GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   how legal is this shit?? stupid sob!!! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=750709)

swampthing 07-12-2007 12:49 AM

how legal is this shit?? stupid sob!!!
 
petiteteenager dot com

this guy has got galleries up on his site called "REALMIX"

look for the galleries that say "realmix"

They are amateur pictures of regular girls. These are not industry girls.

Now you cannot tell me this son of a bitch, has rights to use these pics.
If your program is sponsoring this guy, you might want to check it out and make your own judgment. You probably dont want your program to be associated with this individual. Some of these pics he is posting look pretty illegal to me.

:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:

notabook 07-12-2007 12:54 AM

I don't think Greg has anything to worry about.

Steve Awesome 07-12-2007 12:55 AM

I assume you were attempting to link to this?
http://realgirls.petiteteenager.com/1/realmix16/

swampthing 07-12-2007 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Awesome (Post 12744782)
I assume you were attempting to link to this?

didnt want to link to it, But yes. Thats exactly what I'm talking about.

Don't tell me all that shit is legal, because I know fucking better.

swampthing 07-12-2007 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notabook (Post 12744780)
I don't think Greg has anything to worry about.

and why and how is that? do tell.

Big_D 07-12-2007 07:59 AM

looks pretty ok to me, just another teen tgp

swampthing 07-12-2007 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big_D (Post 12745964)
looks pretty ok to me, just another teen tgp

bullshit.

How in the fuck can you say that? :mad::mad:

yahoo-xxx-girls.com 07-12-2007 08:03 AM

The domain name looks shady, however the "actors" seem to be 18+ ...

The required legal 2257 record is missing with the "custodian of records" info... This guy should be investigated...

Later,

.

RawAlex 07-12-2007 08:11 AM

Quote:

Random Pics

There are no adds on this page, but if you want to help us out- find a cute girl at Fling.

Every time you do, we get a little $. Thanks & enjoy! =P
Interesting selling technique.

swampthing 07-12-2007 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Balalsubturfyooj (Post 12745985)
The domain name looks shady, however the "actors" seem to be 18+ ...

The required legal 2257 record is missing with the "custodian of records" info... This guy should be investigated...

Later,

.

how can you say they seem to be over 18? seriously. These are not industry girls, where there is an ability to prove the age.

yahoo-xxx-girls.com 07-12-2007 08:21 AM

Hi swampthing
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by swampthing (Post 12746063)
how can you say they seem to be over 18? seriously. These are not industry girls, where there is an ability to prove the age.

I have looked at the girls... thats why I said they seem to be 18+, however I did say that this guy should be investigated because he is missing the required legal 2257 record... where you would find the "custodian of records"... such proves the ages of the "actors"...

I am not siding with this guy swampthing...

Later,

rowan 07-12-2007 08:23 AM

From what I can remember the webmaster is Australian, so 2257 regs don't strictly apply to him. There are local regs to follow but none of the images look to be sexually explicit (I just quickly skimmed them)

However, using a likeness for commercial purposes without a signed release is definitely not legal.

There's also copyright violation to consider.

stev0 07-12-2007 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swampthing (Post 12746063)
how can you say they seem to be over 18? seriously. These are not industry girls, where there is an ability to prove the age.

They don't look under 18...

If you're that concerned contact the webmaster, don't start a witch hunt trying to trash peoples reputations without any proof.

teg0 07-12-2007 08:25 AM

I enjoy those types of galleries

stev0 07-12-2007 08:29 AM

http://realgirls.petiteteenager.com/1/realmix7/13.jpg

isn't that a Kate's Playground pic?

yahoo-xxx-girls.com 07-12-2007 08:32 AM

Hi Rowan
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rowan (Post 12746108)
From what I can remember the webmaster is Australian, so 2257 regs don't strictly apply to him. There are local regs to follow but none of the images look to be sexually explicit (I just quickly skimmed them)

However, using a likeness for commercial purposes without a signed release is definitely not legal.

There's also copyright violation to consider.

I did a whois on this site and its in the US...

---
Westchester, CA , US
----

stickyfingerz 07-12-2007 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stev0 (Post 12746136)
http://realgirls.petiteteenager.com/1/realmix7/13.jpg

isn't that a Kate's Playground pic?

yup.......

rowan 07-12-2007 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Balalsubturfyooj (Post 12746153)
I did a whois on this site and its in the US...

---
Westchester, CA , US
----

Registrant Contact:
WhoisGuard
WhoisGuard Protected (e5934a01b4d04e1cbe3fe6b09e9c0c57.protect@whoisgua rd.com)
...

swampthing 07-12-2007 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stev0 (Post 12746109)
They don't look under 18...

