get a job as a cop :2 cents:

So if you're doing business for so long, how can you be so offended by a regular teen tgp which has been around for many years.

Your postcount doesn't matter to me, but you sound exactly like the regular newbie crybaby

The girls all look a probable 18+ to me.

Maybe the OP's at that "awkward stage" of growing up (early 20's), when you begin to realize that you're aging... when 18-year-olds look younger than you think they should?

When I was 22ish, I remember thinking: 'no way that girl's legal - she's at least 4 years younger than me........

...

oh.'

Otherwise, there could be more back-end drama here than I care to involve myself with - the fact that they're unknowns amounts to meaning absolutely nothing, and anyone actually in the business knows that. Whatever the case, imho, there's no way someone in their right mind can simply look at those girls and say that they're absolutely not 18.

I was wondering... does all of these pictures have watermarks to associate programs ?

the crybaby shit, doesnt work with me, sorry. You are going to have to try harder then that.

but, you stupid cunts who are sticking up for this guy, keep posting, becuase you are proving good points. That there are alot of sorry mother fuckers in this industry who certainly do not belong here. You probably belong in jail, getting fucked up the ass.

OK, page http://realgirls.petiteteenager dot com/1/realmix12/ - 20.jpg


This is a 14 year old girl from a currently active Russian non nude model site. I know there are others but this one is absolute proof.

Your lack of common sense and attacking an established site with no proof is showing everyone you are indeed a newb. 11 years in the business you should of learned something. But then again, what did you do during those 11 years? Sites, programs, production, programming, distribution, retail?



FYI: Jerking off to porn doesn't mean you are "in" the industry. :2 cents:

stop, this isnt lightspeed content. this isnt teenrevenue. This is not one of those types of threads.

Those sites can prove the age of those girls, this is something entirely different.

I totally agree with some of the statements you have made there, but that doesnt rule out the fact, that there very well, could be some illegal shit being used there, and he has no fucking way to prove that shit.

I hate 2257 but, thats the exact fucking reason why the powers that be want it.

The guy who owns this site is pushing over the boundary and anyone who has been trading in the teen niche for long enough will recognise the content in his so called mix area.

http://realgirls.petiteteenager.com/1/realmix12/18.jpg

Thanks for the site. Great amateurish flickerish myspacish photos.

Ok, i see, so you obviously condone people using stolen pictures to promote other sites with? Is that the kind of common sense you have?

What a hater. For you, I recommend two things.

First, get laid.

Secondly, focus on your own business and dont worry so much about what others are doing. All this time, effort, and thought that you've expended on this guy, you could have spent growing your own business and/or sites.

24.jpg is Jen Hilton, probably one of the most stolen/fake profile/webcam pics on the net

Really, I suggest you read before posting

http://realgirls.petiteteenager.com/1/realmix12/20.jpg

It was a follow-on, not a correction. You posted a pic, said something about it, I posted another pic, said something about it.

again.... dont confuse this pic with the rest of the pics that he has on there.

some of them look pretty bad, and I am certainly not going to post them.

Sorry I misread your post containing 24.jpg.

Its not very clever of this guy using very young non nude teens next to nudity and hardcore.

not a very well-thought out response.

maybe you should sit back and think about what your condoning there.

I actually have gregs info, and it really doesn't matter what country he lives in.

He is hosting this content at mojohost. I wonder if they are also aware of what he is putting on the servers there?

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

None of you have any idea what you're talking about.

*Edit: Almost none of you. The clueless ones you can easily pick out.

What you talking about Willis?

Ban swampthing. Hes a stupid fuck.

yes, would you care to shed some light on the situation?

considering the fact that he is one of your affiliates.

listen to this guy ... there was a big investigation about this girl so if you dont want to get into trouble remove that crap without any thinking around! :2 cents:

instead of saying stupid shit, maybe add something intelligent to your posts so people might get the idea you are something other then a fucking moron.

Does PT need more traffic... summer slowdown or what?

Sheech.

a thread started by a typical whippersnapper

We're just following your lead.

so, your saying that you don't have a problem accepting this guys traffic?

That "guy" is a lot of people's TOP affiliate. He's a personal friend. He has stayed at my house. He asks permission to do everything he does. I've known him for years. He's not US based and not subject to US 2257 regs. Do I need to keep going?

I think swampthing has an agenda he hasn't revealed yet.

There is that, or there is the possibility that he's just a troll or that he knows absolutely nothing or that he is trying to make a name by "outting" someone.

I lean towards troll/making a name.

yea, maybe you should keep going.

I find it interesting that you are standing up for this guy, when there is clearly some shady activity going on.

I sure hope your business associates do not express the same opinion you do.

You are quite possibly going to find out the hard way.

Again this thread is silly.

LOL You have me shaking in my shoes. Now take your head from your ass and come up with something realistic.

I agree. Accusations of CP, clueless ranting. I'm done.

So far you haven't really given him a reason to change his opinion of his friend. If there's something more specific that you haven't disclosed yet, then it's irrelevant at this point until you do. I'm still not sure myself what exactly you're saying is illegal and it looks like you're accusing someone of hosting child pornography. You'll have to prove it now, or your account will be banned.

Girls looked fine to me. None of them looked any more underage that other teen sites.

you should probably be done. because this shit is going to come back to haunt you, and you dont want to make it worse then it is.