GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Wow....2257 is no F'ing Big Deal Compared to THIS!! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=495283)

ISUSnet 07-23-2005 12:36 AM

Wow....2257 is no F'ing Big Deal Compared to THIS!!
 
Go to Yahoo.com, and look at the top news stories right now. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050722/...ornography_tax

GRRR

-Ryan

Love Brokers 07-23-2005 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ISUSnet
Go to Yahoo.com, and look at the top news stories right now. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050722/...ornography_tax

GRRR

-Ryan

Yeah! Just read that. That's politicians for you. Just pulling dollar numbers out of their asses to empose new taxes on whatever they want! Taxes are suppose to be "reasonable" and not arbitrary! :mad:

KRL 07-23-2005 12:47 AM

Oh yeh, that's a winner idea.

:1orglaugh

spunkmaster 07-23-2005 12:49 AM

WASHINGTON - A Democratic lawmaker is planning to propose a new 25 percent federal tax on Internet pornography and new requirements for adult Web sites to help prevent children from looking at them.

chupacabra 07-23-2005 01:01 AM

(insert timeline pic here)..

marketsmart 07-23-2005 01:06 AM

I really don't see how you can create a tax that applies only to a select industry. This has got to be un-constitutional....

I think at some point, people (adult industry) are going to realize that if they want to continue to do business in this industry, maybe the US is not the place to live......

Fetish 07-23-2005 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart
I really don't see how you can create a tax that applies only to a select industry. This has got to be un-constitutional....

I think at some point, people (adult industry) are going to realize that if they want to continue to do business in this industry, maybe the US is not the place to live......


LOL - ok - maybe I will leace the greatest country on earth just so I can continue to do porn.

Oedipus 07-23-2005 01:32 AM

From the Yahoo article - last 2 paragraphs:

"Called the Internet Safety and Child Protection Act of 2005, the bill also proposes new rules for Web sites to verify they do business only with adults. It would compel sites to use specialized software to verify a customer's age, subject to enforcement by the Federal Trade Commission.

An FTC spokeswoman said the commission was not aware of the proposed bills."

SteveLightspeed 07-23-2005 01:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oedipus
From the Yahoo article - last 2 paragraphs:

"Called the Internet Safety and Child Protection Act of 2005, the bill also proposes new rules for Web sites to verify they do business only with adults. It would compel sites to use specialized software to verify a customer's age, subject to enforcement by the Federal Trade Commission.

An FTC spokeswoman said the commission was not aware of the proposed bills."

That might actually SAVE us some tax money... I'll have to run some numbers. A reduction in taxes for porn peddlers would be an ironic fuckup! Whats next, directly subsidizing us? Woo hoo!

marketsmart 07-23-2005 01:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fetish
LOL - ok - maybe I will leace the greatest country on earth just so I can continue to do porn.

I think maybe you took that the wrong way... What I was implying is that if the govt continues to target select industries, maybe people would be more inclined to go somewhere that doesn't constantly target that industry.

BTW, have you ever lived in a foreign country? There are a lot of other "great countries" on earth....

Johny Traffic 07-23-2005 01:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lightspeed
That might actually SAVE us some tax money... I'll have to run some numbers. A reduction in taxes for porn peddlers would be an ironic fuckup! Whats next, directly subsidizing us? Woo hoo!

I was just thinking that. Im not from the states, so I dont know, but 25% tax seems low to me. Id be more than happy to pay 25% tax

marzzo 07-23-2005 01:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lightspeed
That might actually SAVE us some tax money... I'll have to run some numbers. A reduction in taxes for porn peddlers would be an ironic fuckup! Whats next, directly subsidizing us? Woo hoo!

Who's gonna run with this one?

http://www.pornsubsidy.com

martyVP 07-23-2005 01:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart
I really don't see how you can create a tax that applies only to a select industry. This has got to be un-constitutional....

I think at some point, people (adult industry) are going to realize that if they want to continue to do business in this industry, maybe the US is not the place to live......


The U.S. has been doing a lot of unconstitutional shit lately.

Hinc 07-23-2005 02:00 AM

We need those people out of office....

Cant we get someone slightly liberal to produce voting machines ?

Mr.Fiction 07-23-2005 02:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Johny Traffic
I was just thinking that. Im not from the states, so I dont know, but 25% tax seems low to me. Id be more than happy to pay 25% tax

They are talking about 25% more than what you already pay.

This politician needs to be impeached or exposed for whatever illegal shit he might be doing when no one is looking.

Pim(P) 07-23-2005 02:48 AM

OMG, that's the most retarded plan so far. :mad:

zvik 07-23-2005 03:13 AM

I think the final solution will be outsourcing :) just take your business to some other country.

Persignup Qon 07-23-2005 03:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fetish
LOL - ok - maybe I will leace the greatest country on earth just so I can continue to do porn.


ummmmmm.... yes. :2 cents:





..

pinkz 07-23-2005 03:29 AM

Born FREE Taxed to Death!

xclusive 07-23-2005 03:30 AM

total bullshit no way it passes

JFK 07-23-2005 03:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr.Fiction
They are talking about 25% more than what you already pay.

This politician needs to be impeached or exposed for whatever illegal shit he might be doing when no one is looking.

I am sure he is Squeeky clean :1orglaugh

Shags 07-23-2005 04:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fetish
LOL - ok - maybe I will leace the greatest country on earth just so I can continue to do porn.