If you're that concerned contact the webmaster, don't start a witch hunt trying to trash peoples reputations without any proof.

Don't even try it. Do not even fucking go there.
This is no fucking witch hunt, you stupid fuck.

and secondly, I do not have to contact the webmaster.

There is not just one "realmix" gallery listed on his site. There are several.
I am also pretty disgusted at the fact that you probably are not the only one that will have this opinion. It is pretty fucking sad.

stev0 07-12-2007 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swampthing (Post 12746171)
Don't even try it. Do not even fucking go there.
This is no fucking witch hunt, you stupid fuck.

and secondly, I do not have to contact the webmaster.

There is not just one "realmix" gallery listed on his site. There are several.
I am also pretty disgusted at the fact that you probably are not the only one that will have this opinion. It is pretty fucking sad.

"Fuck fuckity fuck fuck fuck" :1orglaugh

Don't get your panties in a bunch.

stickyfingerz 07-12-2007 08:41 AM

This thread is silly other than the Kate pic which needs to be removed.

stev0 07-12-2007 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12746188)
This thread is silly other than the Kate pic which needs to be removed.

Agreed...

that site looks like every other amateur/teen blog or tgp out there.

noone1 07-12-2007 08:44 AM

Is this thread a joke? I hope so, because it's fucking retarded.

"how can you say they seem to be over 18? seriously. These are not industry girls, where there is an ability to prove the age."

Are you kidding me? Maybe he has it in his desk in his office. They aren't "industry girls" because they don't have there own personal sites? Riiiiiight.

For all you know, he paid for those pictures and has all the info he needs for them.

I see nothing wrong with this. So unless you can prove that there is something illegal going on here, I suggest you just move along.

Edit: OMG http://realgirls.petiteteenager.com/1/realmix7/
Raven Riley? She isn't an industry girl!!!111

yahoo-xxx-girls.com 07-12-2007 08:45 AM

Hey Rowan...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rowan (Post 12746169)
Registrant Contact:
WhoisGuard
WhoisGuard Protected (e5934a01b4d04e1cbe3fe6b09e9c0c57.protect@whoisgua rd.com)
...

It goes by where the server is, from what I understand, and not the physical location of the webmaster... No matter... Rowan, his 2257 record is required by US law to display the "custodian of records" info, if its hosted in the US...

Down-under is strict on the adult industry... I must ask why do you think this guy is there ? and if so then why not use a server there ?

Later,

swampthing 07-12-2007 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stev0 (Post 12746136)
http://realgirls.petiteteenager.com/1/realmix7/13.jpg

isn't that a Kate's Playground pic?

I wouldn't want the readers of this thread to think that just because you found one pic of an industry girl, that the rest are legit.

What it does show, is that he is has no idea where these pics originated from.

commonsense 07-12-2007 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swampthing (Post 12744768)
petiteteenager dot com

this guy has got galleries up on his site called "REALMIX"

look for the galleries that say "realmix"

They are amateur pictures of regular girls. These are not industry girls.

Now you cannot tell me this son of a bitch, has rights to use these pics.
If your program is sponsoring this guy, you might want to check it out and make your own judgment. You probably dont want your program to be associated with this individual. Some of these pics he is posting look pretty illegal to me.

:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:



LOL x 10

Tell us, who the fuck are you?
















** Besides an ASSHAT

noone1 07-12-2007 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swampthing (Post 12746230)
I wouldn't want the readers of this thread to think that just because you found one pic of an industry girl, that the rest are legit.

What it does show, is that he is has no idea where these pics originated from.

Are you kidding me? LOL. Petiteteenager has been around a while and is pretty damn popular. He knows very well that picture is of Kate.

Edit: Ok, I'm out of this thread. I think it's a joke and I've fallen for it. Damn.

swampthing 07-12-2007 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by noone1 (Post 12746207)
Is this thread a joke? I hope so, because it's fucking retarded.

"how can you say they seem to be over 18? seriously. These are not industry girls, where there is an ability to prove the age."

Are you kidding me? Maybe he has it in his desk in his office. They aren't "industry girls" because they don't have there own personal sites? Riiiiiight.

For all you know, he paid for those pictures and has all the info he needs for them.

I see nothing wrong with this. So unless you can prove that there is something illegal going on here, I suggest you just move along.

