did she quit with her ex.

Does that change your stance at all?

If you are not exclusive, you are not exclusive. Have none of you juggled girlfriends/boyfriends?

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 12576672)
Interesting.

So, for the sake of argument, you yourself don't mind dating a guy and finding out later that he was screwing other people while you were "just dating"?

I'm kind of surprised by that. Most people I know would be of the mind that they wouldn't much like that. "You're either dating me or you're with other people, which is it?" kind of thing.

Very tolerant crowd on GFY today. It must be Sunday. :D

Same as above.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peaches (Post 12576771)
Or we're just grownups :thumbsup

Until we've had that "OK, we are exclusive" talk, IMO, all bets are off and you can sleep with whomever, whenever, you want. And TBH, it's smart to ASSume anyone you're sleeping with has been with or is a needle-sharing junkie, or maybe a bi-curious no-condom-using AIDS risk and you should protect yourself accordingly. :2 cents:

:thumbsup

CDSmith 06-10-2007 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 12577425)
If you are not exclusive, you are not exclusive. Have none of you juggled girlfriends/boyfriends?



Same as above.



:thumbsup

Read you the first time. :D


So you are okay if a chick you're seeing is screwing her ex while "just dating" you, doesn't tell you until 2 months into the relationship when you are exclusive. That too is interesting.

I would have thought you'd be in the "I'd cut the bitch loose" camp.



Cool. Anyone else?

Babagirls 06-10-2007 01:36 PM

well, considering that it was BEFORE she met the guy, it really doesn't matter. just my two cents anyways.

BlackCrayon 06-10-2007 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 12577441)
Read you the first time. :D


So you are okay if a chick you're seeing is screwing her ex while "just dating" you, doesn't tell you until 2 months into the relationship when you are exclusive. That too is interesting.

I would have thought you'd be in the "I'd cut the bitch loose" camp.



Cool. Anyone else?

I think baddog gave up looking for a "love" type relationship a long time ago. I don't blame him really but from what he posts he doesn't seem to be looking for "the one".

BlackCrayon 06-10-2007 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 12577425)
If you are not exclusive, you are not exclusive. Have none of you juggled girlfriends/boyfriends?



Same as above.



:thumbsup

Who has time for that? I barely have time for one.

baddog 06-10-2007 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 12577441)
Read you the first time. :D


So you are okay if a chick you're seeing is screwing her ex while "just dating" you, doesn't tell you until 2 months into the relationship when you are exclusive. That too is interesting.

I would have thought you'd be in the "I'd cut the bitch loose" camp.



Cool. Anyone else?

I am not really into "relationships." I always try to make sure my g/f's live at least 300 miles away.

baddog 06-10-2007 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 12577499)
I think baddog gave up looking for a "love" type relationship a long time ago. I don't blame him really but from what he posts he doesn't seem to be looking for "the one".

Quite perceptive.

If it happens, it happens, but I most certainly am not "looking" for it.

baddog 06-10-2007 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 12577500)
Who has time for that? I barely have time for one.

The secret is letting them know from the gate that they are just one you are seeing.

When it gets fun is when three of them are at the same bar together and one is slightly psycho.

Pleasurepays 06-10-2007 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 12577075)
A bit of a dismal view, but essentially correct in a general kind of way I suppose.

I have however met some pretty caring and kind, giving women over the years who think of others and the needs of others before their own, but in general I'd say that what you just said applies to a good many people

As for how what you said applies to this situation, one could be inclined to say that the very act of availing oneself of the availability of their ex for convenient "safe" gratification of their urges is in itself very selfish. While others would say it would be stupid NOT to, I find the space between those two views to be miles long and frankly, quite amusing. :D

i dont think its dismal at all. i think it is what it is. "to love" as a verb means basically means nothing more than treating someone in a certain way to elicit a response from that person which gives YOU a feeling of safety and security in the relationship... and to cause them to become emotionally dependent on you

i think that "loving someone" is nothing more than manipulation for selfish reasons. of course, its a bit like calling a retarded kid retarded. its not acceptable or politically correct and no doubt, anyone would read that and react with defensive remarks.... but the facts do not change, no matter how we want to dress them up or romanticize them. at the end of the day, we are just baboons trying to get by in life and convince ourselves that we aren't baboons.

baddog 06-10-2007 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays (Post 12577560)
i dont think its dismal at all. i think it is what it is. "to love" as a verb means basically means nothing more than treating someone in a certain way to elicit a response from that person which gives YOU a feeling of safety and security in the relationship... and to cause them to become emotionally dependent on you

i think that "loving someone" is nothing more than manipulation for selfish reasons. of course, its a bit like calling a retarded kid retarded. its not acceptable or politically correct and no doubt, anyone would read that and react with defensive remarks.... but the facts do not change, no matter how we want to dress them up or romanticize them. at the end of the day, we are just baboons trying to get by in life and convince ourselves that we aren't baboons.