Get your head out of your ass.

bringer 07-23-2005 04:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr.Fiction
They are talking about 25% more than what you already pay.

This politician needs to be impeached or exposed for whatever illegal shit he might be doing when no one is looking.

whens the aclu coming to the rescue?

Chong 07-23-2005 05:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFK
he

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr.Fiction
he

its a she:
http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/j/msnbc/Co...vsm.vsmall.jpghttp://members.aol.com/ourprez08/lincoln4.jpg
:1orglaugh

Antonio 07-23-2005 06:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lightspeed
That might actually SAVE us some tax money... I'll have to run some numbers. A reduction in taxes for porn peddlers would be an ironic fuckup! Whats next, directly subsidizing us? Woo hoo!

You get taxed 25% for running a porn site, THEN you get to pay your company tax , so you end up paying more taxes than before.

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart
I really don't see how you can create a tax that applies only to a select industry. This has got to be un-constitutional....

Ever heard of 'sin' taxes? Why do you think alchohol and cigarettes are so expensive?

VeriSexy 07-23-2005 06:06 AM

They will try to tax anything they can :Oh crap

Matt 26z 07-23-2005 06:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antonio
You get taxed 25% for running a porn site, THEN you get to pay your company tax , so you end up paying more taxes than before.

It's not a tax on porn site owners. It's a sales tax on surfers. Instead of charging $30, you'd have to try and get $37.50 from them with the new porn sales tax figured in.

AcidMax 07-23-2005 06:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spunkmaster
WASHINGTON - A Democratic lawmaker is planning to propose a new 25 percent federal tax on Internet pornography and new requirements for adult Web sites to help prevent children from looking at them.

OMG liberals are out to get pornographers too? SHOCKING!

MickeyG 07-23-2005 06:54 AM

so will the ASACP get a cut of this money too?

ezrydn 07-23-2005 06:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart
.... maybe the US is not the place to live......

I figured THAT out a couple of years ago! As an American, I hate to travel to the US now. It's not that they treat others like shit. They treat EVERYONE like shit, who enters. I got one Customs Agent fired for being an asshole. If I won't take that shit from others, I sure as hell won't take it from my own people!

Code_Havoc 07-23-2005 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fetish
LOL - ok - maybe I will leace the greatest country on earth just so I can continue to do porn.

If you live in the 'greatest country on earth' you don't have to worry about this, it only applies to those inside the US.

Also;
Money collected from the tax would be used for law enforcement and for protecting children from Internet-related crimes.

Why don't parents just do their god damned job once in a while and keep the kids off the internet on their own. Don't screw over the industry cause 90% of parents today are complete imbecils. I say tax the parents. If an underaged kid gets caught going to a porn site, fine the parents a couple $k and see how many parents start actually acting like parents on this matter.

Dalai lama 07-23-2005 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spunkmaster
WASHINGTON - A Democratic lawmaker is planning to propose a new 25 percent federal tax on Internet pornography and new requirements for adult Web sites to help prevent children from looking at them.

This makes so much sence :1orglaugh

Aric 07-23-2005 07:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Code_Havoc
Why don't parents just do their god damned job once in a while and keep the kids off the internet on their own. Don't screw over the industry cause 90% of parents today are complete imbecils. I say tax the parents. If an underaged kid gets caught going to a porn site, fine the parents a couple $k and see how many parents start actually acting like parents on this matter.

So fucking true. :thumbsup

First it was TV, and now it's the internet acting as a babysitter -- and then they bitch at what is on TV or the net. Time for some parental responsibility/accountability :2 cents:

Fletch XXX 07-23-2005 07:52 AM

nothing tastes better than propaganda

MandyBlake 07-23-2005 07:58 AM

but will it actually pass?

theking 07-23-2005 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by martyVP
The U.S. has been doing a lot of unconstitutional shit lately.

Being that the US Supreme Court decides what is constitutional and what is not...please name a few things that the US has been doing that is unconstitutional...if you can or will.

Linkster 07-23-2005 08:33 AM

Well - since this is the same story that was posted a few days ago multiple times - here's the real answer - if they do approve a tax - they have just made the biz legitimate and can no longer try to shut all the sites down - and no lawmaker in his right mind is gonna vote internet porn legitimate.
Second - the CDA has been already shot down by the Supreme Court many times - which this is just a re-hash of - wont work this time either.
Third - These types of bills get introduced every session of congress and get shot down every session - so dont give it any more than its worth - which is nothing

Giorgio_Xo 07-23-2005 08:36 AM

It is unconstitutional to tax protected speech.

End of drama.

mardigras 07-23-2005 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Code_Havoc
Why don't parents just do their god damned job once in a while and keep the kids off the internet on their own. Don't screw over the industry cause 90% of parents today are complete imbecils. I say tax the parents. If an underaged kid gets caught going to a porn site, fine the parents a couple $k and see how many parents start actually acting like parents on this matter.

Been my stance for years :thumbsup

Another really bad thing is that many of the same people targeting the internet for "clean up" also are working to get the broadcast decency regulations extended to satellite and cable :Oh crap

bringer 07-23-2005 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking
Being that the US Supreme Court decides what is constitutional and what is not...please name a few things that the US has been doing that is unconstitutional...if you can or will.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/24/scotus.property/


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123