Edit: OMG http://realgirls.petiteteenager.com/1/realmix7/
Raven Riley? She isn't an industry girl!!!111

Your a fucking moron. Besides that, what in the fuck is he using raven riley and katesplayground to advertise FLING with?

and again, your picking out photos that are obvious girls in the indousty, 99% of those girls are not.

rowan 07-12-2007 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by noone1 (Post 12746255)
Are you kidding me? LOL. Petiteteenager has been around a while and is pretty damn popular. He knows very well that picture is of Kate.

Yes, and that's why it's surprising. Surely he should know that such content is for direct promotion only, or is spunkycash allowing affiliates to use their pics to send traffic to fling these days? :error

swampthing 07-12-2007 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by noone1 (Post 12746255)
Are you kidding me? LOL. Petiteteenager has been around a while and is pretty damn popular. He knows very well that picture is of Kate.

then why is he using them to promote FLING? that a seriuos violation of some TOS right there to say the least.

again, 99% of those girls are NOT industry!! :mad::mad:

swampthing 07-12-2007 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by commonsense (Post 12746252)
LOL x 10

Tell us, who the fuck are you?
















** Besides an ASSHAT

who the fuck are you? and why should that even fucking matter. The stupidity level has gone through the fucking roof here.

Dont tell me what the law is, and you certainly cant make the shit up as you see fit.

stev0 07-12-2007 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swampthing (Post 12746230)
I wouldn't want the readers of this thread to think that just because you found one pic of an industry girl, that the rest are legit.

What it does show, is that he is has no idea where these pics originated from.

What the hell are you talking about... There's no registry that "industry girls" subscribe to. He could have taken those photos for all you know, you don't know and THAT is the point everyone posting in this thread is trying to hammer into your thick newbie head.

The illegitimate photos that jump out to me are Raven Riley and Kate's Playground, those are copyright violations. I'm willing to say that because I'm quite certain that their use was not authorized on this site as it is not promoting Jaymancash or Kate's program. As for the rest... how the fuck would I know? and they're not mine, why should I care?

Ron2k1 07-12-2007 09:02 AM

Mind your own business cocksucker

mattz 07-12-2007 09:05 AM

Don't you have something better to do with your time like work or something? Rather than sit here and whine about some small site that you have nothing to do with.

commonsense 07-12-2007 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swampthing (Post 12746286)
who the fuck are you? and why should that even fucking matter. The stupidity level has gone through the fucking roof here.

Dont tell me what the law is, and you certainly cant make the shit up as you see fit.

I'm a webmaster, and you?


I'm sure that site sends more joins to Raven and Kate's sites in a week than you will in a lifetime. Do you know for a fact that there is STOLEN content there, or that the content is used without permission?

It sounds like you're a newb or jealous webmaster that looked at the Alexa for that site and wonders why you're not doing better.

The fact that you don't know who those girls are or haven't seen them before doesn't mean a god damn thing.

Ron2k1 07-12-2007 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mattz (Post 12746314)
Don't you have something better to do with your time like work or something? Rather than sit here and whine about some small site that you have nothing to do with.

The site is pretty big actually http://www.alexa.com/data/details/tr...teteenager.com

swampthing 07-12-2007 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stev0 (Post 12746289)
What the hell are you talking about... There's no registry that "industry girls" subscribe to. He could have taken those photos for all you know, you don't know and THAT is the point everyone posting in this thread is trying to hammer into your thick newbie head.

The illegitimate photos that jump out to me are Raven Riley and Kate's Playground, those are copyright violations. I'm willing to say that because I'm quite certain that their use was not authorized on this site as it is not promoting Jaymancash or Kate's program. As for the rest... how the fuck would I know? and they're not mine, why should I care?

Im not a newb. Ive been in the industry since 96. Don't let the low post count or the nic fool you.

The fact that he would even have those pics in there with the rest, should prove to you that he has no idea who in the fuck those girls are, where they come from, or how fucking old they are.

swampthing 07-12-2007 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron2k1 (Post 12746320)

yes it is.

mattz 07-12-2007 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swampthing (Post 12746271)
then why is he using them to promote FLING? that a seriuos violation of some TOS right there to say the least.

again, 99% of those girls are NOT industry!! :mad::mad:

how do you know? And so what? This thread is lame, go do something productive with your time rather than sit here and try to find flaws in a site you have nothing to do with, more than likely to make it seems like you actually know something anout this biz. We all know thats far from the truth after reading this thread.

btw...who are you?

mattz 07-12-2007 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron2k1 (Post 12746320)

oh cool, doesn't really matter, he has nothing to do with this site, and should mind his own business rather than try to make it look like he knows something


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123