Do you think there is a difference between loving someone and being in love with them?

Pleasurepays 06-10-2007 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 12577579)
Do you think there is a difference between loving someone and being in love with them?

i think "being in love" is nothing more than finding the fulfillment of ones own emotional needs... no matter what they might be and no matter how unhealthy they might be (i.e. women who seek out abusive relationships etc)

i would characterize one as manipulation

the other as being manipulated.

i would also say that i am not saying its a bad thing or negative thing. just saying thats how i see it.

i believe that i love my wife. but relationships are what they are... they are two people in a state of emotional co-dependence.

CDSmith 06-10-2007 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays (Post 12577560)
i dont think its dismal at all. i think it is what it is. "to love" as a verb means basically means nothing more than treating someone in a certain way to elicit a response from that person which gives YOU a feeling of safety and security in the relationship... and to cause them to become emotionally dependent on you

i think that "loving someone" is nothing more than manipulation for selfish reasons. of course, its a bit like calling a retarded kid retarded. its not acceptable or politically correct and no doubt, anyone would read that and react with defensive remarks.... but the facts do not change, no matter how we want to dress them up or romanticize them. at the end of the day, we are just baboons trying to get by in life and convince ourselves that we aren't baboons.

Sorry but the way you put it sounds quite dismal to me just the same. :1orglaugh

Good posts though.

DWB 06-10-2007 02:38 PM

Depends... thought she may be the woman of your dreams, but was she supposed to be in a monogamous relationship with you? If not... all best are off.

Peaches 06-10-2007 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 12577579)
Do you think there is a difference between loving someone and being in love with them?

Of course there is. I love my father but I'm not IN love with him - eww!! :helpme

I think as I get older I tend to not really give a shit if someone's seeing someone else if we haven't agreed to be exclusive. Ditto I will continue to see others too. And if someone doesn't like it, I've also found that there's another guy about 2 steps away from the one you're seeing if the guy you're with isn't happy with things :)

CDSmith 06-10-2007 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peaches (Post 12578193)
I think as I get older I tend to not really give a shit if someone's seeing someone else if we haven't agreed to be exclusive.

I guess that's it right there... it's the fact that there's a difference between "seeing someone else" and fucking someone else while dating you* that has some people being not too crazy about the idea.



*You as in you all, as in anyone.

baddog 06-10-2007 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peaches (Post 12578193)
I think as I get older I tend to not really give a shit if someone's seeing someone else if we haven't agreed to be exclusive.

I probably prefer it.

Peaches 06-10-2007 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 12578261)
I guess that's it right there... it's the fact that there's a difference between "seeing someone else" and fucking someone else while dating you* that has some people being not too crazy about the idea.



*You as in you all, as in anyone.

TBH, I would rather someone be screwing their old ex with no emotion while we're not exclusive than taking the time to actually DATE someone. Dating is somehow more intimate than just screwing.

I have just decided being raised by a male has really skewed my estrogen :disgust

CDSmith 06-10-2007 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 12578307)
I probably prefer it.

I knew there would be certain given exceptions to the question. You for example, and also people who are into swinging and devoted to the open lifestyle (like Badmunchkin mentioned earlier). Most of those types probably wouldn't mind if their partner had had sex with an ex during the dating process early-on.


But among the non-baddog's and non-swinging crowd the two sides are quite polarized if what's been posted here so far is any indication.

Personally speaking, having sex with someone means something. I prefer to have it with someone I truly care about and want to invest time and energy into building something with. Having meaningless sex with someone I otherwise don't have any interest in is to me just that... meaningless, and empty. Just to fill a need? Please, I can visit the palm sisters until I meet someone I want to be with. I don't see where it's too much to ask that the lady have similar values.

That might make a few of the so-called "tuff" guys here want to vomit violently, but I'm willing to take that risk. :D

But whether you disagree and think it's not big deal and would accept a woman regardless, or you feel so against it that you would dump her makes little difference to me, I'm not judging anyone. Again, I go on the premise of what works for you is what is right.


If anyone else has an opinion on this I'd love to hear it.

CDSmith 06-10-2007 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peaches (Post 12578315)
I have just decided being raised by a male has really skewed my estrogen :disgust

I still love you.

Peaches 06-10-2007 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 12578346)
I still love you.

Bonus: Almost all of my ex's are married, which is one line I WON'T cross, so you don't have to worry about me sleeping with them :thumbsup

but I do still keep up with them - sorry!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123